Tag Archives: Council on Foreign Relations

MUST WATCH! ILLUMINATING 1976 LECTURE BY GARY ALLEN, AUTHOR OF THE ROCKFELLER FILE

 

Past is prologue.  Timely and illuminating FAIR USE PRESENTATION of a riveting and informative 1976 lecture by Gary Allen, author of “THE ROCKEFELLER FILE” and  “NONE DARE CALL IT A CONSPIRACY” that gives insight through hindsight into the Rockefeller’s influence in the rise of socialism and economic decline over the last 40 years and reveals the true hidden agenda of globalism.

 

RELATED BOOKS AND INFORMATION:

The Rockefeller File by Gary Allen

None Dare Call it A Conspiracy by Gary Allen

The Order of Skull and Bones by Antony Sutton

Wall_Street_and_the_Bolshevik_revolution by Antony C. Sutton

http://www.howardnema.com/2016/09/01/100-books-you-must-read-understand-the-new-world-order/

SUBSCRIBE TO TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2:
https://www.youtube.com/c/TruthTalkNewsChannel2
TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

Key Excerpts from Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time by Carroll Quigley (1966)

Pg. 48-49:

In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value. Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.
Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored. In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other. The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild’s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.
Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. Even after these banking families became fully involved in domestic industry by the emergence of financial capitalism, they remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways: (1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts, including foreign government debts, even in areas which seemed, at first glance, poor risks, like Egypt, Persia, Ottoman Turkey, Imperial China, and Latin America; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods, since they admired “liquidity” and regarded commitments in commodities or even real estate as the first step toward bankruptcy; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of deflation (which they called “sound” money from its close associations with high interest rates and a high value of money) and of the gold standard, which, in their eyes, symbolized and ensured these values; and (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.
Pg. 53: The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.
Pg. 62: In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland’s second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.” This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.”
Pg. 324: the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.
Pg. 326: Norman (Montagu) had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank, especially of Henry P. Davison, who made him secretary of the Bankers Trust Company of New York (in succession to Thomas W. Lamont) in 1904, used him as Morgan’s agent in the banking rearrangements following the crash of 1907, and made him vice-president of the Bankers Trust (still in succession to Lamont) in 1909. He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914. Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.
In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.
Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges. Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates. In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).
Pg. 936-937: Behind this unfortunate situation lies another, more profound, relationship, which influences matters much broader than Far Eastern policy. It involves the organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into foundations to be used for educational, scientific, “and other public purposes.” Sixty or more years ago, public life in the West was dominated by the influence of “Wall Street.” This term has nothing to do with its use by the Communists to mean monopolistic industrialism, but, on the contrary, refers to international financial capitalism deeply involved in the gold standard, foreign-exchange fluctuations, floating of fixed-interest securities and, to a lesser extent, flotation of industrial shares for stock-exchange markets. This group, which in the United States, was completely dominated by J. P. Morgan and Company from the 1880’s to the 1930’s was cosmopolitan, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, eastern seaboard, high Episcopalian, and European-culture conscious. Their connection with the Ivy League colleges rested on the fact that the large endowments of these institutions required constant consultation with the financiers of Wall Street (or its lesser branches on State Street, Boston, and elsewhere) and was reflected in the fact that these endowments, even in 1930, were largely in bonds rather than in real estate or common stocks. As a consequence of these influences, as late as the 1930’s, J. P. Morgan and his associates were the most significant figures in policy making at Harvard, Columbia, and to a lesser extent Yale, while the Whitneys were significant at Yale, and the Prudential Insurance Company (through Edward D. Duffield) dominated Princeton.
Pg. 937: The names of these Wall Street luminaries still adorn these Ivy League campuses, with Harkness colleges and a Payne Whitney gymnasium at Yale, a Pyne dormitory at Princeton, a Dillon Field House and Lamont Library at Harvard. The chief officials of these universities were beholden to these financial powers and usually owed their jobs to them. Morgan himself helped make Nicholas Murray Butler president of Columbia; his chief Boston agent, Thomas Nelson Perkins of the First National Bank of that city, gave Conant his boost from the chemical laboratory to University Hall at Harvard; Duffield of Prudential, caught unprepared when the incumbent president of Princeton was killed in an automobile in 1932, made himself president for a year before he chose Harold Dodds for the post in 1933. At Yale, Thomas Lamont, managing partner of the Morgan firm, was able to swing Charles Seymour into the presidency of that university in 1937.
The significant influence of “Wall Street” (meaning Morgan) both in the Ivy League and in Washington, in the period of sixty or more years following 1880, explains the constant interchange between the Ivy League and the Federal government, an interchange which undoubtedly aroused a good deal of resentment in less-favored circles, who were more than satiated with the accents, tweeds, and High Episcopal Anglophilia of these peoples
Pg. 938: Because of its dominant position in Wall Street, the Morgan firm came also to dominate other Wall Street powers, such as Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, or Dillon-Reed. Close alliances were made with Rockefeller, Mellon, and Duke interests but not nearly so intimate ones with the great industrial powers like du Pont and Ford. [Because] … of the great influence of this “Wall Street” alignment, an influence great enough to merit the name of the “American Establishment,” this group could … control the Federal government and, in consequence, had to adjust to a good many government actions … [which they had secretly supported ]. The chief of these were in taxation law, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913, but culminating, above all else, in the inheritance tax. These tax laws drove the great private fortunes dominated by Wall Street into tax-exempt foundations, which became a major link in the Establishment network between Wall Street, the Ivy League, and the Federal government.
More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street supplied both. The purpose was not to destroy … or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could “blow off steam,” and (3) to have a final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if they ever went “radical.” There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers had talked about it and even attempted it earlier.
Pg. 939: The New Republic was founded by Willard and Dorothy Straight, using her money, in 1914, and continued to be supported by her financial contributions until March 23, 1953. The original purpose for establishing the paper was to provide an outlet for the progressive Left and to guide it quietly in an Anglophile direction. This latter task was entrusted to a young man, only four years out of Harvard, but already a member of the mysterious Round Table group, which has played a major role in directing England’s foreign policy since its formal establishment in 1909. This new recruit, Walter Lippmann, has been, from 1914 to the present, the authentic spokesman in American journalism for the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic in international affairs.
Pg. 950: There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the … Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

 

FULL PDF of Georgetown Professor and Council on Foreign Relations insider Carroll Quigley’s 1966 book, TRAGEDY AND HOPE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

After reading these quotes, it should be clear the intention of those who operate behind the scenes are not working for, but rather against the best interests of America and all of humanity to exploit, profit, achieve and maintain domination over us all.   This small globalist cabal are the enemy of all humanity.   We must not allow their legions of wolves in sheep’s clothing to mesmerize and deceive us into bending to their evil, nefarious will.     HN

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

THE FORT LAUDERDALE AIRPORT SHOOTER: PTSD, ISLAMIC TERRORIST OR “PROGRAMMED” TO KILL?

 By Howard Nema

Fort Lauderdale Airport shooter Esteban Santiago walked into an FBI office in Anchorage, Alaska in November and told authorities he was being mind controlled by the government and forced to fight for ISIS and watch ISIS propaganda videos.

 

ruiez-3
Esteban Santiago points with a Muslim gesture used by ISIS.

Now if you think that is the crazy rantings of a raving murderous loon, let’s take a dose of reality and objectively consider some very interesting and thought provoking facts and see where the trail of  breadcrumbs leads.

Esteban Santiago is a Muslim, but the mainstream media and police officials are ignoring this fact.   However, Aashiq Hammad, also known as Esteban Sabtiago did not cry out the usual “Allahu Akbar” as is customary as he opened fire in the Fort Lauderdale Airport baggage claim area.

Is Aashiq Hammad, an Islamic terrorist, a troubled Iraq War vet suffering from PTSD or does the rabbit hole go even deeper…. to an even more dark and sinister place?

Is it possible that the spike in mass shootings, terrorism and those being radicalized by ISIS be related to mind control?

Having sought “treatment” for his mental disorders, it is likely the Iraq War Veteran is currently taking a stew of dangerous and deadly psychotropic drugs.

The man reported to be behind the Ft. Lauderdale shooting Esteban Santiago RuizSantiago, who has a history of mental health issues, retrieved his luggage after arriving on a flight from Alaska and went directly into the Men’s room, where he unpacked and loaded his gun and came out shooting, emptying two clips into the crowd, killing five people and wounding eight.

What made Estaban Santiago snap, and why didn’t the FBI follow up when there were such obvious clues that Santiago had serious mental issues and could be a threat?

After all, didn’t he tell the FBI he was hearing voices telling him to join ISIS and watch their videos?  Shouldn’t that have raised a red flag? 

Haven’t we heard this story before?

Aaron Alexis-FBI Image.jpgBack on September 16, 2013, Defense contractor Aaron Alexis fatally shot twelve people and injured three others at the Washington, D.C.  Navy Yard before being killed by police.  

On August 2, Alexis filed a police report in Rhode Island claiming to be the victim of harassment and that he was hearing voices in his head.  

Sound familiar?

CCTV footage of the shooter in building 197 holding a Remington 870 shotgun.

According to an FBI official, Alexis, who was taking Trazodone, a powerful serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant for insomnia, believed he was being controlled or influenced by extremely low frequency electromagnetic waves”.

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors cause many debilitating side effects. If taken in certain doses they can cause psychotic episodes.   Used in combination with neuro weapons the effects can be deadly.

Of course there was no inquiry into how these deadly drugs may have affected or contributed to Alexis’s or any of the many other mass murderers who were pumped up on psychotropic pharmaceuticals at the time of their crimes.

Like Santiago, it is still unclear why Aaron Alexis’ concerns about ELF or alleged psychiatric problems were ignored by authorities and trained medical personnel.

Is this just yet another example of how out of control our pill popping society has become?

Is it malpractice?

Or could it be CIA “handling”.

Considering Alexis etched “Better off this way!”, “My ELF weapon!”, “Not what yall say!”, and “End to the torment!” on the butt of his shotgun before going on his deadly rampage one must at least take a look at ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) weapons and the history of mind control:

Electromagnetic Frequency (ELF) Mind Control Weapons are directed energy weapons.

A December 2007 Department of Defense report called ELF mind control weapons a “transformational game changer in military operations, able to augment and improve operational capabilities in many areas,” for both lethal and non-lethal purposes.

CLICK HERE to access the full text of this report.

EMF weapons/devices are used for harassment, surveillance and mind control.

The Pentagon, CIA and NSA use them to monitor people, manipulate their minds, harm, and even kill them.

THE HISTORY OF MK ULTRA

The covert black operation mind control program known as MK-ULTRA was first exposed to the public in 1975.

Senator Frank Church holding CIA heart attack gun as Senator John Tower looks on.

Congressional Hearings headed by Frank Church followed in 1977. 

The CIA claimed the mind control program was halted in 1973 and Director Helms ordered all documents about MK ULTRA destroyed, but thousands of once TOP SECRET and CLASSIFIED documents managed to survive and have been declassified.

Many books have been written of this subject, including SECRETS AND LIES A HISTORY OF CIA TORTURE AND BIO-WEAPONS EXPERIMENTS (2007) by Gordon Thomas.

In his book, GordonThomas  exposes the fact that via Operation Paperclip, Nazi doctors and scientists were secretly imported into the US Gov’t to work on not only rocketry,  but also to work on bio-weapons development and mind control.

 

Image result
Dr. Ewen Cameron (1967)

Dr. Ewen Cameron, one of the world’s leading psychiatrists  led the CIA MK ULTRA program under the supervision of Dr. Sidney Gottleib. 

They sought to discover the methods used to brainwash  US serviceman who were held as POW’s  by the North Koreans, Chinese and the Soviet Union.

Dr. Cameron used LSD and other drugs  combined with electroshock and other torturous methods to control the mind and create create the perfect spy or assassin.   That was the goal of MK ULTRA.

After all, what could be better than having an individual who could be programmed to operate clandestine activities and even murder without any knowledge of their own actions, or that they were doing such work.

Image resultOn August 1, 1966, after writing a note which turned out to be an accurate and detailed account of his plan to kill, Charles Whitman murdered his mother and his wife,  then climbed the clock tower at the University of Texas in Austin with an arsenal of weapons and shot 49 people, killing 14 before being killed by Austin police officers Houston McCoy and Ramiro Martinez.  It was the first mass shooting of its kind and like 9/11, it traumatized an entire nation.

In his note, widely reported by the media, Whitman, who had a 138 IQ, explained that he didn’t know why he was going to do what he did, but was intent to do so and felt compelled to act.   

He also wrote that doctors should examine his brain after death because he believed something was wrong with his brain. 

An autopsy revealed Charles Whitman had a brain tumor.   It is unclear if this was a CIA cover story and Whitman was an MK ULTRA participant.    Whitman certainly had classic indications of MK ULTRA, but sInce most of the documents were destroyed, it is cannot be confirmed that Charles Whitman was a participant in the mind control program.

For greater understanding take a deeper look into Charles Whitman, a troubled yet brilliant man.

Another troubled and kindred spirit of Charles Whitman with a genius IQ was Ted Kaczynski,  a brilliant mathematician. 

At the age of 16,   Kaczynski won a scholarship to Harvard University where he was recruited by the CIA for Project MK ULTRA in 1965.

Kaczynski is more widely known as the Unibomber.   

Image result for ted kaczynski

After volunteering for MK ULTRA, Kaczynski suffered from increasing social and emotional problems.

In 1969 Kaczynski ended a very promising career as a mathematics professor at the University of California at Berkeley to live of the land as a hermit in the wilderness of  Montana.   Over the next 25 years he became a fiercely “radical environmentalist” with militant opposition to modern technology.

In my estimation, Ted’s passionate embrace of the Club of Rome/Limits to Growth eco-fascist agenda was embedded as part of his MK ULTRA programming.

There are many common denominators with Ted Kazcynski and Charles Whitman and it is certainly interesting to compare the two.

MK ULTRA works with what the CIA calls “talent” to create unwitting “spies” and propagandists, utilizing average every day people and some of our most popular celebrities and political figures as working cogs in the clandestine machine advancing the globalist one world agenda.

 

EXAMPLE OF MK ULTRA PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING:

People can be manipulated and their minds can be controlled by verbal commands and electronic means.   It is possible to embed sounds and speech in victims’ brains, actual voices they can’t control or stop.  Victims can be driven to madness or suicide.

Physical harm can also be inflicted by these silent weapons affecting the central nervous system and bodily functions.

Other tortures include “humming” or “buzzing” causing sleeplessness and anxiety, sudden twitching or jerking of limbs and feelings of dread to name just a few.

Memories can also be erased or impaired. Behavior can be modified, even turning people into killers directed by microwave signals.

In the 1980’s, Dr. Ross Adey of the Brain Research Center at the University of Southern California worked on the CIA’s Pandora Project to successfully send microwave signals to human brains.

 

Image result for Dr ROss Adey
Dr. Ross Adey

Dr. Adey’s research involved inducing specific behavior modifications by electromagnetic means to interfere with brain functions.   This “confusion weaponry” has the ability to cause psychological and physical harm.

There are patents proving the existence of all of these weapons, many of which we have seen deployed, like the LRAD (Long Range Acoustical Device) which was used to quell anti-globalist protests at the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh in 2009.

 

Electronic harassment and mind control technologies are VERY REAL. These are truly silent weapons for quiet wars that can travel invisibly over thousands of miles and can penetrate walls, buildings, metals, concrete, mountains and thousands of miles of earth.

Image result for Dr ROss Adey

Direct energy weapons are deployed through lasers, radio frequency energy beams, holography, electromagnetic radiation, radio and sound waves, satellites, radar, miniature electronic robots, smart dust, and other means to track, locate,  target and harm people.

When Saddam Hussein’s command and control system was destroyed, the Iraqi troops were forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency.

The US tactical PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter on the same frequency, overpowering the local Iraqi station.

PsyOps then transmitted “confusing and contradictory military orders and disinformation” and a sophisticated electronic system that “spoke” directly to the mind of the listener, to alter and manipulate their brain’s EEG patterns and artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear, anxiety, despair and hopelessness in the Iraqi troops.

Image result for Dr ROss Adey

This subliminal system doesn’t just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it by implanting an emotion in their minds. As a result, hundreds of Iraqi soldiers surrendered to US Troops without a fight.

Was this technology used on Esteban Santiago and Aaron Alexis?

The mind-altering mechanism is based on a subliminal carrier technology: the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum, also known as S-quad or Squad and was developed by Dr Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia entitled, “Silent Subliminal Presentation System”  US Patent #5,159,703, dated October 27, 1992.

The abstract for the patent reads:

“A silent communications system in which non-aural carriers, in the very low or very high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude- or frequency-modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers.  The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener.”

This patent is a technetronic utilization of Dr. Ewen Cameron’s MK ULTRA psychic driving technique.

In his 1970 book, “Between Two Ages,” Zbigniew Brezezinski, discussed technologies to conduct secret warfare:

“It is possible – and tempting – to exploit, for strategic-political purposes, the fruits of research on the brain and on human behavior.  Accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth.    In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of a very large population in selected regions, over an extended period.”

Silent Sounds, Inc. system uses supercomputers, to analyze human emotional EEG patterns that can replicate them and then store those “emotion signature clusters” on another computer and, at will, “silently induce and change the emotional state in a human being”.

Could these weapons be used against us?

What do you mean, could?

The NSA’s Signals Intelligence involves decoding EMF waves to tap into computers wirelessly and track people.

It can also inflict harm, control subjects psychologically and kill.

Pulsed Energy Projectiles  travel nearly at the speed of light emitting invisible laser pulses, electromagnetic radiation, stunning targets, knocking them off their feet, or paralyzing them in pain.

Voice to Skull Directed Acoustic Devices resembles what the Washington Navy Shooter described when he reported hearing voices.

These are neuro-electromagnetic non-lethal weapons, able to produce mood-altering sounds in a person’s head.

Remote Neural Monitoring uses satellite transmitted extra low frequencies (ELF) to send voice to brain communications.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation emits electrical impulses to the brain to affect mood, sleep patterns, and improve cognitive abilities, memory, attentiveness, visualization, and decision-making.

This and many other technologies have been used for decades to surveil, harass, intimidate, manipulate, torture, and kill.

Google, “TARGETED INDIVIDUALS” for more on this.

 

The fact is, We the People have been in a constant and continuous state of war since the elite forces of and of the Shadow Government declared a silent war against us at the first Bilderberg meeting in 1954.

Elite forces who are protected behind the veil of the National Security Act of 1947 which was created to serve them, not We the People.

Could we be so naive to believe that with the continuous growth in technology that has brought about so many sophisticated weapons would not one day be used against us, or worse, they were created for that exact purpose?

This I do not know.  But we must remain informed and vigilant.   The means and ability are certainly available to create the most evil and incomprehensible tyranny.     Given the CIA’s heinous past it would be foolish the dismiss the possibility and wise to recognize these very real dangers.

 

Image result for esteban santiago photo

Could Esteban Santiago be a programmed MK ULTRA slave on a mind control mission?

It is possible.

 

As we have learned, the CIA does indeed have the capability to create just such an assassin and there is a long history of nefarious deeds committed in the name of “National Security” by this clandestine operation, whose motto is, “the truth shall set you free”.

Presidents come and go.   Powers shift from left to right, but the unseen hand and their power and influence remains a dominant force in world affairs and Our daily lives.

It is this we must pay attention to.

Obama will be nesting near Washington, not so his kids can finish school, but to agitate, undermine and attack Donald Trump in true Saul Alinsky “Rules for Radicals”  fashion for the next four to eight years. 

This you can absolutely count on.   

We must not allow the wealth and influence of those who call themselves the Hidden Masters to use their puppets to exploit us or treat us like cattle as they would, nor must we allow them to infringe on of Our God given individual rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

As a result, and as a necessity, both clearly understood by the Founding Fathers, the American People must remain eternally vigilant and wary of those who would exploit and enslave us, while making us believe they are Our friends and benefactors.

God bless you all until next time – HN

 

SUBSCRIBE TO TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com
Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

Thank you for your continued support.

Please share the valuable information contained on this site.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE and can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

 

 

 

 

BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI

Fritz Springmeier exposes the suppressed history of the Hidden Masters behind the scenes of politics, business and social control. 

Please take the time to listen to this revealing book in its entirety:

BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI (audio book)

BLOODLINES OF THE ILLUMINATI is an encyclopedia of rare suppressed information that is a must read to understand true history and the forces behind events unfolding in the world today.  

 –  The Astor Bloodline

 –  The Bundy Bloodline

 –  The Collins Bloodline

 –  The DuPont Bloodline

 –  The Freeman Bloodline

 –  The Kennedy Bloodline

 –  The Li Bloodline

 –  The Onassis Bloodline

 –  The Reynolds Bloodline

 –  The Rockefeller Bloodline

 –  The Rothschild Bloodline

 –  The Russell Bloodline

 –  The Van Duyn Bloodline

 

INTERCONNECTED FAMILIES:

The Disney Bloodline

The Krupp Bloodline

The McDonald Bloodline

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT OF THIS SITE TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com
Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site.

Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

NETFLIX CEO ENVISIONS ORWELLIAN FUTURE FOR ENTERTAINMENT

 

 

 

By Howard Nema

As fate would have it, as a young ignorant sheep, who thought I knew so much, (as so many 16 year old’s feel they do), I remember sitting in Mr. John Major’s English class at Bayside High School in 1984 and discussing Orwell’s book. He asked the class if we thought America could ever become like Oceania (Atlantis).

Most of us, including myself completely dismissed the idea. After all, America had more freedom than any other country in the world.

Still, Mr Major argued that such a totalitarian society could indeed develop in America.

Laughter burst out the classroom into the halls. Bullshit. No way! Mr. Major continued, warning that history has proven this fact time and time again. No country, including America is immune to tyranny.

Of course, we smirked and guffawed at the ridiculous thought of a tyrannical America.

I remember Mr. Major grinned and nodded his head, as to say, “these stupid little fuckers haven’t got a clue.” What I didn’t realize at the time was that Mr. Major must have been awake and truly concerned about the way things were heading in the country.

He warned us about it. I distinctly remember that. But we could care less as far as I could tell. Besides, we all figured Mr. Major was a burner (smoked pot). Maybe he was high and the weed was making him paranoid. (Be honest my fellow Bayside High alumni, who didn’t want to smoke a joint with Mr. Major back in the day?)

When I read 1984 for the first time, I found it very difficult to read and understand.

Double think was confusing, as was most of the intricacies laced throughout the narrative and what I later discovered actually also exists in the real world. But I didn’t know it at the time. I didn’t know about the LAW OF REVERSAL. I didn’t know about The Brotherhood.

War is Peace. Ignorance is Strength. Freedom Is Slavery.

I didn’t understand the language, how words were going to be shortened in the future like OMG LOL LMAO and that people would be so dumbed down, the language they speak would be practically incomprehensible, like Ebonics. That two opposing thoughts could be perceived as true:

“Whoever heard of rigged elections” and then “the Russians are rigging the elections” . . .

And that 2+2 can equal 5 if there is a consensus, according to Common Core–it just didn’t make sense to me.

Now it does.

But back in 84″, I was too influenced by pop culture and by years of social control by TV and mass media and complete indoctrination from the US Dept of Education to understand, let along pay close attention or care about some dumb book.

After I read 1984 for the first time, I dismissed it as a complete work of fiction, not a warning from history. To me it was no different than The Heart Of Darkness by Joseph Conrad, or any of the many Stephen King books I was into back then.

I totally dismissed Mr. Major as someone who might have taken too many hits of acid at Woodstock. After all it was 1984, Van Halen and The FIRM were touring, the Army just kicked ass in Grenada and America was the bastion of freedom and democracy for the entire world! Like Obama said, “Come on, people”.

I am most certain during the discussions of 1984 I was glancing over at the clock waiting for the bell so I could join the ritual pow wow on the South Lawn. Skunk Weed and Tai-stick were precedent and heavily consumed regularly during 5th and sometimes dragging into 6th period lunch. After all, it was the 80’s and I was one of the flock.

There were new wavers, metal heads and goths, preppies and jocks, dweebs and freaks and everything in between. Nobody was offended.. We were neo-Hippie throwbacks, Sex, Drugs and Rock and Roll was the order of those days.

To me, 1984 was a hard to understand book and a great Van Halen album. I totally dismissed what Orwell wrote could ever happen in real life. Especially in America. There was no way. I was certain, absolutely certain I was free; and that America is a free country and that our rights are protected by the government and that our leaders were honest and ethical and working for Our best interests. I truly believed those lies.

I was certain that We the people would always be free from any form of tyranny or oppression without question.

It was a given that our privacy would never be invaded.
That the government would protect us from treasonous criminals seeking higher office and prosecute them. I believed. . . .

I believed we would always have the opportunity to achieve and improve our economic conditions by the sweat of our own brows and not be dominated by ruling class monopolies and special interests baiting and switching society into poverty and dependence on government programs and crony corporations that benefit from them.

That the government would protect Our rights and property, never strip Our rights and seize Our property, that is the work of dictators and tyrants!.

That we would never be forced to buy Health Insurance or face stiff fines!

That the government would not allow corporations to exploit the people by selling dangerous, deadly products.

That we would never be spied upon.

That we could never be mind controlled . . .

At least that’s what I thought back in 1984. I believed a myth. Ah, the blissful ignorance and eternal optimism of youth.

Fast forward to 2016 and it is obvious to us all that Big Brother is alive and well, thriving and ever feeding and spying on us.

We know all know about Wikileaks, the shadow government, the NSA, Big Brother and the rise of authoritarianism. It is A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO OUR FREEDOM.

True freedom requires eternal vigilance. This they do not teach in school, or promote in movies or in magazines, or newspapers, or on the evening news. And now, thanks to Wikileaks, James O’ Keefe and Project Veritas the whole world knows why. Are you waking up yet?

DEATH TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER!

ORIGINAL OWNERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE CRIME SYNDICATE (1913):

* Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
* Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
* Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy
* Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam
* Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
* Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
* Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
* Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)

Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. 1913 “When the President signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized….the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill.”

In August of 1929, the Fed began to tighten the money supply continually by buying more government bonds. At the same time, all the Wall Street giants of the era, including John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan divested from the stockmarket and put all their assets into cash and gold.

On October 24, 1929, the large brokerages all simultaneously called in their 24 hour “call-loans.” Brokers and investors were now forced to sell their stocks at any price they could get to cover these loans. The resulting market crash on “Black Thursday” was the beginning of the Great Depression.

The Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee, Representative Louis T. Mc Fadden, accused the Fed and international bankers of premeditating the crash.

“It was not accidental,” he declared, “it was a carefully contrived occurrence (created by international bankers) to bring about a condition of despair…so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.”

He went on to accuse European “statesmen and financiers” of creating the situation to facilitate the re-acquisition of the massive amounts of gold which Europe had lost to the U.S. during WWI.

In a 1999 interview, Nobel Prize winning economist and Stanford University Professor Milton Friedman stated: “The Federal Reserve definitely caused the Great Depression.”

US DECLARED bankruptcy

Because the government of the U.S. (a corporation) had paid its loans to the Fed with real money exchangeable for gold, it was now insolvent and could no longer retire its debt. It now had no choice but to file chapter 11. Under the Emergency Banking Act (March 9, 1933, 48 Stat.1, Public law 89-719) President Franklin Roosevelt effectively dissolved the United States Federal Government by declaring the entity bankrupt and insolvent.

June 5, 1933 Congress enacted HR 192 which made all debts, public or private, no longer collectible in gold. Instead, all debts public or private were to be payable in unbacked Fed-created fiat currency. This new currency would now be legal tender in the U.S. for all debts public and private.

Henceforth, our United States Constitution would be continuously eroded due to the fact that our nation is now owned “lock stock and barrel,” by a private consortium of international bankers, contemptuous of any freedoms or sovereignties intended by our forefathers. This was all accomplished by design.

How the Gold was Stolen from America

Under orders of the creditor (the Federal Reserve System and its private owners) on April 5, 1933 President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Presidential order 6102, which required all Americans to deliver all gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates to their local Federal Reserve Bank on or before April 28, 1933.

Any violators would be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned up to ten years, or both for knowingly violating this order. This gold was then offered by the Fed owners to any foreign, non-U.S. citizen, at $35.00 per ounce. Over the entire previous 100 years, gold had remained at a stable value, increasing only from $18.93 per ounce to $20.69 per ounce.

Since then, every U.S. citizen (by virtue of their birth certificate) has become an asset of the government, pledged at a specific dollar amount to pay this debt through future taxation. Thus, every American citizen is in debt from birth (via future taxation), and is, for all practical purposes, property of the creditors, the privately owned Federal Reserve System.

Presently, the United States Government (which again, is completely owned and controlled by the international bankers) continues to forfeit its sovereignty by entering into international monetary and trade agreements which abolish almost all forms of trade tariffs that previously protected not only the value of American commercial productivity and workforce labor, but which were also a substantial source of revenue for the government.

The loss of this revenue, as well as the expanding deficits created by recent massive reduction in taxation for large corporations and the very wealthiest citizens, insures continued borrowing by the government.

This self-perpetuating cycle of borrowing is made possible only by the ability of the government to guarantee repayment (of only the interest, never the principal) through future taxation on the earnings of every American citizen.

Due to our banking history of deception, fraud and counterfeiting, which only benefits the purported elite bankers and their underlings, the borrowed principal itself is being used to make the payments on our debt at interest, thus, it is mathematically impossible to pay off.

We are, therefore, obligated to continue this cycle of borrowing indefinitely, causing complete money slavery for life.

The amount owed will expand endlessly, until our monthly payments exceed our income and we are bankrupt, and all we have acquired is pillaged from us. Or, until the privately owned Federal Reserve Crime Syndicate is ended and all debts are terminated.

edward-bernays-quote

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

bertrand-russel-dietbertrand-russell

 

As I have included in my above video report, cinema (print & TV) have always been used by the establishment (global elite) as a mechanism to influence public opinion and to create an obedient, servile public by keeping them amused and distracted with entertainment and fantasy as the forward the ancient plan of the Great work into the New Age.

THE AGE OF CINEMA WAS SIMULTANEOUSLY BORN IN 7 COUNTRIES IN 1896:

UNITED STATES

GREAT BRITAIN

FRANCE

BELGIUM

THE NETHERLANDS

GERMANY

AUSTRIA-HUNGARY

AN INTERESTING NOTE: Between 1896 and about 1905 the only films produced in Austria were newsreels, mostly by French companies such as Pathé Frères and Gaumont.  The international elite have controlled content in cinema and then television from the beginning.

The first films by an Austrian filmmaker were a series of short erotic movies such as Am Sklavenmarkt produced by photographer and practitioner of The Mysteries, Satanist Johann Schwarzer, who founded the Saturn-Film company (SATURNALIA/SATAN) company in 1906.   Below is clip from Am Sklavenmarkt (1906).

 

Several Austrian directors pursued careers in Weimar Germany and later in the US, among them were  Josef von Sternberg and Fritz Lang who directed METROPOLIS (1927).

Metropolis is actually a foreshadowing of United Nations Agenda 21 and the Plan:

The creation of a neo-feudal two class society, a society that is fully described and outlined in Council on Foreign Relations insider Carroll Quigley’s 1966 book, TRAGEDY AND HOPE.

Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY is not about space.  It is about man.  And how man through knowledge will evolve into God.  It is the Luciferian doctrine of the Mysteries. A message to all the adepts, priests and high priestess that the Plan of the Great Work is nearing completion.

As Stanley Kubrick’s 2001 directly communicates with adepts of the Mystery Schools so does Fritz Lang in his film Metropolis.  Both films are chock full of references to the Mysteries, Freemasonry, the Great Work, Big Brother, a New “utopian” Atlantis and the New World Order.

A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is another inside look at a post industrial world envisioned by the globalists where moral decay, crime and drugs are rampant and cities are run down ghettos for the lower class and mansions and palaces for the ruling class.    It is yet another Kubrick look into the designed dystopian future of United Nations Agenda 21 which is being sold as a Utopian model for humanity.

Kubrick’s final film, EYES WIDE SHUT (1999) is another look into the world of the elite puppet masters and their truly Satanic behavior behind the scenes.   Kubrick was always given free reign in his productions and he demanded a closed set.  Kubrick was also very secretive during post-production.

It is very possible the Inner Circle of the Hidden Masters never saw the film until it was released.  Only days after EYES WIDE SHUT was released Kubrick died of heart attack.   Take from that what you will

During production of EYES WIDE SHUT which took 3 years, Kubrick was desperately trying to free his daughter from the Church of Scientology Cult founded by fellow Satanist and Aleister Crowley’s good friend, L. Ron Hubbard.

I am convinced that over the years and experiences he witnessed, Kubrick, who was himself an adept of the Order known as the shadow government.   Think of it.  Of all years in the future to choose, 2001 was chosen.   Do you think that the historical significance of the year 2001 is a mere coincidence?  No.  2o01 was the dawning of the New Age.    The New World Order.

Kubrick clearly knew how film was being used as a medium to influence, or brainwash the masses and his work indicates a gnawing desire to awaken his audience to the many things that troubled him about the world and the elite.

In my view, Kubrick deeply regretted some of the things he had done to advance the agenda of the order, such as faking the first moon landing, a fact he reveals in his film The Shining with many visual references to the moon shot and Apollo 13. The following documentary THE SHINING CODE 2.0 explains this is great detail.

EYES WIDE SHUT appears to be a way of making amends by conveying some of the very wicked truth he no doubt witnessed first hand.  To emphasize this, Kubrick chose a title that uses the LAW OF REVERSAL.

In fact, in EYES WIDE SHUT, the eyes are wide open on the way the elite conduct their lives and their influence and control over society.  It is a revealing and disturbing look at the elite’s depravity and insanity.  These are the people who rule Our planet.

But the sleeping giant that is humanity is finally awakening the criminals who have hijacked Our government.

DEATH TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER!

 

TRUMP 2016!

 

SOURCES AND RELATED INFORMATION:

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/netflix-pills-drugs-reed-hastings-tv-future-movies-shows-matrix-a7381416.html

THE OWNERS AND HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE CRIME SYNDICATE

CURRENT CORPORATE OWNERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE CRIME SYNDICATE:

http://www.howardnema.com/2014/08/09/operation-mockingbird-still-flying-high/

http://www.howardnema.com/2014/08/09/propaganda-the-art-of-social-control/

1984 by George Orwell

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

PROPAGANDA by Edward Burnays (1928)

http://www.wnd.com/2014/02/70-million-americans-taking-mind-altering-drugs/

Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era by Zbigniew Brzezinski

CENTURY OF THE SELF – BBC Documentary

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_film

DARK SIDE OF GENIUS THE LIFE OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK by Donald Spoto

Below are clips from the earliest propaganda films ever produced:

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

Visit http://www.HowardNema.com ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com
Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

CRITICAL EXCERPTS FROM TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966) THAT EXPLAIN OUR WORLD TODAY

 carroll-quigley-quote

Pg. 48-49:

In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value. Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.

Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored. In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other. The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild’s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.

Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. Even after these banking families became fully involved in domestic industry by the emergence of financial capitalism, they remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways: (1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts, including foreign government debts, even in areas which seemed, at first glance, poor risks, like Egypt, Persia, Ottoman Turkey, Imperial China, and Latin America; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods, since they admired “liquidity” and regarded commitments in commodities or even real estate as the first step toward bankruptcy; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of deflation (which they called “sound” money from its close associations with high interest rates and a high value of money) and of the gold standard, which, in their eyes, symbolized and ensured these values; and (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.

Pg. 53: The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

Pg. 62: In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland’s second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.” This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.”

Pg. 324: the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.

Pg. 326: Norman (Montagu) had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank, especially of Henry P. Davison, who made him secretary of the Bankers Trust Company of New York (in succession to Thomas W. Lamont) in 1904, used him as Morgan’s agent in the banking rearrangements following the crash of 1907, and made him vice-president of the Bankers Trust (still in succession to Lamont) in 1909. He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914. Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges. Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates. In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).

Pg. 936-937: Behind this unfortunate situation lies another, more profound, relationship, which influences matters much broader than Far Eastern policy. It involves the organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into foundations to be used for educational, scientific, “and other public purposes.” Sixty or more years ago, public life in the West was dominated by the influence of “Wall Street.” This term has nothing to do with its use by the Communists to mean monopolistic industrialism, but, on the contrary, refers to international financial capitalism deeply involved in the gold standard, foreign-exchange fluctuations, floating of fixed-interest securities and, to a lesser extent, flotation of industrial shares for stock-exchange markets. This group, which in the United States, was completely dominated by J. P. Morgan and Company from the 1880’s to the 1930’s was cosmopolitan, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, eastern seaboard, high Episcopalian, and European-culture conscious. Their connection with the Ivy League colleges rested on the fact that the large endowments of these institutions required constant consultation with the financiers of Wall Street (or its lesser branches on State Street, Boston, and elsewhere) and was reflected in the fact that these endowments, even in 1930, were largely in bonds rather than in real estate or common stocks. As a consequence of these influences, as late as the 1930’s, J. P. Morgan and his associates were the most significant figures in policy making at Harvard, Columbia, and to a lesser extent Yale, while the Whitneys were significant at Yale, and the Prudential Insurance Company (through Edward D. Duffield) dominated Princeton.

Pg. 937: The names of these Wall Street luminaries still adorn these Ivy League campuses, with Harkness colleges and a Payne Whitney gymnasium at Yale, a Pyne dormitory at Princeton, a Dillon Field House and Lamont Library at Harvard. The chief officials of these universities were beholden to these financial powers and usually owed their jobs to them. Morgan himself helped make Nicholas Murray Butler president of Columbia; his chief Boston agent, Thomas Nelson Perkins of the First National Bank of that city, gave Conant his boost from the chemical laboratory to University Hall at Harvard; Duffield of Prudential, caught unprepared when the incumbent president of Princeton was killed in an automobile in 1932, made himself president for a year before he chose Harold Dodds for the post in 1933. At Yale, Thomas Lamont, managing partner of the Morgan firm, was able to swing Charles Seymour into the presidency of that university in 1937.

The significant influence of “Wall Street” (meaning Morgan) both in the Ivy League and in Washington, in the period of sixty or more years following 1880, explains the constant interchange between the Ivy League and the Federal government, an interchange which undoubtedly aroused a good deal of resentment in less-favored circles, who were more than satiated with the accents, tweeds, and High Episcopal Anglophilia of these peoples

Pg. 938: Because of its dominant position in Wall Street, the Morgan firm came also to dominate other Wal1 Street powers, such as Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, or Dillon-Reed. Close alliances were made with Rockefeller, Mellon, and Duke interests but not nearly so intimate ones with the great industrial powers like du Pont and Ford. [Because] … of the great influence of this “Wall Street” alignment, an influence great enough to merit the name of the “American Establishment,” this group could … control the Federal government and, in consequence, had to adjust to a good many government actions … [which they had secretly supported ]. The chief of these were in taxation law, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913, but culminating, above all else, in the inheritance tax. These tax laws drove the great private fortunes dominated by Wall Street into tax-exempt foundations, which became a major link in the Establishment network between Wall Street, the Ivy League, and the Federal government.

More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street supplied both. The purpose was not to destroy … or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could “blow off steam,” and (3) to have a final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if they ever went “radical.” There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers had talked about it and even attempted it earlier.

Pg. 939: The New Republic was founded by Willard and Dorothy Straight, using her money, in 1914, and continued to be supported by her financial contributions until March 23, 1953. The original purpose for establishing the paper was to provide an outlet for the progressive Left and to guide it quietly in an Anglophile direction. This latter task was entrusted to a young man, only four years out of Harvard, but already a member of the mysterious Round Table group, which has played a major role in directing England’s foreign policy since its formal establishment in 1909. This new recruit, Walter Lippmann, has been, from 1914 to the present, the authentic spokesman in American journalism for the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic in international affairs.

Pg. 950: There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the … Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

LINK TO FULL FREE PDF of TRAGEDY AND HOPE

 

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2:
https://www.youtube.com/c/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

TRUTH TALK NEWS

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

 

TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com reports are all sourced and verifiable.

Feel free to share, download this FAIR USE content and upload it to your own sites!

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

Still Don’t Believe In The New World Order?

Revelations From Great And Powerful Men

PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE THESE QUOTES EVERYWHERE!

“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

THAT quotation and the following – and many others like them – clearly demonstrate that the words “new world order” are very real and deadly serious.

They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The “old world order” is one based on independent nation-states. The “new world order” involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government.

This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.).

The various notions of the “new world order” differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance:

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.” Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed when Korean Airlines flight 007 was shot down by the Soviets

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

“The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.” Myron Fagan

“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press….They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.” U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, Congressional Record 1917

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.” George Herbert Walker Bush

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

“The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments’ plans. ” British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)

“What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil.” Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920

“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen….At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.” New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922

“From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.” Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.

“The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semi-occult power which….pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I.” British military historian Major General J.F.C. Fuller, l941

“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.

“The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

“The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.” A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.” Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

“Fifty men have run America, and that’s a high figure.” Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

“Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.” Senator William Jenner, 1954

“The case for government by elites is irrefutable.” Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?

“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.” U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.” Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

“The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.” Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

“The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation.” The Christian Science Monitor, September 1, l961

“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.

“The planning of UN can be traced to the ‘secret steering committee’ established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department’s Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department’s postwar planning.” Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, “Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy.” (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.” Harpers, July l958

“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.” Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.” M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.” Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)

“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.” Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.'” Excerpt from article entitled “New World Order Pledged to Jews,” in The New York Times (October 1940)

“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order.” The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

“New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor”

Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.” Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 194

“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God.” American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)

“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper.” Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order.” Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)

“Alchemy for a New World Order” Article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'” Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” — The New York Times (February 1962)

“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.” Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order.'” Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)

“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.” Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled “Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)

“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.” Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

“At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt’s time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order.” Part of article in The New York Times (November 1975)

“A New World Order” Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms.” Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)

“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.” Richard Gephardt, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.” President George Bush (January 1991)

“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council.” Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in The New York Times (January 1991)

“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.” George McGovern, in The New York Times (February 199

“… it’s Bush’s baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler ‘new order’ root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier.” William Safire, in The New York Times (February 1991)

“How I Learned to Love the New World Order” Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

“How to Achieve The New World Order” Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.” Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State” Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)

“The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.” Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

“The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important “for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order.” President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in The New York Times (April 1995)

One World Order supporters….

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day. But a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers (administrations), too plainly proves a deliberate systematic plan of reducing us to slavery.” Thomas Jefferson

“…This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of “one world government’….National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…” Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter.

“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” President George Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1,1992.

“…This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.” Senator Joseph S. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate, March 1, 1962, about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever.

“Let me control a peoples currency and I care not who makes their laws…” Meyer Nathaniel Rothchild in a speech to a gathering of world bankers February 12, 1912.The following year, we subscribed to the “services” of the newly incorporated Federal Reserve, headed by Mr. Rothchild.

“By the end of this decade (2000 AD) we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations … a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government is inevitable.” Pope John Paul II quoted by Malachi Martin in the book “The Keys of This Blood”

“The New World Order is a world that has a supernational authority to regulate world commerce and industry; an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a World Development Fund that would make funds available to free and Communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order.” Former West German Chancellor, Willy Brandt, former chairman of the Fifth-Socialist International, who chaired the Brandt Commission in the late 1980s.

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” David Rockefeller

“But this present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for long. Already there are powerful forces at work that threaten to destroy all of our hopes and efforts to erect an enduring structure of global interdependence.” David Rockefeller, speaking at the Business Council for the United Nations, September 14, 1994.

“A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.” Brent Scowcroft, George Bush’s National Security Advisor, said on the eve of the Gulf War.

“The Persian Gulf crisis is a rare opportunity to forge new bonds with old enemies (the Soviet Union)…Out of these troubled times a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.” President George Bush, September 11, 1990.

“The world can therefore seize the opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to fulfill the long held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.” President George Bush in his State of the Union Address, January 29, 1991.

“NAFTA is a major stepping stone to the New World Order.” Henry Kissinger when campaigning for the passage of NAFTA.

“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.” Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations, December 1988.

“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.” Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in “Foreign Affairs,” July/August 1995.

“…In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” Richard N. Gardner, in “Foreign Affairs,” April 1974.

“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people – will hate the new world order – and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.” H. G. Wells, in his book entitled “The New World Order” (1939).

“Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control, to Sen. Howard Metzenbaum, The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.

“When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans… and so a lot of people say there’s too much personal freedom. When personal freedom’s being abused, you have to move to limit it. That’s what we did in the announcement I made last weekend on the public housing projects, about how we’re going to have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to make people safer in their communities.” President Bill Clinton, 3-22-94, MTV’s “Enough is Enough”

“We can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans…” Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” David Rockefeller, statement in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)

“You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the great struggle for independence.” Charles Austin Beard (1874-1948)

“War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack. Our time will come in thirty or forty years. To win, we shall need the element of surprise. The Western world will need to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movement on record. There shall be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate to their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist.” Dmitrii Z. Manuilskii (Lenin School of Political Warfare, Moscow, 1931)

“There is no reason for anyone in this country, anyone except a police officer or a military person, to buy, to own, to have, to use a handgun….And the only way to do that is to change the Constitution.” Michael Gartner, 1992 in USA Today

“The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is repealed.” H. J. Res. 438Introduced by Rep. Major Owens, 1992

Vice President Al Gore as he traveled to Marrakech, Morocco, in April for the signing of the new world trade agreement. Gore appeared hours after U.S. planes enforcing an allied ‘no fly’ zone over northern Iraq accidentally shot down two U.S. helicopters, killing 15 Americans and 11 foreign officials. ‘I want to extend condolences,’ Gore said, ‘to the families of those who died in the service of the United Nations.'” (Los Angeles Times, 6/12/94)

“There is nothing wrong with the planet. The planet is fine . . . been here 4 1/2 billion years. We’ve been here, what, a 100,000 years, maybe 200,000. And we’ve only been engaged in heavy industry a little over 200 years. 200 years versus 4 1/2 billion. And we have the conceit to think that somehow we’re a threat? The planet isn’t going away. We are.” George Carlin

“To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson

“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.” H. L. Mencken

“Nuclear power must be dealt with irrationally. . . . Nuclear plants are carcinogens. Let’s get that story out. . . . Their lies will catch up to them. We need endless Chernobyl reminders.” Ralph Nader

Cannibalism is a “radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.” Lyall Watson, The Financial Times, 15 July 1995

“‘Protecting the Environment’ is a ruse. The goal is the political and economic subjugation of most men by the few, under the guise of preserving nature.” J. H. Robbins

“…the only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don’t suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them.” Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

“The necessary consequence of an egalitarian program is the decidedly inegalitarian creation of a ruthless power elite.” M. N. Rothbard

Global Sustainability requires: “the deliberate quest of poverty . . . reduced resource consumption . . . and set levels of mortality control.” Professor Maurice King

“Allowing the EPA to condone continued use of a chemical whenever the benefits outweighs the risks is absolutely anathema to the environmental community.” Janet Hathaway, Natural Resources Defense Council

The Environmentalist’s Dream is an Egalitarian Society based on: rejection of economic growth, a smaller population, eating lower on the food chain, consuming a lot less, and sharing a much lower level of resources much more equally. Aaron Wildavsky

“A global climate treaty must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the greenhouse effect.” Richard Benedict, State Dept. employee working on assignment from the Conservation Foundation

“Giving society cheap, abundant energy . . . would be the equivalent o f giving an idiot child a machine gun.” Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University

“The secret to David McTaggart’s (early officer in Greanpeace) success is the secret to Greenpeace’s success: It doesn’t matter what is true . . . . it only matters what people believe is true . . . . You are what the media define you to be. [Greenpeace] became a myth, and a myth-generating machine.” Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace

“. . . a year is about one-fifth of the time we have left if we are going to preserve any kind of quality in our world.” Garrett de Bell (1970)

“The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency.” Pope John Paul I

“The move toward cotnrolling less and less pollution at greater and greater expense — until you are spending everything to control nothing — is one of the big water quality problems we are facing in the future.” Ernest Rosenberg

“Complex technology of any sort is an assault on human dignity. It would be little short of disastrous for us to discover the source of clean, cheap, abundant energy, because of what we might do with it.” Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute

“. . . the Planning Commission must say ‘no’ to development . . . Austin, Texas, is showing us about land use . . . . ” Judge Armstrong, Kentucky County

“It is easy to be conspicuously ‘compassionate’ if others are being forced to pay the cost.” M. N. Rothbard

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.” John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

“We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing — in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado)

“We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects . . . We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land.” David Foreman, Earth First!

“. . . There is no such thing in America as an independent press . . . We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes . . . Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” John Swinton, former New York Times Chief of Staff

“We have the opportunity to avoid choices like nuclear power which will come back to haunt us 30 years from now.” Russell Peterson, National Audobon Society President

“. . . The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.” Dr. Reed F. Noss, The Wildlands Project

“One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God’s selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death.” Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard – member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank. The Population Control Agenda.The Timeline

“. . . as radical environmentalists, we can see AIDS not as a problem, but as a necessary solution.” Miss Ann Thropy (pseudonym), Earth First! Journal

“The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing . . . This is not to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run.” Economist editorial

“I suspect that the politicians and businessmen who are jumping on the environment bandwagon don’t have the slightest idea of what they are getting into. They are talking about emission control devices on automobiles, while we are talking about bans on automobiles.” Dennis Hayes, Earth Day Agenda (1970)

“The invention of the concept of sustainable human development and that of so-called human security, as opposed to territorial security of nation- states, and its promotion by the UN is in clear contradiction to all that we, the Group of 77, and the UN Charter itself consider inalienable, namely national sovereignty and security.” Pranab Mukherjee, India’s Minister of Commerce, Earth Times, 15 October 1994

“It’s (the prospect of cheap fusion energy) the worst thing that could happen to the planet.” Jeremy Rifkin

“No case for expensive policies for safeguarding species can be made without more extensive analysis.” Endangered Species Blueprint, National Wilderness Institute

“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” H. L. Mencken

“If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund

“They want timid, helpless people who are anxious to get in touch with their inner child, enter twelve-step programs, and run to the government with every little problem.” Clark Stooksbury

“. . . Our production and consumption is not sustainable . . . Agenda 21 is to be implemented . . . The Texas Sustainable Energy Development Council will develop the Texas Plan . . . The money will come from milking the utilities and redirecting oil overcharge funds . . . . ” Commissioner Karl Rabago, Texas Public Utilities Commission

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro

“Behind the honeyed but patently absurd pleas for equality is a ruthless drive for placing ‘the new elite’ at the top of a new hierachy of power.” M. N. Rothbard

“Pure guesswork has become the basis of a forecast that has been published in newspapers to be read and understood as a scientific statement.” Endangered Species Blueprint, National Wilderness Institute

“Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” Peter Singer, the “Father of Animal Rights”

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” Norman Thomas, former U.S. Socialist Presidential Candidate

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day.” Dr. Jacques Cousteau

“I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal

“Measured on virtually any scale, the world is in worse shape than it was 20 years ago.” Dennis Hayes, Chairman of Earth Day 1990

“The world has cancer, and the cancer is man.” A. Gregg, Mankind at the Turning Point

“People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any.” Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund

“This is a political game. It has nothing to do with science. It has nothing to do with health and safety.” Sherry Neddick, Greenpeace

“Free Enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have the freedom to exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the process . . . Capitalism is destroying the earth.” Helen Caldicott, Union of Concerned Scientists

“The system of private property is the most important guaranty to freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because of the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that no one has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what we do for ourselves.” Friedrich A. Hayck

“The only proper purpose of a government is to protect man’s rights . . .” Ayn Rand

“We reject the idea of private property.” Peter Berle, President of the National Audobon Society

“Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion.” Murray Rothbard

“No government knows any limits to its power except the endurance of the people.” Lysander Spooner

“The real culprits are those who created a system that makes it dangerous to work and safe to loaf.” Thomas Sowell

“The three branches of government . . . are not, in any sense, ‘branches’ since that would imply that there is something they are all attached to besides self-aggrandizement and our pocketbooks.”       P. J. O’Rourke

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”
All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

http://www.HowardNema.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.
Do the research.
Find your own truth.
There is only one truth.
Seek and you will find it.
If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.
All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

BERNIE, TRUMP AND THE TRAGEDY OF HOPE AND CHANGE

By Howard Nema

Could democracy be merely an illusion?

Have you have ever suspected that very powerful people have  guided events throughout history for generations; and that these royal and noble families have created a system appearing to be democratic, but actually excludes ordinary citizens from decision-making and through ever increasing taxation, regulations and legislation, incrementally enslaves them in a system of benevolent despotism with generous helpings of circus and bread?

We see this with the 2016 Presidential Elections which is clearly a circus and is chock full of bread $$$.

We also see the influence of the Hidden Masters behind both the democratic and republican political machines that have each attacked and sought to destroy their own party members, namely Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.

In Quigley’s work we discover that national constitutions are routinely undermined by the leaders who are elected to defend them.

We learn that “all social instruments tend to become institutions,” regardless of their benevolent origin, and, from that point forward, the institution is run for the benefit of those who control it (at the expense of its original purpose).

(We see this in the generational rise of socialism and government dependence.)

Quigley reveals that real power operates behind the scenes, in secrecy, and with little to fear from democratic elections.

He proves that conspiracies, secret societies, and small, powerful networks of individuals are not only real; they’re extremely effective at creating or destroying entire nations and shaping the world as a whole.

We learn that “representative government” is nothing less than a carefully managed con, like the Federal Reserve, the IRS and a litany of other collectivist tyrannies we must endure to feed the parasite elites and their insatiable quest for global domination.

Since these disturbing truths contradict nearly everything we have been taught to believe about our government, our education system, and the media, many dismiss these truths as nonsensical nut job conspiracy theories that only gullible fools would believe.

But Carroll Quigley was no conspiracy theorist or gullible fool. He was a prominent historian who specialized in studying the evolution of civilizations as well as secret societies.

Quigley taught at Princeton University, Harvard University, and the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He worked as an advisor to the US Defense Department, the US Navy, and the Smithsonian Institution.

In short, Carroll Quigley was a well-connected member of Ivy League society. Based on his own words, and his training as a historian, it appears that he was chosen by members of a secret network to write the real history of their rise to power. However, as Quigley later realized, these individuals did not expect or intend for him to publish their secrets for the rest of the world to see.

In 1966 after 2 years of having unfettered access to the records and minutes of the Council on Foreign Relations and more than 20 years of being in the presence of their leaders and spheres of influence, Bill Clinton’s mentor, Jesuit professor at Georgetown University Carroll Quigley wrote Tragedy and Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time.

In this superb expose of the ruling elite and their plans for a one world system of financial and political control in private hands, Quigley intricately details the “Anglo-American Establishment and their collectivist corporate goal of unifying the United States and Great Britain in a socio-economic political system dominated by the Central Banks of the world.

Shortly after publishing Tragedy and Hope, “the Network” took action against and the book he’d spent twenty years researching and two years writing was pulled from the market.

As Quigley recounts:

“The original edition published by Macmillan in 1966 sold about 8800 copies and sales were picking up in 1968 when they “ran out of stock,” as they told me (but in 1974, when I went after them with a lawyer, they told me that they had destroyed the plates in 1968). They lied to me for six years, telling me that they would re-print when they got 2000 orders, which could never happen because they told anyone who asked that it was out of print and would not be reprinted. They denied this until I sent them Xerox copies of such replies to libraries, at which they told me it was a clerk’s error. In other words they lied to me but prevented me from regaining the publication rights by doing so. . .

[Rights revert back to the copyright holder if the book is out of print, but not if the book is simply out of stock.]

…Powerful influences in this country want me, or at least my work, suppressed.”

When reading the 1377 page Tragedy and Hope, you immediately realize that it wasn’t written for the casual reader.  It is a long, tedious read of which 95 percent consists of basic economic, political, and diplomatic history. However, the other 5 percent contains some truly astonishing admissions about the existence, nature, and effectiveness of covert power.

As one would expect from an Ivy League historian, both Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment reveals the existence of a secret network that formed to bring “all the habitable portions of the world” under its control.

A college of corporations. In Tragedy and Hope, Quigley wrote:

“I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quigley exposes this wealthy “Anglophile network” that cooperates with any group that can help it achieve its goal.

(This includes Communists, which, on the surface, would seem to be the sworn enemy of super-wealthy capitalist conspirators.)

Quigley chronicles how the Network formed in the late 1800s in England and immediately began creating front groups.  By 1919, it had formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House), and it went on to create other extremely powerful institutes within “the chief British dominions and in the United States.” Hiding behind these front groups, the Network began secretly exercising its power.

In the United States the main institute was named the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which Quigley described as “a front for J. P. Morgan and company.”

In short time, the Network expanded its operations; spreading like cancer into our universities, media, and especially government “foreign policy.”

On this basis, which was originally financial and goes back to George Peabody, there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. In England, the center was the Round Table Group, while in the United States it was J. P. Morgan and Company or its local branches in Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland.

The American branch of this “English Establishment” exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and the lamented Boston Evening Transcript). In fact, the editor of the Christian Science Monitor was the chief American correspondent (anonymously)…It might be mentioned that the existence of this Wall Street, Anglo-American axis is quite obvious once it is pointed out.

If the idea of powerful Wall Street insiders joining a secret foreign network to establish dominion over all “habitable portions of the world” and successfully penetrating “into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy” sounds like something you should have heard about, you’re right. But the secret to why you haven’t is contained in the story itself. (The successful “penetration” of universities, the press, and the government has proven quite useful to those who wish “to remain unknown.”)

The group behind this Great Work which Carroll Quigley calls, “The Network”, which has no official name is also known as the Milner Group, or Milner’s kindergarten.

They have worked for generations, centuries– to achieve this goal and to reach the stage of socio-political control we see today.

Their nameless, faceless dominant presence is obvious to all of us in inflation and dollar devaluation. We see it in rising food prices, commodities stagnant wages, rising unemployment, poverty and shrinking middle class.

Although most are aware of these effects of their influence, they are ignorant to the group, or their agenda.

Quigley agrees on most of the goals of this clandestine operation, but disagrees on the group’s omerta of absolute secrecy, believing the “cause” of the Milner’s is significant in world history and should be known.

Here are a few key quotes from Quigley’s

Tragedy And Hope:

“In 1891, Cecil Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a “Circle of Initiates” and an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” later organized as the Round Table organization. In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States.

In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations. After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries. They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom.

There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.   Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

The Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR)

Quigley provides many examples of Network infiltration and manipulation. For instance, on pages 132 and 953 of Tragedy and Hope, he exposes yet another “front group” called the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). Because the IPR provides priceless insight into the deceptive nature and true power of the Network, we’ll briefly cover it here. Let’s begin with the final report of a US Senate investigation of the IPR. It stated, in part:

The IPR has been considered by the American Communist Party and by Soviet officials as an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and military intelligence. The IPR disseminated and sought to popularize false information including information originating from Soviet and Communist sources…The IPR was a vehicle used by the Communists to orient American far eastern policies toward Communist objectives.

To the average person, it sounds crazy to suggest that a network of super-wealthy capitalists is secretly conspiring to gain control of the world.

But it sounds even crazier to accuse these same super-wealthy capitalists of using their tremendous wealth and power to “popularize” a system of government (Communism) that would, in theory anyway, lead to the destruction of all their wealth and power.

Surely, if such an unbelievable story were true, the free press would have shouted it from the rooftops…right? Wrong. Let’s jump ahead for just a second and look at how Quigley described the Network-directed media cover up of the Senate investigation:

“It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any [revelations] to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions.

As this demonstrates, the Network fully understands the importance of controlling public opinion. This also provides a glimpse into how it can do so.”

(If a disturbing truth isn’t reported on by a “respected” news outlet, it might as well not exist. The vast majority of citizens will remain forever oblivious.)

Additionally, in this particular case, any senator that insisted on taking the investigation “too far” would surely face a smear campaign by the same press that was ignoring the IPR story.

Needless to say, this type of influence can drastically affect how much attention an issue receives in the media. The merit and importance of a story will often take a backseat to the wishes of those who have the power to keep it quiet. More importantly, similar tactics of control can be applied in other areas as well. Keep that in mind as you read the following short summary of the IPR’s activities, because the blueprint for directing perception and policies hasn’t changed.

In 1951 the Subcommittee on Internal Security of the Senate Judiciary Committee…sought to show that China had been lost to the Communists by the deliberate actions of a group of academic experts on the Far East and Communist fellow travelers whose work in that direction was controlled and coordinated by the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). The influence of the Communists in IPR is well established, but the patronage of Wall Street is less well known.

The headquarters of the IPR and of the American Council of IPR were both in New York and were closely associated on an interlocking basis. Each spent about $2.5 million dollars [nearly $30 million when adjusted for inflation] over the quarter-century from 1925 to 1950, of which about half, in each case, came from the Carnegie Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation (which were themselves interlocking groups controlled by an alliance of Morgan and Rockefeller interests in Wall Street). Much of the rest…came from firms closely allied to these two Wall Street interests, such as Standard Oil, International Telephone and Telegraph, International General Electric, the National City Bank, and the Chase National Bank.”

On the Network’s influence over Far East Policy:

“There is considerable truth in the…contention that the American experts on China were organized into a single interlocking group which had a general consensus of a Leftish character.

It is also true that this group, from its control of funds, academic recommendations, and research or publication opportunities, could favor persons who accepted the established consensus and could injure, financially or in professional advancement, persons who did not accept it.

It is also true that the established group, by its influence on book reviewing in The New York Times, the Herald Tribune, the Saturday Review, a few magazines, including the “liberal weeklies,” and in the professional journals, could advance or hamper any specialist’s career.

It is also true that these things were done in the United States in regard to the Far East by the Institute of Pacific Relations, that this organization had been infiltrated by Communists, and by Communist sympathizers, and that much of this group’s influence arose from its access to and control over the flow of funds from financial foundations to scholarly activities.

Awards for work in the Far Eastern area required approval or recommendation from members of IPR. Moreover, access to publication and recommendations to academic positions in the handful of great American universities concerned with the Far East required similar sponsorship.

And, finally, there can be little doubt that consultant jobs on Far Eastern matters in the State Department or other government agencies were largely restricted to IPR-approved people. The individuals who published, who had money, found jobs, were consulted, and who were appointed intermittently to government missions were those who were tolerant of the IPR line.”

Amazingly, after admitting all of this, Quigley somehow concludes:

“The charges…accepted and proliferated by the neo-isolationists in the 1950’s and by the radical Right in the 1960’s, that China was “lost” because of this group, or that the members of this group were disloyal to the United States, or engaged in espionage, or were participants in a conscious plot, or that the whole group was controlled by Soviet agents or even by Communists, is not true.

In Quigley’s defense, the last part of his statement is obviously accurate: the group wasn’t controlled by “Soviet agents or even Communists.” Rather, according to Quigley himself, the group was controlled by a secret network of individuals who “have no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.”

This is one of many cases where Quigley expresses a clear bias toward the Network and its “instruments.” Clearly, this bias clouds his judgment. For instance, he repeatedly describes the Network’s methodical deception of others, but apparently he never questions whether he too might have been deceived.

He describes the carnage of their “mistaken” policies, but their “good intentions” are always accepted without a second thought.

Combine this favorable bias with his open contempt for “the radical Right” and “neo-isolationists,” and poorly reasoned conclusions are nearly unavoidable.

His casual dismissal of the IPR’s role in the fate of China provides but one shining example. That Quigley can admit the IPR had tremendous financial and political power, a specific agenda, and actually achieved its goals, but then attribute the rise of Mao Zedong solely to the “incompetence and corruption” of Chiang Kai-shek’s regime is difficult to explain.

After the creation of the IPR in 1925, wouldn’t you know the civil war in China conveniently began? It seems the Network preferred a Communist regime in China. This is apparent in the following statement by Quigley:

“From the broadest point of view the situation was this: The rivalry between the two super-Powers [the United States and Soviet Union] could be balanced and its tensions reduced only by the coming into existence of another Great Power on the land mass of Eurasia. There were three possibilities of this: a federated and prosperous Western Europe, India, or China. The first was essential; one of the others was highly desirable; and possibly all three might be achievable, but in no case was it essential, or even desirable, for the new Great Power to be allied with the United States.

If the Soviet Union were boxed in by the allies of the United States, it would feel threatened by the United States, and would seek security by more intensive exploitation of its resources in a military direction, with a natural increase in world tension. If, on the other hand, the Soviet Union were boxed in by at least two great neutral Powers, it could be kept from extensive expansion by the initial strength of such great Powers and the possibility that these Powers would ally with the United States if the Soviet Union put pressure on them.”

The “Great Game” of playing one side off another, engaging in balance-of-power politics, is discussed many times throughout Quigley’s book. I’ve included the reference above only because it provides a potentially logical motive (at least logical in the Realpolitik sense of the word) for the Network’s policy toward China.

Now, returning to Quigley’s characterization of the IPR conspiracy and the subsequent lack of media coverage referenced earlier: As a result of continuing pressure, spurred on by the “radical Right,” the Network soon found itself the target of two Congressional investigations. Quigley describes the second of these investigations, the Reece Committee, this way:

“A congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. The Eighty-third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman.

It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any [revelations] to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions.

An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of the interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece committee’s general counsel, Rene A. Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called Foundations: Their Power and Influence.”

Quigley then closes this chapter on the Network with the following:

“The financial circles of London and those of the eastern United States…reflects one of the most powerful influences in the twentieth-century American and world history.

The two ends of this English-speaking axis have sometimes been called, perhaps facetiously, the English and American Establishments. There is, however, a considerable degree of truth behind the joke, a truth which reflects a very real power structure. It is this power structure which the Radical Right in the United States has been attacking for years in the belief that they are attacking the Communists.”

Again, as Quigley points out, the “power structure” that he exposed isn’t loyal to Communism, or Socialism, or Fascism, or capitalism. The Network is happy to exploit the rhetoric of any movement or ideology, prop up any dictator or tyrant, and support any economic or political model, provided it serves their one overarching aim.

That aim, to bring “all the habitable portions of the world under their control,” is as old as the lust for power itself. The death and suffering that their policies have already caused in pursuit of this aim are incalculable. Allowing them to continue as they have will only bring more of the same.

W. Cleon Skousen shines light on this in his book, The Naked Capitalist:

“As I see it, the great contribution which Dr. Carroll Quigley unintentionally made by writing Tragedy and Hope was to help the ordinary American realize the utter contempt which the network leaders have for ordinary people. Human beings are treated en masse as helpless puppets on an international chess board where giants of economic and political power subject them to wars, revolution, civil strife, confiscation, subversion, indoctrination, manipulation and deception.”

Skousen hit the nail on the head. Tragedy and Hope revealed something even more important than “one of the most powerful influences in the twentieth-century American and world history.” It inadvertently revealed the mind-set of those who wield such power. It exposed the astonishing arrogance and hypocrisy of those who feel they have the right to rule billions of other human beings.

If there is one goal for this book, it is to expose the attitude and inherent nature of those who seek to dominate others. Don’t worry about remembering all of the dates and names that have been listed. Don’t worry about trying to recall all of the specific events.

(All of that information will always be here if you need to find it again.)

Instead, make it a point to simply verify the following: there is no lie that these men and women will not tell.

There is no crime that they will not commit. The only measure of “right” and “wrong,” in their view, is whether their tactics succeed or fail.

The Network’s game is won by those who calculate properly, and moral considerations only impede accurate calculation.

Henry Kissinger personifies the essence of the Network accurate calculation mindset. In his book Diplomacy, he introduces his readers to the amoral concepts of raison d’état (translated as “reasons of state,” or state interests) and Realpolitik.

The basis of both concepts, Kissinger explains, that individual men can be judged negatively on moral grounds, but governments cannot. When it comes to government action, the only suitable judgment is based on whether or not the government achieves its ends.

Throughout his book, Kissinger praises those who are “wise enough” to govern by these concepts and practically mocks those who object on so-called “moral” grounds.

In praise of seventeenth-century French statesman, Cardinal de Richelieu, Kissinger writes:

“Though privately religious, [Richelieu] viewed his duties as minister in entirely secular terms. Salvation might be his personal objective, but to Richelieu, the statesman, it was irrelevant. “Man is immortal, his salvation is hereafter,” he once said. “The state has no immortality, its salvation is now or never.” In other words, states do not receive credit in any world for doing what is right; they are only rewarded for being strong enough to do what is necessary.

As the King’s First Minister, [Richelieu] subsumed both religion and morality to raison d’état, his guiding light.

Richelieu was indeed the manipulator described, and did use religion [as a tool of manipulation]. He would no doubt have replied that he had merely analyzed the world as it was, much as Machiavelli had. Like Machiavelli, he might well have preferred a world of more refined moral sensibilities, but he was convinced that history would judge his statesmanship by how well he had used the conditions and the factors he was given to work with.”

To clarify, according to statesman like Kissinger, the moral and legislative laws that limit the actions of ordinary men do not apply to a select few. To escape accountability, the ruling class needs only to invoke the name of the state.

This, of course, is the same position held by past rulers who justified theft, deceit, torture, slavery, and slaughter in the name of God.

The tactic has simply been modernized. Our new rulers have substituted “the state” for God. And conveniently for them, they are the state…and not just any state; they are the emerging, omnipotent, global state.

Though citizens have been conditioned to believe that their statesmen and government instruments are in place to serve them, nothing could be further from the truth. Both the instruments and statesmen are part of an institutional apparatus that exists for the benefit of those who control it.

Put another way: the state is nothing more than a collection of men and women who direct the resources and policies of government. Contrary to popular belief, it is an institution that exists for its own sake, to ensure its own “salvation,” and to prevent the rise of anything that might challenge its power.

This is a harsh reality, and some will surely object on the grounds that the modern state is different. After all, it is built on the consent of the people. Democratic elections enable citizens to vote for who their leaders will be. They can choose from Republicans or Democrats. They can throw either out of office if they break their campaign promises.

But what if our so-called representative government is all a carefully crafted illusion? What if the Network chooses the candidates that we get to vote for? What if the Network’s “experts,” not the figureheads placed in official positions of power, are the ones who ultimately determine government policy? What if both political parties, right and left, are controlled by the exact same people? Quigley shines some light on this topic as well:

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

Quigley goes even further when describing the system that’s now emerging:

“It is increasingly clear that, in the twentieth century, the expert will replace…the democratic voter in control of the political system…Hopefully, the elements of choice and freedom may survive for the ordinary individual in that he may be free to make a choice between two opposing political groups (even if these groups have little policy choice within the parameters of policy established by the experts)…in general, his freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives.”

Does that statement alarm you? Let’s hope so.

Quigley’s work highlights how a small group of dominant men were able to secure control of local, national, continental, and even global policy to the point of control we see today. We blame politicians for all of societies ills, when these hidden masters are behind most of the mayhem in the world.

Quigley continued:

“Though the power of this network is not complete, they are moving inexorably in that direction. Without increased awareness (and resistance), their unelected and unaccountable global state will become a reality. And though the illusion of national sovereignty might be maintained, the freedom of the world’s citizens will be controlled within very narrow alternatives.

Real power is unelected. Politicians change, but the power structure does not. The Network operates behind the scenes, for its own benefit, without ever consulting those who are affected by its decisions.

The Network is composed of individuals who prefer anonymity. They are satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power.

This approach of secretly exercising power is common throughout history because it protects the conspirators from the consequences of their actions.

A primary tactic for directing public opinion and government policy is to place willing servants in leadership positions of trusted institutions (media, universities, government, foundations, etc.).

If there is ever a major backlash against a given policy, the servant can be replaced. This leaves both the institution and the individuals who actually direct its power unharmed.

Historically, those who establish sophisticated systems of domination are not only highly intelligent; they are supremely deceptive and ruthless. They completely ignore the ethical barriers that govern a normal human being’s behavior. They do not believe that the moral and legislative laws, which others are expected to abide by, apply to them. This gives them an enormous advantage over the masses that cannot easily imagine their mind-set.

Advances in technology have enabled modern rulers to dominate larger and larger areas of the globe. As a result, the substance of national sovereignty has already been destroyed, and whatever remains of its shell is being dismantled as quickly as possible. The new system they’re building (which they themselves refer to as a New World Order), will trade the existing illusion of democratically directed government for their long-sought, expert-directed, authoritarian technocracy.”

To be sure, it’s difficult to accept these statements upon first hearing them. They challenge our world view and force us to reconsider everything that we’ve been taught to believe. It’s much easier to dismiss these facts without further investigation; it’s easier to accept comforting lies that alleviate our anxieties.

But this, of course, is exactly the opposite of what must be done. If we allow ourselves to be manipulated, we empower the Network at our own expense.

Edward Bernays, perhaps more than anyone, helped establish the modern system of public manipulation. Drawing on the psychoanalytical techniques of his uncle, Sigmund Freud, Bernays became known as the father of propaganda. His low opinion of the masses is best expressed in his own words. The following quotes are taken from his book Propaganda:

“No serious sociologist any longer believes that the voice of the people expresses any divine or specially wise and lofty idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders…and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion.

If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?”

The fact is, we are dominated by a small cabal that understand the mental processes of the masses and psychological manipulation more almost any of us.

It is they who pull the strings of the puppets we elect. Puppets who are guided to control the public mind and contrive new ways to forward the Great Work and guide the world into the New World Order.

Political campaigns today are circus and bread. Lots of bread $$$$

A presidential candidate may be drafted due to popular demand,” but his or her future is really decided by the so called society of experts, a half dozen men, hidden in the shadows of luxurious secrecy.

The conscious manipulation of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.

Bertrand Russell describes the global “society of experts:

“The society of experts will control propaganda and education. It will teach loyalty to the world government, and make nationalism high treason. The government, being an oligarchy, will instill submissiveness into the great bulk of the population…It is possible that it may invent ingenious ways of concealing its own power, leaving the forms of democracy intact, and allowing the plutocrats or politicians to imagine that they are cleverly controlling these forms…whatever the outward forms may be, all real power will come to be concentrated in the hands of those who understand the art of scientific manipulation.”

In 1974 after his legal battle against his publisher failed, Carroll Quigley said:

“I am now quite sure that ‘Tragedy and Hope’ was suppressed although I do not know why or by whom.”

I do.   And now so do you. They are the elusive hidden masters of the Network who, by concealing its own power seek to dominate our world. They are the puppet masters holding the strings of Our political leaders and using mass media to influence public opinion by any and all means necessary to attain their goal.

Purveyors of the democratic illusion assure us that sophisticated conspiracies and powerful secret societies are figments of Our imaginations, given to right wing extremism and religious fanaticism.

But as you have learned, there does indeed exist a hidden hand guiding the course of history. We must awaken others to this reality. Until a critical mass of understanding is reached, humanity will remain enslaved and the elite sociopaths operating behind the scenes will never be held accountable for their treasonous crimes.

Sources and related material:

Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiY36HJgJzOAhXJbR4KHZofCtQQFggsMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FTragedy_and_Hope.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH6wvYbRPSBH_5GDlMlYygpcIfiAw&sig2=buNtyz3ikB8-1dJloG1TGA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi9zq_WgJzOAhXDHh4KHZmDD5IQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2Fthe_anglo-american_establishment.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF5uQ0g3JT-l9gvLUcAqe-c3anizQ&sig2=qHSbWXkeRrFxHntySofoHA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Weapons Systems And Political Stability by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiQxbjlgJzOAhWJpx4KHRkKC8MQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FWeapons%2520Systems%2520and%2520Political%2520Stability.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHvQqG-3Ai1p4_rR0Y0esN1xlDFRg&sig2=f1sQfkPAabBPmFBuQ9LukQ&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

The Evolution Of Civilizations by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj-6bn1gJzOAhVFqR4KHUlfBUIQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FCarroll-Quigley-TheEvolutionOfCivilizations-AnIntroductionToHistoricalAnalysis-1st%262nd-Editions.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGnRarxBobdsojSAC3NFG_RC7bbnA&sig2=JX7xqoE8dJ3WGJwgdog1CA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Propaganda by Edward Burnays:

http://edward-bernays.soup.io/post/19658768/Edward-Bernays-Propaganda-1928-pdf-PDF-357

Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjpjbCegZzOAhVHdh4KHVAcBWEQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwwnorton.com%2Fcollege%2Fhistory%2Famerica-essential-learning%2Fdocs%2FWLippmann-Public_Opinion-1922.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH-x94uyZy4HtkgffUceti-szn3TQ&sig2=hy-KMBB3bZLh1XsQ3tWo_A&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Diplomacy by Henry Kissinger:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiIw_itgJzOAhVJFh4KHQ9aC84QFggqMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.virginia.edu%2Fusdiphis%2Freadings%2FKissinger%2C%2520Diplomacy.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGjlzo9XfhG1lcNCXlZmgNyOoatLA&sig2=TNYuiQLotEycTMJPAt5vFQ

The Final Days by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward:

https://www.google.com/#q=the+final+days+bernstein+pdf

The Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A. Wormser:

https://archive.org/details/FoundationsTheirPowerAndInfluenceReneAWormser1958

The Naked Capitalist by W. Cleon Skousen:

https://archive.org/details/104813153CleonSkousenTheNakedCapitalist1970

Norman Dodd interview by G. Edward Griffin regarding the 1953 Reese Committee (1982):

http://truthtalknews.blogspot.com/2014/08/common-core-and-the-hidden-agenda-a-1982-interview-with-Norman-Dodd.html

Network (1976) FULL MOVIE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynnLCMppOls

Morals And Dogma by Albert Pike:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiShJ3xgpzOAhXTNx4KHV5mB98QFghJMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.resist.com%2FOnlinebooks%2FPike-MoralsAndDogma.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFDJXS8z_L50GcyHRmeq98MWdMImQ&sig2=PaoPFMWptQ7CFKWcdj4yWg&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

A.C. De La Rive, La Femme et l’Enfants Dans La Franc – maconnerie universelle

(English Translation) :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.histoireebook.com/index.php%3Fpost/2012/05/20/De-La-Rive-A-C-La-femme-et-l-enfant-dans-la-franc-maconnerie-universelle&prev=search

Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Sion) :

http://www.howardnema.com/tag/protocols-of-the-elders-of-sion/

Proofs of A Conspiracy by John Robison (1797):

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjK2eTKg5zOAhWH8x4KHVgiDE8QFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.conspiracyarchive.com%2FPROOFS_OF_A_CONSPIRACY_John_Robison.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFJ_LT44aFH2J6QYLdJFWnOgNzO7g&sig2=vjN3pLJp-SHARrLfZdIheg&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

 Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

In the end all we have is memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

TRUTH TALK NEWS

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

http://www.HowardNema.com

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

KEY EXCERPTS FROM CARROLL QUIGLEY’S TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)

KEY EXCERPTS FROM CARROLL QUIGLEY’S TRAGEDY AND HOPE (1966)

Past is Prologue.  The Key to understanding today, and planning for the future is to look to the past – Howard Nema

“There does exist an international Anglophile network which we may identify as the Round Table Groups. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records.

I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quote from Pg. 950 of Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope: A History In Our Time (1966)

Carroll Quigley was a Jesuit professor of history at Georgetown University from 1941 to 1976.  His writings omit the connections to the Jesuits, the Vatican and the Black Nobility by name, but their power structure is a key component of the Round Table.

Quigley also taught at Princeton and at Harvard, and lectured at the Brookings Institution. He was a frequent lecturer at the U.S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, the Foreign Service Institute, and the Naval College at Norfolk, Virginia.

In 1958, he served as a consultant to the Congressional Select Committee which set up the National Space Agency.   In 1964, he was a consultant at the Navy Post-Graduate School, Monterey, California on Project Seabed.   The project was created to visualize the status of future American weapons systems.

Key Excerpts from the book

Tragedy and Hope

A History of the World in Our Time

by Carroll Quigley, 1966

 

Chapter 5European Economic Developments

Commercial Capitalism

Western Civilization is the richest and most powerful social organization ever made by man. One reason for this success has been its economic organization, [which] has passed through six successive stages, of which at least four are called “capitalism.” Each stage created the conditions which tended to bring about the next stage.

The [first stage] of self-sufficient agrarian units (manors) was in a society organized so that its upper ranksthe lords, lay and ecclesiasticalfound their desires for necessities so well met that they sought to exchange their surpluses of necessities for luxuries of remote origin. This gave rise to a trade in foreign luxuries (spices, fine textiles, fine metals) which was the first evidence of the stage of commercial capitalism. In this second stage, mercantile profits and widening markets created a demand for textiles and other goods which could be met only by application of power to production.

This gave the third stage: industrial capitalism. The stage of industrial capitalism soon gave rise to such an insatiable demand for heavy fixed capital, like railroad lines, steel mills, shipyards, and so on, that these investments could not be financed from the profits and private fortunes of individual proprietors. New instruments for financing industry came into existence in the form of limited-liability corporations and investment banks. These were soon in a position to control the chief parts of the industrial system, since they provided capital to it.

This gave rise to financial capitalism. The control of financial capitalism was used to integrate the industrial system into ever-larger units with interlinking financial controls. This made possible a reduction of competition with a resulting increase in profits. As a result, the industrial system soon found that it was again able to finance its own expansion from its own profits, and, with this achievement, financial controls were weakened, and the stage of monopoly capitalism arrived.

In this fifth stage, great industrial units, working together either directly or through cartels and trade associations, were in a position to exploit the majority of the people. The result was a great economic crisis which soon developed into a struggle for control of the statethe minority hoping to use political power to defend their privileged position, the majority hoping to use the state to curtail the power and privileges of the minority. This dualist struggle dwindled with the rise of economic and social pluralism after 1945.

 

The Operations of Banking Were Concealed So They Appeared Difficult to Master

In sum, specialization of economic activities, by breaking up the economic process, had made it possible for people to concentrate on one portion of the process and, by maximizing that portion, to jeopardize the rest. The process was not only broken up into producers, exchangers, and consumers but there were also two kinds of exchangers (one concerned with goods, the other with money), with almost antithetical, short-term, aims. The problems which inevitably arose could be solved and the system reformed only by reference to the system as a whole.

Unfortunately, however, three parts of the system, concerned with the production, transfer, and consumption of goods, were concrete and clearly visible so that almost anyone could grasp them simply by examining them, while the operations of banking and finance were concealed, scattered, and abstract so that they appeared to many to be difficult. To add to this, bankers themselves did everything they could to make their activities more secret and more esoteric. Their activities were reflected in mysterious marks in ledgers which were never opened to the curious outsider.

In the course of time the central fact of the developing economic system, the relationship between goods and money, became clear, at least to bankers. This relationship, the price system, depended upon five things: the supply and the demand for goods, the supply and the demand for money, and the speed of exchange between money and goods.

An increase in three of these (demand for goods, supply of money, speed of circulation) would move the prices of goods up and the value of money down. This inflation was objectionable to bankers, although desirable to producers and merchants. On the other hand, a decrease in the same three items would be deflationary and would please bankers, worry producers and merchants, and delight consumers (who obtained more goods for less money). The other factors worked in the opposite direction, so that an increase in them (supply of goods, demand for money, and slowness of circulation or exchange) would be deflationary [and vice versa].

Such changes of prices, either inflationary or deflationary, have been major forces in history for the last six centuries at least. Over that long period, their power to modify men’s lives and human history has been increasing.

 

Bankers Obsessed With Maintaining Value of Money

Rising prices benefit debtors and injure creditors, while falling prices do the opposite. A debtor called upon to pay a debt at a time when prices are higher than when he contracted the debt must yield up less goods and services than he obtained at the earlier date, on a lower price level when he borrowed the money. A creditor, such as a bank, which has lent moneyequivalent to a certain quantity of goods and serviceson one price level, gets back the same amount of moneybut a smaller quantity of goods and serviceswhen repayment comes at a higher price level, because the money repaid is then less valuable.

This is why bankers, as creditors in money terms, have been obsessed with maintaining the value of money, although the reason they have traditionally given for this obsessionthat “sound money” maintains “business confidence”has been propagandist rather than accurate.

Hundreds of years ago, bankers began to specialize, with the richer and more influential ones associated increasingly with foreign trade and foreign-exchange transactions. Since these were richer and more cosmopolitan and increasingly concerned with questions of political significance, such as stability and debasement of currencies, war and peace, dynastic marriages, and worldwide trading monopolies, they became the financiers and financial advisers of governments.

Moreover, since their relationships with governments were always in monetary terms and not real terms, and since they were always obsessed with the stability of monetary exchanges between one country’s money and another, they used their power and influence to do two things: (1) to get all money and debts expressed in terms of a strictly limited commodityultimately gold; and (2) to get all monetary matters out of the control of governments and political authority, on the ground that they would be handled better by private banking interests.

 

Bankers Create Money Out of Nothing

For generations men had sought to avoid the one drawback of gold, its heaviness, by using pieces of paper to represent specific pieces of gold. We call such pieces of paper gold certificates. Such a certificate entitles its bearer to exchange it for its piece of gold on demand, but in view of the convenience of paper, only a small fraction of certificate holders ever did make such demands.

It early became clear that gold need be held on hand only to the amount needed to cover the fraction of certificates likely to be presented for payment; accordingly, the rest of the gold could be used for business purposes, or, what amounts to the same thing, a volume of certificates could be issued greater than the volume of gold reserved for payment of demands against them. Such an excess volume of paper claims against reserves we now call bank notes.

In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts. Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts.

Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money … no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value.

 

The Dynasties of International Bankers

The merchant bankers of London … brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.

The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers. The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces.

In concentrating, as we must, on the financial or economic activities of international bankers, we must not totally ignore their other attributes. They were, especially in later generations, cosmopolitan rather than nationalistic. They were usually highly civilized, cultured gentlemen, patrons of education and of the arts, so that today colleges, professorships, opera companies, symphonies, libraries, and museum collections still reflect their munificence. For these purposes they set a pattern of endowed foundations which still surround us today.

 

Bankers Felt Politicians Could Not Be Trusted With the Monetary System

The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

In most countries the central bank was surrounded closely by the almost invisible private investment banking firms. These, like the planet Mercury, could hardly be seen in the dazzle emitted by the central bank which they, in fact, often dominated. Yet a close observer could hardly fail to notice the close private associations between these private, international bankers and the central bank itself.

Two of the five factors which determined the value of money are the supply and the demand for money. The supply of money in a single country was subject to no centralized, responsible control in most countries over recent centuries. Instead, there were a variety of controls of which some could be influenced by bankers, some could be influenced by the government, and some could hardly be influenced by either.

Central banks can usually vary the amount of money in circulation by “open market operations” or by influencing the discount rates of lesser banks. In open market operations, a central bank buys or sells government bonds in the open market. If it buys, it releases money into the economic system; if it sells it reduces the amount of money in the community. The change is greater than the price paid for the securities [due to the fractional reserve system].

Central banks can also change the quantity of money by influencing the credit policies of other banks. This can be done by various methods, such as changing the re-discount rate or changing reserve requirements. By changing the re-discount rate, we mean the interest rate which central banks charge lesser banks for loans. By raising the re-discount rate the central bank forces the lesser bank to raise its discount rate in order to operate at a profit; such a raise in interest rates tends to reduce the demand for credit and thus the amount of deposits (money). Lowering the re-discount rate permits an opposite result.

The powers of governments over the quantity of money are of various kinds, and include (a) control over a central bank, (b) control over public taxation, and (c) control over public spending. The control of governments over central banks varies greatly from one country to another, but on the whole has been increasing. Since most central banks have been (technically) private institutions, this control is frequently based on custom rather than on law.

The powers of the government over the quantity of money in the community exercised through taxation and public spending are largely independent of banking control. Taxation tends to reduce the amount of money in a community and is usually a deflationary force; government spending tends to increase the amount of money in a community and is usually an inflationary force. The total effects of a government’s policy will depend on which item is greater. An unbalanced budget will be inflationary; a budget with a surplus will be deflationary.

 

Money PowerControlled by International Investment BankersDominates Business and Government

On the whole, in the period up to 1931, bankers, especially the Money Power controlled by the international investment bankers, were able to dominate both business and government. They could dominate business, especially in activities and in areas where industry could not finance its own needs for capital, because investment bankers had the ability to supply or refuse to supply such capital. Thus, Rothschild interests came to dominate many of the railroads of Europe, while Morgan dominated at least 26,000 miles of American railroads.

Such bankers went further than this. In return for flotations of securities of industry, they took seats on the boards of directors of industrial firms, as they had already done on commercial banks, savings banks, insurance firms, and finance companies. From these lesser institutions they funneled capital to enterprises which yielded control and away from those who resisted. These firms were controlled through interlocking directorships, holding companies, and lesser banks. They engineered amalgamations and generally reduced competition, until by the early twentieth century many activities were so monopolized that they could raise their noncompetitive prices above costs to obtain sufficient profits to become self-financing.

But before that stage was reached a relatively small number of bankers were in positions of immense influence in European and American economic life. As early as 1909, Walter Rathenau, who was in a position to know (since he had inherited from his father control of the German General Electric Company and held scores of directorships himself), said, “Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.”

 

The Power of Investment Bankers Over Governments

The power of investment bankers over governments rests on a number of factors, of which the most significant, perhaps, is the need of governments to issue short-term treasury bills as well as long-term government bonds. Just as businessmen go to commercial banks for current capital advances to smooth over the discrepancies between their irregular and intermittent incomes and their periodic and persistent outgoes, so a government has to go to merchant bankers (or institutions controlled by them) to tide over the shallow places caused by irregular tax receipts.

As experts in government bonds, the international bankers not only handled the necessary advances, but provided advice to government officials and, on many occasions, placed their own members in official posts for varied periods to deal with special problems. This is so widely accepted even today that in 1961 a Republican investment banker became Secretary of the Treasury in a Democratic Administration in Washington without significant comment from any direction.

Naturally, the influence of bankers over governments during the age of financial capitalism (roughly 1850-1931) was not something about which anyone talked freely, but it has been admitted frequently enough by those on the inside, especially in England. In 1852 Gladstone, chancellor of the Exchequer, declared, “The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned.” On September 26, 1921, The Financial Times wrote, “Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills.”

 

Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan Dominate the Financial World

In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures.   Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally.

Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. The powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well.

On November 11, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.” This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March 21, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion … Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.” It might be added that Governor Norman rarely acted in major world problems without consulting with J. P. Morgan’s representatives.

 

Chapter 9The British Imperial Crisis

Britain acquired the world’s greatest empire because it possessed certain advantages which other countries lacked. We mention three of these advantages: (1) that it was an island, (2) that it was in the Atlantic, and (3) that its social traditions at home produced the will and the talents for imperial acquisition.

 

Cecil Rhodes Organized a Secret Society in 1891

[Cecil] Rhodes (1853-1902) feverishly exploited the diamond and goldfields of South Africa, rose to be prime minister of the Cape Colony (1890-1896), contributed money to political parties, controlled parliamentary seats both in England and in South Africa, and sought to win a strip of British territory across Africa from the Cape of Good Hope to Egypt and to join these two extremes together with a telegraph line and ultimately with a Cape-to-Cairo Railway.

Rhodes inspired devoted support for his goals from others in South Africa and in England. With financial support from Lord Rothschild and Alfred Beit, he was able to monopolize the diamond mines of South Africa as De Beers Consolidated Mines and to build up a great gold mining enterprise as Consolidated Gold Fields. In the middle 1890’s Rhodes had a personal income of at least a million pounds sterling a year [equivalent to about $100 million a year in current U.S. dollars] which was spent so freely for his mysterious purposes that he was usually overdrawn on his account.

[An] association was formally established on February 5, 1891, when Rhodes and [William] Stead organized a secret society of which Rhodes had been dreaming for sixteen years. In this secret society Rhodes was to be leader; Stead, Brett, and Milner were to form an executive committee; Arthur (Lord) Balfour, (Sir) Harry Johnston, Lord Rothschild, Albert (Lord) Grey, and others were listed as potential members of a “Circle of Initiates”; while there was to be an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” (later organized by Milner as the Round Table organization).

In 1919 [Rhodes’ followers] founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) for which the chief financial supporters were Sir Abe Bailey and the Astor family (owners of The Times). Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and in the United States (where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations) in the period 1919-1927. The power and influence of this Rhodes-Milner group in British imperial affairs and in foreign policy since 1889, although not widely recognized, can hardly be exaggerated. We might mention as an example that this group dominated The Times from 1890 to 1912, and has controlled it completely since 1912 (except for the years 1919-1922).

In spite of the terms of the Rhodes wills, Rhodes himself was not a racist. Nor was he a political democrat. He worked as easily and as closely with Jews, black natives, or Boers as he did with English. His greatest weakness rested on the fact that his passionate attachment to his goals made him overly tolerant in regard to methods. He did not hesitate to use either bribery or force to attain his ends if he judged they would be effective.

 

Chapter 20The Period of Stabilization, 1922-1930

America Becomes the World’s Greatest Creditor

By 1914 Britain’s supremacy as financial center, as commercial market, as creditor, and as merchant shipper was being threatened. At this critical stage in Britain’s development, the World War occurred. This had a double result as far as this subject is concerned. It forced Britain to postpone indefinitely any reform of her industrial system to adjust it to more modern trends; and it speeded up the development of these trends so that what might have occurred in twenty years was done instead in five.

The war changed the position of the United States in respect to the rest of the world from that of a debtor owing about $3 billion to that of a creditor owed $4 billion. This does not include intergovernmental debts of about $10 billion owed to the United States as a result of the war. At the same time, Britain’s position changed from a creditor owed about $18 billion to a creditor owed about $13.5 billion. In addition, Britain was owed about $8 billion in war debts from her Allies … and owed to the United States war debts of well over $54 billion. Most of these war debts and reparations were sharply reduced after 1920, but the net result for Britain was a drastic change in her position in respect to the United States.

The basic economic organization of the world was modified in other ways. The more backward areas of Europe and the world had been industrialized to a great degree and were unwilling to fall back to a position in which they would obtain industrial products from Britain, Germany, or the United States in return for their raw materials and food. This refusal was made more painful for both sides by the fact that these backward areas had increased their outputs of raw materials and food so greatly that the total could hardly have been sold even if they had been willing to buy all their industrial products from their prewar sources.

The result was a situation where all countries were eager to sell and reluctant to buy, and sought to achieve these mutually irreconcilable ends by setting up subsidies and bounties on exports, tariffs, and restrictions on imports, with disastrous results on world trade.

The only sensible solution to this problem of excessive productive capacity would have been a substantial rise in domestic standards of living, but this would have required a fundamental reapportionment of the national income so that claims to the product of the excess capacity would go to those masses eager to consume, rather than continue to go to the minority desiring to save. Such a reform was rejected by the ruling groups in both “advanced” and “backward” countries, so that this solution was reached only to a relatively small degree in a relatively few countries.

The system of international payments which had worked … before 1914 worked only haltingly after that date, and practically ceased to work at all after 1930. The chief cause of these factors was that neither goods nor money obeyed purely economic forces and did not move as formerly to the areas in which each was most valuable. The chief result was a complete mal-distribution of gold, a condition which became acute after 1928 and which by 1933 had forced most countries off the gold standard.

 

Money Power Seeks to Create a World System of Financial Control in Private Hands Able to Dominate Every Nation on Earth

Pg. 324: the powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.

This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.

The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.

Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.

Pg. 326: Norman (Montagu) had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank, especially of Henry P. Davison, who made him secretary of the Bankers Trust Company of New York (in succession to Thomas W. Lamont) in 1904, used him as Morgan’s agent in the banking rearrangements following the crash of 1907, and made him vice-president of the Bankers Trust (still in succession to Lamont) in 1909.

He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914. Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Pg. 326-327: It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks.

These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks. This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world.

They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts; they could dominate governments by their control over current government loans and the play of the international exchanges.

Almost all of this power was exercised by the personal influence and prestige of men who had demonstrated their ability in the past to bring off successful financial coupe, to keep their word, to remain cool in a crisis, and to share their winning opportunities with their associates.

In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838).

 

Norman Was the Commander-in-Chief of the World System of Banking Control

The commander in chief of the world system of banking control was Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, who was built up by the private bankers to a position where he was regarded as an oracle in all matters of government and business.

In January, 1924, Reginald McKenna, who had been chancellor of the Exchequer in 1915-1916, as chairman of the board of the Midland Bank told its stockholders:

“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money…. And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.”

Montagu Norman’s position may be gathered from the fact that his predecessors in the governorship, almost a hundred of them, had served two-year terms, increased rarely in time of crisis. But Norman held the position for twenty-four years (1920-1944).

Norman was a strange man whose mental outlook was one of successfully suppressed hysteria or even paranoia. He had no use for governments and feared democracy. Both of these seemed to him to be threats to private banking. Strong-willed, tireless, and ruthless, he viewed his life as a kind of cloak-and-dagger struggle with the forces of … [sound] money.

Norman had a devoted colleague in Benjamin Strong, the first governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.  Strong owed his career to the favor of the Morgan Bank. He became governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as the joint nominee of Morgan and of Kuhn, Loeb, and Company in 1914.

Two years later, Strong met Norman for the first time, and they at once made an agreement to work in cooperation for the financial practices they both revered.

In the 1920’s, they were determined to use the financial power of Britain and of the United States to force all the major countries of the world to go on the gold standard and to operate it through central banks free from all political control, with all questions of international finance to be settled by agreements by such central banks without interference from governments.

Norman and Strong Were Mere Agents of the Powerful Bankers Who Remained Behind the Scenes and Operated in Secret

It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.

The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.

This dominance of investment bankers was based on their control over the flows of credit and investment funds in their own countries and throughout the world. They could dominate the financial and industrial systems of their own countries by their influence over the flow of current funds through bank loans, the discount rate, and the re-discounting of commercial debts. They could dominate governments by their control over … government loans and the play of the international exchanges.

In this system the Rothschilds had been preeminent during much of the nineteenth century, but, at the end of that century, they were being replaced by J. P. Morgan whose central office was in New York, although it was always operated as if it were in London (where it had, indeed, originated as George Peabody and Company in 1838). The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and a use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.

 

Money Power Creates an Ingenious Plan to Create and Control Giant Monopolies

[Financial capitalists eventually] sought to sever control from ownership of securities, believing they could hold the former and relinquish the latter. On the industrial side, they sought to advance monopoly and restrict production, thus keeping prices up and their security holdings liquid.

The efforts of financiers to separate ownership from control were aided by the great capital demands of modern industry. Such demands for capital made necessary the corporation form of business organization. This inevitably brings together the capital owned by a large number of persons to create an enterprise controlled by a small number of persons. The financiers did all they could to make the former number as large as possible and the latter number as small as possible. The result of this was that larger and larger aggregates of wealth fell into the control of smaller and smaller groups of men.

While financial capitalism was thus weaving the intricate pattern of modern corporation law and practice on one side, it was establishing monopolies and cartels on the other. Both helped to dig the grave of financial capitalism and pass the reins of economic control on to the newer monopoly capitalism. On one side, the financiers freed the controllers of business from the owners of business, but on the other side, this concentration gave rise to monopoly conditions which freed the controllers from the banks.

Pg. 48-49: In effect, this creation of paper claims greater than the reserves available means that bankers were creating money out of nothing. The same thing could be done in another way, not by note-issuing banks but by deposit banks. Deposit bankers discovered that orders and checks drawn against deposits by depositors and given to third persons were often not cashed by the latter but were deposited to their own accounts.

Thus there were no actual movements of funds, and payments were made simply by bookkeeping transactions on the accounts. Accordingly, it was necessary for the banker to keep on hand in actual money (gold, certificates, and notes) no more than the fraction of deposits likely to be drawn upon and cashed; the rest could be used for loans, and if these loans were made by creating a deposit for the borrower, who in turn would draw checks upon it rather than withdraw it in money, such “created deposits” or loans could also be covered adequately by retaining reserves to only a fraction of their value.

Such created deposits also were a creation of money out of nothing, although bankers usually refused to express their actions, either note issuing or deposit lending, in these terms. William Paterson, however, on obtaining the charter of the Bank of England in 1694, to use the moneys he had won in privateering, said, “The Bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing.” This was repeated by Sir Edward Holden, founder of the Midland Bank, on December 18, 1907, and is, of course, generally admitted today.

Pg. 51: The merchant bankers of London had already at hand in 1810-1850 the Stock Exchange, the Bank of England, and the London money market when the needs of advancing industrialism called all of these into the industrial world which they had hitherto ignored.

In time they brought into their financial network the provincial banking centers, organized as commercial banks and savings banks, as well as insurance companies, to form all of these into a single financial system on an international scale which manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other.

The men who did this, looking backward toward the period of dynastic monarchy in which they had their own roots, aspired to establish dynasties of international bankers and were at least as successful at this as were many of the dynastic political rulers.

The greatest of these dynasties, of course, were the descendants of Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) of Frankfort, whose male descendants, for at least two generations, generally married first cousins or even nieces. Rothschild’s five sons, established at branches in Vienna, London, Naples, and Paris, as well as Frankfort, cooperated together in ways which other international banking dynasties copied but rarely excelled.

Pg. 52: The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Raring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan. Even after these banking families became fully involved in domestic industry by the emergence of financial capitalism, they remained different from ordinary bankers in distinctive ways:

(1) they were cosmopolitan and international; (2) they were close to governments and were particularly concerned with questions of government debts, including foreign government debts, even in areas which seemed, at first glance, poor risks, like Egypt, Persia, Ottoman Turkey, Imperial China, and Latin America; (3) their interests were almost exclusively in bonds and very rarely in goods, since they admired “liquidity” and regarded commitments in commodities or even real estate as the first step toward bankruptcy; (4) they were, accordingly, fanatical devotees of deflation (which they called “sound” money from its close associations with high interest rates and a high value of money) and of the gold standard, which, in their eyes, symbolized and ensured these values; and (5) they were almost equally devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence in political life.

Pg. 53: The influence of financial capitalism and of the international bankers who created it was exercised both on business and on governments, but could have done neither if it had not been able to persuade both these to accept two “axioms” of its own ideology. Both of these were based on the assumption that politicians were too weak and too subject to temporary popular pressures to be trusted with control of the money system; accordingly, the sanctity of all values and the soundness of money must be protected in two ways: by basing the value of money on gold and by allowing bankers to control the supply of money. To do this it was necessary to conceal, or even to mislead, both governments and people about the nature of money and its methods of operation.

Pg. 62: In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity.

Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland’s second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November I l, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman “the currency dictator of Europe.”

This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March Zl, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later. On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, “I hold the hegemony of the world.”

Pg. 936-937: Behind this unfortunate situation lies another, more profound, relationship, which influences matters much broader than Far Eastern policy. It involves the organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into foundations to be used for educational, scientific, “and other public purposes.” Sixty or more years ago, public life in the West was dominated by the influence of “Wall Street.”

This term has nothing to do with its use by the Communists to mean monopolistic industrialism, but, on the contrary, refers to international financial capitalism deeply involved in the gold standard, foreign-exchange fluctuations, floating of fixed-interest securities and, to a lesser extent, flotation of industrial shares for stock-exchange markets.

This group, which in the United States, was completely dominated by J. P. Morgan and Company from the 1880’s to the 1930’s was cosmopolitan, Anglophile, internationalist, Ivy League, eastern seaboard, high Episcopalian, and European-culture conscious. Their connection with the Ivy League colleges rested on the fact that the large endowments of these institutions required constant consultation with the financiers of Wall Street (or its lesser branches on State Street, Boston, and elsewhere) and was reflected in the fact that these endowments, even in 1930, were largely in bonds rather than in real estate or common stocks. As a consequence of these influences, as late as the 1930’s, J. P. Morgan and his associates were the most significant figures in policy making at Harvard, Columbia, and to a lesser extent Yale, while the Whitneys were significant at Yale, and the Prudential Insurance Company (through Edward D. Duffield) dominated Princeton.

Pg. 937: The names of these Wall Street luminaries still adorn these Ivy League campuses, with Harkness colleges and a Payne Whitney gymnasium at Yale, a Pyne dormitory at Princeton, a Dillon Field House and Lamont Library at Harvard. The chief officials of these universities were beholden to these financial powers and usually owed their jobs to them. Morgan himself helped make Nicholas Murray Butler president of Columbia; his chief Boston agent, Thomas Nelson Perkins of the First National Bank of that city, gave Conant his boost from the chemical laboratory to University Hall at Harvard; Duffield of Prudential, caught unprepared when the incumbent president of Princeton was killed in an automobile in 1932, made himself president for a year before he chose Harold Dodds for the post in 1933. At Yale, Thomas Lamont, managing partner of the Morgan firm, was able to swing Charles Seymour into the presidency of that university in 1937.

The significant influence of “Wall Street” (meaning Morgan) both in the Ivy League and in Washington, in the period of sixty or more years following 1880, explains the constant interchange between the Ivy League and the Federal government, an interchange which undoubtedly aroused a good deal of resentment in less-favored circles, who were more than satiated with the accents, tweeds, and High Episcopal Anglophilia of these peoples

Pg. 938: Because of its dominant position in Wall Street, the Morgan firm came also to dominate other Wal1 Street powers, such as Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, or Dillon-Reed. Close alliances were made with Rockefeller, Mellon, and Duke interests but not nearly so intimate ones with the great industrial powers like du Pont and Ford. [Because] … of the great influence of this “Wall Street” alignment, an influence great enough to merit the name of the “American Establishment,” this group could … control the Federal government and, in consequence, had to adjust to a good many government actions … [which they had secretly supported ]. The chief of these were in taxation law, beginning with the graduated income tax in 1913, but culminating, above all else, in the inheritance tax. These tax laws drove the great private fortunes dominated by Wall Street into tax-exempt foundations, which became a major link in the Establishment network between Wall Street, the Ivy League, and the Federal government.

More than fifty years ago the Morgan firm decided to infiltrate the Left-wing political movements in the United States. This was relatively easy to do, since these groups were starved for funds and eager for a voice to reach the people. Wall Street supplied both. The purpose was not to destroy … or take over but was really threefold: (1) to keep informed about the thinking of Left-wing or liberal groups; (2) to provide them with a mouthpiece so that they could “blow off steam,” and (3) to have a final veto on their publicity and possibly on their actions, if they ever went “radical.” There was nothing really new about this decision, since other financiers had talked about it and even attempted it earlier.

Pg. 939: The New Republic was founded by Willard and Dorothy Straight, using her money, in 1914, and continued to be supported by her financial contributions until March 23, 1953. The original purpose for establishing the paper was to provide an outlet for the progressive Left and to guide it quietly in an Anglophile direction. This latter task was entrusted to a young man, only four years out of Harvard, but already a member of the mysterious Round Table group, which has played a major role in directing England’s foreign policy since its formal establishment in 1909.

This new recruit, Walter Lippmann, has been, from 1914 to the present, the authentic spokesman in American journalism for the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic in international affairs.

Chapter 65American Confusions, 1945-1950

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

Chapter 77Conclusion

The hope of the twentieth century rests on its recognition that war and depression are man-made and needless. They can be avoided in the future by turning from … nineteenth-century characteristics … and going back to other characteristics that our Western society has always regarded as virtues: generosity, compassion, cooperation, rationality, and foresight, and finding an increased role in human life for love, spirituality, charity, and self-discipline.

LINK TO FULL PDF OF TRAGEDY AND HOPE

 

In the end all we have is memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES: http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com http://www.HowardNema.com

TRUTH TALK NEWS “Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’ Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

 

OBAMA’S LEGACY AND THE SUMMER OF CHAOS

TRUTH TALK NEWS rant on Obama’s Legacy,  the Fundamental Subversion of America into the benevolent despotism of authoritarian socialism and the summer of chaos leading up to the November elections.

letters-to-alinsky-published1

1saulhillary2

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton listens during a panel discussion at the Clinton Global Initiative, Monday, Sept. 22, 2014 in New York. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

whither_black_lives_matter

tumblr_oa5nei9C291u3nkrio1_500 abortion-stats- EUA_STPPgraphic BLACK COMMUNITY DEATH CAUSES Fatherless Children Molyneux 6_30_14 PP-facts

In the end all we have is our memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES: http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com http://www.HowardNema.com

TRUTH TALK NEWS “Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’

Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes