GLOBAL WARMING, FAKE NEWS AND THE DISINFORMATION AGE

By Howard Nema

TRUTH TALK NEWS

TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

The threat of man made Global warming, or climate change is the best example of how disinformation has “transformed” America and the world.

Indeed, “climate” change is real. . . and it is also man made.  A man made scam cooked up by Auriello Peccei co-founder of the Club of Rome in 1991.

While using existing technology to cause droughts and famine, like chemtrails and weather modification and cause earthquakes, as HAARP has the ability to do, to make climate change appear blatant and obvious to the public.

Well climate is always changing.  So climate change does exist.   And yes, the increase in storms and earthquakes are all caused by human activity, as I mentioned.  What it not true is that it is caused by over population, increased energy use and resource depletion.

http://www.naturalnews.com/055151_global_warming_science_hoax_climate_skepticism.html

That is the scam.  And it is deadly.   The outrage from the left after the 2016 Presidential Election attacking FAKE NEWS is ironic, since the New World Order conspiracy has used fake news and disinformation to control public opinion since 1915.

It is only with the advent of the internet and alternative news sources that expose the mainstream media’s bias and control of information and has not only challenged, but won the battle of public opinion.

As a result of decades of lies and suppressing true information that has now been exposed by millions of activists and alternative news sources, only 6% of mainstream media viewers/readers believe the media.

This has sent the mainstream media establishment into a frenzy, showing their true authoritarian colors and seeking to ban free speech and “fake news” sites as ad revenues plummet.   Below are a few examples of global warming/climate change disinformation propaganda.

time_covers

Remember in the 1970’s we were supposed to run out of oil within a decade?  Of course that never happened.  In fact, in Texas they have just discovered nearly a trillion barrels of untapped oil, a find larger than the Bakken reserve in Montana and North Dakota.

time-energyAmerica is now on the path of true energy independence under a Trump Administration, not a globalist scam to fool the sheople as Obama has done for eight solid years, while bankrupting the coal industry and wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on designed to fail green energy companies like Solyndra, who took the Enron course out of business.

We all want clean air, water, affordable energy and a safe environment and those facts are being used as weapons against us.

Qui bono?  Who benefits?

The environment?  Not in China, or India.

Does the environment really benefit?

Or do the special interests?

 

“The common enemy of humanity is man.  In searching for an enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.    In their totality and interaction these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in DESIGNATING these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap which we have already warned readers about, mainly mistaking symptoms for causes.    All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.     The real enemy then, is humanity itself.“    Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution (1991) Pg 75

– HN

 

The US Department of Justice has been considering whether people should be prosecuted for the offense of climate change denial.

“This matter has been discussed. We have received information about it and have referred it to the FBI to consider whether or not it meets the criteria for which we could take action on,” said Attorney General Loretta Lynch, responding to a question from green activist Sen Sheldon Whitehouse at a Senate Judiciary Hearing.

Whitehouse said:

“The similarities between the mischief of the tobacco industry pretending that the science of tobacco’s dangers was unsettled and the fossil fuel industry pretending that the science of carbon emissions’ dangers is unsettled has been remarked on widely, particularly by those who study the climate denial apparatus that the fossil fuel industry has erected.”

“Under President Clinton, the Department of Justice brought and won a civil RICO action against the tobacco industry for its fraud. Under President Obama, the Department of Justice has done nothing so far about the climate denial scheme,”

Perhaps the kind of RICO action Whitehouse has in mind is similar to the one proposed to President Obama a few months ago by a number of key climate scientists, led by one Jagadish Shukla of George Mason University.

However this campaign appears to have gone mysteriously quiet of late.

Could it perhaps be that having become embroiled in “the largest science scandal in US history” and now being under investigation for “double-dipping” and the potential misuse of $63 million worth of taxpayer funded grants, Shukla feels somewhat less confident of holding the moral high ground?

source:  CRIMINALIZING CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS

 

There is ample proof that the coming ice age of the 70’s, global warming of the 90’s and climate change today are all a hoax to deindustrialize the world into a totalitarian neo-feudal socialist world government. – HN

 

THE RISE IN AUTHORITARIANISM AND GOV’T CONTROL

by HN

While the left calls out President Elect Trump as a fascist authoritarian, they negate the many authoritarians measures Obama has used for almost 8 years to advance his globalist political agenda and the many attempts to subvert the U.S. Constitution because Obama supporters and Democrats see nothing wrong with the “fairness” of globalism and using authoritarian government actions so long as it advances their Utopian visions and liberal goals, even if that means creating a post industrial world ruled by oligarchs in a feudalist fashion as described in Carroll Quigley’s 1966 book, Tragedy And Hope so long as it saves the planet.  But will it?  And how is this to be achieved?

Millennials have been burdened by college debt. conditioned to favor all things sustainable. They favor mass transit over cars, veganism and living in 400 square foot homes, which have become all the rage thanks to popular TV shows.  Being green is cool and trendy and embracing servitude is paramount as millennials scurry off to safe spaces to deal with their feelings of learned helplessness and despair

The Millennials certainly have helped ease the “transformation” of the world into neo-feudalism globalism by believing in overpopulation and embracing environmentalism to save the earth.  Saving the earth gives many purpose and identity in their every day lives.   They no doubt agree that humanity is a plague on the earth as ecofascists have promoted for decades.

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse?
Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?” – Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)
Anthropogenic “climate change”, and the control of energy in the form of carbon dioxide has deep roots in a radical agenda to reduce the world’s population.   The United Nations seeks to use China’s one child policy and neo-feudalism as a model for the rest of the world.

Nixon, Rockefeller and Kissinger paved the way for the Club Of Rome’s agenda to be adopted and implemented in the early 1970’s when they opened relations with China and created the use of artificial scarcity to raise prices and cause poverty.

The UN claims it is attacking poverty as it creates it.  This Malthusian agenda engineered by the environmental movement in the mid 1970’s, realized that d using “global warming” as a rally cry would play to quite a number of its social agendas.

The goal was advanced, most notably, by The Club Of Rome (Consultants to the UN) – a group of mainly European scientists and academics, who used computer modelling to warn that the world would run out of finite resources if population growth were left unchecked.

The Club Of Rome’s 1972 environmental best-seller “The Limits To Growth”, examined five variables in the original model: world population, industrialisation, pollution, food production and resource depletion.

Not surprisingly, the study predicted a dire future for mankind unless we ‘act now’ :

In 1975, influential anthropologist and president of the American Medical Association for the Advancement of Science, Margaret Mead, gathered together like-minded anti-pop fraudsters at her North Carolina conference, “The Atmosphere: Endangered and Endangering”.

Mead’s star recruits were climate scare artist Stephen Schneider, population-freak George Woodwell and former AAAS head, John P. Holdren (currently Obama’s Science and Technology Czar). All three are disciples of Malthusian catastrophist Paul Ehrlich, author of the “The Population Bomb”. (Think Soylent Green)

The elite now employs the likes of iconic figures like Leo Di Caprio to sell the dangers of CO2 and climate change in UN addresses and deindustrialization propaganda films as he travels around the globe spewing Co2 from his yachts and private jets.

The conference concluded that human-produced carbon dioxide would fry the planet, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life. The idea being to sow enough fear of man-made climate change to force global cutbacks in industrial activity and halt Third World development.

With man’s industrial fortunes fingered as the driver of eco-destructive population growth, it was inevitable that ‘Science’ would be called upon to act as judge, jury and executioner. However, as it turned out, the science of global warming was butchered, tortured and corrupted to prove a hypothesis, rather than to perform objective science.

The media has propped up the fear mongering first of the threat of an oncoming ice age, then global warming and most recently climate as a greater threat to the world than ISIS.

Secretary of State John Kerry has called for an end to the use of air conditioning to quell the use of fluorocarbons as they continue to fluoridate drinking water. I’d like to see any of these elitists give up air conditioning, meat eating and living in 400 square foot hovels as they have proposed for the rest of us.

Dr Tim Ball details how the science of climate change came to be “tortured until it fitted in with the notion.  Almost every aspect of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) work is manipulated, selected, and controlled, to prove human CO2 is causing global warming.  The objective was to prove the hypothesis, not to perform objective science.”

This goal was established by the Club of Rome whose leading member, Maurice Strong, who died in 2016, transmitted and translated it into world government policy through what became known as UNITED NATIONS AGENDA 21, or more recently, AGENDA 2030.  Keywords used to describe this plan being implemented by the UN in countries and cities across the world, is known as sustainability, or going green.  The Green Movement is a key component of forwarding the elite’s neo-feudal goals.

NAFTA achieved great success for the eco-fascist globalists having deindustrialized America so effectively, wages are at today at 1998 levels. The collectivist global elite have been naked in their desire to use globalism as a means to collectivise wealth and resources for the benefit of the few at the cost of the many.

In 1993 Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation did not hide the naked political objective:

“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.“ They have been aided in their deception, by national weather agencies and bureaucratic hack scientists with similar political persuasions appointed to the IPCC and claimed their goal was achieved in the 2007 IPCC Report which concluded:

“Another unusual aspect of recent climate change is its cause: past climate changes were natural in origin, whereas most of the warming of the past 50 years is attributable to human activities.” and cow’s flatulence, I may add. Yes. Methane bullshit. That is what the elite want us all to believe. It is all bullshit.

IPCC wanted to prove human CO2 was causing global warming as part of their belief that industrialized populations would exhaust all resources and had to be shut down. Their only objective was to show human production was steadily, inexorably increasing. Their calculations predetermine that, because human CO2 production is directly linked to population increase.

A population increase guarantees a CO2 increase. It is another of their circular arguments that has no basis in science, like the publicized myth that there are too many people.

Dr. Tim Ball has done the numbers and concludes, “The world is not overpopulated. That fallacy is perpetuated in all environmental research, policy and planning including global warming and latterly climate change.”

All the CO2 numbers used by the IPCC have been fudged and propagandized by mass media and Hollywood. – HN

 

Establishment of the Club of Rome

Rockefeller's Private Estate in Bellagio

Rockefeller’s private estate in Bellagio

The Club of Rome was created in April, 1968 by members of the original Morgenthau group during a meeting at Rockefeller’s private house in Bellagio, Italy.  The meeting was organized by Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist who had close relations to the Olivetti Corporation and was the owner of Fiat who claimed to have solutions for world peace and prosperity, which could be accomplished through a New World Order.

(Think in Orwellian terms:  World Peace = World War  Prosperity = Poverty)

The Club Of Rome’s original purpose was to establish the New World Order by the year 2000. The Club of Rome has engaged in a continuous hidden agenda to divide the entire world into ten regions or kingdoms.

The Club of Rome was established with 75 prominent industrialists, economists and scientists members from 25 nations.    The Bilderberg Group and the Club of Rome are the most important foreign policy arms of the Round table, which is led by the Committee of 300.

Many of the Club of Rome members were drawn from NATO, and they have been able to create a lot of what NATO claims are its policies. Through Lord Carrington, they were able to split NATO into two groups, a left-wing political faction, and its former military alliance.

The 10 Kingdoms

The Club of Rome acts as a research institute on political, social and economic issues, and claims that “there is no other viable alternative to the future survival of mankind than a new global community under a single form of government.”
On September 17, 1973, the Club of Rome published a report entitled the “Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System“, which was authored by Eduard Pestel and Mihajlo Mesarovic.

The report revealed the Club’s intention to divide the world into ten economic/political regions, called “Kingdoms”, which would unite the entire world under a common leadership. These regions are:

  • North America
  • Western Europe
  • Japan
  • Australia and South Africa
  • Eastern Europe
  • Latin America
  • North Africa and the Middle East
  • Main Africa
  • South and Southeast Asia
  • Centrally Planned Asia

Club of Rome 10 Kingdoms

the Club of Rome planned to divide the entire world into ten economic/political regions, which it refers to as ‘kingdoms’

The term “Kingdoms” was left out, when the plan was released in a book entitled “Mankind at the Turning Point“, which stated that the solutions to the problems of the world could only “be developed in a global context.”

Population Control

In 1972, the Club of Rome released a report entitled “Limits to Growth“, which dealt with the problem of overpopulation.

In the August, 1980 edition of Fusion magazine, Howard Odum, a marine biologist at the University of Florida, who was a member of the Club of Rome, was quoted, saying: “It’s necessary that the U.S. cut its population by 2/3 within the next 50 years.” He did not mention how this should be accomplished.

During the presidency of Jimmy Carter, a task force was created to expand the “Limits on Growth” document, and on 24 July, 1980, a two-volume report was released entitled “Global 2000 Report” which had been authored by former Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance. The report, which was presented to President Carter, attempted to project global economic trends for the next two decades, and indicated that there aren’t enough resources on earth to support the expected dramatic increase in the world population. The document says the population of the United States should be reduced by 100 million people by the year 2050.
About half a year later, the Council on Environmental Quality made recommendations based on the document, entitled “Global Future: A Time to Act.” They proposed an aggressive plan to control the population which included contraception, abortion and sterilization.

In August, 1982, the Executive Intelligence Review released a document entitled “Global 2000: Blueprint for Genocide” which stated the 2 before mentioned Presidential documents “are correctly understood as political statements of intent – the intent on the part of such policy centers as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the International Monetary Fund, to pursue policies that will result not only in the death of the 120 million cited in the reports, but in the death of upwards of two billion people by the year 2000.” Throughout the world, the Club of Rome has said that genocide should be used to eliminate people who they refer to as “useless eaters.

U.S. Association of the Club of Rome

In 1976, the U.S. Association of the Club of Rome (USACOR) was created, its purpose is to shut down the U.S. economy gradually. Henry Kissinger was then, and still is, a high ranked member in the service of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, a member of the Club of Rome and the Council on Foreign Relations.

Kissinger instituted Memorandum 200 to depopulate the third world in conjunction with the United Nations Population Council and more recently, Bill Gates generous vaccines that have paralyzed thousands of children in Africa.

Kissinger’s foreign policy “experience”  also had a major role in the attempt to destabilize the U.S. by means of three wars, in the Middle East, Vietnam and Korea.   In the Gulf War the United States Army acted as mercenaries for the Committee of 300 in bringing Kuwait back under its control and at the same time making an example out of Iraq so that other small countries would not attempt anything against the wishes of the Committee. – HN

 

UN climate chief: Communism is best to fight global warming

Photo of Michael Bastasch

By Michael Bastasch
January 15, 2014

United Nations climate chief Christiana Figueres said that democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model.

China may be the world’s top emitter of carbon dioxide and struggling with major pollution problems of their own, but the country is “doing it right” when it comes to fighting global warming says Figueres.

“They actually want to breathe air that they don’t have to look at,” she said. “They’re not doing this because they want to save the planet. They’re doing it because it’s in their national interest.”

Figueres added that the deep partisan divide in the U.S. Congress is “very detrimental” to passing any sort of legislation to fight global warming. The Chinese Communist Party, on the other hand, can push key policies and reforms all on its own. The country’s national legislature largely enforces the decisions made by the party’s Central Committee and other executive offices.

Communism was responsible for the deaths of about 94 million people in China, the Soviet Union, North Korea, Afghanistan and Eastern Europe in the 20th Century. China alone was responsible for 65 million of those deaths under communist rule.

Environmentalists often hail China as a model for fighting global warming, since they are a “leader” in renewable energy. The country set a goal of getting 15 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2020. In 2012, China got 9 percent of its power from renewables — the U.S. by contrast got 11 percent in 2012.

However, the country still gets 90 percent of its power from fossil fuels, mostly from coal. In fact, Chinese coal demand is expected to explode as the country continues to develop. China has approved 100 million metric tons of new coal production capacity in 2013 as part of the government’s plan to bring 860 million metric tons of coal production online by 2015.

China has publicly made big efforts to clean up its environment. The country’s booming industrial apparatus has caused so much pollution that the skies have been darkened over major cities and the air quality has heavily deteriorated.

The Wall Street Journal notes that China’s air quality was so bad that about “1.2 million people died prematurely in China in 2010 as a result of air pollution” and Chinese government figures show that “lung cancer is now the leading cause of death from malignant tumors. Many of those dying are nonsmokers.”

The Soviet bloc’s environmental track record was similarly dismal.

The Communist Party’s National Action Plan spent $275 billion to combat rampant pollution through 2017, including reducing particulate matter 2.5 levels in the Beijing region by 25 percent.

Source: http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/15/un-climate-chief-communism-is-best-to-fight-global-warming

China has adopted a pure capitalist model, combined with state-run market and labor control, to pursue the biggest industrial expansion the world has ever seen.

Its ‘renewable revolution’ is providing nearly the entire eco-brainwashed-western-world with its ‘clean energy‘ hardware to fight global-non-warming.

China can manufacture renewables wind and solar at a far more competitive rate than its western consumers. A no-win situation for Australia who export the steel and coal to China, who then manufacture without the burden of carbon taxes or emissions controls. Australia then imports the renewables back from China to satisfy its emissions target fantasies. The consumer then pays the Renewable Energy Target (RET) on top of the $23 per ton carbon (dioxide) making its electricity even more expensive again » more jobs and industry are lost to China.

BdufIaXCAAAmOPT

China’s own ‘personal’ use of renewable energy, splashed across the ABC and other global warming sympathetic media, is grade-school eco-propaganda to appease critics of its noncompliance to any United Nations “save the planet” treaty. Smart China. Gullible West.

Renewables will never, ever be able to provide China with the energy required to pursue its current expansion goals, let alone go close to providing enough base-load power to satisfy the West’s deluded hunger for ‘feel-good’ renewables unreliables.

Everyday, China gets stronger as they pursue the capitalist model, while the Western world gets weaker as it wilfully embraces the United Nations’ misanthropic, malthusian, eco-socialist agenda.

China ENERGY USAGE

China’s fossil energy output exceeded new wind energy by 6 times and solar by 27 times.

Figueres’ communist intent would allow her to silence dissent from non-believers who remain sceptical of her eco-fascist, totalitarian ideology. A totalitarian, democracy-free-zone allowing The United Nations to ram its draconian climate policy and sustainability agenda through, unopposed.

Meanwhile the planet refuses to warm after 17 years and 3 months, despite 35% of all human CO² emissions, since 1751, emitted over the same period. Clearly, something other than evil human carbon dioxide carbon pollution drives climate and temperature change.

clip_image012

UPDATE – The journal Nature embraces ‘the (16yr) pause’ and ocean cycles as the cause, Trenberth still betting his heat will show up | Watts Up With That?

UPDATE  Shock news : The UN believes global prosperity is causing global warming climate change

Screen Shot 2014-01-23 at , January 23, 10.20.56 am

Source:   UN: Global prosperity is causing global warming | The Daily Caller

Related Articles and information :

United Nations’ Sustainable Development and Agenda 21 (Agenda 2030:

Climatism Links:

 

Sources/Additional Information: