Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat. As so it was in Hitler’s Germany. In the 1930’s the Nazis implemented a eugenics depopulation program regarding the elderly, the sick, mentally challenged and physically deformed called T-4.
Wall Street and the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations are responsible for funding Hitler’s rise to power and the eugenics programs the Nazis modeled their T-4 program from American Eugenicists to rid the Germany and the Aryan race of what Hitler called “useless eaters”.
In fact, these powerful forces continue their eugenics research to this day, branching out into DNA and genetics in their quest to rid the world of not only all disease, but all flawed humans. Their goal is to create the perfect human while weeding out the unwanted and useless elements of our society by overtly and covertly depopulating the planet to manageable levels, namely 500,000,000.
Sound’s crazy, doesn’t it? But its true. You can’t make this stuff up.
And what about the rise in autism from vaccines? 1 in 10,000 Americans had autism in 1980 with 6 vaccines given to children. Today more than 60 vaccines are given to children and autism rates are 1 in 68.
In 20 years what will America look like and what will be done with all of these millions and millions of autistic grown-ups? Hitler has the answer, a neo-T-4 depopulation program.
And what about this elderly “health aid”? Could it be a coincidence that this company titled their product T-4 by accident, or as a sick joke, or maybe it is something more sinister hidden right before our very eyes.
Without going into a whole new article, since 1955 there has been a covert depopulation agenda in place using war, additives in food, soil, air, water, illicit drugs, deadly pharmaceuticals, birth control, abortion and “euthanasia” to reduce the world population.
Big pharma kills 140,000 Americans every year, but you’ll never hear about that anywhere. As an AMA protocol there is an almost religious ritual asking and hoping elderly patients and all of us, for that matter have a living will when treated in hospitals and nursing homes around the country. It seems more important to be able to end a person’s life than sustain it, these days. This is not by accident.
A 2015 study has shown that pharmaceutical drugs cause more overdoses and more deaths than all of the illegal drugs on the market combined. According to the government’s own statistics, listed on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, deaths relating to pharmaceutical drugs rose to roughly 23,000 last year, which accounts for over half of the total overdose deaths in the country for that time period.
Additionally, a recent study conducted by researchers with the University of Virginia, University of Arkansas, the Partnership for Drug Free Kids, and the American Institutes for Research reconfirmed the known dangers of pharmaceutical drug abuse.
The study concluded that, “Teens need help before they reach these tipping points for prescription drug abuse. Adults spotting teens with very high levels of anxiety and at least moderate use of other restricted substances should realize that these are students with a high likelihood of prescription abuse. Male teens with a high need to be popular andteens in general appear to be at exceptional risk. Campaigns must target parents as well, since they clearly underestimate both the physical risks of prescription drugs and the likelihood that their children will abuse these drugs.”
Sadly, the authors of the study described any average teenager, however, it does give us some insight into the root causes of teenage drug abuse.
As the study noted, teens are being pushed towards drug use by the high-stress environment that is created by modern culture and government schools. Many times, these students are even prescribed a wide variety of these medications to help them cope with the stresses of teenage life, which means that doctors are essentially putting their stamp of approval on daily teenage use of amphetamines like Adderall or tranquilizers like Xanax.
A study by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) highlighted this phenomenon, pointing out that “Prescription drugs are seen as blessed by a trusted institution, the FDA, while increasingly aggressive advertising by drug companies simultaneously floods parents and children with messages that these substances are safe, popular, and beneficial.”
The previous excerpt was from John Vibes’ article (Government Says Big Pharma Kills More People Than All Illegal Drugs Combined) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org.
“Influenza vaccination in the United States has long been recommended for all persons 65 years or older.
Vaccination coverage for this age group increased from between 15% and 20% before 1980 to 65% in 2001.
However, 3-year moving averages of unadjusted excess P&I mortality rates among people 65 years or older—compiled for the Healthy People 2000 initiative to track the effect of vaccination on US influenza-related mortality—rose substantially during this period. This was surprising because influenza vaccination is thought to be highly effective at reducing influenza-related mortality.”
So says a recent study by the Journal of the American Medical Association, a peer-reviewed medical journal published 48 times a year by the American Medical Association.
Sharyl Attkisson, a former investigative journalist for CBS, says the study shows there is no improvement in mortality rates among senior citizens who get flu shots, and may actually contribute to increased ill-health and death.
An important and definitive “mainstream” government study done a decade ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side. It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially.
The authors of the study admitted a bias going into the study. Here was the history as described to me: Public health experts long assumed flu shots were effective in the elderly. But, paradoxically, all the studies done failed to demonstrate a benefit. Instead of considering that they, the experts, could be wrong–instead of believing the scientific data–the public health experts assumed the studies were wrong.
After all, flu shots have to work, right?
So the NIH launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu shots were beneficial to the elderly. The government would gather some of the brightest scientific minds for the research, and adjust for all kinds of factors that could be masking that presumed benefit.
But when they finished, no matter how they crunched the numbers, the data kept telling the same story: flu shots were of no benefit to the elderly. Quite the opposite. The death rate had increased markedly since widespread flu vaccination among older Americans. The scientists finally had to acknowledge that decades of public health thought had been mistaken.
After a 2006 study, lead author Lone Simonsen revealed no benefit to the elderly by taking flu shots. In fact, taking flu shots increased the risk of death by the flu. Many international studies also arrived at the same conclusion.
You probably haven’t heard much about these “incendiary” findings since too much money is being made promoting flu shots.
Inquisitr.com reports: The study “got little attention,” she says, “because the science came down on the wrong side.” Whereas the researchers had set out to prove that the push for massive flu vaccination would save the world, the researchers were “astonished” to find that the data did not support their presupposition at all. The data actually shows that deaths increased, not decreased, among seniors following vaccination.
Johns Hopkins scientist, Peter Doshi, Ph.D., issued a report in the prestigious British Medical Journal, according to NewsLI, asserting that the CDC policy of routinely recommending the flu vaccine is being based on “low quality studies that do not substantiate claims.” He says there is no evidence that the vaccine reduces deaths among senior citizens. Interestingly, Doshi cites an Australian study which found significant risks for children as well, stating that “one in every 110 children under the age of five had convulsions following vaccinations in 2009 for H1N1 influenza.”
During the drug trials for the Fluzone flu vaccine, 23 seniors out of 3,833 died after receiving the shot, according to the drug’s package insert, reported by Health Impact News. Another 226 experienced “serious adverse effects.” The manufacturer denies any connection between the deaths and the flu vaccine.
Seniors Told Get Flu Vaccine
There appears to be growing public skepticism that the flu vaccine is as beneficial as the experts say. The level of doubt is strongly correlated to the incidence of accounts of research fraud in the vaccine industry, an industry which makes billions of dollars of profit every year.
Founded in 1968 by Italian industrialist, Aurelio Peccei, the Club of Rome is a global think tank that deals with a variety of international political issues.
Originally, the Club of Rome had defined the three major concepts that have formed the Club’s thinking ever since: a global perspective, the long term, and the cluster of intertwined problems they called “the problematique”.
Some would say they specialize in “crisis creation,” using the Hegelian Dialectic to accomplish their goals.
According to its website, the Club of Rome is composed of “scientists, economists, businessmen, international high civil servants, heads of state and former heads of state from all five continents who are convinced that the future of humankind is not determined once and for all and that each human being can contribute to the improvement of our societies.”
The Club of Rome is perhaps at the apex of the New World Order pyramid, a Neo-Malthusian organization with interlocking membership with European power elite groups such as the Committee of 300 (a secret society founded by the British aristocracy in 1727) and the Bilderberg Group.
Thomas Robert Malthus argued that population was held within resource limits by two types of checks: positive ones, which raised the death rate, and preventative ones, which lowered the birth rate. The positive checks included hunger, disease and war; the preventative checks, abortion, birth control, prostitution, homosexuality, postponement of marriage, and celibacy.
The Club of Rome’s elitist and royalty members believe humanity requires “a common motivation, namely a common adversary” in order to realize their world government.
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” – Club of Rome, The First Global Revolution, 1991
To facilitate the management of the New World Order agenda calls for the elimination of most of the worlds population through war, disease, abortion and famine. According to the Club of Rome’s publications, the common enemy of humanity is man. One of the major goals of the Club of Rome is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary.
This above video highlights the connection between the environmental movement and those who are striving to bring about a new system of control to the world.
Not only did the Club of Rome’s 1972 report, “Limits to Growth” call for a reduced level of consumption of resources, it also argued that humankind needs to re-evaluate its exploitative attitude towards humans and the earth itself. The failure to give more foreign aid is indicative of the increased selfishness of rich countries. Meanwhile, the world’s richest 20 per cent of the population consume 86 per cent of its goods and services, over half its energy and nearly half its meat and fish.
In the Club of Rome book, The First Global Revolution, the group called for a “limit to growth” approach to solve the world’s problems, in fact a problem the global elite has with humanity. “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill,” the book states. “All these dangers are caused by human intervention,” and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or… one invented for the purpose.” In the process of struggling against this implacable enemy, democracy “will be made to seem responsible for the lagging economy, the scarcity and uncertainties. The very concept of democracy could then be brought into question and allow for the seizure of power.”
One World Government
Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, expanded on this topic in his article, State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era. According to Haass, a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming and terrorism, both invented as the Club of Rome suggested. “Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change,” writes Haass. “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.”
In 1976, the United States Association of the Club of Rome (USACOR) was formed for the purpose of gradually shutting down the U.S. economy.
Since then, working in concert with their international counterparts, they have been pushing the junk science of climate change, fueled a global financial crisis triggered by the mortgage crisis in America resulting in $Trillions being transferred to globalist banks from countries around the world on the brink of default, and enciting revolutions throughout the Middle East that are spreading to the Western world. Our global rulers are systematically taking down the global economy in order to impose what Haass describes as “an international system of either world government or anarchy.”
The Club of Rome, headed until his death last year by Maurice Strong, is THE elite “think tank” that takes the issue of global warming (whether real or imagined) as an excuse to institute a one world government, or new world order.
Led by elitists wishing to instill communism by disguising it as “Progressivism”, the U.S. Congress have passed a cap-and-trade system that resulted in the largest transfer of wealth in U.S. history with relatively little opposition until Donald Trump came on the scene to restore Our republic and save America from the clutches of these neo-feudal Malthusian global elitists.
Now you know what there is such hatred and opposition to Trump from the mass media and Hollywood, who are owned by these Malthusian elitists. Trump is decimating the New World Order agenda, which threatens the goal of depopulation and neo-feudalism controlled by the central banks of the world working in concert.
In recent years, with the help of the corporate media, they have cranked up the propaganda about climate change and fully intended to impose punitive carbon taxes on the American people, a scheme that if successful lead to the near complete reversal of hundreds of years of technological progress.
“Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” — Barack Obama, January 17, 2008, San Francisco Chronicle
The 1992 Earth Summit in Rio is where the elite’s United Nations Agenda 21 deindustrialization depopulation plot was hatched by Maurice Strong and other globalist one worlders. Soon after, the mass media and phony pseudo-scientists began bombarding the public with propaganda about the dangers of “man made Global Warming, claiming rising CO2 levels are caused by fossil fuels and that mankind itself is a cancer on the earth.
Hollywood is a key element to the effectiveness of the climate change propaganda, as are high profile “activists” like Leonardo Di Caprio, who rails against fossil fuel and carbon footprints while flying around the world in private jets. Just one flight on Leo’s private jet, or one jaunt on his 200 foot yacht leaves behind a carbon footprint most Americans wouldn’t leave behind in an entire lifetime.
After more than 20 years of global cooling , this fraud to “save the planet” from human activity morphed into the “climate change” fraud, since the earth has not warmed and is in fact in a cooling trend.
GLOBAL WARMING AKA CLIMATE CHANGE IS AN ELITIST FRAUD TO COLLECTIVIZE RESOURCES, DEINDUSTRIALIZE INDUSTRIALIZED NATIONS AND STEAL THE WEALTH OF THE WORLD!
See the Vosteck ice core samples to learn more about this fraud perpetrated by the elite that claims carbon dioxide, a necessary chemical to sustain life, is a deadly, toxic poison polluting the planet.
The Committee of 300
“There is no need to use ‘they’ or ‘the enemy’ except as shorthand. We know who ‘they,’ the enemy, is. The Committee of 300 with its Eastern Liberal Establishment ‘aristocracy,’ its banks, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators – this is the enemy.” – John Coleman, “Conspirators Hierarchy”
This Committee of 300 is modeled after the British East India Company’s Council of 300, founded by the British aristocracy in 1727. Most of its immense wealth arose out of the opium trade with China. This group is responsible for the phony drug wars here in the U.S. with the agenda of getting us to give away our constitutional rights. Asset forfeiture is a prime example, where huge assets can be seized without trial and no proof of guilt needed.
“Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves.” -Walter Rathenau of General Electric, 1909
Some notable members of the Committee of 300 past and present include:
The British royal family, Dutch royal family, House of Hapsburg, House of Orange, Duke of Alba, Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh, Lord Carrington, Lord Halifax, Lord Alfred Milner, John Jacob and Waldorf of the Astor Illuminati bloodline, Winston Churchill, Cecil Rhodes, Queen Elizabeth II, Queen Juliana, Queen Beatrix, Queen Magreta, King Haakon of Norway, Colonel Mandel House, Aldous Huxley, John Forbes, Averill Harriman, William and McGeorge Bundy, George Bush, Prescott Bush, Henry Kissinger, J.P. Morgan, Maurice Strong, David Rockefeller, David and Evelyn Rothschild, Paul, Max and Felix Warburg, Ormsby and Al Gore, Bertrand Russell, Sir Earnest and Harry of the Oppenheimer Illuminati bloodline, Warren Buffet, Giuseppe Mazzini, Sir William Hesse, George Schultz, H.G. Wells, and Ted Turner.
The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale, followed by depressions, as a softening-up technique for bigger things to come, as its principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become its “welfare” recipients of the future.