Category Archives: Tragedy And Hope

KEY EXCERPTS FROM CARROLL QUIGLEY’S TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)

KEY EXCERPTS FROM CARROLL QUIGLEY’S TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)

Past is Prologue.  The Key to understanding today, and planning for the future is to look to the past – Howard Nema

“There does exist an international Anglophile network which we may identify as the Round Table Groups. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quote from Pg. 950 of Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope: A History In Our Time (1966)

Carroll Quigley was a Jesuit professor of history at Georgetown University from 1941 to 1976.  His writings omit the connections to the Jesuits, the Vatican and the Black Nobility by name, but their power structure is a key component of the Round Table.

Quigley also taught at Princeton and at Harvard, and lectured at the Brookings Institution. He was a frequent lecturer at the U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, the Foreign Service Institute, and the Naval College at Norfolk, Virginia.

In 1958, he served as a consultant to the Congressional Select Committee which set up the National Space Agency.   In 1964, he was a consultant at the Navy Post-Graduate School, Monterey, California on Project Seabed.   The project was created to visualize the status of future American weapons systems.

Key Excerpts from the book

Tragedy and Hope

A History of the World in Our Time

by Carroll Quigley, 1966

 

Chapter 5European Economic Developments

Commercial Capitalism

Western Civilization is the richest and most powerful social organization ever made by man. One reason for this success has been its economic organization, [which] has passed through six successive stages, of which at least four are called “capitalism.” Each stage created the conditions which tended to bring about the next stage.

The [first stage] of self-sufficient agrarian units (manors) was in a society organized so that its upper ranksthe lords, lay and ecclesiasticalfound their desires for necessities so well met that they sought to exchange their surpluses of necessities for luxuries of remote origin. This gave rise to a trade in foreign luxuries (spices, fine textiles, fine metals) which was the first evidence of the stage of commercial capitalism. In this second stage, mercantile profits and widening markets created a demand for textiles and other goods which could be met only by application of power to production.

This gave the third stage: industrial capitalism. The stage of industrial capitalism soon gave rise to such an insatiable demand for heavy fixed capital, like railroad lines, steel mills, shipyards, and so on, that these investments could not be financed from the profits and private fortunes of individual proprietors. New instruments for financing industry came into existence in the form of limited-liability corporations and investment banks. These were soon in a position to control the chief parts of the industrial system, since they provided capital to it.

This gave rise to financial capitalism. The control of financial capitalism was used to integrate the industrial system into ever-larger units with interlinking financial controls. This made possible a reduction of competition with a resulting increase in profits. As a result, the industrial system soon found that it was again able to finance its own expansion from its own profits, and, with this achievement, financial controls were weakened, and the stage of monopoly capitalism arrived.

In this fifth stage, great industrial units, working together either directly or through cartels and trade associations, were in a position to exploit the majority of the people. The result was a great economic crisis which soon developed into a struggle for control of the statethe minority hoping to use political power to defend their privileged position, the majority hoping to use the state to curtail the power and privileges of the minority. This dualist struggle dwindled with the rise of economic and social pluralism after 1945.

 

The Operations of Banking Were Concealed So They Appeared Difficult to Master

In sum, specialization of economic activities, by breaking up the economic process, had made it possible for people to concentrate on one portion of the process and, by maximizing that portion, to jeopardize the rest. The process was not only broken up into producers, exchangers, and consumers but there were also two kinds of exchangers (one concerned with goods, the other with money), with almost antithetical, short-term, aims. The problems which inevitably arose could be solved and the system reformed only by reference to the system as a whole.

Unfortunately, however, three parts of the system, concerned with the production, transfer, and consumption of goods, were concrete and clearly visible so that almost anyone could grasp them simply by examining them, while the operations of banking and finance were concealed, scattered, and abstract so that they appeared to many to be difficult. To add to this, bankers themselves did everything they could to make their activities more secret and more esoteric. Their activities were reflected in mysterious marks in ledgers which were never opened to the curious outsider.

In the course of time the central fact of the developing economic system, the relationship between goods and money, became clear, at least to bankers. This relationship, the price system, depended upon five things: the supply and the demand for goods, the supply and the demand for money, and the speed of exchange between money and goods.

An increase in three of these (demand for goods, supply of money, speed of circulation) would move the prices of goods up and the value of money down. This inflation was objectionable to bankers, although desirable to producers and merchants. On the other hand, a decrease in the same three items would be deflationary and would please bankers, worry producers and merchants, and delight consumers (who obtained more goods for less money). The other factors worked in the opposite direction, so that an increase in them (supply of goods, demand for money, and slowness of circulation or exchange) would be deflationary [and vice versa].

Such changes of prices, either inflationary or deflationary, have been major forces in history for the last six centuries at least. Over that long period, their power to modify men’s lives and human history has been increasing.

 

Bankers Obsessed With Maintaining Value of Money

Rising prices benefit debtors and injure creditors, while falling prices do the opposite. A debtor called upon to pay a debt at a time when prices are higher than when he contracted the debt must yield up less goods and services than he obtained at the earlier date, on a lower price level when he borrowed the money. A creditor, such as a bank, which has lent moneyequivalent to a certain quantity of goods and serviceson one price level, gets back the same amount of moneybut a smaller quantity of goods and serviceswhen repayment comes at a higher price level, because the money repaid is then less valuable.

This is why bankers, as creditors in money terms, have been obsessed with maintaining the value of money, although the reason they have traditionally given for this obsessionthat “sound money” maintains “business confidence”has been propagandist rather than accurate.

Hundreds of years ago, bankers began to specialize, with the richer and more influential ones associated increasingly with foreign trade and foreign-exchange transactions. Since these were richer and more cosmopolitan and increasingly concerned with questions of political significance, such as stability and debasement of currencies, war and peace, dynastic marriages, and worldwide trading monopolies, they became the financiers and financial advisers of governments.

Moreover, since their relationships with governments were always in monetary terms and not real terms, and since they were always obsessed with the stability of monetary exchanges between one country’s money and another, they used their power and influence to do two things: (1) to get all money and debts expressed in terms of a strictly limited commodityultimately gold; and (2) to get all monetary matters out of the control of governments and political authority, on the ground that they would be handled better by private banking interests.

 

Bankers Create Money Out of Nothing

For generations men had sought to avoid the one drawback of gold, its heaviness, by using pieces of paper to represent specific pieces of gold. We call such pieces of paper gold certificates. Such a certificate entitles its bearer to exchange it for its piece of gold on demand, but in view of the convenience of paper, only a small fraction of certificate holders ever did make such demands.

It early became clear that gold need be held on hand only to the amount needed to cover the fraction of certificates likely to be presented for payment; accordingly, the rest of the gold could be used for business purposes, or, what amounts to the same thing, a volume of certificates could be issued greater than the volume of gold reserved for payment of demands against them. Such an excess volume of paper claims against reserves we now call bank notes.

In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts.

Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money … no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value.

 

The Dynasties of International Bankers

The merchant bankers of London … brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.

The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces.

In concentrating, as we must, on the financial or economic activities of international bankers, we must not totally ignore their other attributes. They were, especially in later generations, cosmopolitan rather than nationalistic. They were usually highly civilized, cultured gentlemen, patrons of education and of the arts, so that today colleges, professorships, opera companies, symphonies, libraries, and museum collections still reflect their munificence. For these purposes they set a pattern of endowed foundations which still surround us today.

 

Bankers Felt Politicians Could Not Be Trusted With the Monetary System

The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

In most countries the central bank was surrounded closely by the almost invisible private investment banking firms. These, like the planet Mercury, could hardly be seen in the dazzle emitted by the central bank which they, in fact, often dominated. Yet a close observer could hardly fail to notice the close private associations between these private, international bankers and the central bank itself.

Two of the five factors which determined the value of money are the supply and the demand for money. The supply of money in a single country was subject to no centralized, responsible control in most countries over recent centuries. Instead, there were a variety of controls of which some could be influenced by bankers, some could be influenced by the government, and some could hardly be influenced by either.

Central banks can usually vary the amount of money in circulation by “open market operations” or by influencing the discount rates of lesser banks. In open market operations, a central bank buys or sells government bonds in the open market. If it buys, it releases money into the economic system; if it sells it reduces the amount of money in the community. The change is greater than the price paid for the securities [due to the fractional reserve system].

Central banks can also change the quantity of money by influencing the credit policies of other banks. This can be done by various methods, such as changing the re-discount rate or changing reserve requirements. By changing the re-discount rate, we mean the interest rate which central banks charge lesser banks for loans. By raising the re-discount rate the central bank forces the lesser bank to raise its discount rate in order to operate at a profit; such a raise in interest rates tends to reduce the demand for credit and thus the amount of deposits (money). Lowering the re-discount rate permits an opposite result.

The powers of governments over the quantity of money are of various kinds, and include (a) control over a central bank, (b) control over public taxation, and (c) control over public spending. The control of governments over central banks varies greatly from one country to another, but on the whole has been increasing. Since most central banks have been (technically) private institutions, this control is frequently based on custom rather than on law.

The powers of the government over the quantity of money in the community exercised through taxation and public spending are largely independent of banking control. Taxation tends to reduce the amount of money in a community and is usually a deflationary force; government spending tends to increase the amount of money in a community and is usually an inflationary force. The total effects of a government’s policy will depend on which item is greater. An unbalanced budget will be inflationary; a budget with a surplus will be deflationary.

 

Money PowerControlled by International Investment BankersDominates Business and Government

On the whole, in the period up to 1931, bankers, especially the Money Power controlled by the international investment bankers, were able to dominate both business and government. They could dominate business, especially in activities and in areas where industry could not finance its own needs for capital, because investment bankers had the ability to supply or refuse to supply such capital. Thus, Rothschild interests came to dominate many of the railroads of Europe, while Morgan dominated at least 26,000 miles of American railroads.

Such bankers went further than this. In return for flotations of securities of industry, they took seats on the boards of directors of industrial firms, as they had already done on commercial banks, savings banks, insurance firms, and finance companies. From these lesser institutions they funneled capital to enterprises which yielded control and away from those who resisted. These firms were controlled through interlocking directorships, holding companies, and lesser banks. They engineered amalgamations and generally reduced competition, until by the early twentieth century many activities were so monopolized that they could raise their noncompetitive prices above costs to obtain sufficient profits to become self-financing.

But before that stage was reached a relatively small number of bankers were in positions of immense influence in European and American economic life. As early as 1909, Walter Rathenau, who was in a position to know (since he had inherited from his father control of the German General Electric Company and held scores of directorships himself), said, “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.”

 

The Power of Investment Bankers Over Governments

The power of investment bankers over governments rests on a number of factors, of which the most significant, perhaps, is the need of governments to issue short-term treasury bills as well as long-term government bonds. Just as businessmen go to commercial banks for current capital advances to smooth over the discrepancies between their irregular and intermittent incomes and their periodic and persistent outgoes, so a government has to go to merchant bankers (or institutions controlled by them) to tide over the shallow places caused by irregular tax receipts.

As experts in government bonds, the international bankers not only handled the necessary advances, but provided advice to government officials and, on many occasions, placed their own members in official posts for varied periods to deal with special problems. This is so widely accepted even today that in 1961 a Republican investment banker became Secretary of the Treasury in a Democratic Administration in Washington without significant comment from any direction.

Naturally, the influence of bankers over governments during the age of financial capitalism (roughly 1850-1931) was not something about which anyone talked freely, but it has been admitted frequently enough by those on the inside, especially in England. In 1852 Gladstone, chancellor of the Exchequer, declared, “The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned.” On September 26, 1921, The Financial Times wrote, “Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills.”

 

Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan Dominate the Financial World

In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures.   Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally.

Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. The powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well.

On November 11, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.” This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March 21, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion … Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.” It might be added that Governor Norman rarely acted in major world problems without consulting with J. P. Morgan’s representatives.

 

Chapter 9The British Imperial Crisis

Britain acquired the world’s greatest empire because it possessed certain advantages which other countries lacked. We mention three of these advantages: (1) that it was an island, (2) that it was in the Atlantic, and (3) that its social traditions at home produced the will and the talents for imperial acquisition.

 

Cecil Rhodes Organized a Secret Society in 1891

[Cecil] Rhodes (1853-1902) feverishly exploited the diamond and goldfields of South Africa, rose to be prime minister of the Cape Colony (1890-1896), contributed money to political parties, controlled parliamentary seats both in England and in South Africa, and sought to win a strip of British territory across Africa from the Cape of Good Hope to Egypt and to join these two extremes together with a telegraph line and ultimately with a Cape-to-Cairo Railway.

Rhodes inspired devoted support for his goals from others in South Africa and in England. With financial support from Lord Rothschild and Alfred Beit, he was able to monopolize the diamond mines of South Africa as De Beers Consolidated Mines and to build up a great gold mining enterprise as Consolidated Gold Fields. In the middle 1890’s Rhodes had a personal income of at least a million pounds sterling a year [equivalent to about $100 million a year in current U.S. dollars] which was spent so freely for his mysterious purposes that he was usually overdrawn on his account.

[An] association was formally established on February 5, 1891, when Rhodes and [William] Stead organized a secret society of which Rhodes had been dreaming for sixteen years. In this secret society Rhodes was to be leader; Stead, Brett, and Milner were to form an executive committee; Arthur (Lord) Balfour, (Sir) Harry Johnston, Lord Rothschild, Albert (Lord) Grey, and others were listed as potential members of a “Circle of Initiates”; while there was to be an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” (later organized by Milner as the Round Table organization).

In 1919 [Rhodes’ followers] founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) for which the chief financial supporters were Sir Abe Bailey and the Astor family (owners of The Times). Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and in the United States (where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations) in the period 1919-1927. The power and influence of this Rhodes-Milner group in British imperial affairs and in foreign policy since 1889, although not widely recognized, can hardly be exaggerated. We might mention as an example that this group dominated The Times from 1890 to 1912, and has controlled it completely since 1912 (except for the years 1919-1922).

In spite of the terms of the Rhodes wills, Rhodes himself was not a racist. Nor was he a political democrat. He worked as easily and as closely with Jews, black natives, or Boers as he did with English. His greatest weakness rested on the fact that his passionate attachment to his goals made him overly tolerant in regard to methods. He did not hesitate to use either bribery or force to attain his ends if he judged they would be effective.

 

Chapter 20The Period of Stabilization, 1922-1930

America Becomes the World’s Greatest Creditor

By 1914 Britain’s supremacy as financial center, as commercial market, as creditor, and as merchant shipper was being threatened. At this critical stage in Britain’s development, the World War occurred. This had a double result as far as this subject is concerned. It forced Britain to postpone indefinitely any reform of her industrial system to adjust it to more modern trends; and it speeded up the development of these trends so that what might have occurred in twenty years was done instead in five.

The war changed the position of the United States in respect to the rest of the world from that of a debtor owing about $3 billion to that of a creditor owed $4 billion. This does not include intergovernmental debts of about $10 billion owed to the United States as a result of the war. At the same time, Britain’s position changed from a creditor owed about $18 billion to a creditor owed about $13.5 billion. In addition, Britain was owed about $8 billion in war debts from her Allies … and owed to the United States war debts of well over $54 billion. Most of these war debts and reparations were sharply reduced after 1920, but the net result for Britain was a drastic change in her position in respect to the United States.

The basic economic organization of the world was modified in other ways. The more backward areas of Europe and the world had been industrialized to a great degree and were unwilling to fall back to a position in which they would obtain industrial products from Britain, Germany, or the United States in return for their raw materials and food. This refusal was made more painful for both sides by the fact that these backward areas had increased their outputs of raw materials and food so greatly that the total could hardly have been sold even if they had been willing to buy all their industrial products from their prewar sources.

The result was a situation where all countries were eager to sell and reluctant to buy, and sought to achieve these mutually irreconcilable ends by setting up subsidies and bounties on exports, tariffs, and restrictions on imports, with disastrous results on world trade.

The only sensible solution to this problem of excessive productive capacity would have been a substantial rise in domestic standards of living, but this would have required a fundamental reapportionment of the national income so that claims to the product of the excess capacity would go to those masses eager to consume, rather than continue to go to the minority desiring to save. Such a reform was rejected by the ruling groups in both “advanced” and “backward” countries, so that this solution was reached only to a relatively small degree in a relatively few countries.

The system of international payments which had worked … before 1914 worked only haltingly after that date, and practically ceased to work at all after 1930. The chief cause of these factors was that neither goods nor money obeyed purely economic forces and did not move as formerly to the areas in which each was most valuable. The chief result was a complete mal-distribution of gold, a condition which became acute after 1928 and which by 1933 had forced most countries off the gold standard.

 

Money Power Seeks to Create a World System of Financial Control in Private Hands Able to Dominate Every Nation on Earth

Pg. 324: the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.

Pg. 326: Norman (Montagu) had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank, especially of Henry P. Davison, who made him secretary of the Bankers Trust Company of New York (in succession to Thomas W. Lamont) in 1904, used him as Morgan’s agent in the banking rearrangements following the crash of 1907, and made him vice-president of the Bankers Trust (still in succession to Lamont) in 1909.

He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914. Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks.

These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world.

They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges.

Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates.

In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).

 

Norman Was the Commander-in-Chief of the World System of Banking Control

The commander in chief of the world system of banking control was Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, who was built up by the private bankers to a position where he was regarded as an oracle in all matters of government and business.

In January, 1924, Reginald McKenna, who had been chancellor of the Exchequer in 1915-1916, as chairman of the board of the Midland Bank told its stockholders:

“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…. And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.”

Montagu Norman’s position may be gathered from the fact that his predecessors in the governorship, almost a hundred of them, had served two-year terms, increased rarely in time of crisis. But Norman held the position for twenty-four years (1920-1944).

Norman was a strange man whose mental outlook was one of successfully suppressed hysteria or even paranoia. He had no use for governments and feared democracy. Both of these seemed to him to be threats to private banking. Strong-willed, tireless, and ruthless, he viewed his life as a kind of cloak-and-dagger struggle with the forces of … [sound] money.

Norman had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank. He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914.

Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Norman and Strong Were Mere Agents of the Powerful Bankers Who Remained Behind the Scenes and Operated in Secret

It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.

This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts. They could dominate governments by their control over … government loans and the play of the international exchanges.

In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838). The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and a use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.

 

Money Power Creates an Ingenious Plan to Create and Control Giant Monopolies

[Financial capitalists eventually] sought to sever control from ownership of securities, believing they could hold the former and relinquish the latter. On the industrial side, they sought to advance monopoly and restrict production, thus keeping prices up and their security holdings liquid.

The efforts of financiers to separate ownership from control were aided by the great capital demands of modern industry. Such demands for capital made necessary the corporation form of business organization. This inevitably brings together the capital owned by a large number of persons to create an enterprise controlled by a small number of persons. The financiers did all they could to make the former number as large as possible and the latter number as small as possible. The result of this was that larger and larger aggregates of wealth fell into the control of smaller and smaller groups of men.

While financial capitalism was thus weaving the intricate pattern of modern corporation law and practice on one side, it was establishing monopolies and cartels on the other. Both helped to dig the grave of financial capitalism and pass the reins of economic control on to the newer monopoly capitalism. On one side, the financiers freed the controllers of business from the owners of business, but on the other side, this concentration gave rise to monopoly conditions which freed the controllers from the banks.

Pg. 48-49: In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts.

Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value.

Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.

Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored.

In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.

The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers.

The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild’s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.

Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. Even after these banking families became fully involved in domestic industry by the emergence of financial capitalism, they remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways:

(1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts, including foreign government debts, even in areas which seemed, at first glance, poor risks, like Egypt, Persia, Ottoman Turkey, Imperial China, and Latin America; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods, since they admired “liquidity” and regarded commitments in commodities or even real estate as the first step toward bankruptcy; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of deflation (which they called “sound” money from its close associations with high interest rates and a high value of money) and of the gold standard, which, in their eyes, symbolized and ensured these values; and (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.

Pg. 53: The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

Pg. 62: In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity.

Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland’s second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.”

This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.”

Pg. 936-937: Behind this unfortunate situation lies another, more profound, relationship, which influences matters much broader than Far Eastern policy. It involves the organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into foundations to be used for educational, scientific, “and other public purposes.” Sixty or more years ago, public life in the West was dominated by the influence of “Wall Street.”

This term has nothing to do with its use by the Communists to mean monopolistic industrialism, but, on the contrary, refers to international financial capitalism deeply involved in the gold standard, foreign-exchange fluctuations, floating of fixed-interest securities and, to a lesser extent, flotation of industrial shares for stock-exchange markets.

This group, which in the United States, was completely dominated by J. P. Morgan and Company from the 1880’s to the 1930’s was cosmopolitan, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, eastern seaboard, high Episcopalian, and European-culture conscious. Their connection with the Ivy League colleges rested on the fact that the large endowments of these institutions required constant consultation with the financiers of Wall Street (or its lesser branches on State Street, Boston, and elsewhere) and was reflected in the fact that these endowments, even in 1930, were largely in bonds rather than in real estate or common stocks. As a consequence of these influences, as late as the 1930’s, J. P. Morgan and his associates were the most significant figures in policy making at Harvard, Columbia, and to a lesser extent Yale, while the Whitneys were significant at Yale, and the Prudential Insurance Company (through Edward D. Duffield) dominated Princeton.

Pg. 937: The names of these Wall Street luminaries still adorn these Ivy League campuses, with Harkness colleges and a Payne Whitney gymnasium at Yale, a Pyne dormitory at Princeton, a Dillon Field House and Lamont Library at Harvard. The chief officials of these universities were beholden to these financial powers and usually owed their jobs to them. Morgan himself helped make Nicholas Murray Butler president of Columbia; his chief Boston agent, Thomas Nelson Perkins of the First National Bank of that city, gave Conant his boost from the chemical laboratory to University Hall at Harvard; Duffield of Prudential, caught unprepared when the incumbent president of Princeton was killed in an automobile in 1932, made himself president for a year before he chose Harold Dodds for the post in 1933. At Yale, Thomas Lamont, managing partner of the Morgan firm, was able to swing Charles Seymour into the presidency of that university in 1937.

The significant influence of “Wall Street” (meaning Morgan) both in the Ivy League and in Washington, in the period of sixty or more years following 1880, explains the constant interchange between the Ivy League and the Federal government, an interchange which undoubtedly aroused a good deal of resentment in less-favored circles, who were more than satiated with the accents, tweeds, and High Episcopal Anglophilia of these peoples

Pg. 938: Because of its dominant position in Wall Street, the Morgan firm came also to dominate other Wal1 Street powers, such as Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, or Dillon-Reed. Close alliances were made with Rockefeller, Mellon, and Duke interests but not nearly so intimate ones with the great industrial powers like du Pont and Ford. [Because] … of the great influence of this “Wall Street” alignment, an influence great enough to merit the name of the “American Establishment,” this group could … control the Federal government and, in consequence, had to adjust to a good many government actions … [which they had secretly supported ]. The chief of these were in taxation law, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913, but culminating, above all else, in the inheritance tax. These tax laws drove the great private fortunes dominated by Wall Street into tax-exempt foundations, which became a major link in the Establishment network between Wall Street, the Ivy League, and the Federal government.

More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street supplied both. The purpose was not to destroy … or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could “blow off steam,” and (3) to have a final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if they ever went “radical.” There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers had talked about it and even attempted it earlier.

Pg. 939: The New Republic was founded by Willard and Dorothy Straight, using her money, in 1914, and continued to be supported by her financial contributions until March 23, 1953. The original purpose for establishing the paper was to provide an outlet for the progressive Left and to guide it quietly in an Anglophile direction. This latter task was entrusted to a young man, only four years out of Harvard, but already a member of the mysterious Round Table group, which has played a major role in directing England’s foreign policy since its formal establishment in 1909.

This new recruit, Walter Lippmann, has been, from 1914 to the present, the authentic spokesman in American journalism for the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic in international affairs.

Chapter 65American Confusions, 1945-1950

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

Chapter 77Conclusion

The hope of the twentieth century rests on its recognition that war and depression are man-made and needless. They can be avoided in the future by turning from … nineteenth-century characteristics … and going back to other characteristics that our Western society has always regarded as virtues: generosity, compassion, cooperation, rationality, and foresight, and finding an increased role in human life for love, spirituality, charity, and self-discipline.

LINK TO FULL PDF OF TRAGEDY AND HOPE

 

In the end all we have is memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES: http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com http://www.HowardNema.com

TRUTH TALK NEWS “Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’ Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

 

IS THERE HOPE FOR THE ANGLO-AMERICAN TRAGEDY?

by Howard Nema
The Anglo-American Establishment.
It is becoming impossible to ignore the giant elephant in the room. Despite fervent mass media efforts to discredit the truth for the last 100 years, the internet has now allowed millions, if not billions to learn about the hidden rulers of the world, their nefarious past and even more sinister intent.
Today, 6 multinational corporations own 95% of mass media.   The elite control 95% of what we see.   What gets on the news, content in TV, movies, magazines, video games, all influencing us as to what to buy, how to live, what we like, what we don’t like, what to think. Conditioning ideological messages abound in this social control mechanism using mind controlling propaganda.
Any attempts to threaten the dream like illusion most people believe to be reality is met with fierce opposition.
“Conspiracy theory” resounds as the most mind numbing response.
We all must remember that Richard Nixon adopted that pitch “conspiracy theorists” during Watergate.
Big conspiracy there.    No theory.
The resistance to investigating claims of a conspiracy theory actually exposes the truth.
This is not rocket science.   Yet, cognitive dissonance abounds.   With the media’s constant bantering to discredit the truth you can see why most dismiss it. After all, these are effective tools of influence.
Also, most folks are too damned busy trying to keep their heads above water making credit card payments, car payments, house payments, and other payments, payments, payments to worry about why they have to struggle so much.
And if you do complain, the stock answer from spouses to bosses to friends and family is, “that’s just the way it is”.
If further investigation leads you to a few books like Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment, or you begin an investigation into the Federal Reserve, or the Council on Foreign Relations, the Tax-Exempt Foundations, or government documents, congressional records and other suppressed information, you will find the truth. And yes, you too will soon labeled a conspiracy nut.
Especially if you share your findings with the public.
But, in fact books like Tragedy and Hope (1966) and The Anglo-American Establishment (1981) both by Carroll Quigley, or The Naked Communist (1970) by Cleon Skousen, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin (1994), Mullins on the Federal Reserve (1952) Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1983) by Eustace Mullins and many other similar past treatments on these subjects truly prove and amplify the near fruition of this very real agenda.
Even with oligarch controlled mass media monopoly on news and pop cultural influence, and COINTELPRO disinformation, the global elite’s plans are being thwarted by an ever growing alert and active populace.
This is thanks most in part to social media and widespread availablity of this truthful evidence on the internet.
People are waking up. More and more are learning the truth that has been hidden from them in plain sight. Overwhelming evidence is available to find if only you simply take the time to look.
By reading the right books and investigating the right organizations, documents and records, many are discovering the truth. A critical mass is approaching.
Recent attempts to criminalize conspiracy theories and free speech should amplify this. Tyranny abounds. The Constitution is being trampled on.
Once that balance shifts and the awakened mobilize politically, the jig is up.   This is why I fear the elite are conjuring up another horrifying false flag event like they did on 9/11.
But this time, it will directly effect the entire world.
On September 14, 1994, speaking at a U.N. business conference, David Rockfeller said:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the world will accept the New World Order.”
Indeed. 9/11 was the catalyst, the inciting incident of the New World Order, setting in motion the agenda that has unfolded in recent history.    Much of it having to do with control of oil interests and establishing Rothschild owned central banks.
In 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank: They were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.
In 2007, General Wesley Clark (ret) reported that shortly after the terror attacks of 9/11/01 he was informed of the government’s agenda to conquer seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.
Interestingly, today the only countries left without a Rothschild Central Bank are: Cuba, North Korea and Iran. Well what do you know? No wonder Obama is getting so cushy-cushy with communist Cuba and softening on Iran.
Our recent history illuminates roots that were sown long ago. In “Tragedy And Hope A History of the World in Our Time” written by Georgetown University professor Carrol Quigley in 1966, exposes the realities of this age old and ongoing agenda.
Covering the years 1880 to 1963, “Tragedy And Hope” focuses on the economic problems designed by the global elite.
Quigley, was the mentor of Rhodes Scholar and former president and Arkansas governor Bill Clinton, had unfettered access to documents from the Council on Foreign Relations for more than two years, proudly revealing the fact that secret societies have played a significant role in world history.
In fact, he very much agreed with it and wondered why so much trouble was made to keep the world government agenda a secret.
“I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.   I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”   Tragedy and Hope pp 949–950
In his book The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden, Quigley traces the history of a secret society founded in 1891 by Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner to foster the British Empire’s power and influence over the world.
Quigley wrote: “The organization was so modified and so expanded by Milner after the eclipse of Stead in 1899, and especially after the death of Rhodes in 1902, that it took on quite a different organization and character, although it continued to pursue the same goals.”
The society consisted of an inner circle (“The Society of the Elect”) and an outer circle (“The Association of Helpers”, also known as The Milner Kindergarten, The Times group, the All Souls group, the Cliveden set and the Round Table Group.) The society does not have an actual name but all affiliations are of the same group and working for the same goal, a New World Order.
Quigley notes that the leaders of this group were Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner from 1891 until Rhodes’ death in 1902 and Milner led the group until his death in 1925.
Subsequent leaders, Lionel Curtis from 1925 to 1955, Baron Robert H Brand from 1955 to 1963, and Adam D. Marris from 1963 until the time Quigley wrote Tragedy and Hope in 1966.
This secretive and influential alliance continues to this day under the cover of darkness.      The agenda moves forward via secret meetings. First known as the Omega Group, since 1954 it has been called the Bilderberg Group.

BILDERBERG NICE

Only until recently, within the last thirty years has the shadowy Bilderberg Group been exposed to the light of criticism.
Before the 1980’s any investigation into the group, its members and intentions was met by dead silence from the mainstream media.
For more than thirty years the Bilderberg’s existance was fully denied and shot down as a wild conspiracy theory.
Indeed, the Bilderbergers and the Milner Group have been secretly working behind the scenes and using their enormous wealth and clout to control the political systems every country in the world.
This organization also functions through certain loosely affiliated “front groups”, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs (which is today known as Chatham House), the Institute of Pacific Relations and the Council on Foreign Relations. Tragedy and Hope pp. 132, 950-952
Quigley states he was in direct contact with the international Anglo-American network. To achieve their aim of world financial domination, the organization cooperates with any group, on either side of the political spectrum, fascists, communists, anarchists, even today’s radical Islamists.
Norman Dodd further exposed this reality shortly before his death in an interview with G. Edward Griffin.    Below is the complete 1982 interview.

 

Dodd also speaks of a 1953 meeting he had with Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, who candidly stated the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and others wished to comfortably merge the United States with the Soviet Union.

Image result for Rockefeller moscow 1970's

Wouldn’t you know, the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations continue to fund communist and socialist causes. Of course they do. They are collectivists.
During the cold war David Rockefeller had unfettered access to regularly fly in and out of Moscow on banking business. When he landing at the airport, he was met like a rock star with much pomp and circumsance. The Russian people loved him.
In addition, other secret societies are briefly discussed in Tragedy and Hope, including a consortium of the leaders of the central banks of several countries, who formed the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). Tragedy and Hope pp 323–324
Initially, the BIS was established on May 17, 1930 by Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States to supposedly facilitate reparations imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I.
A charter for the bank was drafted at the International Bankers Conference and its charter was adopted on January 20, 1930.
The BIS is based in Switzerland and has immunity in all the contracting states.
And we wonder why the warmongering economic hitmen and nation killers are never prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
To seal Our fate of being consumed by the deathroes of economic slavery and war for all eternity, according to the charter, shares in the bank could be held by individuals and non-governmental entities.
This of course was quite convenient for the Rothschild, Rockefeller and Royals among the other Illuminati bloodline families who are among the top shareholders. They are the rulers. At least they want to be.
Quigley reveals quite openly that the Milner Group wielded considerable influence over British and American foreign policy in the first half of the twentieth century. This influence continues to this day, albeit the relationship and goals are obscured from the public and tightly hidden from view.
As a totalitarian one world government is incrementally established, any evidence of this truth is quickly shot down by the controlled mainstream media, even as history proves this alliance to be quite real and factual.

 

carroll_quigley_tragedy_n_hope

Below is the list of the 60 member central banks or monetary authorities of the Bank of International Settlements:
Algeria Bank of AlgeriaArgentina Central Bank of ArgentinaAustralia Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustria Austrian National BankBelgium National Bank of Belgium

Bosnia and Herzegovina Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Brazil Central Bank of Brazil

Bulgaria Bulgarian National Bank

Canada Bank of Canada

Chile Central Bank of Chile

China People’s Bank of China

Colombia Bank of the Republic (Colombia)

Croatia Croatian National Bank

Czech Republic Czech National Bank

Denmark National Bank of Denmark

Estonia Bank of Estonia

European Union European Central Bank

Finland Bank of Finland

France Bank of France

Germany Deutsche Bundesbank

Greece Bank of GreeceHong Kong Hong Kong Monetary AuthorityHungary Hungarian National BankIceland Central Bank of IcelandIndia Reserve Bank of India

Indonesia Bank IndonesiaRepublic of Ireland Central Bank of Ireland

Israel Bank of Israe

lItaly Bank of Italy

Japan Bank of Japan

South Korea Bank of Korea

Latvia Bank of Latvia

Lithuania Bank of Lithuania

Luxembourg Central Bank of Luxembourg

Republic of Macedonia National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia

Malaysia Central Bank of Malaysia

Mexico Bank of Mexico

Netherlands De Nederlandsche Bank

New Zealand Reserve Bank of New Zealand

Norway Norges Bank

Peru Central Reserve Bank of PeruPhilippines Central Bank of the PhilippinesPoland National Bank of PolandPortugal Bank of PortugalRomania National Bank of Romania

Russia Central Bank of the Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Serbia National Bank of Serbia
Singapore Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia Bank of Slovenia

South Africa South African Reserve Bank

Spain Bank of Spain

Sweden Sveriges Riksbank

Switzerland Swiss National Bank

Thailand Bank of Thailand

Turkey Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey

United Arab Emirates Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom Bank of England

United States Federal Reserve System

Follow and share TRUTH TALK NEWS!

 

http://www.HowardNema.com

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

http://www.youtube.com/FreedomFirstFilms

 

 

THE CFR, THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE PUSH FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT




A TRUTH TALK NEWS breakdown of the Council on Foreign Relations control over
U.S. State Department policy for more than 70 years and the push for global government.

Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS LIVE 7pm EST Weeknights on www.TruthBroadcastNetwork.com

If you seek truth and want to restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this channel. Thank you for your continued support.

Together we can restore Our republic. Together we can be the change we wish to see in the world by exposing the forces that wish to enslave us.


Subscribe, follow and share TRUTH TALK NEWS
http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com//FreedomFirstF
http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE
http://www.livestream.com/TruthTalkNews
http://www.twitter.com/TruthTalkNews
http://www.pinterest.com/howardnema/
http://truth-talk-news.tumblr.com/

GET THE TRUTH OUT

An open discussion of all things New World Order.  Broadcast LIVE, Monday, August 11, 2014.

Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS LIVE 7pm EST Weeknights on www.TruthBroadcastNetwork.com

If you seek truth and want to restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this blog.

Thank you for your continued support. Together we can restore Our republic.   Together we can be the change we wish to see in the world by exposing the forces that wish to enslave us.

Subscribe, follow and share TRUTH TALK NEWS

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com//FreedomFirstFilms
http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE
http://www.livestream.com/TruthTalkNews
http://www.twitter.com/TruthTalkNews
http://www.pinterest.com/howardnema/
http://truth-talk-news.tumblr.com/

PROTOCOLS OF THE ILLUMINATI: PROTOCOLS 4-7

Fourth TRUTH TALK NEWS installment exposing the controversial book,  “The Protocols of the Learned Elders Of Sion” as a working Illuminati blueprint for the New World Order and dissecting the Hegelian ruse to blame the Jews for the plot.  

Broadcast LIVE Thursday, August 7, 2014.


Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS LIVE 7pm EST Weeknights on www.TruthBroadcastNetwork.com

If you seek truth and want to restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this channel. Thank you for your continued support.  

Together we can restore Our republic. Together we can be the change we wish to see in the world by exposing the forces that wish to enslave us.

 

 

Subscribe, follow and share TRUTH TALK NEWS

 

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

 

http://www.youtube.com//FreedomFirstFilms

 

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

 

http://www.livestream.com/TruthTalkNews

 

http://www.twitter.com/TruthTalkNews

 

http://www.pinterest.com/howardnema/

 

http://truth-talk-news.tumblr.com/

PROTOCOLS OF THE ILLUMINATI: PROTOCOLS 2 & 3

Third TRUTH TALK NEWS installment exposing the controversial book,
“The Protocols of the Learned Elders Of Sion” (1905) as an Illuminati working blueprint
for the New World Order and the ruse to blame the Jews for the plot.
 

Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS LIVE 7pm EST Weeknights on www.TruthBroadcastNetwork.com

 

 

If you seek truth and want to restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the information contained on this channel.  Together we can restore Our republic. 

 

Together we can be the change we wish to see in the world by exposing the forces that wish to enslave us.  I ask for your continued support by sharing this valuable free public service. 

 

Watch Truth Talk News LIVE

Weeknights 7pm EST on

http://www.TruthBroadcastNetwork.com

 

 

Subscribe, follow and share:

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://www.youtube.com//FreedomFirstFilms

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

http://www.livestream.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.twitter.com/TruthTalkNews

http://truth-talk-news.tumblr.com/

http://www.pinterest.com/howardnema/

PROTOCOLS OF THE ILLUMINATI: PROTOCOL 1

 

Second installment of a weeklong TRUTH TALK NEWS series dissecting the controversial book, “The Protocols of the Learned Elders Of Sion” (1905) as an Illuminati blueprint for the New World Order and exposing the ruse to blame the Jews for the plot.

 

Broadcast LIVE Tuesday, August 5, 2014

 

Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS LIVE Weeknights 7pm EST on http://www.TruthBroadcastNetwork.com

 

“Where news the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

Subscribe, follow and share:

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://www.youtube.com//FreedomFirstFilms

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

http://www.livestream.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.twitter.com/TruthTalkNews

http://truth-talk-news.tumblr.com/

http://www.pinterest.com/howardnema/

TRAGEDY AND HOPE (PDF)

TRAGEDY AND HOPE (PDF)

Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS on TRUTH BROADCAST NEWORK  CHANNEL 6

“Where news the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”


Share, follow and subscribe:

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com//FreedomFirstFilms

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

http://www.livestream.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.twitter.com/TruthTalkNews

http://truth-talk-news.tumblr.com/

http://www.pinterest.com/howardnema/


ALL MULTIMEDIA APPEARING ON TRUTH TALK NEWS are for the purpose of FAIR USE. 

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.