Tag Archives: Carroll Quigley

Key Excerpts from Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley (1966)

Pg. 48-49:

In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value. Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.
Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored. In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other. The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild’s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.
Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. Even after these banking families became fully involved in domestic industry by the emergence of financial capitalism, they remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways: (1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts, including foreign government debts, even in areas which seemed, at first glance, poor risks, like Egypt, Persia, Ottoman Turkey, Imperial China, and Latin America; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods, since they admired “liquidity” and regarded commitments in commodities or even real estate as the first step toward bankruptcy; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of deflation (which they called “sound” money from its close associations with high interest rates and a high value of money) and of the gold standard, which, in their eyes, symbolized and ensured these values; and (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.
Pg. 53: The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.
Pg. 62: In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland’s second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.” This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.”
Pg. 324: the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.
Pg. 326: Norman (Montagu) had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank, especially of Henry P. Davison, who made him secretary of the Bankers Trust Company of New York (in succession to Thomas W. Lamont) in 1904, used him as Morgan’s agent in the banking rearrangements following the crash of 1907, and made him vice-president of the Bankers Trust (still in succession to Lamont) in 1909. He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914. Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.
In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.
Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges. Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates. In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).
Pg. 936-937: Behind this unfortunate situation lies another, more profound, relationship, which influences matters much broader than Far Eastern policy. It involves the organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into foundations to be used for educational, scientific, “and other public purposes.” Sixty or more years ago, public life in the West was dominated by the influence of “Wall Street.” This term has nothing to do with its use by the Communists to mean monopolistic industrialism, but, on the contrary, refers to international financial capitalism deeply involved in the gold standard, foreign-exchange fluctuations, floating of fixed-interest securities and, to a lesser extent, flotation of industrial shares for stock-exchange markets. This group, which in the United States, was completely dominated by J. P. Morgan and Company from the 1880’s to the 1930’s was cosmopolitan, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, eastern seaboard, high Episcopalian, and European-culture conscious. Their connection with the Ivy League colleges rested on the fact that the large endowments of these institutions required constant consultation with the financiers of Wall Street (or its lesser branches on State Street, Boston, and elsewhere) and was reflected in the fact that these endowments, even in 1930, were largely in bonds rather than in real estate or common stocks. As a consequence of these influences, as late as the 1930’s, J. P. Morgan and his associates were the most significant figures in policy making at Harvard, Columbia, and to a lesser extent Yale, while the Whitneys were significant at Yale, and the Prudential Insurance Company (through Edward D. Duffield) dominated Princeton.
Pg. 937: The names of these Wall Street luminaries still adorn these Ivy League campuses, with Harkness colleges and a Payne Whitney gymnasium at Yale, a Pyne dormitory at Princeton, a Dillon Field House and Lamont Library at Harvard. The chief officials of these universities were beholden to these financial powers and usually owed their jobs to them. Morgan himself helped make Nicholas Murray Butler president of Columbia; his chief Boston agent, Thomas Nelson Perkins of the First National Bank of that city, gave Conant his boost from the chemical laboratory to University Hall at Harvard; Duffield of Prudential, caught unprepared when the incumbent president of Princeton was killed in an automobile in 1932, made himself president for a year before he chose Harold Dodds for the post in 1933. At Yale, Thomas Lamont, managing partner of the Morgan firm, was able to swing Charles Seymour into the presidency of that university in 1937.
The significant influence of “Wall Street” (meaning Morgan) both in the Ivy League and in Washington, in the period of sixty or more years following 1880, explains the constant interchange between the Ivy League and the Federal government, an interchange which undoubtedly aroused a good deal of resentment in less-favored circles, who were more than satiated with the accents, tweeds, and High Episcopal Anglophilia of these peoples
Pg. 938: Because of its dominant position in Wall Street, the Morgan firm came also to dominate other Wall Street powers, such as Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, or Dillon-Reed. Close alliances were made with Rockefeller, Mellon, and Duke interests but not nearly so intimate ones with the great industrial powers like du Pont and Ford. [Because] … of the great influence of this “Wall Street” alignment, an influence great enough to merit the name of the “American Establishment,” this group could … control the Federal government and, in consequence, had to adjust to a good many government actions … [which they had secretly supported ]. The chief of these were in taxation law, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913, but culminating, above all else, in the inheritance tax. These tax laws drove the great private fortunes dominated by Wall Street into tax-exempt foundations, which became a major link in the Establishment network between Wall Street, the Ivy League, and the Federal government.
More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street supplied both. The purpose was not to destroy … or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could “blow off steam,” and (3) to have a final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if they ever went “radical.” There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers had talked about it and even attempted it earlier.
Pg. 939: The New Republic was founded by Willard and Dorothy Straight, using her money, in 1914, and continued to be supported by her financial contributions until March 23, 1953. The original purpose for establishing the paper was to provide an outlet for the progressive Left and to guide it quietly in an Anglophile direction. This latter task was entrusted to a young man, only four years out of Harvard, but already a member of the mysterious Round Table group, which has played a major role in directing England’s foreign policy since its formal establishment in 1909. This new recruit, Walter Lippmann, has been, from 1914 to the present, the authentic spokesman in American journalism for the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic in international affairs.
Pg. 950: There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the … Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

 

FULL PDF of Georgetown Professor and Council on Foreign Relations insider Carroll Quigley’s 1966 book, TRAGEDY AND HOPE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

After reading these quotes, it should be clear the intention of those who operate behind the scenes are not working for, but rather against the best interests of America and all of humanity to exploit, profit, achieve and maintain domination over us all.   This small globalist cabal are the enemy of all humanity.   We must not allow their legions of wolves in sheep’s clothing to mesmerize and deceive us into bending to their evil, nefarious will.     HN

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

Still Don’t Believe In The New World Order?

Revelations From Great And Powerful Men

PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE THESE QUOTES EVERYWHERE!

“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

THAT quotation and the following – and many others like them – clearly demonstrate that the words “new world order” are very real and deadly serious.

They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The “old world order” is one based on independent nation-states. The “new world order” involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government.

This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.).

The various notions of the “new world order” differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance:

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed when Korean Airlines flight 007 was shot down by the Soviets

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

“The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.” Myron Fagan

“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press….They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.” U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, Congressional Record 1917

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.” George Herbert Walker Bush

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

“The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments’ plans. ” British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)

“What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil.” Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920

“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen….At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.” New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922

“From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.” Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.

“The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semi-occult power which….pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I.” British military historian Major General J.F.C. Fuller, l941

“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.

“The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

“The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.” Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

“Fifty men have run America, and that’s a high figure.” Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

“Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.” Senator William Jenner, 1954

“The case for government by elites is irrefutable.” Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?

“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.” U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.” Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

“The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.” Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

“The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation.” The Christian Science Monitor, September 1, l961

“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.

“The planning of UN can be traced to the ‘secret steering committee’ established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department’s Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department’s postwar planning.” Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, “Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy.” (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.” Harpers, July l958

“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.” M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.” Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)

“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.” Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.'” Excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in The New York Times (October 1940)

“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order.” The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor”

Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.” Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 194

“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God.” American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)

“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper.” Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order.” Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)

“Alchemy for a New World Order” Article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'” Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” — The New York Times (February 1962)

“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.” Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order.'” Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)

“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.” Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)

“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.” Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order.” Part of article in The New York Times (November 1975)

“A New World Order” Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms.” Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)

“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.” Richard Gephardt, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.” President George Bush (January 1991)

“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council.” Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in The New York Times (January 1991)

“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.” George McGovern, in The New York Times (February 199

“… it’s Bush’s baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler ‘new order’ root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier.” William Safire, in The New York Times (February 1991)

“How I Learned to Love the New World Order” Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

“How to Achieve The New World Order” Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.” Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State” Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)

“The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.” Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

“The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order.” President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in The New York Times (April 1995)

One World Order supporters….

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day. But a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers (administrations), too plainly proves a deliberate systematic plan of reducing us to slavery.” Thomas Jefferson

“…This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of “one world government’….National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…” Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter.

“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” President George Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1,1992.

“…This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.” Senator Joseph S. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate, March 1, 1962, about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever.

“Let me control a peoples currency and I care not who makes their laws…” Meyer Nathaniel Rothchild in a speech to a gathering of world bankers February 12, 1912.The following year, we subscribed to the “services” of the newly incorporated Federal Reserve, headed by Mr. Rothchild.

“By the end of this decade (2000 AD) we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations … a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable.” Pope John Paul II quoted by Malachi Martin in the book “The Keys of This Blood”

“The New World Order is a world that has a supernational authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and Communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order.” Former West German Chancellor, Willy Brandt, former chairman of the Fifth-Socialist International, who chaired the Brandt Commission in the late 1980s.

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” David Rockefeller

“But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence.” David Rockefeller, speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994.

“A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.” Brent Scowcroft, George Bush’s National Security Advisor, said on the eve of the Gulf War.

“The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)…Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.” President George Bush, September 11, 1990.

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.” President George Bush in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991.

“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order.” Henry Kissinger when campaigning for the passage of NAFTA.

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations, December 1988.

“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in “Foreign Affairs,” July/August 1995.

“…In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” Richard N. Gardner, in “Foreign Affairs,” April 1974.

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people – will hate the new world order – and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939).

“Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control, to Sen. Howard Metzenbaum, The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.

“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans… and so a lot of people say there’s too much personal freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That’s what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we’re going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities.” President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV’s “Enough is Enough”

“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…” Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” David Rockefeller, statement in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)

“You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.” Charles Austin Beard (1874-1948)

“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The Western world will need to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist.” Dmitrii Z. Manuilskii (Lenin School of Political Warfare, Moscow, 1931)

“There is no reason for anyone in this country, anyone except a police officer or a military person, to buy, to own, to have, to use a handgun….And the only way to do that is to change the Constitution.” Michael Gartner, 1992 in USA Today

“The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.” H. J. Res. 438Introduced by Rep. Major Owens, 1992

Vice President Al Gore as he traveled to Marrakech, Morocco, in April for the signing of the new world trade agreement. Gore appeared hours after U.S. planes enforcing an allied ‘no fly’ zone over northern Iraq accidentally shot down two U.S. helicopters, killing 15 Americans and 11 foreign officials. ‘I want to extend condolences,’ Gore said, ‘to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations.'” (Los Angeles Times, 6/12/94)

“There is nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine . . . been here 4 1/2 billion years. We’ve been here, what, a 100,000 years, maybe 200,000. And we’ve only been engaged in heavy industry a little over 200 years. 200 years versus 4 1/2 billion. And we have the conceit to think that somehow we’re a threat? The planet isn’t going away. We are.” George Carlin

“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson

“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken

“Nuclear power must be dealt with irrationally. . . . Nuclear plants are carcinogens. Let’s get that story out. . . . Their lies will catch up to them. We need endless Chernobyl reminders.” Ralph Nader

Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” Lyall Watson, The Financial Times, 15 July 1995

“‘Protecting the Environment’ is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature.” J. H. Robbins

“…the only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don’t suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them.” Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

“The necessary consequence of an egalitarian program is the decidedly inegalitarian creation of a ruthless power elite.” M. N. Rothbard

Global Sustainability requires: “the deliberate quest of poverty . . . reduced resource consumption . . . and set levels of mortality control.” Professor Maurice King

“Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweighs the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community.” Janet Hathaway, Natural Resources Defense Council

The Environmentalist’s Dream is an Egalitarian Society based on: rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally. Aaron Wildavsky

“A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” Richard Benedict, State Dept. employee working on assignment from the Conservation Foundation

“Giving society cheap, abundant energy . . . would be the equivalent o f giving an idiot child a machine gun.” Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

“The secret to David McTaggart’s (early officer in Greanpeace) success is the secret to Greenpeace’s success: It doesn’t matter what is true . . . . it only matters what people believe is true . . . . You are what the media define you to be. [Greenpeace] became a myth, and a myth-generating machine.” Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

“. . . a year is about one-fifth of the time we have left if we are going to preserve any kind of quality in our world.” Garrett de Bell (1970)

“The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency.” Pope John Paul I

“The move toward cotnrolling less and less pollution at greater and greater expense — until you are spending everything to control nothing — is one of the big water quality problems we are facing in the future.” Ernest Rosenberg

“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover the source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.” Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

“. . . the Planning Commission must say ‘no’ to development . . . Austin, Texas, is showing us about land use . . . . ” Judge Armstrong, Kentucky County

“It is easy to be conspicuously ‘compassionate’ if others are being forced to pay the cost.” M. N. Rothbard

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

“We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado)

“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects . . . We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land.” David Foreman, Earth First!

“. . . There is no such thing in America as an independent press . . . We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes . . . Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” John Swinton, former New York Times Chief of Staff

“We have the opportunity to avoid choices like nuclear power which will come back to haunt us 30 years from now.” Russell Peterson, National Audobon Society President

“. . . The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.” Dr. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project

“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.” Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard – member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank. The Population Control Agenda.The Timeline

“. . . as radical environmentalists, we can see AIDS not as a problem, but as a necessary solution.” Miss Ann Thropy (pseudonym), Earth First! Journal

“The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing . . . This is not to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run.” Economist editorial

“I suspect that the politicians and businessmen who are jumping on the environment bandwagon don’t have the slightest idea of what they are getting into. They are talking about emission control devices on automobiles, while we are talking about bans on automobiles.” Dennis Hayes, Earth Day Agenda (1970)

“The invention of the concept of sustainable human development and that of so-called human security, as opposed to territorial security of nation- states, and its promotion by the UN is in clear contradiction to all that we, the Group of 77, and the UN Charter itself consider inalienable, namely national sovereignty and security.” Pranab Mukherjee, India’s Minister of Commerce, Earth Times, 15 October 1994

“It’s (the prospect of cheap fusion energy) the worst thing that could happen to the planet.” Jeremy Rifkin

“No case for expensive policies for safeguarding species can be made without more extensive analysis.” Endangered Species Blueprint, National Wilderness Institute

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” H. L. Mencken

“If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund

“They want timid, helpless people who are anxious to get in touch with their inner child, enter twelve-step programs, and run to the government with every little problem.” Clark Stooksbury

“. . . Our production and consumption is not sustainable . . . Agenda 21 is to be implemented . . . The Texas Sustainable Energy Development Council will develop the Texas Plan . . . The money will come from milking the utilities and redirecting oil overcharge funds . . . . ” Commissioner Karl Rabago, Texas Public Utilities Commission

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro

“Behind the honeyed but patently absurd pleas for equality is a ruthless drive for placing ‘the new elite’ at the top of a new hierachy of power.” M. N. Rothbard

“Pure guesswork has become the basis of a forecast that has been published in newspapers to be read and understood as a scientific statement.” Endangered Species Blueprint, National Wilderness Institute

“Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” Peter Singer, the “Father of Animal Rights”

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas, former U.S. Socialist Presidential Candidate

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day.” Dr. Jacques Cousteau

“I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

“Measured on virtually any scale, the world is in worse shape than it was 20 years ago.” Dennis Hayes, Chairman of Earth Day 1990

“The world has cancer, and the cancer is man.” A. Gregg, Mankind at the Turning Point

“People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any.” Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund

“This is a political game. It has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with health and safety.” Sherry Neddick, Greenpeace

“Free Enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have the freedom to exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the process . . . Capitalism is destroying the earth.” Helen Caldicott, Union of Concerned Scientists

“The system of private property is the most important guaranty to freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because of the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that no one has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what we do for ourselves.” Friedrich A. Hayck

“The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights . . .” Ayn Rand

“We reject the idea of private property.” Peter Berle, President of the National Audobon Society

“Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion.” Murray Rothbard

“No government knows any limits to its power except the endurance of the people.” Lysander Spooner

“The real culprits are those who created a system that makes it dangerous to work and safe to loaf.” Thomas Sowell

“The three branches of government . . . are not, in any sense, ‘branches’ since that would imply that there is something they are all attached to besides self-aggrandizement and our pocketbooks.”       P. J. O’Rourke

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”
All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

http://www.HowardNema.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.
Do the research.
Find your own truth.
There is only one truth.
Seek and you will find it.
If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.
All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

BERNIE, TRUMP AND THE TRAGEDY OF HOPE AND CHANGE

By Howard Nema

Could democracy be merely an illusion?

Have you have ever suspected that very powerful people have  guided events throughout history for generations; and that these royal and noble families have created a system appearing to be democratic, but actually excludes ordinary citizens from decision-making and through ever increasing taxation, regulations and legislation, incrementally enslaves them in a system of benevolent despotism with generous helpings of circus and bread?

We see this with the 2016 Presidential Elections which is clearly a circus and is chock full of bread $$$.

We also see the influence of the Hidden Masters behind both the democratic and republican political machines that have each attacked and sought to destroy their own party members, namely Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.

In Quigley’s work we discover that national constitutions are routinely undermined by the leaders who are elected to defend them.

We learn that “all social instruments tend to become institutions,” regardless of their benevolent origin, and, from that point forward, the institution is run for the benefit of those who control it (at the expense of its original purpose).

(We see this in the generational rise of socialism and government dependence.)

Quigley reveals that real power operates behind the scenes, in secrecy, and with little to fear from democratic elections.

He proves that conspiracies, secret societies, and small, powerful networks of individuals are not only real; they’re extremely effective at creating or destroying entire nations and shaping the world as a whole.

We learn that “representative government” is nothing less than a carefully managed con, like the Federal Reserve, the IRS and a litany of other collectivist tyrannies we must endure to feed the parasite elites and their insatiable quest for global domination.

Since these disturbing truths contradict nearly everything we have been taught to believe about our government, our education system, and the media, many dismiss these truths as nonsensical nut job conspiracy theories that only gullible fools would believe.

But Carroll Quigley was no conspiracy theorist or gullible fool. He was a prominent historian who specialized in studying the evolution of civilizations as well as secret societies.

Quigley taught at Princeton University, Harvard University, and the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He worked as an advisor to the US Defense Department, the US Navy, and the Smithsonian Institution.

In short, Carroll Quigley was a well-connected member of Ivy League society. Based on his own words, and his training as a historian, it appears that he was chosen by members of a secret network to write the real history of their rise to power. However, as Quigley later realized, these individuals did not expect or intend for him to publish their secrets for the rest of the world to see.

In 1966 after 2 years of having unfettered access to the records and minutes of the Council on Foreign Relations and more than 20 years of being in the presence of their leaders and spheres of influence, Bill Clinton’s mentor, Jesuit professor at Georgetown University Carroll Quigley wrote Tragedy and Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time.

In this superb expose of the ruling elite and their plans for a one world system of financial and political control in private hands, Quigley intricately details the “Anglo-American Establishment and their collectivist corporate goal of unifying the United States and Great Britain in a socio-economic political system dominated by the Central Banks of the world.

Shortly after publishing Tragedy and Hope, “the Network” took action against and the book he’d spent twenty years researching and two years writing was pulled from the market.

As Quigley recounts:

“The original edition published by Macmillan in 1966 sold about 8800 copies and sales were picking up in 1968 when they “ran out of stock,” as they told me (but in 1974, when I went after them with a lawyer, they told me that they had destroyed the plates in 1968). They lied to me for six years, telling me that they would re-print when they got 2000 orders, which could never happen because they told anyone who asked that it was out of print and would not be reprinted. They denied this until I sent them Xerox copies of such replies to libraries, at which they told me it was a clerk’s error. In other words they lied to me but prevented me from regaining the publication rights by doing so. . .

[Rights revert back to the copyright holder if the book is out of print, but not if the book is simply out of stock.]

…Powerful influences in this country want me, or at least my work, suppressed.”

When reading the 1377 page Tragedy and Hope, you immediately realize that it wasn’t written for the casual reader.  It is a long, tedious read of which 95 percent consists of basic economic, political, and diplomatic history. However, the other 5 percent contains some truly astonishing admissions about the existence, nature, and effectiveness of covert power.

As one would expect from an Ivy League historian, both Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment reveals the existence of a secret network that formed to bring “all the habitable portions of the world” under its control.

A college of corporations. In Tragedy and Hope, Quigley wrote:

“I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quigley exposes this wealthy “Anglophile network” that cooperates with any group that can help it achieve its goal.

(This includes Communists, which, on the surface, would seem to be the sworn enemy of super-wealthy capitalist conspirators.)

Quigley chronicles how the Network formed in the late 1800s in England and immediately began creating front groups.  By 1919, it had formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House), and it went on to create other extremely powerful institutes within “the chief British dominions and in the United States.” Hiding behind these front groups, the Network began secretly exercising its power.

In the United States the main institute was named the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which Quigley described as “a front for J. P. Morgan and company.”

In short time, the Network expanded its operations; spreading like cancer into our universities, media, and especially government “foreign policy.”

On this basis, which was originally financial and goes back to George Peabody, there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. In England, the center was the Round Table Group, while in the United States it was J. P. Morgan and Company or its local branches in Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland.

The American branch of this “English Establishment” exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and the lamented Boston Evening Transcript). In fact, the editor of the Christian Science Monitor was the chief American correspondent (anonymously)…It might be mentioned that the existence of this Wall Street, Anglo-American axis is quite obvious once it is pointed out.

If the idea of powerful Wall Street insiders joining a secret foreign network to establish dominion over all “habitable portions of the world” and successfully penetrating “into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy” sounds like something you should have heard about, you’re right. But the secret to why you haven’t is contained in the story itself. (The successful “penetration” of universities, the press, and the government has proven quite useful to those who wish “to remain unknown.”)

The group behind this Great Work which Carroll Quigley calls, “The Network”, which has no official name is also known as the Milner Group, or Milner’s kindergarten.

They have worked for generations, centuries– to achieve this goal and to reach the stage of socio-political control we see today.

Their nameless, faceless dominant presence is obvious to all of us in inflation and dollar devaluation. We see it in rising food prices, commodities stagnant wages, rising unemployment, poverty and shrinking middle class.

Although most are aware of these effects of their influence, they are ignorant to the group, or their agenda.

Quigley agrees on most of the goals of this clandestine operation, but disagrees on the group’s omerta of absolute secrecy, believing the “cause” of the Milner’s is significant in world history and should be known.

Here are a few key quotes from Quigley’s

Tragedy And Hope:

“In 1891, Cecil Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a “Circle of Initiates” and an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” later organized as the Round Table organization. In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States.

In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations. After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries. They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom.

There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.   Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

The Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR)

Quigley provides many examples of Network infiltration and manipulation. For instance, on pages 132 and 953 of Tragedy and Hope, he exposes yet another “front group” called the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). Because the IPR provides priceless insight into the deceptive nature and true power of the Network, we’ll briefly cover it here. Let’s begin with the final report of a US Senate investigation of the IPR. It stated, in part:

The IPR has been considered by the American Communist Party and by Soviet officials as an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and military intelligence. The IPR disseminated and sought to popularize false information including information originating from Soviet and Communist sources…The IPR was a vehicle used by the Communists to orient American far eastern policies toward Communist objectives.

To the average person, it sounds crazy to suggest that a network of super-wealthy capitalists is secretly conspiring to gain control of the world.

But it sounds even crazier to accuse these same super-wealthy capitalists of using their tremendous wealth and power to “popularize” a system of government (Communism) that would, in theory anyway, lead to the destruction of all their wealth and power.

Surely, if such an unbelievable story were true, the free press would have shouted it from the rooftops…right? Wrong. Let’s jump ahead for just a second and look at how Quigley described the Network-directed media cover up of the Senate investigation:

“It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any [revelations] to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions.

As this demonstrates, the Network fully understands the importance of controlling public opinion. This also provides a glimpse into how it can do so.”

(If a disturbing truth isn’t reported on by a “respected” news outlet, it might as well not exist. The vast majority of citizens will remain forever oblivious.)

Additionally, in this particular case, any senator that insisted on taking the investigation “too far” would surely face a smear campaign by the same press that was ignoring the IPR story.

Needless to say, this type of influence can drastically affect how much attention an issue receives in the media. The merit and importance of a story will often take a backseat to the wishes of those who have the power to keep it quiet. More importantly, similar tactics of control can be applied in other areas as well. Keep that in mind as you read the following short summary of the IPR’s activities, because the blueprint for directing perception and policies hasn’t changed.

In 1951 the Subcommittee on Internal Security of the Senate Judiciary Committee…sought to show that China had been lost to the Communists by the deliberate actions of a group of academic experts on the Far East and Communist fellow travelers whose work in that direction was controlled and coordinated by the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). The influence of the Communists in IPR is well established, but the patronage of Wall Street is less well known.

The headquarters of the IPR and of the American Council of IPR were both in New York and were closely associated on an interlocking basis. Each spent about $2.5 million dollars [nearly $30 million when adjusted for inflation] over the quarter-century from 1925 to 1950, of which about half, in each case, came from the Carnegie Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation (which were themselves interlocking groups controlled by an alliance of Morgan and Rockefeller interests in Wall Street). Much of the rest…came from firms closely allied to these two Wall Street interests, such as Standard Oil, International Telephone and Telegraph, International General Electric, the National City Bank, and the Chase National Bank.”

On the Network’s influence over Far East Policy:

“There is considerable truth in the…contention that the American experts on China were organized into a single interlocking group which had a general consensus of a Leftish character.

It is also true that this group, from its control of funds, academic recommendations, and research or publication opportunities, could favor persons who accepted the established consensus and could injure, financially or in professional advancement, persons who did not accept it.

It is also true that the established group, by its influence on book reviewing in The New York Times, the Herald Tribune, the Saturday Review, a few magazines, including the “liberal weeklies,” and in the professional journals, could advance or hamper any specialist’s career.

It is also true that these things were done in the United States in regard to the Far East by the Institute of Pacific Relations, that this organization had been infiltrated by Communists, and by Communist sympathizers, and that much of this group’s influence arose from its access to and control over the flow of funds from financial foundations to scholarly activities.

Awards for work in the Far Eastern area required approval or recommendation from members of IPR. Moreover, access to publication and recommendations to academic positions in the handful of great American universities concerned with the Far East required similar sponsorship.

And, finally, there can be little doubt that consultant jobs on Far Eastern matters in the State Department or other government agencies were largely restricted to IPR-approved people. The individuals who published, who had money, found jobs, were consulted, and who were appointed intermittently to government missions were those who were tolerant of the IPR line.”

Amazingly, after admitting all of this, Quigley somehow concludes:

“The charges…accepted and proliferated by the neo-isolationists in the 1950’s and by the radical Right in the 1960’s, that China was “lost” because of this group, or that the members of this group were disloyal to the United States, or engaged in espionage, or were participants in a conscious plot, or that the whole group was controlled by Soviet agents or even by Communists, is not true.

In Quigley’s defense, the last part of his statement is obviously accurate: the group wasn’t controlled by “Soviet agents or even Communists.” Rather, according to Quigley himself, the group was controlled by a secret network of individuals who “have no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.”

This is one of many cases where Quigley expresses a clear bias toward the Network and its “instruments.” Clearly, this bias clouds his judgment. For instance, he repeatedly describes the Network’s methodical deception of others, but apparently he never questions whether he too might have been deceived.

He describes the carnage of their “mistaken” policies, but their “good intentions” are always accepted without a second thought.

Combine this favorable bias with his open contempt for “the radical Right” and “neo-isolationists,” and poorly reasoned conclusions are nearly unavoidable.

His casual dismissal of the IPR’s role in the fate of China provides but one shining example. That Quigley can admit the IPR had tremendous financial and political power, a specific agenda, and actually achieved its goals, but then attribute the rise of Mao Zedong solely to the “incompetence and corruption” of Chiang Kai-shek’s regime is difficult to explain.

After the creation of the IPR in 1925, wouldn’t you know the civil war in China conveniently began? It seems the Network preferred a Communist regime in China. This is apparent in the following statement by Quigley:

“From the broadest point of view the situation was this: The rivalry between the two super-Powers [the United States and Soviet Union] could be balanced and its tensions reduced only by the coming into existence of another Great Power on the land mass of Eurasia. There were three possibilities of this: a federated and prosperous Western Europe, India, or China. The first was essential; one of the others was highly desirable; and possibly all three might be achievable, but in no case was it essential, or even desirable, for the new Great Power to be allied with the United States.

If the Soviet Union were boxed in by the allies of the United States, it would feel threatened by the United States, and would seek security by more intensive exploitation of its resources in a military direction, with a natural increase in world tension. If, on the other hand, the Soviet Union were boxed in by at least two great neutral Powers, it could be kept from extensive expansion by the initial strength of such great Powers and the possibility that these Powers would ally with the United States if the Soviet Union put pressure on them.”

The “Great Game” of playing one side off another, engaging in balance-of-power politics, is discussed many times throughout Quigley’s book. I’ve included the reference above only because it provides a potentially logical motive (at least logical in the Realpolitik sense of the word) for the Network’s policy toward China.

Now, returning to Quigley’s characterization of the IPR conspiracy and the subsequent lack of media coverage referenced earlier: As a result of continuing pressure, spurred on by the “radical Right,” the Network soon found itself the target of two Congressional investigations. Quigley describes the second of these investigations, the Reece Committee, this way:

“A congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. The Eighty-third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman.

It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any [revelations] to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions.

An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of the interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece committee’s general counsel, Rene A. Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called Foundations: Their Power and Influence.”

Quigley then closes this chapter on the Network with the following:

“The financial circles of London and those of the eastern United States…reflects one of the most powerful influences in the twentieth-century American and world history.

The two ends of this English-speaking axis have sometimes been called, perhaps facetiously, the English and American Establishments. There is, however, a considerable degree of truth behind the joke, a truth which reflects a very real power structure. It is this power structure which the Radical Right in the United States has been attacking for years in the belief that they are attacking the Communists.”

Again, as Quigley points out, the “power structure” that he exposed isn’t loyal to Communism, or Socialism, or Fascism, or capitalism. The Network is happy to exploit the rhetoric of any movement or ideology, prop up any dictator or tyrant, and support any economic or political model, provided it serves their one overarching aim.

That aim, to bring “all the habitable portions of the world under their control,” is as old as the lust for power itself. The death and suffering that their policies have already caused in pursuit of this aim are incalculable. Allowing them to continue as they have will only bring more of the same.

W. Cleon Skousen shines light on this in his book, The Naked Capitalist:

“As I see it, the great contribution which Dr. Carroll Quigley unintentionally made by writing Tragedy and Hope was to help the ordinary American realize the utter contempt which the network leaders have for ordinary people. Human beings are treated en masse as helpless puppets on an international chess board where giants of economic and political power subject them to wars, revolution, civil strife, confiscation, subversion, indoctrination, manipulation and deception.”

Skousen hit the nail on the head. Tragedy and Hope revealed something even more important than “one of the most powerful influences in the twentieth-century American and world history.” It inadvertently revealed the mind-set of those who wield such power. It exposed the astonishing arrogance and hypocrisy of those who feel they have the right to rule billions of other human beings.

If there is one goal for this book, it is to expose the attitude and inherent nature of those who seek to dominate others. Don’t worry about remembering all of the dates and names that have been listed. Don’t worry about trying to recall all of the specific events.

(All of that information will always be here if you need to find it again.)

Instead, make it a point to simply verify the following: there is no lie that these men and women will not tell.

There is no crime that they will not commit. The only measure of “right” and “wrong,” in their view, is whether their tactics succeed or fail.

The Network’s game is won by those who calculate properly, and moral considerations only impede accurate calculation.

Henry Kissinger personifies the essence of the Network accurate calculation mindset. In his book Diplomacy, he introduces his readers to the amoral concepts of raison d’état (translated as “reasons of state,” or state interests) and Realpolitik.

The basis of both concepts, Kissinger explains, that individual men can be judged negatively on moral grounds, but governments cannot. When it comes to government action, the only suitable judgment is based on whether or not the government achieves its ends.

Throughout his book, Kissinger praises those who are “wise enough” to govern by these concepts and practically mocks those who object on so-called “moral” grounds.

In praise of seventeenth-century French statesman, Cardinal de Richelieu, Kissinger writes:

“Though privately religious, [Richelieu] viewed his duties as minister in entirely secular terms. Salvation might be his personal objective, but to Richelieu, the statesman, it was irrelevant. “Man is immortal, his salvation is hereafter,” he once said. “The state has no immortality, its salvation is now or never.” In other words, states do not receive credit in any world for doing what is right; they are only rewarded for being strong enough to do what is necessary.

As the King’s First Minister, [Richelieu] subsumed both religion and morality to raison d’état, his guiding light.

Richelieu was indeed the manipulator described, and did use religion [as a tool of manipulation]. He would no doubt have replied that he had merely analyzed the world as it was, much as Machiavelli had. Like Machiavelli, he might well have preferred a world of more refined moral sensibilities, but he was convinced that history would judge his statesmanship by how well he had used the conditions and the factors he was given to work with.”

To clarify, according to statesman like Kissinger, the moral and legislative laws that limit the actions of ordinary men do not apply to a select few. To escape accountability, the ruling class needs only to invoke the name of the state.

This, of course, is the same position held by past rulers who justified theft, deceit, torture, slavery, and slaughter in the name of God.

The tactic has simply been modernized. Our new rulers have substituted “the state” for God. And conveniently for them, they are the state…and not just any state; they are the emerging, omnipotent, global state.

Though citizens have been conditioned to believe that their statesmen and government instruments are in place to serve them, nothing could be further from the truth. Both the instruments and statesmen are part of an institutional apparatus that exists for the benefit of those who control it.

Put another way: the state is nothing more than a collection of men and women who direct the resources and policies of government. Contrary to popular belief, it is an institution that exists for its own sake, to ensure its own “salvation,” and to prevent the rise of anything that might challenge its power.

This is a harsh reality, and some will surely object on the grounds that the modern state is different. After all, it is built on the consent of the people. Democratic elections enable citizens to vote for who their leaders will be. They can choose from Republicans or Democrats. They can throw either out of office if they break their campaign promises.

But what if our so-called representative government is all a carefully crafted illusion? What if the Network chooses the candidates that we get to vote for? What if the Network’s “experts,” not the figureheads placed in official positions of power, are the ones who ultimately determine government policy? What if both political parties, right and left, are controlled by the exact same people? Quigley shines some light on this topic as well:

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

Quigley goes even further when describing the system that’s now emerging:

“It is increasingly clear that, in the twentieth century, the expert will replace…the democratic voter in control of the political system…Hopefully, the elements of choice and freedom may survive for the ordinary individual in that he may be free to make a choice between two opposing political groups (even if these groups have little policy choice within the parameters of policy established by the experts)…in general, his freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives.”

Does that statement alarm you? Let’s hope so.

Quigley’s work highlights how a small group of dominant men were able to secure control of local, national, continental, and even global policy to the point of control we see today. We blame politicians for all of societies ills, when these hidden masters are behind most of the mayhem in the world.

Quigley continued:

“Though the power of this network is not complete, they are moving inexorably in that direction. Without increased awareness (and resistance), their unelected and unaccountable global state will become a reality. And though the illusion of national sovereignty might be maintained, the freedom of the world’s citizens will be controlled within very narrow alternatives.

Real power is unelected. Politicians change, but the power structure does not. The Network operates behind the scenes, for its own benefit, without ever consulting those who are affected by its decisions.

The Network is composed of individuals who prefer anonymity. They are satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power.

This approach of secretly exercising power is common throughout history because it protects the conspirators from the consequences of their actions.

A primary tactic for directing public opinion and government policy is to place willing servants in leadership positions of trusted institutions (media, universities, government, foundations, etc.).

If there is ever a major backlash against a given policy, the servant can be replaced. This leaves both the institution and the individuals who actually direct its power unharmed.

Historically, those who establish sophisticated systems of domination are not only highly intelligent; they are supremely deceptive and ruthless. They completely ignore the ethical barriers that govern a normal human being’s behavior. They do not believe that the moral and legislative laws, which others are expected to abide by, apply to them. This gives them an enormous advantage over the masses that cannot easily imagine their mind-set.

Advances in technology have enabled modern rulers to dominate larger and larger areas of the globe. As a result, the substance of national sovereignty has already been destroyed, and whatever remains of its shell is being dismantled as quickly as possible. The new system they’re building (which they themselves refer to as a New World Order), will trade the existing illusion of democratically directed government for their long-sought, expert-directed, authoritarian technocracy.”

To be sure, it’s difficult to accept these statements upon first hearing them. They challenge our world view and force us to reconsider everything that we’ve been taught to believe. It’s much easier to dismiss these facts without further investigation; it’s easier to accept comforting lies that alleviate our anxieties.

But this, of course, is exactly the opposite of what must be done. If we allow ourselves to be manipulated, we empower the Network at our own expense.

Edward Bernays, perhaps more than anyone, helped establish the modern system of public manipulation. Drawing on the psychoanalytical techniques of his uncle, Sigmund Freud, Bernays became known as the father of propaganda. His low opinion of the masses is best expressed in his own words. The following quotes are taken from his book Propaganda:

“No serious sociologist any longer believes that the voice of the people expresses any divine or specially wise and lofty idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders…and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion.

If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?”

The fact is, we are dominated by a small cabal that understand the mental processes of the masses and psychological manipulation more almost any of us.

It is they who pull the strings of the puppets we elect. Puppets who are guided to control the public mind and contrive new ways to forward the Great Work and guide the world into the New World Order.

Political campaigns today are circus and bread. Lots of bread $$$$

A presidential candidate may be drafted due to popular demand,” but his or her future is really decided by the so called society of experts, a half dozen men, hidden in the shadows of luxurious secrecy.

The conscious manipulation of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.

Bertrand Russell describes the global “society of experts:

“The society of experts will control propaganda and education. It will teach loyalty to the world government, and make nationalism high treason. The government, being an oligarchy, will instill submissiveness into the great bulk of the population…It is possible that it may invent ingenious ways of concealing its own power, leaving the forms of democracy intact, and allowing the plutocrats or politicians to imagine that they are cleverly controlling these forms…whatever the outward forms may be, all real power will come to be concentrated in the hands of those who understand the art of scientific manipulation.”

In 1974 after his legal battle against his publisher failed, Carroll Quigley said:

“I am now quite sure that ‘Tragedy and Hope’ was suppressed although I do not know why or by whom.”

I do.   And now so do you. They are the elusive hidden masters of the Network who, by concealing its own power seek to dominate our world. They are the puppet masters holding the strings of Our political leaders and using mass media to influence public opinion by any and all means necessary to attain their goal.

Purveyors of the democratic illusion assure us that sophisticated conspiracies and powerful secret societies are figments of Our imaginations, given to right wing extremism and religious fanaticism.

But as you have learned, there does indeed exist a hidden hand guiding the course of history. We must awaken others to this reality. Until a critical mass of understanding is reached, humanity will remain enslaved and the elite sociopaths operating behind the scenes will never be held accountable for their treasonous crimes.

Sources and related material:

Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiY36HJgJzOAhXJbR4KHZofCtQQFggsMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FTragedy_and_Hope.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH6wvYbRPSBH_5GDlMlYygpcIfiAw&sig2=buNtyz3ikB8-1dJloG1TGA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi9zq_WgJzOAhXDHh4KHZmDD5IQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2Fthe_anglo-american_establishment.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF5uQ0g3JT-l9gvLUcAqe-c3anizQ&sig2=qHSbWXkeRrFxHntySofoHA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Weapons Systems And Political Stability by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiQxbjlgJzOAhWJpx4KHRkKC8MQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FWeapons%2520Systems%2520and%2520Political%2520Stability.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHvQqG-3Ai1p4_rR0Y0esN1xlDFRg&sig2=f1sQfkPAabBPmFBuQ9LukQ&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

The Evolution Of Civilizations by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj-6bn1gJzOAhVFqR4KHUlfBUIQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FCarroll-Quigley-TheEvolutionOfCivilizations-AnIntroductionToHistoricalAnalysis-1st%262nd-Editions.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGnRarxBobdsojSAC3NFG_RC7bbnA&sig2=JX7xqoE8dJ3WGJwgdog1CA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Propaganda by Edward Burnays:

http://edward-bernays.soup.io/post/19658768/Edward-Bernays-Propaganda-1928-pdf-PDF-357

Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjpjbCegZzOAhVHdh4KHVAcBWEQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwwnorton.com%2Fcollege%2Fhistory%2Famerica-essential-learning%2Fdocs%2FWLippmann-Public_Opinion-1922.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH-x94uyZy4HtkgffUceti-szn3TQ&sig2=hy-KMBB3bZLh1XsQ3tWo_A&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Diplomacy by Henry Kissinger:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiIw_itgJzOAhVJFh4KHQ9aC84QFggqMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.virginia.edu%2Fusdiphis%2Freadings%2FKissinger%2C%2520Diplomacy.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGjlzo9XfhG1lcNCXlZmgNyOoatLA&sig2=TNYuiQLotEycTMJPAt5vFQ

The Final Days by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward:

https://www.google.com/#q=the+final+days+bernstein+pdf

The Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A. Wormser:

https://archive.org/details/FoundationsTheirPowerAndInfluenceReneAWormser1958

The Naked Capitalist by W. Cleon Skousen:

https://archive.org/details/104813153CleonSkousenTheNakedCapitalist1970

Norman Dodd interview by G. Edward Griffin regarding the 1953 Reese Committee (1982):

http://truthtalknews.blogspot.com/2014/08/common-core-and-the-hidden-agenda-a-1982-interview-with-Norman-Dodd.html

Network (1976) FULL MOVIE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynnLCMppOls

Morals And Dogma by Albert Pike:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiShJ3xgpzOAhXTNx4KHV5mB98QFghJMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.resist.com%2FOnlinebooks%2FPike-MoralsAndDogma.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFDJXS8z_L50GcyHRmeq98MWdMImQ&sig2=PaoPFMWptQ7CFKWcdj4yWg&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

A.C. De La Rive, La Femme et l’Enfants Dans La Franc – maconnerie universelle

(English Translation) :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.histoireebook.com/index.php%3Fpost/2012/05/20/De-La-Rive-A-C-La-femme-et-l-enfant-dans-la-franc-maconnerie-universelle&prev=search

Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Sion) :

http://www.howardnema.com/tag/protocols-of-the-elders-of-sion/

Proofs of A Conspiracy by John Robison (1797):

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjK2eTKg5zOAhWH8x4KHVgiDE8QFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.conspiracyarchive.com%2FPROOFS_OF_A_CONSPIRACY_John_Robison.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFJ_LT44aFH2J6QYLdJFWnOgNzO7g&sig2=vjN3pLJp-SHARrLfZdIheg&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

 Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

In the end all we have is memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

TRUTH TALK NEWS

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

http://www.HowardNema.com

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

KEY EXCERPTS FROM CARROLL QUIGLEY’S TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)

KEY EXCERPTS FROM CARROLL QUIGLEY’S TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)

Past is Prologue.  The Key to understanding today, and planning for the future is to look to the past – Howard Nema

“There does exist an international Anglophile network which we may identify as the Round Table Groups. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quote from Pg. 950 of Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope: A History In Our Time (1966)

Carroll Quigley was a Jesuit professor of history at Georgetown University from 1941 to 1976.  His writings omit the connections to the Jesuits, the Vatican and the Black Nobility by name, but their power structure is a key component of the Round Table.

Quigley also taught at Princeton and at Harvard, and lectured at the Brookings Institution. He was a frequent lecturer at the U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, the Foreign Service Institute, and the Naval College at Norfolk, Virginia.

In 1958, he served as a consultant to the Congressional Select Committee which set up the National Space Agency.   In 1964, he was a consultant at the Navy Post-Graduate School, Monterey, California on Project Seabed.   The project was created to visualize the status of future American weapons systems.

Key Excerpts from the book

Tragedy and Hope

A History of the World in Our Time

by Carroll Quigley, 1966

 

Chapter 5European Economic Developments

Commercial Capitalism

Western Civilization is the richest and most powerful social organization ever made by man. One reason for this success has been its economic organization, [which] has passed through six successive stages, of which at least four are called “capitalism.” Each stage created the conditions which tended to bring about the next stage.

The [first stage] of self-sufficient agrarian units (manors) was in a society organized so that its upper ranksthe lords, lay and ecclesiasticalfound their desires for necessities so well met that they sought to exchange their surpluses of necessities for luxuries of remote origin. This gave rise to a trade in foreign luxuries (spices, fine textiles, fine metals) which was the first evidence of the stage of commercial capitalism. In this second stage, mercantile profits and widening markets created a demand for textiles and other goods which could be met only by application of power to production.

This gave the third stage: industrial capitalism. The stage of industrial capitalism soon gave rise to such an insatiable demand for heavy fixed capital, like railroad lines, steel mills, shipyards, and so on, that these investments could not be financed from the profits and private fortunes of individual proprietors. New instruments for financing industry came into existence in the form of limited-liability corporations and investment banks. These were soon in a position to control the chief parts of the industrial system, since they provided capital to it.

This gave rise to financial capitalism. The control of financial capitalism was used to integrate the industrial system into ever-larger units with interlinking financial controls. This made possible a reduction of competition with a resulting increase in profits. As a result, the industrial system soon found that it was again able to finance its own expansion from its own profits, and, with this achievement, financial controls were weakened, and the stage of monopoly capitalism arrived.

In this fifth stage, great industrial units, working together either directly or through cartels and trade associations, were in a position to exploit the majority of the people. The result was a great economic crisis which soon developed into a struggle for control of the statethe minority hoping to use political power to defend their privileged position, the majority hoping to use the state to curtail the power and privileges of the minority. This dualist struggle dwindled with the rise of economic and social pluralism after 1945.

 

The Operations of Banking Were Concealed So They Appeared Difficult to Master

In sum, specialization of economic activities, by breaking up the economic process, had made it possible for people to concentrate on one portion of the process and, by maximizing that portion, to jeopardize the rest. The process was not only broken up into producers, exchangers, and consumers but there were also two kinds of exchangers (one concerned with goods, the other with money), with almost antithetical, short-term, aims. The problems which inevitably arose could be solved and the system reformed only by reference to the system as a whole.

Unfortunately, however, three parts of the system, concerned with the production, transfer, and consumption of goods, were concrete and clearly visible so that almost anyone could grasp them simply by examining them, while the operations of banking and finance were concealed, scattered, and abstract so that they appeared to many to be difficult. To add to this, bankers themselves did everything they could to make their activities more secret and more esoteric. Their activities were reflected in mysterious marks in ledgers which were never opened to the curious outsider.

In the course of time the central fact of the developing economic system, the relationship between goods and money, became clear, at least to bankers. This relationship, the price system, depended upon five things: the supply and the demand for goods, the supply and the demand for money, and the speed of exchange between money and goods.

An increase in three of these (demand for goods, supply of money, speed of circulation) would move the prices of goods up and the value of money down. This inflation was objectionable to bankers, although desirable to producers and merchants. On the other hand, a decrease in the same three items would be deflationary and would please bankers, worry producers and merchants, and delight consumers (who obtained more goods for less money). The other factors worked in the opposite direction, so that an increase in them (supply of goods, demand for money, and slowness of circulation or exchange) would be deflationary [and vice versa].

Such changes of prices, either inflationary or deflationary, have been major forces in history for the last six centuries at least. Over that long period, their power to modify men’s lives and human history has been increasing.

 

Bankers Obsessed With Maintaining Value of Money

Rising prices benefit debtors and injure creditors, while falling prices do the opposite. A debtor called upon to pay a debt at a time when prices are higher than when he contracted the debt must yield up less goods and services than he obtained at the earlier date, on a lower price level when he borrowed the money. A creditor, such as a bank, which has lent moneyequivalent to a certain quantity of goods and serviceson one price level, gets back the same amount of moneybut a smaller quantity of goods and serviceswhen repayment comes at a higher price level, because the money repaid is then less valuable.

This is why bankers, as creditors in money terms, have been obsessed with maintaining the value of money, although the reason they have traditionally given for this obsessionthat “sound money” maintains “business confidence”has been propagandist rather than accurate.

Hundreds of years ago, bankers began to specialize, with the richer and more influential ones associated increasingly with foreign trade and foreign-exchange transactions. Since these were richer and more cosmopolitan and increasingly concerned with questions of political significance, such as stability and debasement of currencies, war and peace, dynastic marriages, and worldwide trading monopolies, they became the financiers and financial advisers of governments.

Moreover, since their relationships with governments were always in monetary terms and not real terms, and since they were always obsessed with the stability of monetary exchanges between one country’s money and another, they used their power and influence to do two things: (1) to get all money and debts expressed in terms of a strictly limited commodityultimately gold; and (2) to get all monetary matters out of the control of governments and political authority, on the ground that they would be handled better by private banking interests.

 

Bankers Create Money Out of Nothing

For generations men had sought to avoid the one drawback of gold, its heaviness, by using pieces of paper to represent specific pieces of gold. We call such pieces of paper gold certificates. Such a certificate entitles its bearer to exchange it for its piece of gold on demand, but in view of the convenience of paper, only a small fraction of certificate holders ever did make such demands.

It early became clear that gold need be held on hand only to the amount needed to cover the fraction of certificates likely to be presented for payment; accordingly, the rest of the gold could be used for business purposes, or, what amounts to the same thing, a volume of certificates could be issued greater than the volume of gold reserved for payment of demands against them. Such an excess volume of paper claims against reserves we now call bank notes.

In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts.

Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money … no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value.

 

The Dynasties of International Bankers

The merchant bankers of London … brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.

The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces.

In concentrating, as we must, on the financial or economic activities of international bankers, we must not totally ignore their other attributes. They were, especially in later generations, cosmopolitan rather than nationalistic. They were usually highly civilized, cultured gentlemen, patrons of education and of the arts, so that today colleges, professorships, opera companies, symphonies, libraries, and museum collections still reflect their munificence. For these purposes they set a pattern of endowed foundations which still surround us today.

 

Bankers Felt Politicians Could Not Be Trusted With the Monetary System

The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

In most countries the central bank was surrounded closely by the almost invisible private investment banking firms. These, like the planet Mercury, could hardly be seen in the dazzle emitted by the central bank which they, in fact, often dominated. Yet a close observer could hardly fail to notice the close private associations between these private, international bankers and the central bank itself.

Two of the five factors which determined the value of money are the supply and the demand for money. The supply of money in a single country was subject to no centralized, responsible control in most countries over recent centuries. Instead, there were a variety of controls of which some could be influenced by bankers, some could be influenced by the government, and some could hardly be influenced by either.

Central banks can usually vary the amount of money in circulation by “open market operations” or by influencing the discount rates of lesser banks. In open market operations, a central bank buys or sells government bonds in the open market. If it buys, it releases money into the economic system; if it sells it reduces the amount of money in the community. The change is greater than the price paid for the securities [due to the fractional reserve system].

Central banks can also change the quantity of money by influencing the credit policies of other banks. This can be done by various methods, such as changing the re-discount rate or changing reserve requirements. By changing the re-discount rate, we mean the interest rate which central banks charge lesser banks for loans. By raising the re-discount rate the central bank forces the lesser bank to raise its discount rate in order to operate at a profit; such a raise in interest rates tends to reduce the demand for credit and thus the amount of deposits (money). Lowering the re-discount rate permits an opposite result.

The powers of governments over the quantity of money are of various kinds, and include (a) control over a central bank, (b) control over public taxation, and (c) control over public spending. The control of governments over central banks varies greatly from one country to another, but on the whole has been increasing. Since most central banks have been (technically) private institutions, this control is frequently based on custom rather than on law.

The powers of the government over the quantity of money in the community exercised through taxation and public spending are largely independent of banking control. Taxation tends to reduce the amount of money in a community and is usually a deflationary force; government spending tends to increase the amount of money in a community and is usually an inflationary force. The total effects of a government’s policy will depend on which item is greater. An unbalanced budget will be inflationary; a budget with a surplus will be deflationary.

 

Money PowerControlled by International Investment BankersDominates Business and Government

On the whole, in the period up to 1931, bankers, especially the Money Power controlled by the international investment bankers, were able to dominate both business and government. They could dominate business, especially in activities and in areas where industry could not finance its own needs for capital, because investment bankers had the ability to supply or refuse to supply such capital. Thus, Rothschild interests came to dominate many of the railroads of Europe, while Morgan dominated at least 26,000 miles of American railroads.

Such bankers went further than this. In return for flotations of securities of industry, they took seats on the boards of directors of industrial firms, as they had already done on commercial banks, savings banks, insurance firms, and finance companies. From these lesser institutions they funneled capital to enterprises which yielded control and away from those who resisted. These firms were controlled through interlocking directorships, holding companies, and lesser banks. They engineered amalgamations and generally reduced competition, until by the early twentieth century many activities were so monopolized that they could raise their noncompetitive prices above costs to obtain sufficient profits to become self-financing.

But before that stage was reached a relatively small number of bankers were in positions of immense influence in European and American economic life. As early as 1909, Walter Rathenau, who was in a position to know (since he had inherited from his father control of the German General Electric Company and held scores of directorships himself), said, “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.”

 

The Power of Investment Bankers Over Governments

The power of investment bankers over governments rests on a number of factors, of which the most significant, perhaps, is the need of governments to issue short-term treasury bills as well as long-term government bonds. Just as businessmen go to commercial banks for current capital advances to smooth over the discrepancies between their irregular and intermittent incomes and their periodic and persistent outgoes, so a government has to go to merchant bankers (or institutions controlled by them) to tide over the shallow places caused by irregular tax receipts.

As experts in government bonds, the international bankers not only handled the necessary advances, but provided advice to government officials and, on many occasions, placed their own members in official posts for varied periods to deal with special problems. This is so widely accepted even today that in 1961 a Republican investment banker became Secretary of the Treasury in a Democratic Administration in Washington without significant comment from any direction.

Naturally, the influence of bankers over governments during the age of financial capitalism (roughly 1850-1931) was not something about which anyone talked freely, but it has been admitted frequently enough by those on the inside, especially in England. In 1852 Gladstone, chancellor of the Exchequer, declared, “The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned.” On September 26, 1921, The Financial Times wrote, “Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills.”

 

Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan Dominate the Financial World

In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures.   Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally.

Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. The powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well.

On November 11, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.” This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March 21, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion … Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.” It might be added that Governor Norman rarely acted in major world problems without consulting with J. P. Morgan’s representatives.

 

Chapter 9The British Imperial Crisis

Britain acquired the world’s greatest empire because it possessed certain advantages which other countries lacked. We mention three of these advantages: (1) that it was an island, (2) that it was in the Atlantic, and (3) that its social traditions at home produced the will and the talents for imperial acquisition.

 

Cecil Rhodes Organized a Secret Society in 1891

[Cecil] Rhodes (1853-1902) feverishly exploited the diamond and goldfields of South Africa, rose to be prime minister of the Cape Colony (1890-1896), contributed money to political parties, controlled parliamentary seats both in England and in South Africa, and sought to win a strip of British territory across Africa from the Cape of Good Hope to Egypt and to join these two extremes together with a telegraph line and ultimately with a Cape-to-Cairo Railway.

Rhodes inspired devoted support for his goals from others in South Africa and in England. With financial support from Lord Rothschild and Alfred Beit, he was able to monopolize the diamond mines of South Africa as De Beers Consolidated Mines and to build up a great gold mining enterprise as Consolidated Gold Fields. In the middle 1890’s Rhodes had a personal income of at least a million pounds sterling a year [equivalent to about $100 million a year in current U.S. dollars] which was spent so freely for his mysterious purposes that he was usually overdrawn on his account.

[An] association was formally established on February 5, 1891, when Rhodes and [William] Stead organized a secret society of which Rhodes had been dreaming for sixteen years. In this secret society Rhodes was to be leader; Stead, Brett, and Milner were to form an executive committee; Arthur (Lord) Balfour, (Sir) Harry Johnston, Lord Rothschild, Albert (Lord) Grey, and others were listed as potential members of a “Circle of Initiates”; while there was to be an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” (later organized by Milner as the Round Table organization).

In 1919 [Rhodes’ followers] founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) for which the chief financial supporters were Sir Abe Bailey and the Astor family (owners of The Times). Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and in the United States (where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations) in the period 1919-1927. The power and influence of this Rhodes-Milner group in British imperial affairs and in foreign policy since 1889, although not widely recognized, can hardly be exaggerated. We might mention as an example that this group dominated The Times from 1890 to 1912, and has controlled it completely since 1912 (except for the years 1919-1922).

In spite of the terms of the Rhodes wills, Rhodes himself was not a racist. Nor was he a political democrat. He worked as easily and as closely with Jews, black natives, or Boers as he did with English. His greatest weakness rested on the fact that his passionate attachment to his goals made him overly tolerant in regard to methods. He did not hesitate to use either bribery or force to attain his ends if he judged they would be effective.

 

Chapter 20The Period of Stabilization, 1922-1930

America Becomes the World’s Greatest Creditor

By 1914 Britain’s supremacy as financial center, as commercial market, as creditor, and as merchant shipper was being threatened. At this critical stage in Britain’s development, the World War occurred. This had a double result as far as this subject is concerned. It forced Britain to postpone indefinitely any reform of her industrial system to adjust it to more modern trends; and it speeded up the development of these trends so that what might have occurred in twenty years was done instead in five.

The war changed the position of the United States in respect to the rest of the world from that of a debtor owing about $3 billion to that of a creditor owed $4 billion. This does not include intergovernmental debts of about $10 billion owed to the United States as a result of the war. At the same time, Britain’s position changed from a creditor owed about $18 billion to a creditor owed about $13.5 billion. In addition, Britain was owed about $8 billion in war debts from her Allies … and owed to the United States war debts of well over $54 billion. Most of these war debts and reparations were sharply reduced after 1920, but the net result for Britain was a drastic change in her position in respect to the United States.

The basic economic organization of the world was modified in other ways. The more backward areas of Europe and the world had been industrialized to a great degree and were unwilling to fall back to a position in which they would obtain industrial products from Britain, Germany, or the United States in return for their raw materials and food. This refusal was made more painful for both sides by the fact that these backward areas had increased their outputs of raw materials and food so greatly that the total could hardly have been sold even if they had been willing to buy all their industrial products from their prewar sources.

The result was a situation where all countries were eager to sell and reluctant to buy, and sought to achieve these mutually irreconcilable ends by setting up subsidies and bounties on exports, tariffs, and restrictions on imports, with disastrous results on world trade.

The only sensible solution to this problem of excessive productive capacity would have been a substantial rise in domestic standards of living, but this would have required a fundamental reapportionment of the national income so that claims to the product of the excess capacity would go to those masses eager to consume, rather than continue to go to the minority desiring to save. Such a reform was rejected by the ruling groups in both “advanced” and “backward” countries, so that this solution was reached only to a relatively small degree in a relatively few countries.

The system of international payments which had worked … before 1914 worked only haltingly after that date, and practically ceased to work at all after 1930. The chief cause of these factors was that neither goods nor money obeyed purely economic forces and did not move as formerly to the areas in which each was most valuable. The chief result was a complete mal-distribution of gold, a condition which became acute after 1928 and which by 1933 had forced most countries off the gold standard.

 

Money Power Seeks to Create a World System of Financial Control in Private Hands Able to Dominate Every Nation on Earth

Pg. 324: the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.

Pg. 326: Norman (Montagu) had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank, especially of Henry P. Davison, who made him secretary of the Bankers Trust Company of New York (in succession to Thomas W. Lamont) in 1904, used him as Morgan’s agent in the banking rearrangements following the crash of 1907, and made him vice-president of the Bankers Trust (still in succession to Lamont) in 1909.

He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914. Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks.

These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world.

They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges.

Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates.

In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).

 

Norman Was the Commander-in-Chief of the World System of Banking Control

The commander in chief of the world system of banking control was Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, who was built up by the private bankers to a position where he was regarded as an oracle in all matters of government and business.

In January, 1924, Reginald McKenna, who had been chancellor of the Exchequer in 1915-1916, as chairman of the board of the Midland Bank told its stockholders:

“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…. And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.”

Montagu Norman’s position may be gathered from the fact that his predecessors in the governorship, almost a hundred of them, had served two-year terms, increased rarely in time of crisis. But Norman held the position for twenty-four years (1920-1944).

Norman was a strange man whose mental outlook was one of successfully suppressed hysteria or even paranoia. He had no use for governments and feared democracy. Both of these seemed to him to be threats to private banking. Strong-willed, tireless, and ruthless, he viewed his life as a kind of cloak-and-dagger struggle with the forces of … [sound] money.

Norman had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank. He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914.

Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Norman and Strong Were Mere Agents of the Powerful Bankers Who Remained Behind the Scenes and Operated in Secret

It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.

This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts. They could dominate governments by their control over … government loans and the play of the international exchanges.

In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838). The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and a use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.

 

Money Power Creates an Ingenious Plan to Create and Control Giant Monopolies

[Financial capitalists eventually] sought to sever control from ownership of securities, believing they could hold the former and relinquish the latter. On the industrial side, they sought to advance monopoly and restrict production, thus keeping prices up and their security holdings liquid.

The efforts of financiers to separate ownership from control were aided by the great capital demands of modern industry. Such demands for capital made necessary the corporation form of business organization. This inevitably brings together the capital owned by a large number of persons to create an enterprise controlled by a small number of persons. The financiers did all they could to make the former number as large as possible and the latter number as small as possible. The result of this was that larger and larger aggregates of wealth fell into the control of smaller and smaller groups of men.

While financial capitalism was thus weaving the intricate pattern of modern corporation law and practice on one side, it was establishing monopolies and cartels on the other. Both helped to dig the grave of financial capitalism and pass the reins of economic control on to the newer monopoly capitalism. On one side, the financiers freed the controllers of business from the owners of business, but on the other side, this concentration gave rise to monopoly conditions which freed the controllers from the banks.

Pg. 48-49: In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts.

Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value.

Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.

Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored.

In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.

The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers.

The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild’s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.

Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. Even after these banking families became fully involved in domestic industry by the emergence of financial capitalism, they remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways:

(1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts, including foreign government debts, even in areas which seemed, at first glance, poor risks, like Egypt, Persia, Ottoman Turkey, Imperial China, and Latin America; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods, since they admired “liquidity” and regarded commitments in commodities or even real estate as the first step toward bankruptcy; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of deflation (which they called “sound” money from its close associations with high interest rates and a high value of money) and of the gold standard, which, in their eyes, symbolized and ensured these values; and (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.

Pg. 53: The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

Pg. 62: In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity.

Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland’s second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.”

This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.”

Pg. 936-937: Behind this unfortunate situation lies another, more profound, relationship, which influences matters much broader than Far Eastern policy. It involves the organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into foundations to be used for educational, scientific, “and other public purposes.” Sixty or more years ago, public life in the West was dominated by the influence of “Wall Street.”

This term has nothing to do with its use by the Communists to mean monopolistic industrialism, but, on the contrary, refers to international financial capitalism deeply involved in the gold standard, foreign-exchange fluctuations, floating of fixed-interest securities and, to a lesser extent, flotation of industrial shares for stock-exchange markets.

This group, which in the United States, was completely dominated by J. P. Morgan and Company from the 1880’s to the 1930’s was cosmopolitan, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, eastern seaboard, high Episcopalian, and European-culture conscious. Their connection with the Ivy League colleges rested on the fact that the large endowments of these institutions required constant consultation with the financiers of Wall Street (or its lesser branches on State Street, Boston, and elsewhere) and was reflected in the fact that these endowments, even in 1930, were largely in bonds rather than in real estate or common stocks. As a consequence of these influences, as late as the 1930’s, J. P. Morgan and his associates were the most significant figures in policy making at Harvard, Columbia, and to a lesser extent Yale, while the Whitneys were significant at Yale, and the Prudential Insurance Company (through Edward D. Duffield) dominated Princeton.

Pg. 937: The names of these Wall Street luminaries still adorn these Ivy League campuses, with Harkness colleges and a Payne Whitney gymnasium at Yale, a Pyne dormitory at Princeton, a Dillon Field House and Lamont Library at Harvard. The chief officials of these universities were beholden to these financial powers and usually owed their jobs to them. Morgan himself helped make Nicholas Murray Butler president of Columbia; his chief Boston agent, Thomas Nelson Perkins of the First National Bank of that city, gave Conant his boost from the chemical laboratory to University Hall at Harvard; Duffield of Prudential, caught unprepared when the incumbent president of Princeton was killed in an automobile in 1932, made himself president for a year before he chose Harold Dodds for the post in 1933. At Yale, Thomas Lamont, managing partner of the Morgan firm, was able to swing Charles Seymour into the presidency of that university in 1937.

The significant influence of “Wall Street” (meaning Morgan) both in the Ivy League and in Washington, in the period of sixty or more years following 1880, explains the constant interchange between the Ivy League and the Federal government, an interchange which undoubtedly aroused a good deal of resentment in less-favored circles, who were more than satiated with the accents, tweeds, and High Episcopal Anglophilia of these peoples

Pg. 938: Because of its dominant position in Wall Street, the Morgan firm came also to dominate other Wal1 Street powers, such as Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, or Dillon-Reed. Close alliances were made with Rockefeller, Mellon, and Duke interests but not nearly so intimate ones with the great industrial powers like du Pont and Ford. [Because] … of the great influence of this “Wall Street” alignment, an influence great enough to merit the name of the “American Establishment,” this group could … control the Federal government and, in consequence, had to adjust to a good many government actions … [which they had secretly supported ]. The chief of these were in taxation law, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913, but culminating, above all else, in the inheritance tax. These tax laws drove the great private fortunes dominated by Wall Street into tax-exempt foundations, which became a major link in the Establishment network between Wall Street, the Ivy League, and the Federal government.

More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street supplied both. The purpose was not to destroy … or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could “blow off steam,” and (3) to have a final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if they ever went “radical.” There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers had talked about it and even attempted it earlier.

Pg. 939: The New Republic was founded by Willard and Dorothy Straight, using her money, in 1914, and continued to be supported by her financial contributions until March 23, 1953. The original purpose for establishing the paper was to provide an outlet for the progressive Left and to guide it quietly in an Anglophile direction. This latter task was entrusted to a young man, only four years out of Harvard, but already a member of the mysterious Round Table group, which has played a major role in directing England’s foreign policy since its formal establishment in 1909.

This new recruit, Walter Lippmann, has been, from 1914 to the present, the authentic spokesman in American journalism for the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic in international affairs.

Chapter 65American Confusions, 1945-1950

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

Chapter 77Conclusion

The hope of the twentieth century rests on its recognition that war and depression are man-made and needless. They can be avoided in the future by turning from … nineteenth-century characteristics … and going back to other characteristics that our Western society has always regarded as virtues: generosity, compassion, cooperation, rationality, and foresight, and finding an increased role in human life for love, spirituality, charity, and self-discipline.

LINK TO FULL PDF OF TRAGEDY AND HOPE

 

In the end all we have is memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES: http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com http://www.HowardNema.com

TRUTH TALK NEWS “Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’ Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

 

THE BLACK NETWORK

NWO SHADOW GOVTBy Howard Nema

At  a Council on Foreign Relations meeting in Montreal in 2011, Zbigniew Brzezinski warned of a “global political awakening,” that threatened to topple the existing international order, complaining that the Internet has made it almost impossible for the global elite to control the political environment.

In his 1970 book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era Brzezinski wrote:

“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.

In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.”

How nice.   Well, Obama’s attractive personality has certainly been given the full Hollywood treatment complete with a glossy Madison Avenue shine.

These days Brzezinski is leaving the latest communication techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason to his daughter Mika, a New World Order media propagandist on MSNBC’s Morning Joe talk show.

Back in 1981 with help from the CIA, Zbignew Brzezinski created Al Qaeda as an opposition force to the Soviets in Afghanistan. That same year, Brzezinski recruited a CIA operative code named Tim Osman to lead the Al Qaeda “freedom fighters”.

The name Osman has Islamic historical significance and also irony. The Ottomans were named after Osman, an elite bloodline. Osman’s son ruled as Sultan and was known as the “Hero of the world”.

Indeed, Tim Osman became a hero to many in the Muslim world on September 11, 2001. His real name was Osama Bin Ladin.

Back in 1978, former CIA Director and future President George HW Bush and Salem Bin Laden founded Arbusto Energy. Salem was Osama Bin Laden’s brother. The Bush and Bin Laden families have deep business ties going back to the 1940’s.

In 1988 the Saudis bought a portion of President Bush’s son GW’s floundering oil company, Harken. Although the company had no overseas experience, Harken wins a contract in the Persian Gulf and makes enormous profits.

Two major investors in GW’s company are Salem bin Laden and Khalid bin Mahfouz. Salem bin Laden is Osama Bin Laden’s oldest brother.

Khalid bin Mahfouz is a Saudi banker with a 20 percent stake in the corrupt BCCI, the Bank of Credit & Commerce International, a $20 billion rogue empire shut down by regulators in 62 countries in July, 1991.

Today, we see Wachovia-Wells Fargo, Bank of America and HSBC have partnered with the black network. When caught laundering drug money, these banks are all given slaps on the wrists, while small time dealers and users are incarcerated and have their assets seized.

Still, today’s corrupt banksters have nothing on the wanton evil and corruption of the thugs at B.C.C.I.

B.C.C.I was the largest money-laundering operation ever created, serving dictators, terrorists and drug smugglers alike.

B.C.C.I. even owned an American Bank, First American Bankshares, a Washington-based holding company with offices stretching from Florida to New York, whose chairman was former U.S. Defense Secretary Clark Clifford.

This caliber of leadership was omnipresent at B.C.C.I. The bank was in fact, run as a military operation, including a clandestine division of the bank called the “black network,” which functioned as a global intelligence operation with a Mafia-esque enforcement squad.

The B.C.C.I black network operated primarily out of Karachi, Pakistan, using sophisticated intelligence gathering equipment and operated a criminal operation including bribery, extortion, racketeering, kidnapping and murder.

This is how the New World Order rolls.

To this day, the black network operates a lucrative arms-trade business and transports drugs and gold, assisted by Western and Middle Eastern intelligence agencies.

In the 1980’s The National Security Council used B.C.C.I. to funnel money for the Iran-contra deals. The CIA maintained accounts to fund other covert operations. The Defense Intelligence Agency also maintained a slush-fund account to pay for clandestine operations.

B.C.C.I. worked closely with Israel’s spy agencies and other Western intelligence groups mostly arranging arms deals to terrorist groups and rogue nations. The bank maintained cozy relationships with international terrorists in Libya, Syria and the Palestine Liberation Organization.

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 accelerated the growth of B.C.C.I.’s black network.

By the mid-1980’s, the CIA’s Islamabad operation was one of the largest U.S. intelligence stations in the world.

The black network’s original purpose was to pay bribes, intimidate authorities and squash investigations. In the early 1980s the black network began running its own drugs, weapon and currency deals.

The bank’s organizational web consisted of dozens of shell companies, offshore banks, branches and subsidiaries in 70 countries. The CIA, MOSSAD and other Western intelligence agencies continue their clandestine collaborations with the black network to this day.

You may recall in 1997, a CNN camera crew interviewed Osama Bin Laden from his secret hideout while Our government was supposedly diligently working to “track him down.” In fact, Our government wasn’t looking for Osama Bin Laden at all.

On 9/27/2001, the WALL STREET JOURNAL reported that in January 2000 former President George H. W. Bush met with the bin Laden family on behalf of the Carlyle Group. Bush denied the meeting took place until a thank you note was found confirming that it did indeed take place.

The SUNDAY HERALD, GLASGOW reported on 10/7/2001, that an earlier meeting between Bush and Bin Laden took place in November 1998 on behalf of the Carlyle Group in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

The BBC reported in late January 2001 that after the elections, US intelligence agencies were told to ‘back off’ investigating the Bin Ladens and Saudi royals.

Early in 2001, FBI agent Robert Wright, attempted to pursue an investigation into Saudi multimillionaire Yassin al-Qadi, but was told by his superiors, “it’s just better to let sleeping dogs lie.”

Really? The more we learn about the ties between the Bush family, the Bin Laden’s, the FBI, 9/11 and the bogus war on terror the more one must wonder:

Did GW Bush really want to capture Bin Laden?

Apparently not.

After all, they are both part of the same insider clique. Interestingly, on Sept. 11, 2001, members of the Carlyle Group including Bush senior, and his former secretary of state, James Baker were meeting at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in Washington, D.C.. Also in attendance was Shafiq bin Laden, another of Osama’s brothers.

After news of the Bin Laden-Bush connection became public, the elder Bush stepped down from Carlyle to escape the heat.

Although all flights were halted on 9/11 due to the terrorist attacks, there was one exception. With no interrogation and despite the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, the Bush Regime authorized planes to pick up 140 Saudi nationals, including 24 members of the Bin Laden family, living in various cities in the U.S. to bring them back to Saudi Arabia.

In fact, there is no country on earth who has promulgated more chaos and destabilization in the Middle East than the Saudis, who have invested billions since the 1970s to eradicate the Sufi, moderate Sunni and Shiite versions of Islam and replacing it with the radical, anti-women, anti-Western Wahhabi Salafism.

It is the Saudis who want a draconian global Caliphate under Sharia Law. They are the hidden force behind the rise of radical Islam.

We can also thank the Saudis for spreading misogyny and terror throughout the Muslim world, funding mosques and madrasas from Morocco to Pakistan to Indonesia and here in the U.S.

Take a moment to explore the great cultural changes that have occurred in Islam. Before the 1970’s women wearing head scarves and burqa were non existent. Today they are omnipresent.

Under Sharia, women are third class citizens subject to honor killings, rape and stonings for allowing themselves to be raped.

Why this aspect of Islam isn’t exposed in the media and called Islamophobia or hate further amplifies enormous hypocrisy.

Unlike homophobia, which isn’t a phobia, but rather a rejection of homosexuality.  People aren’t actually afraid of homosexuals.  The same cannot be said about Islam.

Radical Islamists have killed millions in recent years.  Islamophobia is a rational reaction to the very real and deadly threat Islam poses to the world.   So Islamophobia is actually justified.  In fact, homosexuals should fear Islam the most, since many are thrown of rooftops these days.

I cannot understand how so many progressive and liberal thinkers support Islam since many liberal causes are abhorred by Islam.  This defies logic, but many thing liberals profess defy logic.

For instance, if there is a supposed war on women, and such outcries about inequality by liberals, why is Islam and Sharia Law left out of the media love fest?

The truth is, most are unaware or unwilling to believe the historical fact that Islam, including Muhammad, launched their own Crusades, a jihad against Christianity long  before the European Crusades.

In fact, the First Christian Crusade was in response to decades long barbarism from Islam, much like the new era of terrorism we see today.

As in ancient times, a growing number of Muslim clerics, scholars, and activists want to impose Sharia Law around the world. This jihad continues, funded mostly by the Saudis.

The B.C.C.I scandal illustrates many connections and partnerships with the secret societies.   These alliances serve the Council on Foreign Relations crowd’s quest for financial control of the economies and political systems of the world.

The global quest of the secret societies is to establish central banks, plunder those countries’ natural resources and install friendly socialist puppet regimes under control of the central banks, which are they themselves private corporations.

Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley saw nothing wrong with the plot, only the fact that it was a secret. Quigley had more than twenty years of inside dealings with the Council on Foreign Relations and their members and was given two years to explore the records and minutes of the CFR to research into what would become his 1966 book, TRAGEDY AND HOPE.

In TRAGEDY AND HOPE, Quigley wrote:

“In 1891, Cecile Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a ‘Circle of Initiates’ and an outer circle known as the ‘Association of Helpers’ later organized as the Round Table organization.

In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States. In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations.

After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries. They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom. …

There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments.

I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

One must remember that before the Rothschild IMF and World Bank nation killers got their mitts on Iraq and Afghanistan there were only seven countries that lacked a Rothschild controlled central bank: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

Today, thanks to ongoing U.S. military involvement only three countries lack a Rothschild bank. Cuba, North Korea and Iran. There are other corporate interests in the region that include Syria.

This explains the zealous efforts to demonize Iran and Syria, doesn’t it?

Communist Cuba was recently brought into the fold by Obama’s reestablishing trade relations. There can be little doubt that Cuba will soon emerge with yet another Rothschild central bank.

That leaves North Korea and Iran. What does that tell you?

It makes one wonder why radical Islam has been allowed to flourish thus far, despite wars and lack luster interventions, does it not?

One must consider that part of Hussein Obama’s fundamental transformation of Amerika involves violent fundamentalist Islamic jihadis. This does seem to be the case.

After all, Islam and the goals of the New World Order are quite similar. Like the Anglo-American establishment seeks world dominance, so does Islam.

Interestingly, both want control of the globe with one world government and one world religion, controlling all aspects of human life and behavior.

It seems that these all of these decades old factors: B.C.C.I, the black network, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, destabilization of the Middle East, the rise of ISIS, the fundamental transformation of Amerika and the rise of radical Islam are being used to help implement the New World Order.

This could very well be. After all, we have members of the Muslim Brotherhood in high positions of power currently operating in the Obama Regime.

Consider the following:

Hasan Al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood in Cairo in 1928. Today, the Muslim Brotherhood is the most powerful organization in Egypt. In his book, Jihad, Al-Banna argues that Muslims must take up arms against unbelievers.

“The verses of the Qur’an and the Sunnah summon people in to jihad, to warfare, to the armed forces, and all means of land and sea fighting.”

Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it. While the Western world has adopted a more or less secular live for today attitude, deferring children, Muslims are doing the exact opposite and multiplying their numbers.

In fact, Muslims outpace the extinction level birth rates seen in Europe by 4-1 and 4-2 in the US.

By 2070, Islam will be the dominant religion on earth. Islam’s stated intention is TO RULE THE WORLD UNDER AN ISLAMIC CALIPHATE, GOVERNED BY SHARIA LAW.

This is not rhetoric. It is their stated plan.

So now, out of his Christian charity, Obama is bringing Syrian Muslim refugees across Our already unsecured borders, but not allowing any Christians.

And hundreds, if not thousands of Muslim Clerics, many presiding over Mosques here in America are promoting jihad against the infidels to create a global Caliphate.

Already, “refugees” with forged passports and terrorist ties have been identified. Still Obama stands firm to clothe, feed and house these Syrian “refugees.”

Radio host Michael Savage made a great point recently saying that if you had a bowl of M&M’s and in this bowl were a few poisonous ones that would cause instant death would you eat any of the M&M’s, or would you chuck out the whole bowl?

Somehow logic and common sense has been erased from the public’s psyche in favor of compassion. The elite are masters of controlling emotions and human behavior and many have indeed fallen under their spell.

Retired US. Air Force Gen. Tom McInerney, former assistant vice chief of staff and commander in chief of U.S. Air Forces Europe is not under the spell. Earlier this year, General McInerney announced the presence of the Muslim Brotherhood inside the U.S. government on a radio program.

Of course, the controlled mainstream media continue to ignore this critically important revelation, despite recent events in Paris and the Trojan Horse Refugee Crisis Islamic extremists still maintain key positions within Our Federal government.

No wonder HUSSEIN Obama replaced all of Our best, most Patriotic Constitutional Generals with compliant pawns of the regime.

Now it is making more and more sense why Hussein would allow in Syrian refugees and has placed members of the Muslim Brotherhood into high security positions inside the Federal government including homeland security, doesn’t it?

Gee, how can that happen?

How about Huma Abedin, the wife of degenerate pervert Congressman, Anthony Weiner, whose family has undeniable family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood?

Huma’s mother and brother Hassan are deeply involved with the Muslim Brotherhood. Hassan, is also on the board of the Oxford Centre For Islamic Studies where he is a fellow. Other board members including “Al-Qaeda associate, Omar Naseef and the notorious Muslim Brotherhood leader Sheikh Youssef Qaradawi who are both listed as Oxford Center For Islamic Studies Trustees.”

What about Arif Alikhan, a devout Sunni Muslim, who is an open advocate for a Sharia Law takeover of the United States.

Alikhan also happens to be a former deputy mayor of Homeland Security and Public Safety for the City of Los Angeles responsible for thwarting the LAPD’s plan to monitor activities at radical mosques known to have provided aid and comfort to the 9/11 hijackers.

Arif Alikhan was appointed assistant secretary for the Office of Policy Development in Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security in 2009 and became a Professor of Homeland Security and Counterterrorism in 2010.

You can’t make this stuff up. How can this man be working for the Department of Homeland Security? You tell me.

What about granting the FBI Presidential appointee seal of approval to the grandson of the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder, Siraj Wahhaj, a co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing?

Did you know the FBI supervised the construction of the WTC bomb using an informant named Emad Salem? I bet you didn’t. The FBI had their fingerprints all over the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11/01.

Speaking of 9/11/01, in 2007, Maj. General Wesley Clarke revealed the true foreign policy agenda of the U.S. after 9/11, which was to take out seven countries in five years: “We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran”

Then there is Eboo Patel, a member of Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships spoke at a Muslim Students Association and Islamic Society of North America and partnered with Tariq Ramadan.

Ramadan is the grandson of Siraj Wahhaj. Wahhaj advocates for the Islamic takeover of America under the banner of Sharia Law. He was also named as a possible co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and has defended the convicted WTC bombers.

Like Obama, Patel has strong ties with former leaders of the terrorist Weather Underground members Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn.

Could this all be a coincidence?

Consider this: Aren’t the Weathermen’s propagandized ideologies once again being spewed today by the Obama Regime and the controlled mainstream media? You bet they are.

Issues such as “white privilege”, racism and world communism are all touchstones of the Obama Regime, are they not?

It all makes perfect sense according to the late FBI informant, Larry Grathwohl, who stated terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorne launched the political career of Barry Soetoro HUSSEIN Obama from their home in Chicago.

Bill Ayers, I might add, is also an associate of Eboo Patel. In fact, both Ayers and Patel are frequent vistitors at the White House.

Way to go Barry!

The Weather Underground Terrorist Group was also allowed to fester in the 1970’s, with little intervention despite the bombing of the U.S. Capital, the Pentagon and post offices. Why?

Why would we install Homeland Security Advisor, Mohamed Elibiary, who is quoted by ISIS terrorists and is an admitted admirer of the late Ayatollah Khomeini” who seized the American embassy in Tehran in 1979 and the imprisoned U.S. embassy officials for 444 days.

Elibiary has advised numerous law-enforcement organizations on homeland security-related matters and was named to President Obama’s Homeland Security Advisory Council in 2010. Elibiary misused classified documents in order to promote the notion of “Islamophobia” was widespread.

Does this not concern you? What about this: Malick Obama is Barry Soetoro Hussein Obama’s half brother. And wouldn’t you know it, Malick is a terrorist in charge of finances and arms procurement for the Muslim Brotherhood. How about that?

And you thought only the Bushes and Bin Ladens kept it in the family.

You can’t make this stuff up.

The oversight of the Muslim Brotherhood’s international investments is one reason for the Obama administration’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, according to an Egyptian news IDO, a group created by the Sudanese government, which is labeled as a terrorist state by the U.S. State Department.

And the Obama Regime refuses to call these terrorists Radical Islamists. Are you starting to see why?

According to documents uncovered by Freedom Outpost, Obama’s top supporter, Marty Nesbitt, a long-time aid and chief consultant to Obama’s re-election campaign launched a foundation to develop and build a Presidential library for the Communist in Chief. The foundation tied to this endeavor is headed by none other than Malik Obama.

Al-Jazeera also reports on Hussein Obama’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Aside from the fact that the CIA, MOSSAD, MI6 and the secret government have their dirty fingerprints all over most of the politically arousing acts of false flag terrorism we experience from ISIS and Al-CIA-da, there are definitely independent, unaffiliated lone wolf radicals and groups of radicalized Islamists who are intent upon waging their own Jihad and unleashing even more chaos on the West. Make no mistake about it.

Foreigners who have no Constitutional rights are being favored as Americans have seen Our rights and liberties slowly eroded.

Since 9/11, America has spent more than a trillion dollars fighting terrorism. Forteen years of forsaken our civil liberties in the pursuit of this endless Hegelian battle while allowing Our government to be infiltrated with our own enemies.

Incredible as this may sound, it is nonetheless true. We have funded Our enemies. And these enemies have infiltrated America.

Make no mistake about it, there are sleeper terrorist cells right here in the US.

We would be fools to assume otherwise, since there are 35 known terrorists training camps right here in the US in Our own back yard.

One must understand that America’s fundamental values and Our Constitution are diametrically opposed to Islam and Sharia Law, despite what Obama, communist and Islamic professors, intellectuals and the lamestream media degenerates profess.

Another important thing to consider in this Hegelian conflict is why has ISIS not struck Israel? The answer should be obvious by now. Like most answers to the secrets of the New World Order, they are hidden in plain sight. ISIS is a fabrication of the CIA and MOSSAD.

Like the growth of the Muslim Brotherhood in Our government. Apparently, Federal government employees, like the Syrian refugees are not being vetted by the FBI and are allowed to be placed in highly sensitive government positions?

An apparent CIA Hollywood front company called FINAL SOLUTION PRODUCTIONS was caught producing ISIS recruitment videos last February. This of course, was swept under the rug of mainstream media silence. To be clear, radical Islam is very REAL. It is not just CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 false flag attacks.

Radical Islam is real and growing. In fact, many recent converts found radical Islam not only in US mosques and the internet, but in prison.

Could the secret societies, who are the powers behind the rise of Saudi Arabia be facilitating the war on terror?

I think evidence of this is overwhelming.

Let’s take a look back to the early 1970’s when Secretary of State Henry Kissinger made a secret deal with Saudi Arabia for the exclusive purchase of oil.

In fact, the biggest and most profitable oil company is a PRIVATELY HELD corporation called: ARAMCO OIL (Arabian American Oil)

The Bush and Bin Ladin families and other global elitists have deep connections to ARAMCO OIL to this day.

When we wonder why HUSSEIN Obama drops leaflets warning ISIS (a CIA/MOSSAD creation) that the US would be bombing oil trucks we start to see the motive, don’t we?

So, Kissinger made the agreement to buy all the oil from Saudi Arabia and NOT drill in the vast oil fields of the United States as a “gesture” to the Saudis. As a result, the Saudis would have a guaranteed source of income from the USA in perpetuity.

The plan was to deplete all of the Saudi’s oil and then drill in the USA for our own oil and, in turn, have a monopoly on the oil production in the world well into the 21st Century. We are well on Our way to accomplishing this feat. It may also explain why Saudi Arabia funds terrorism against the West.

But the story does not end there. Kissinger also had the Saudis agree that ALL INTERNATIONAL OIL TRANSACTIONS were to be only in UNITED STATES DOLLARS.

This means that, if Germany wants to buy oil on the open market it must first buy US Dollars and then purchase its oil.   How nice.

This is one of the reasons why Gaddafi was taken out. He no longer wanted to be paid in U.S. petro dollars. He wanted to be paid in gold for Libyan oil.

The U.S. dollar is a fiat monetary instrument. Fiat money is not BACKED by any real commodity. It is merely a “promise to pay.”

The Nixon Administration, in cahoots with the FED, decided to take the US off the GOLD STANDARD in 1971, thus making the deal work. So, in 1972, Kissinger made the “secret oil deal” and Nixon took the US off the Gold Standard thus, paving the way for inflation and a weaker dollar.

Now since the US was “secretly dependent” on Saudi oil that meant the US would have to DEFEND its oil interests in Saudi Arabia and the only Democracy in the Middle East the State of Israel. And this secret deal continues to this day.

So, the predicament that ensuing administrations have faced all stem from having to protect Saudi Arabia one of the most repressive totalitarian ISLAMIC regimes in the Middle East, who use their oil proceeds to fund global terrorism and also be the number one supporter of Israel, who are the sworn enemies of Islam.

The result: Conflict, war and terrorism.

Most Americans are not aware of this political conundrum.

The recent clamor for American Energy Independence threatens this whole veil of secrecy and the plot to deindustrialize America by implementing Agenda 21 protocols.

The post 2008 economic boom in North Dakota and Montana are a thorn in the side of the collectivists as a direct result of oil drilling

Hey, if you want a $15 hour job at Mac Donald’s don’t protest, move to Fargo and you will get it.

Of course, the economic development in these oil rich states and other like Texas, downplay oil’s roll in the improvement.

This is why the EPA and the environmental movement was created, to intentionally slow economic growth, raise energy costs and reduce the standard of living of most Americans.

This is all occurring as America has an abundance of oil to last for at least the next 100 years.   A fact well known to Kissinger and geologists back in 1972.

The Secret Oil Deal is also the “underlying basis” of the PRESERVATION OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL. Assuring that the US kept its bargain with the Saudis, also meant America had to defend Israel. By building up Israel’s military to one of the biggest in the WORLD, the US has a land base from which to launch military operations anywhere in the Middle East. It is as simple as that. And convenient, since the CIA and MOSSAD frequently work together, hand in hand. Like on 9/11/01.

The clever Political Zionists have so far successfully hijacked the Jewish People in the name of Israel, creating a false paradigm that maintains any attack on Israel is an attack on the Jewish People, which is nonsense.

Why does the media and Our politicians give Israel a free pass when the Orthodox Jews, Rabbis, the UN, Amnesty International and other human rights groups have condemned Israel for its Apartheid against the Palestinians?

Why the bias? Well, first off, you must understand that Zionism and Judaism are diametrically opposed.

The State Of Israel was a Zionist ploy, a political ideology that is condemned by all true religious Jews.

When thousands of Jewish Rabbi’s come to the U.S. Capital to protest against the Apartheid State of Israel, and the Zionist perversion of Judaism there is no media coverage at all.

But when Al Sharpton and Co. stage a Black Lives Matter protest the whole world is over exposed to their dangerous and divisive propaganda.   Why is that?

For Christians, there is also a biblical warning:

“Beware of the false Jews, those who say they are Jews but are really of the synagogue of Satan” – Rev 2:9

It is not anti-Semetic to be anti-Israel, in fact to be anti-Israel is to be pro Jewish. The Zionists have caused all of the destabilization of the middle east since 1947.

Despite what AIPAC, the mainstream media and Our corrupt so called “leaders” profess, Israel is an Apartheid police state. And like Saudi Arabia, America and Israel are more partners and collaborators than allies.

These are merely the facts.

Obama’s carefully chosen promises were really nothing more than payback to his special interest owners, like Solyndra.

The promises Obama has broken were simply lies necessary to garner support for various aspects of the Regime’s agenda, like mandated socialist healthcare.

Obama is no dummy. He knows exactly what he is doing. As Kissinger noted, Obama has been tasked with furthering the aims of the New World Order. And true to form, Marxist Obama is delivering. He is competently and systematically destroying our economy, our military and every value America holds dear.

Like the corruption of the Bush and Clinton Crime Families, the Obama Regime is no different. It is business as usual. They all serve the masters of the black network. They all have been selected to move America further into the New World Order.

And like Hitler and Stalin, Obama employs communists, thugs, tax cheats and criminals to do the Great Work. Sleazy, divisive and Corruptible folks. People like Eric Holder and Lois Lerner.

After all Obama nominated tax cheat Tom Daschle to be Secretary of Health and Human Services. When Daschle turned down the position, Obama nominated another tax cheat Kathleen Sebelius.

Obama also nominated tax cheat Nancy Killefer to be his Chief Performance Officer and tax cheat Hilda Solis to be the Secretary of Labor. He appointed another tax cheat Ron Kirk be the White House Chief Trade Representative.

Speaking of tax cheaters, Al Sharpton owes millions in taxes with no action taken against him. Just watch what happens if you owe the IRS and don’t pay.

The blatant nepotism and corruption of the Obama Regime is omnipresent. So is Obama’s blatant affinity for Marxists. His White House Communications Director Anita Dunn, said that one of her favorite political philosophers was Mao Tse-tung, the Chinese dictator who murdered sixty millions of his own people.

Obama also has an obvious soft spot for Islam. In July 2010, Charles Bolden, the administrator of NASA, said that Obama had told him that the primary purpose of NASA was “to reach out to the Muslim world.”

Indeed. In January 2012, Obama appointed members of the Muslim Brotherhood to high positions of power in Our government while Congress was in recess, which is a violation of the Constitution, something Obama does regularly. Of course, he invokes the Constitution when it serves the transformation agenda.

After the 9/11 Benghazi attacks the Obama Regime lied about the fact it was an obvious terrorist attack, creating a bogus narrative that Susan Rice was tasked to peddle to the American people on the Sunday morning circuit about an inflammatory video.

It took more than an entire week before the Obama administration was forced to acknowledge that Benghazi was indeed a terrorist attack. Still, the Regime refused to identify the terrorists as radical Muslims.

At that same time, the Washington Post reported Obama’s false statement that he had called Bengahzi a terrorist attack from the beginning.

After the attack began, U.S. military was ordered to “stand down,”. Obama falsely reported that not such stand down order had been made.

Although the Obama Regime made many revisions to its talking points, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney falsely stated that only a “single adjustment” had been made, and that it simply involved changing the wording of “consulate” to “diplomatic facility.”

ABC News published a complete list of all the changes to the talking points, which can be read here.

Among the changes was the deletion of the following paragraph:

“The Agency has produced numerous pieces on the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya. These noted that, since April, there have been at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi by unidentified assailants, including the June attack against the British Ambassador’s convoy. We cannot rule out the individuals has previously surveilled the U.S. facilities, also contributing to the efficacy of the attacks.”

Victoria Nuland, a State Department spokeswoman, played a key role in the editing of the talking points. But instead of firing her for this, Obama offered her a promotion.

Stalin and Mao would be so proud of you, Barrack. . .

So would Josef Goebbels, Hitler’s Minster of Propaganda, who said:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

The distortion of history and the clear and present totalitarian socialist agenda American’s have been slowly been subjected for decades by democrats and republicans alike evidences the operation of a corrupt, oligarchical, one party, government controlled media dictatorship.

The political divisiveness created by the Obama Regime is unprecedented in Our history. Using Communist street thug Alinsky tactics, Obama has America divided in every way: race, religion, class, sexual preferences, gay marriage, you name it.

While Americans are divided, they are also distracted from the economy, the lack of good paying jobs and a  growing welfare state.

There has been more social chaos and upheaval in the last seven years than in the last forty. And like Hitler and Stalin, Obama has employed the sleaziest of the sleazy and the most corrupt of the corruptible: criminals, cheats, liars, derelicts and deviants in his continuing efforts to fundamentally transform America  into a totalitarian socialist welfare state.

Thanks to the massive media love fest the elite have bestowed upon Obama, I can think of no one, aside from Hitler, who has so transformed a nation in such short time.

As the growing chaos and division in Our country illustrates, the change is not for the better.

For out of chaos will come order.

A New World Order.

ADDITIONAL  LINKS, ARTICLES, SOURCES AND VIDEOS:

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/631725.Early_Islam

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/02/opinion/thomas-friedman-our-radical-islamic-bff-saudi-arabia.html?_r=0

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/31/combat-terror-end-support-saudi-arabia-dictatorships-fundamentalism

http://www.wnd.com/2008/04/61488/

http://www.denverpost.com/rodriguez/ci_4319898

https://www.corbettreport.com/osama-bin-laden-pronounced-dead-for-the-ninth-time/

http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-does-the-u-s-support-saudi-arabia-a-country-which-hosts-and-finances-islamic-terrorism-on-behalf-of-washington/5398408

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html?pagewanted=all

http://www.jstor.org/stable/4328744

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2011-08-27/Unemployed-Go-to-North-Dakota/50136572/1

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362331913000773

http://www.jewishhistory.org/the-rise-of-islam/

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/09/sibel-2.html

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080

http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/06/03/in-the-year-2000-there-were-seven-countries-without-a-rothschild-owned-central-bank-now-there-are-more/

http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-created-al-qaeda-and-the-isis-terror-group/5402881

Rise of The Gulf: Saudi Arabia as a Global Player

by Nicolás M. Depetris Chauvin:

AMERICA ALONE by Mark Steyn

Subscribe to TRUTH TALK NEWS and Howard Nema on youtube.

TRUTH TALK NEWS where news and HowardNema.com

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

It is critical that you take the initiative to confirm the information contained in this presentation.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

http://www.HowardNema.com
http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews
http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com
http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’

Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE.

All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are free and independent of any network, group or association.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

CULTURAL MARXISM, ZIONISM, ISLAM AND THE REAL WAR ON WOMEN

 TRUTH TALK NEWS broadcast LIVE Saturday, August 15, 2015 on UnitedFMRadio.com

By Howard Nema

More and more, I am reminded that the world we live in is indeed Satan’s Kingdom. Evil thrives while goodness and truth are attacked and spit upon.

Image result for WAR ON WOMEN

This is especially true regarding the War On Women propaganda agenda.   On August 15th, the Washington Post reported:

The leader of the Islamic State personally kept a 26-year-old American woman, Kayla Mueller as a hostage and raped her repeatedly, according to U.S. officials and her family.
In an interview Friday Kayla’s family said the FBI had informed them that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the emir of the Islamic State, had sexually abused their daughter, a humanitarian worker.
Mueller’s parents said the FBI first spoke to the family about the sexual assault in late June and provided more details two weeks ago. The bureau pieced together what happened to the American from interviews with other hostages and the captured wife of a senior Islamic State figure.
The FBI also told the Muellers that their daughter had been tortured.
“June was hard for me,” said Marsha Mueller, Kayla’s mother. “I was really upset with what I heard.”
The disclosure that Mueller was raped by Baghdadi adds to the grim evidence that the exploitation and abuse of women has been sanctioned at the highest levels of the Islamic State. The sexual enslavement of even teenage girls is seen as religiously endorsed by the group and regarded as a recruiting tool.
News of Baghdadi’s abuse of Mueller, who was from Prescott, Ariz., was first reported Friday by the Independent, a London newspaper.
“As painful as this is for our family, we just feel like the world needs to know the truth,” said Carl Mueller, Kayla’s father. The Muellers noted that Friday would have been their daughter’s 27th birthday.
The Islamic State claimed that Mueller was killed earlier this year after a Jordanian fighter plane dropped a bomb on the building where she was being held. The U.S. government confirmed the death but not the cause.
Mueller’s family had previously released a letter their daughter had written in which she talked about the conditions of her captivity. “Please know I am in a safe location, completely unharmed + healthy (put on weight in fact); I have been treated w/the utmost respect + kindness,” she wrote in the letter, which the family received in the spring of 2014.
Kayla’s mother said she had thought her daughter had been treated reasonably until she learned about the conditions of her captivity during a June meeting with FBI officials in Washington. The FBI said they learned about Mueller’s mistreatment from the wife of a senior Islamic State operative captured earlier this year, as well as young female members of the Yazidi religious sect who had spent two months in captivity with Mueller before at least one of them escaped last fall.
U.S. officials had previously said that Mueller was abused by her captors, but it was not known until now that she was kept as a sex slave of the leader of the Islamic State.
Baghdadi is a former Iraqi insurgent who was detained by U.S. forces early in the Iraq war. He was part of an al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq that was thought to have been largely destroyed before the civil war in Syria allowed it to regenerate.
Though little is known about his background, Baghdadi is regarded as an experienced fighter and a capable leader. His most prominent public appearance came last year when he surfaced at a mosque in Mosul to declare himself the leader of a restored caliphate.
Mueller was abducted in August 2013 after leaving a hospital in the Syrian city of Aleppo. Three months after she died, the compound where she had been held was targeted in a raid by U.S. Special Operations forces.
The operation was aimed at capturing Abu Sayyaf, the nom de guerre of a high-ranking Tunisian member of the Islamic State, who was thought to be in charge of oil smuggling and other illicit enterprises that have funded the terrorist group.
Sayyaf was killed in what U.S. officials described as intense “close quarters combat.” But his wife, identified only as Umm Sayyaf, survived and was eventually brought back to Iraq aboard a bullet-riddled U.S. aircraft. She was then questioned by U.S. interrogators for months, providing information about Mueller as well as the Islamic State’s leadership, before recently being turned over to Iraqi custody.
Mueller’s mistreatment is the latest evidence of the Islamic State’s systematic abuse of women on a significant scale.
A report released in April by Human Rights Watch accused the Islamic State of war crimes for its brutal treatment of female Yazidis many of them teenagers who were captured in Iraq last August, taken to Syria and forced into sexual slavery by the Islamic State.
After surging into the northern Iraqi town of Sinjar last year, Islamic State fighters captured as many as 1,000 Yazidi women, many of whom were given a bleak choice of “marriage” to a fighter or imprisonment and potential death.
The Human Rights Watch report focused on 20 women who escaped the group and provided detailed accounts of their treatment.
One described attempting to kill herself by going into a bathroom, turning on water and grasping a wire “to electrocute myself but there was no electricity.”
After being discovered, she said she was badly beaten, handcuffed to a sink, stripped of her clothes and washed. “They took me out of the bathroom, brought in [a friend] and raped her in the room in front of me,” said the woman, who is referred to only as Leila. Later she, too, was raped.
Another victim, who was only 12 years old, said that after being abducted in Sinjar, the women in her family were separated from the men and sent to a house in Mosul. Islamic State fighters “would come and select us,” she said. One of the captors beat her, she said, and then “spent three days having sex with me.”
A recent issue of the English-language magazine published by the Islamic State described the taking of sex slaves as religiously justified. The article titled “Slave girls or prostitutes?” endorsed the practice, saying sex slaves are “lawful for the one who ends up possessing them even without pronouncement of divorce by their [non-Muslim] husbands.”
The article went on to cite accounts that the prophet Muhammad “took four slave-girls as concubines,” a purported religious basis for the practice.

Remembering Kayla Mueller

SHARIA STONINGAAA-Soraya Female genital mutilationmaxresdefault female-genital-mutilation   This is the REAL war on women.

Where are the women’s rights activists now?   Where is Obama?

At Martha’s Vineyard.

Female-genital-mutilation-11FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION

 

 

Where is Hillary? HILLARY HIPPIE COMMIE

She’s probably doing bong hits  with her top aide, naked selfie degenerate Anthony Weiner’s humilitated wife and Muslim Brotherhood supporter, Huma Abedin, devising more schemes and lies to cover up her TOP SECRET email scandal.

anthony-weiner-shirtless

I could just see Huma Abedin’s adulterer husband, Oscar Meyer Weiner giving her a golden shower like the vile perverted scumbag that he is, not the nauseating farce of a devoted, wife loving family man who misstepped and fell from grace and is then forgiven by his loyal, compassionate wife as depicted by People Magazine, in an attempt to portray Weiner, an  elitist insider degenerate in a favorable light.

This only amplifies the reality that the media supports, protects and defends the insiders, not the Constitution of Our great Republic.

 

anthonyweiner-1374690160

After all, birds of a feather tend to flock together.

Let’s hear it for the sexual revolution and the decline of the Western Civilization.

I guess they are all too busy covering up their lies and shilling for Planned Parenthood, who engage in a genocidal war against women and their unborn female children.

Doesn’t the female fetus matter?  All lives matter.

But black lives don’t matter to planned parenthood, since 50% of black pregnancies end in abortion. This is genocide.

Where is Al Sharpton?

This reveals such an obvious agenda.

Can you see it?

Can you understand it?

The entire war on women is a cultural Marxist political ploy that began with Equal Rights Amendment movement and the National Organization for Women. Abortion rights were their main rally cry.

Margaret Sanger KKKPlanned Parenthood became their benefactor.

Planned Parenthood was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and founded by racist Nazi loving KKK white supremacist Margaret Sanger to promote abortion, especially in the black community, and to bring more women into the workplace so they can be taxed and be away from the home and the kids.

Margaret Sanger quote 2

It was never about women’s rights. It was and is about breaking up the family. This is the essence of Marxist/Illuminati/Zionist AshkeNAZI doctrine.   All of these ideologies are one in the same.

ZIONISM = NAZISM ZIONISM IS NAZISM

VATICAN FREEMASONRY unisrflag3%20640x480_jpg

In communist countries children are educated and cared for by the State.   Check out China, or communist Cuba— all totalitarian regimes.   America is engaged in a silent war fought with quiet weapons to created a secular cultural Marxist society.

ZIONISM

Do some research.  Communism, Fascism and Zionism are all creations of the guardians of the secrets of the Ages, the illumined ones.

The 10 planks of communism are in fact the same 10 planks of the Illuminati goal to destroy all the monarchies and religions of the world as revealed in John Robison’s 1797 book, Proofs of a Conspiracy against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, carried on in the secret meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies.

The book was widely circulated to the royal families and clergy of the day. By this time, the Illuminati had infilitrated Freemasonry. They were key players in promulgating and executing the French Revolution. Fearing for their monarchies and the clergy fearing for the church, the Illuminati was banned.

But the 2,000 gnostic elitist adepts of the Order did not go away. For they were but one of many working to achieve the same goal. The Illuminati got caught, and became the fall guy.   But the Illuminati did not fall.

Each had sworn an oath to further the great work of creating a New Atlantis, or New World Order.  These crafty, highly intelligent and enlightened bearers of the secret knowlege of the ages simply slithered through the cracks into further secrecy behind the scenes where they have remained to this day.

This group which has no name is widespread throught government, industry, commerce and finance and they are indeed working for one world totalitarian socialist government. They are the force behind Mordechai Levi (Karl Marx) and Frederick Engel, who were tasked with writing the Communist Manifesto at the behest of the Rothschild family, who were high level Illuminists.

In 1798, the Reverend G. W. Snyder sent Robison’s book to President George Washington for his thoughts on the subject, in which Washington replied in a letter:

It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation). That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.The Illuminati as described in Proofs of a Conspiracy compares closely the views found in Carrol Quigley’s Tragedy And Hope (1966)

This is real.   This is the exact reason why there is cultural Marxism and a movement away from God and morality in Our society.

MINISTRY OF PROPAANDA

In the 1960’s Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev pounded his shoe on the podium of the United Nations and shouted to the West,

“We will bury you!”

Despite America building the most awesome military machine in history, Kruschev was right. the Communists are burying us. Amerika has being taken over by a new generation of socialist – communist – liberal activists who have high gained office and are destroying American law by a process of gradually institution of the Communist agenda within our legal system and separate branches of government.

From the beginning, this has been the Communist goal. Complete domination of the world. Sadly, Americans now believe that Communism is dead because the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain have been removed. That is how mind controlled and brainwashed they are. Most cannot, or will not notice.

The ironic truth is that Communism has just switched names to become more “politically correct”. Today it is called globalism, social justice, social democracy, or international democracy.

The reason that the Berlin Wall came crashing down is not because Communism is dead but because they have achieved a planned agenda to communize the West, including America. The fall of the Berlin was was a red herring. A Trojan horse.

As the last vestiges of Judeo-Christian law are removed from the government there is less and less resistance against world Communism. This is not only tragic, but deadly.

Posted below is a comparison of the original ten planks of the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848, along with the American adopted counterpart of each of the planks.

The American people truly have been “buried in Communism” by propganda and mass media manipulation reinforced by Our own traitorous politicians from both the Republican and Democratic parties.

In the Communist Manifesto, the ghostwriters for Karl Marx and Frederick Engel were stating in the Communist Manifesto that these planks will test whether a country has become communist or not. Keep this in mind, in the Communist Manifesto it is noted that if these planks are all in effect and enforced the country is communist.

1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rent to public purpose.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State “income” taxes. We call it “paying your fair share”.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

We call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

We call in government seizures, tax liens, Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

We call it the Federal Reserve which is a credit/debt system nationally organized by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State.

We call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) madated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver’s licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

We call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

We call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136.

10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.

People are being taxed to support what we call “public” schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education”.

The Federal Government is waging a War on We the People, but the media amplifies cries for a war on drugs, a war on poverty, a war on obesity and a war on women.

However, there is indeed a war on women.  It is called Sharia Law.

This is the REAL war on women.  Where are the women’s rights activists now?

SHARIA STONING SHARIA STONINGAAA-Soraya

So where is Gloria Steinheim now?

If Gloria Steinheim, (whose Ms. magazine was also funded by the Rockefeller Foundation) was really a true activist for women’s rights and sincerely wanted to recognize oppression of women, Gloria Steinheim and her ilk would strike out against the ongoing horror against women at the hands of Islam and Sharia Law.

sharialaw_xlarge

What about the honor killings, some occurring here in the U.S., where husbands kill their wives, or children for dishonoring them? Oh — That’s right, that is just domestic violence.

The Koran is Satan’s greatest deception on humanity.

What about the rape of children, sex slavery, stonings, genital mutilations and other oppression of women that happens everyday?

Why continuously chime in on the same old same old feminist rhetoric of income inequality and the right to have a Gov’t funded abortion while praising immorality as moral and breaking up the traditional family?

You see. If it doesn’t suit the agenda it is not a war on women even if 8 year old girls are raped up to 30 times a day by these Islamo-fascist scum.

Utopia on this earth will never exist. The best chance we have is if everyone stops stirring the pot and do the right things.

Do right by yourselves, by your job, your co-workers, your friends, family, your unborn child.

Do the right thing because it is the right thing to do and there will be little wrong in the world.

We as a society can never be perfect, unless we were genetically designed that way and I believe some of the mad scientists of the world are indeed working on this. It all sounds good. But the Devil is in the details. Only God is perfect.

But of course, there is also a War on God because those who seek to control us believe that due to their intellect and wealth, they are Gods. They are gnostics. They worship knowledge and the Mysteries. They believe seeking pleasure and avoiding pain is the number one priority in life.

When morality and doing the right thing become less important than doing what you want and all else be damned, society is heading for deep decline.

This is very dangerous in many ways. The parallels to the fall of Rome are frighteningly similar. Today, the Barbarians known as the Vandals have been replaced by Islam. To not call out and protest against the heinous acts committed in the name of Allah as Islamic terrorism is insanity. Or an agenda.

Millions of Christians, Jews and Muslims are being slaughtered and beheaded in Africa and the Middle East with little attention or fanfare by the controlled mainstream press. Everyone is watching baseball, Naked Dating and Becoming Us as America becomes a depraved third world socialist cesspool.

Amidst the chaos of more than 1,000 bombings, gas shortages, and the energy crisis of the mid 1970’s, while the Women’s movement enticed women to burn their bras, congress attempted to curb sex and violence in the media.

Deep Throat was a big hit in 1972. It was the first porno film to make the mainstream.

That same year Linda Lovelace predicted that porn and mainstream film will one day merge. Today the line between porn and mainstream cinema is indeed getting thinner and thinner.

In the mid 70’s Carroll O’ Conner, who played Archie Bunker on the sitcom All in The Family, and others in the entertainment community spoke out against the government’s attempt to curb violence and sex on TV and in the movies, successfully arguing that curtailing sex and violence was censorship.

MILEY CYRUS MILEY LICKING METAL MILEY WRECKING BALL

I wonder what Archie Bunker would think of Miley Cyrus swinging naked on a wrecking ball today?

How much social distortion and destruction has resulted due to the sexual revolution? Too much. We can see that in today’s disposable marriages, broken homes and our hyper-sexualized society.

From the 1950’s Leave it To Beaver to today’s Miley Cyrus’ bald beaver on a wrecking ball. We can all thank sociopath pedophile and masochist Alfred Kinsey, whose work sought to normalize deviant sexual behavior thanks to funding from the Rockefeller Foundation.

This is where the seeds of cultural Marxism/Zionism were sown.

Alfred Kinsey was made famous by the establishment and is known as “The Father of the Sexual Revolution”.   His Rockefeller Foundation funded studies set the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s.

His 1948 book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and his 1953 Sexual Behavior in the Human Female were the foundations for the construction of this false facade.

Kinsey reported that between 30-45% of men had affairs, 85% of men had had sex prior to marriage, that 70% of men had slept with prostitutes, and that between 10 and 37% of men had engaged in homosexual behavior.

These findings were were based on tainted evidence. The Father of the Sexual Revolution was also a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children. Kinsey’s research portrayed people as amoral and sex-driven, and is credited as fundamentally changing the way our culture views sex.

Kinsey falsified his findings.  He encouraged those he was working with to engage in all types of sexual activity as a form of research, misrepresented single people as married, and hugely over represented incarcerated sex criminals and prostitutes in his data.

Kinsey’s other disturbing findingsan in depth study on the sexual behavior of children and claims that nearly 10% of men had performed sex acts with animals and as 3.6% of women had sex with animals. This number rose to between 40-50% based on proximity to farms.

Kinsey himself was a sexually deviant pedophile and sex criminal. In her book, Sex, Lies and Kinsey Dr. Judith Reisman explained that Kinsey facilitated brutal sexual abuse to get his so-called research:

Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal “child sexuality.”Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.

For example, “Table 34” on page 180 of Kinsey’s “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” claims to be a “scientific” record of “multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.”

Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for “orgasm” by Kinsey’s “technically trained” aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an alleged 26 “orgasms.”

Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these child “data” to prove children’s need for homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via “safe-sex” education. These data are also regularly used to “prove” children are sexual from birth.

BAALKinsey was enthusiastically heralded by mainstream publications such as Time and Life Magazine.

SKULL-AND-BONBS1

Time Magazine was founded by Yale Skull and Bonesmen alumni Henry Luce, the founder of Time Magazine, who was known by fellow Bonesmen as Baal.

MOLECH

Baal is one of the many gods worshipped in the ancient Mystery Religion of Babylon. A god who requires the blood sacrifice of children.

Percy Rockefeller was also a Skull And Bones alumni from the Class of 1900. He who was a New York lawyer, oil man and gun dealer who, along with his family profited greatly from the Great War (WWI).

The Kinsey propaganda campaign waged by Time and Life magazines proved to be nothing less than a monstrous facilitator of child-rape.

In fact, Kinsey, a psychopathic pedophile even recorded children shrieking and thrashing in pain, passing out and convulsing as the result of the hellish abuse he was putting them through, as evidence of “orgasm”especially for children who could not yet speak.

Kinsey’s so-called research was simply a quest to justify the fact that he himself was a deeply disturbed sociopath.

Dr. Reisman writes, “Both of Kinsey’s most recent admiring biographers confessed he was a sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and coerced his wife, his staff and the staff’s wives to perform for and with him in illegal pornographic films made in the family attic.

Kinsey and his mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard, had ‘front’ Marriages that concealed their strategies to supplant what they say as a narrow pro-creational Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous ‘anything goes’ bi/gay pedophile paradise.”

KINSEY SYNDROMEvid_tks_new_180x256Yes. The elite annointed Kinsey the Father of the Sexual Revolution, who  was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children.

His goal was not just to engage in scientific research in order to see where the data took him, but rather to launch a crusade to undermine traditional sexual morality. History has proven just how successful this agenda has become.

But when funding from the Rockefeller Foundation was finally cut off, Kinsey attempted suicide by hanging himself by his testicles. This is the man society has accepted as the Father of the Sexual Revolution. More like the Father of sexual deviation.

Kinsey’s influence on sex education and law in the Western world is absolutely staggering.

Planned Parenthood regularly advises their teen “patients” about S&M, anal sex and other dangerous and deviant sex acts like asphyxiation and categorize this as normal adolescent behavior.

Aside from offering birth control and abortions, Planned Parenthood officials even offer instructions on how to use and obtain sex toys and pornography and “protect” these children by keeping this information from their parents.

In many states in America minors can get abortions, but cannot pray in school.

The movement away from God and morality has inched its way from Kinsey through the sexual revolution of the 1960’s and 70’s to today’s young Disney stars, who are transformed from cute kids into scantily clad drug addicted MK ULTRA sex objects to be exploited.

MK ULTRA DISNEY

MK ULTRA SLUTBritney Spears, Miley Cyrus, Christina Aguilara, Lindsey Lohan, Amanda Bynes, Selena Gomez, Demi Lovato and many others.

How ironic that a supposedly family oriented company like Disney creates sex pots?

Actually, if you do some research you will find many sexually oriented subliminals in Disney films and TV shows going back more than 50 years.

Kinsey and Crowley Aug04134Getting back to Kinsey: Dr. Reisman has exposed that Kinsey’s fundamental conclusions and his data still is blatantly false. According to Dr. Reisman:

1. [Dr. Kinsey’s team] ‘forced’ subjects to give the desired answers to their sex questions, 2. Secretly trashed three quarters of their research data, and 3. Based their claims about normal males on a roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals.  Moreover, so few normal women would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a year with a man ‘married,’ reclassifying data on prostitutes and other unconventional women as “Susie Homemaker.”It is crucially important that people become aware of the truth behind the Kinsey Reports and how the Tax Exempt Foundations like Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford have worked in concert for generations to demoralize America via education, entertainment and culture.

These facts are of course muted by the controlled mainstream media and their political puppets, but the truth is undeniable if one simply takes the time to do some research. .

Today’s deviant sex educators, legal experts, academics, and more disturbingly, pedophile groups such as NAMBLA push “inter-generational intimacy,” all use Kinsey’s bogus work to justify their agendas and lend scientific credibility to their causes.

The NAMBLA pedophiles and their ilk are now working to use the gay marriage issue to legalize pedophilia, make no mistake about it.

I have no issue with homosexuals to have all the rights as any married couple, but it is not marriage and I am not a homophobe because I believe marriage is between and man and a woman.

The suppressed and horrifying truth about Kinsey and the social engineers behind the New World Order is sickening, but it is crucial that we know where these seeds of destruction were sown and exactly how and why our culture has developed as it has.

Since the 1950’s, a time labelled as “prudish”, or not “hip”, we have moved farther away from morality, family and God establish a culture of such sexual nihilism and abandon.

There is a powerful agenda working to foster Satanist Aleister Crowley’s “Do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law” philosophy. Crowley is of course heralded by Satanists and many in the music and entertainment business.

This “if it feels good do it,” attitude has basically brought our culture to where it is today.

Violence and sex in media and video games permeate Our society and humanity has been desensitized to the very ills that will ultimately destroy the social order of the world, ultimately leaving it in chaos.

Human life is little valued by drugs and gangs, many of whoms members are victims of this plot. They were latch key kids with little or no parental involvement, and little education.

The CDC reports that the number of live births to unmarried women was 1,595,873 in 2014.

Birth rates for unmarried women is 44.3 births per 1,000 unmarried women aged 15-44 years. The percent of all births to unmarried women in the US is 40.6%

On the flip side, according to its annual report, Planned Parenthood performed 327,653 abortions in 2013, up from its 327,166 performed in 2012.

Planned Parenthood has recently been caught organ harvesting from aborted fetuses, a practice that has been going on for decades.

In truth, abortions made up 94 percent of the organization’s “pregnancy services,” while prenatal care accounted for only five percent (18,684), and adoption referrals only 0.5 percent (1,880).

Despite these declines in services, Planned Parenthood reports more than $127 million in excess revenue, and over $1.4 billion in net assets. After all, aborted fetus organ harvesting is BIG BUSINESS.

Like selling harvested organs from aborted fetuses.

Planned Parenthood claims to be an altruistic health care provider for women and girls but their bottom line is all about abortions and organ harvesting.

This is the true war on women.

Don’t allow yourselves to be so manipulated by the agenda based mass media mind control social engineers to recognize this obvious truth.

And now, since gay marriage has become law, pedophiles have been hammering even harder for “equal rights.” The War on Pedophiles will be the next leftist ambition. And don’t be so naïve to think that won’t happen.

After all, the only real war is the war on truth.

TRUTH TALK NEWS SAT 1-3PM

Listen to TRUTH TALK NEWS LIVE

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

Saturdays 1-3 PM EST

Listen on any device @ http://streema.com/radios/United_FM_Radio                       Call in # 860-626-5193

Subscribe, follow and share the truth

http://www.HowardNema.com

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’ 

Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS, United FM Radio and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

TRUTH TALK NEWS and http://www.HowardNema.com are both free and independent of any network, group or association.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Additional links and sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/skull-and-bones-alumni-2011-2

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/skull-and-bones/

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/unmarried-childbearing.htm

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_01.pdf

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/undercover-video-shows-planned-parenthood-exec-discussing-organ-harvesting/2015/07/14/ae330e34-2a4d-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html

http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/14/organ-trafficking-middleman-stemexpress-severs-ties-with-planned-parenthood/

http://nypost.com/2015/07/15/planned-parenthoods-horrendous-organ-trade/

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/01/01/planned-parenthood-annual-report-all-about-abortions-and-profits/

KINSEY REPORT:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCUQFjABahUKEwjj87qWyK3HAhUDJB4KHaciAZQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.drjudithreisman.com%2Farchives%2FKinsey_Law.pdf&ei=s3zQVaPOMYPIeKfFhKAJ&usg=AFQjCNEJD2vKRezLoIdpjUDdM0jlqKwaEg&sig2=Sq_aqtyLdPzOei5W3o3Ohw

http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/research/ak-data.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/kinsey-report-cuddling-sex-2011-7

Enjolie commercial (1978)

MYSTERY BABYLON SERIES (FULL) – HOUR OF THE TIME -WILLIAM COOPER

PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF SION

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Benjamin Harrison[1] Freedman (1890 – May 1984)[2] was an American businessman, Holocaust denier,[3][4][5] and vocal anti-Zionist.[6][7] Born in a Jewish family, he converted from Judaism to Roman Catholicism.[8] Outside of political activism, Freedman was a partner in a dermatological institute and investor for small businesses.

Biography

Freedman was, from 1925 to 1937, a partner with Samuel D. Leidesdorf and the John H. Woodbury Laboratories, a dermatological institute[9] and a derivative company of the old Woodbury Soap Company.[10] Benjamin H Freedman was listed on the letterhead of the Institute for Arab American Affairs and around 1946, along with his wife, listed as “R M Schoendorf” (Rose M. Schoendorf Freedman), “sponsored a series of advertisements under the imprint of ‘The League for Peace with Justice in Palestine'”.[11] In 1946 he sued the American Jewish Committee for libel and the case was thrown out in less than a month.[12][13]

In 1988, the Institute for Historical Review, an organization known for propagating Holocaust denial, published Robert John’s Behind the Balfour Declaration, including a single acknowledgment, to Freedman. John wrote that Freedman “gave me copies of materials on the Balfour Declaration which I might never have found on my own and (he) encouraged my own research.”[14]

Activities

He was a financial backer of the author Conde McGinley, publisher of the antisemitic periodical Common Sense.[15][16][17][18][19] In the 1955 libel trial by Rabbi Joachim Prinz against McGinley, Freedman testified that “he [Freedman] had given Mr. McGinley financial support of ‘more than $10,000 but less than $100,000′”.[20] Prinz had sued McGinley for calling him a “red rabbi.”

At the Henry George School, Benjamin Freedman spoke on “The Genesis of Middle East Tensions”.[21] Long John Nebel reported on WNBC that Freedman would discuss anti-Semitism.[22] Freedman was politically active until the mid-1970s when he was well over 85 years old. He died in May 1984 at the age of 94.[23][24]

Freedman opposed the nomination of Anna M. Rosenberg to be Assistant Secretary of Defense in 1950.[25] An article in the ADL Bulletin entitled The Plot Against Ann Rosenberg attributed the attacks on Rosenberg’s loyalty to “professional anti-Semites and lunatic nationalists,” including the “Jew-baiting cabal of John Rankin, Benjamin Freedman, and Gerald Smith.”[5]

Freedman, an apostate Jew, was well known to the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee as an active supporter of the Arab cause in the Middle East. (fn 33) In the course of his erratic and often contradictory testimony before the Senate committee, Freedman revealed the roles played by anti-Semitic agitators and right-wing anticommunists — including Gerald L. K. Smith, Conde McGinley, the “Reverend” Wesley Swift, Congressman John Rankin, Senator Joseph McCarthy, and J.B. Matthews — in the campaign against the Rosenberg appointment. (fn 34)[5]

He is mentioned in a report by the House Un-American Activities Committee.[26]

Works

  • League for Peace With Justice in Palestine. Freedman published his own broadsheets under the aegis of the League for Peace With Justice in Palestine, which he founded in 1946.[27]
  • “Palestine,” Destiny: The Magazine of National Life (Jan. 1948): 26–28 (originally appeared in the National Economic Council’s Letter, no. 177, Oct. 15, 1947). Haverhill, Mass.
  • Facts are Facts, Noontide Press (Softcover), ISBN 0-317-53273-1. A pamphlet purporting to be the text of a 1954 letter from Freedman to David Goldstein, proponent of the idea that Christianity fulfilled Judaism. The text expounds the notion that most people now identified as Jews are descendants of Khazars, a Turkic people of Central Asia who converted to Judaism. Freedman does not refer to Jews but to “so-called or ‘self-styled Jews’.
  • Why Congress is Crooked or Crazy or Both, Founder, 1946, League for Peace with Justice in Palestine (New York, 1975)

Notes

  1. Jump up ^ House Committee on un-American activities, pg 17, calling him “Benjamin Harrison Freedman … of 960 Park Avenue”
  2. Jump up ^ Social Security Death Index: “born Oct 4 1890, died May 1984 Benjamin Freeman [sic] Garden City, NY
  3. Jump up ^ Benjamin H.Freedman, “Six Million Jew Hoax,” Common Sense (May 1, 1959)
  4. Jump up ^ “In the meantime, however, a vicious campaign against Mrs. Rosenberg’s nomination had been launched by a group of professional anti-Semites. The leaders of the group were Benjamin H. Freedman, a retired New York businessman… and Gerald L. K. Smith, the notorious leader of the ‘Christian Nationalist Crusade.'” Robert K. Griffith, The Politics of Fear, p. 136.
  5. ^ Jump up to: a b c Stuart Svonkin, Jews Against Prejudice, p. 120.
  6. Jump up ^ New York Times, May 8, 1948: Anti-Zionist Tells of Dinner in Capital
  7. Jump up ^ New York Times, May 9, 1948: ANTI-ZIONIST LISTS POLICY ‘DICTATORS’; Lehman, Baruch and Warburg Named as Among Those Who Influence U.S. on Palestine
  8. Jump up ^ New York Times, May 5, 1948, p. 35 :”Mr Freedman who was born in the Jewish faith, but now practices Catholicism….”
  9. Jump up ^ Scribner’s Magazine
  10. Jump up ^ Nomination of Anna M. Rosenberg to be Assistant Secretary of Defense, Freedman’s testimony starts on page 145
  11. Jump up ^ Cairo to Damascus by John Roy Carlson. Knopf 1951 (PDF 4.5M)
  12. Jump up ^ New York Times, Jul 8, 1946
  13. Jump up ^ New York Times, May 27, 1948, pg 23
  14. Jump up ^ Introduction Behind the Balfour Declaration: the hidden origins of today’s Mideast crisis, ISBN 0-939484-29-3 OCLC: 20481166
  15. Jump up ^ Preliminary Report on Neo-fascist and Hate Groups pg 18
  16. Jump up ^ Stephen E. Atkins (2009). Holocaust Denial as an International Movement. ABC-CLIO. pp. 154–. ISBN 978-0-313-34538-8. 
  17. Jump up ^ Chip Berlet; Matthew Nemiroff Lyons (2000). Right-wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort. Guilford Press. pp. 172–. ISBN 978-1-57230-562-5. 
  18. Jump up ^ Philip Jenkins (January 1997). Hoods and Shirts: The Extreme Right in Pennsylvania, 1925-1950. Univ of North Carolina Press. pp. 225–. ISBN 978-0-8078-2316-3. 
  19. Jump up ^ Clive Webb (15 March 2011). Fight Against Fear: Southern Jews and Black Civil Rights. University of Georgia Press. pp. 52–. ISBN 978-0-8203-4009-8. 
  20. Jump up ^ New York Times, Apr 1, 1955, pg 9
  21. Jump up ^ New York Times, Feb 14, 1964
  22. Jump up ^ New York Times, Sep 2, 1965
  23. Jump up ^ Social Security Death Index: “born Oct 4 1890, died May 1984 Benjamin Freeman [sic] Garden City, NY”
  24. Jump up ^ New York Passenger Lists, online at www.ancestry.com : Arriving on the Queen of Bermuda, 24 Feb 1936, from Hamilton, Bermuda, Sheet 126 “Benjamin Freedman 46 born 1890 New York City, residence 2138 Edwin Ave, West Hill, NY”. Next entry is “Rose Margaret Freedman 30 born 1905 New York City, residence 2138 Edwin Ave, West Hill, NY
  25. Jump up ^ Nomination of Anna M. Rosenberg to be Assistant Secretary of Defense
  26. Jump up ^ House Un-American Activities Committee, pg 17
  27. Jump up ^ Yearbook of the United Nations 1946/7

Resources

External links

TO SEE THE FUTURE LOOK TO THE PAST

 

by Howard Nema

“Those whose forget the past are condemned to repeat it.”

George Santayana

Indeed.

Past is prologue. But true history is often ignored or suppressed.
The illumination of truth becomes brighter when the past becomes present, as is happening today.

The problem is, most do not tie predictions from the past to the events of the present, especially if they have been suppressed by the controlled mainstream media.

To understand why the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer and why our rights are being stripped, why Big Brother is watching, why there is a rising police state, and why the world is in embroiled in constant turmoil, we must look to the past.

In quotes from “Tragedy and Hope” (1966) by Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley we can see the causes and effects that have come to pass over time.

There is indeed a direct correlation between the past and the present and a clearly visible view of our future– or atleast the path we are presently travelling on.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.

The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

“In 1891, Cecil Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a Circle of Initiates and an outer circle known as the Association of Helpers later organized as the Round Table organization.
In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States.

In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations.

After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries.

They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom. …

There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act.

In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.

I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments.

I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

“I am now quite sure that ‘Tragedy and Hope’ was suppressed although I do not know why or by whom.”

Indeed, Mr. Quigley. But I bet you had a very good idea. Quigley died in 1977.

In 1981 his book, “The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden written in 1949 and published posthumously in 1981, Quigley traces the history of a secret society founded in 1891 by Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner.

Quigley notes that “the organization was so modified and so expanded by Milner after the eclipse of Stead in 1899, and especially after the death of Rhodes in 1902, that it took on quite a different organization and character, although it continued to pursue the same goals.”

The society consisted of an inner circle known as “The Society of the Elect” and an outer circle called “The Association of Helpers”, also known as The Round Table or the Milner Kindergarten.

“The society as a whole does not have a fixed name. This society has been known at various times as Milner’s Kindergarten, as the Round Table Group, as the Rhodes crowd, as The Times crowd, as the All Souls group, and as the Cliveden set.

I have chosen to call it the Milner group. Those persons who have used the other terms, or heard them used, have not generally been aware that all these various terms referred to the same Group this Group is, as I shall show, one of the most important historical facts of the twentieth century.”

Quigley give exclusive credit for many historical events including the Jameson Raid, the Second Boer War, the founding of the Union of South Africa, the replacement of the British Empire with the Commonwealth of Nations, and a number of Britain’s foreign policy decisions in the twentieth century.

An interesting note, Quigley’s mentor was Bill Clinton, a beloved and protected inner circle puppet of the global elite.

With chaos in the middle east and the rise of radical Islam around the world we must understand that in 1998 it was Clinton, not Bush who first read from the weapons of mass destruction script.

Past is prologue, ladies and gentlemen. . .

There are many pieces to be found when researching the New World Order. Do not be intimidated. One by one, put the pieces together and you will figure out the puzzle.
Please research this information.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth. Seek and you will find it.


Subscribe, follow and share the truth @
http://www.HowardNema.com
http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews
http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”
‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’

Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

Together we can restore Our republic. Together we can be the change we wish to see in the world by exposing the forces that wish to enslave us.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE and can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

TRUTH TALK NEWS and http://www.HowardNema.com are both free and independent of any network, group or association.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

 

IS THERE HOPE FOR THE ANGLO-AMERICAN TRAGEDY?

by Howard Nema
The Anglo-American Establishment.
It is becoming impossible to ignore the giant elephant in the room. Despite fervent mass media efforts to discredit the truth for the last 100 years, the internet has now allowed millions, if not billions to learn about the hidden rulers of the world, their nefarious past and even more sinister intent.
Today, 6 multinational corporations own 95% of mass media.   The elite control 95% of what we see.   What gets on the news, content in TV, movies, magazines, video games, all influencing us as to what to buy, how to live, what we like, what we don’t like, what to think. Conditioning ideological messages abound in this social control mechanism using mind controlling propaganda.
Any attempts to threaten the dream like illusion most people believe to be reality is met with fierce opposition.
“Conspiracy theory” resounds as the most mind numbing response.
We all must remember that Richard Nixon adopted that pitch “conspiracy theorists” during Watergate.
Big conspiracy there.    No theory.
The resistance to investigating claims of a conspiracy theory actually exposes the truth.
This is not rocket science.   Yet, cognitive dissonance abounds.   With the media’s constant bantering to discredit the truth you can see why most dismiss it. After all, these are effective tools of influence.
Also, most folks are too damned busy trying to keep their heads above water making credit card payments, car payments, house payments, and other payments, payments, payments to worry about why they have to struggle so much.
And if you do complain, the stock answer from spouses to bosses to friends and family is, “that’s just the way it is”.
If further investigation leads you to a few books like Tragedy and Hope and the Anglo-American Establishment, or you begin an investigation into the Federal Reserve, or the Council on Foreign Relations, the Tax-Exempt Foundations, or government documents, congressional records and other suppressed information, you will find the truth. And yes, you too will soon labeled a conspiracy nut.
Especially if you share your findings with the public.
But, in fact books like Tragedy and Hope (1966) and The Anglo-American Establishment (1981) both by Carroll Quigley, or The Naked Communist (1970) by Cleon Skousen, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin (1994), Mullins on the Federal Reserve (1952) Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1983) by Eustace Mullins and many other similar past treatments on these subjects truly prove and amplify the near fruition of this very real agenda.
Even with oligarch controlled mass media monopoly on news and pop cultural influence, and COINTELPRO disinformation, the global elite’s plans are being thwarted by an ever growing alert and active populace.
This is thanks most in part to social media and widespread availablity of this truthful evidence on the internet.
People are waking up. More and more are learning the truth that has been hidden from them in plain sight. Overwhelming evidence is available to find if only you simply take the time to look.
By reading the right books and investigating the right organizations, documents and records, many are discovering the truth. A critical mass is approaching.
Recent attempts to criminalize conspiracy theories and free speech should amplify this. Tyranny abounds. The Constitution is being trampled on.
Once that balance shifts and the awakened mobilize politically, the jig is up.   This is why I fear the elite are conjuring up another horrifying false flag event like they did on 9/11.
But this time, it will directly effect the entire world.
On September 14, 1994, speaking at a U.N. business conference, David Rockfeller said:
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the world will accept the New World Order.”
Indeed. 9/11 was the catalyst, the inciting incident of the New World Order, setting in motion the agenda that has unfolded in recent history.    Much of it having to do with control of oil interests and establishing Rothschild owned central banks.
In 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank: They were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.
In 2007, General Wesley Clark (ret) reported that shortly after the terror attacks of 9/11/01 he was informed of the government’s agenda to conquer seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.
Interestingly, today the only countries left without a Rothschild Central Bank are: Cuba, North Korea and Iran. Well what do you know? No wonder Obama is getting so cushy-cushy with communist Cuba and softening on Iran.
Our recent history illuminates roots that were sown long ago. In “Tragedy And Hope A History of the World in Our Time” written by Georgetown University professor Carrol Quigley in 1966, exposes the realities of this age old and ongoing agenda.
Covering the years 1880 to 1963, “Tragedy And Hope” focuses on the economic problems designed by the global elite.
Quigley, was the mentor of Rhodes Scholar and former president and Arkansas governor Bill Clinton, had unfettered access to documents from the Council on Foreign Relations for more than two years, proudly revealing the fact that secret societies have played a significant role in world history.
In fact, he very much agreed with it and wondered why so much trouble was made to keep the world government agenda a secret.
“I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records.   I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies… but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”   Tragedy and Hope pp 949–950
In his book The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden, Quigley traces the history of a secret society founded in 1891 by Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner to foster the British Empire’s power and influence over the world.
Quigley wrote: “The organization was so modified and so expanded by Milner after the eclipse of Stead in 1899, and especially after the death of Rhodes in 1902, that it took on quite a different organization and character, although it continued to pursue the same goals.”
The society consisted of an inner circle (“The Society of the Elect”) and an outer circle (“The Association of Helpers”, also known as The Milner Kindergarten, The Times group, the All Souls group, the Cliveden set and the Round Table Group.) The society does not have an actual name but all affiliations are of the same group and working for the same goal, a New World Order.
Quigley notes that the leaders of this group were Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner from 1891 until Rhodes’ death in 1902 and Milner led the group until his death in 1925.
Subsequent leaders, Lionel Curtis from 1925 to 1955, Baron Robert H Brand from 1955 to 1963, and Adam D. Marris from 1963 until the time Quigley wrote Tragedy and Hope in 1966.
This secretive and influential alliance continues to this day under the cover of darkness.      The agenda moves forward via secret meetings. First known as the Omega Group, since 1954 it has been called the Bilderberg Group.

BILDERBERG NICE

Only until recently, within the last thirty years has the shadowy Bilderberg Group been exposed to the light of criticism.
Before the 1980’s any investigation into the group, its members and intentions was met by dead silence from the mainstream media.
For more than thirty years the Bilderberg’s existance was fully denied and shot down as a wild conspiracy theory.
Indeed, the Bilderbergers and the Milner Group have been secretly working behind the scenes and using their enormous wealth and clout to control the political systems every country in the world.
This organization also functions through certain loosely affiliated “front groups”, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs (which is today known as Chatham House), the Institute of Pacific Relations and the Council on Foreign Relations. Tragedy and Hope pp. 132, 950-952
Quigley states he was in direct contact with the international Anglo-American network. To achieve their aim of world financial domination, the organization cooperates with any group, on either side of the political spectrum, fascists, communists, anarchists, even today’s radical Islamists.
Norman Dodd further exposed this reality shortly before his death in an interview with G. Edward Griffin.    Below is the complete 1982 interview.

 

Dodd also speaks of a 1953 meeting he had with Rowan Gaither, president of the Ford Foundation, who candidly stated the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and others wished to comfortably merge the United States with the Soviet Union.

Image result for Rockefeller moscow 1970's

Wouldn’t you know, the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations continue to fund communist and socialist causes. Of course they do. They are collectivists.
During the cold war David Rockefeller had unfettered access to regularly fly in and out of Moscow on banking business. When he landing at the airport, he was met like a rock star with much pomp and circumsance. The Russian people loved him.
In addition, other secret societies are briefly discussed in Tragedy and Hope, including a consortium of the leaders of the central banks of several countries, who formed the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). Tragedy and Hope pp 323–324
Initially, the BIS was established on May 17, 1930 by Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States to supposedly facilitate reparations imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I.
A charter for the bank was drafted at the International Bankers Conference and its charter was adopted on January 20, 1930.
The BIS is based in Switzerland and has immunity in all the contracting states.
And we wonder why the warmongering economic hitmen and nation killers are never prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
To seal Our fate of being consumed by the deathroes of economic slavery and war for all eternity, according to the charter, shares in the bank could be held by individuals and non-governmental entities.
This of course was quite convenient for the Rothschild, Rockefeller and Royals among the other Illuminati bloodline families who are among the top shareholders. They are the rulers. At least they want to be.
Quigley reveals quite openly that the Milner Group wielded considerable influence over British and American foreign policy in the first half of the twentieth century. This influence continues to this day, albeit the relationship and goals are obscured from the public and tightly hidden from view.
As a totalitarian one world government is incrementally established, any evidence of this truth is quickly shot down by the controlled mainstream media, even as history proves this alliance to be quite real and factual.

 

carroll_quigley_tragedy_n_hope

Below is the list of the 60 member central banks or monetary authorities of the Bank of International Settlements:
Algeria Bank of AlgeriaArgentina Central Bank of ArgentinaAustralia Reserve Bank of AustraliaAustria Austrian National BankBelgium National Bank of Belgium

Bosnia and Herzegovina Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Brazil Central Bank of Brazil

Bulgaria Bulgarian National Bank

Canada Bank of Canada

Chile Central Bank of Chile

China People’s Bank of China

Colombia Bank of the Republic (Colombia)

Croatia Croatian National Bank

Czech Republic Czech National Bank

Denmark National Bank of Denmark

Estonia Bank of Estonia

European Union European Central Bank

Finland Bank of Finland

France Bank of France

Germany Deutsche Bundesbank

Greece Bank of GreeceHong Kong Hong Kong Monetary AuthorityHungary Hungarian National BankIceland Central Bank of IcelandIndia Reserve Bank of India

Indonesia Bank IndonesiaRepublic of Ireland Central Bank of Ireland

Israel Bank of Israe

lItaly Bank of Italy

Japan Bank of Japan

South Korea Bank of Korea

Latvia Bank of Latvia

Lithuania Bank of Lithuania

Luxembourg Central Bank of Luxembourg

Republic of Macedonia National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia

Malaysia Central Bank of Malaysia

Mexico Bank of Mexico

Netherlands De Nederlandsche Bank

New Zealand Reserve Bank of New Zealand

Norway Norges Bank

Peru Central Reserve Bank of PeruPhilippines Central Bank of the PhilippinesPoland National Bank of PolandPortugal Bank of PortugalRomania National Bank of Romania

Russia Central Bank of the Russian Federation

Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Serbia National Bank of Serbia
Singapore Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia Bank of Slovenia

South Africa South African Reserve Bank

Spain Bank of Spain

Sweden Sveriges Riksbank

Switzerland Swiss National Bank

Thailand Bank of Thailand

Turkey Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey

United Arab Emirates Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom Bank of England

United States Federal Reserve System

Follow and share TRUTH TALK NEWS!

 

http://www.HowardNema.com

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsLIVE

http://www.youtube.com/FreedomFirstFilms