Tag Archives: Middle East conflict

THE ZIONIST PLAN FOR THE MIDDLE EAST

In 1979, the Council On Foreign Relations forecast that “terrorism” would be the new obstacle to “freedom and democracy” in the 1980’s.   As usual, the CFR’s crystal ball is ever illuminating the “psychic power” of those working to create a New World Order.

When looking back at a 1982 publication, we learn why there is so much conflict in the middle east.  It may not be what you think.

Translated and edited by

Israel Shahak

The Israel conceived by Theodore Herzl (1904) and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947)

In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”

Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”

 

From Oded Yinon’s

“A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”

Published by the

Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc.

Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982

Special Document No. 1 (ISBN 0-937694-56-8)

Table of Contents

Publisher’s Note

1

The Association of Arab-American University Graduates finds it compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with Oded Yinon’s article which appeared in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Oded Yinon is an Israeli journalist and was formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel. To our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed and unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East. Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the “vision” for the entire Middle East of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Begin, Sharon and Eitan. Its importance, hence, lies not in its historical value but in the nightmare which it presents.

2

The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.

3

This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication,  Israel’s Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach’s study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.

4

The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Oded Yinon in his essay, “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980’s,” talks about “far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967” that are created by the “very stormy situation [that] surrounds Israel.”

5

The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very much an active policy, but is pursued more forcefully in times of conflict, such as in the 1947-1948 war and in the 1967 war. An appendix entitled  “Israel Talks of a New Exodus” is included in this publication to demonstrate past Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides the main Zionist document we present, other Zionist planning for the de-Palestinization of Palestine.

6

It is clear from the Kivunim document, published in February, 1982, that the “far-reaching opportunities” of which Zionist strategists have been thinking are the same “opportunities” of which they are trying to convince the world and which they claim were generated by their June, 1982 invasion. It is also clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target since their viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or later.

7

Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy, unfortunately, suffers from ambiguity and incoherence. There is no indication that Arab strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead, they react with incredulity and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle East is not taken seriously Arab reaction to any future siege of other Arab capitals will be the same.

Khalil Nakhleh

July 23, 1982

Foreward

by Israel Shahak

1

The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note. Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points:

2

1. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze’ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha’aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the “best” that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: “The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi’ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part” (Ha’aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.

3

2. The strong connection with Neo-Conservative thought in the USA is very prominent, especially in the author’s notes. But, while lip service is paid to the idea of the “defense of the West” from Soviet power, the real aim of the author, and of the present Israeli establishment is clear: To make an Imperial Israel into a world power. In other words, the aim of Sharon is to deceive the Americans after he has deceived all the rest.

4

3. It is obvious that much of the relevant data, both in the notes and in the text, is garbled or omitted, such as the financial help of the U.S. to Israel. Much of it is pure fantasy. But, the plan is not to be regarded as not influential, or as not capable of realization for a short time. The plan follows faithfully the geopolitical ideas current in Germany of 1890-1933, which were swallowed whole by Hitler and the Nazi movement, and determined their aims for East Europe. Those aims, especially the division of the existing states, were carried out in 1939-1941, and only an alliance on the global scale prevented their consolidation for a period of time.

5

The notes by the author follow the text. To avoid confusion, I did not add any notes of my own, but have put the substance of them into this foreward and the conclusion at the end. I have, however, emphasized some portions of the text.

Israel Shahak

June 13, 1982


 

A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties

by Oded Yinon

This essay originally appeared in Hebrew in KIVUNIM (Directions), A Journal for Judaism and Zionism; Issue No, 14–Winter, 5742, February 1982, Editor: Yoram Beck. Editorial Committee: Eli Eyal, Yoram Beck, Amnon Hadari, Yohanan Manor, Elieser Schweid. Published by the Department of Publicity/The World Zionist Organization, Jerusalem.

1

At the outset of the nineteen eighties the State of Israel is in need of a new perspective as to its place, its aims and national targets, at home and abroad. This need has become even more vital due to a number of central processes which the country, the region and the world are undergoing. We are living today in the early stages of a new epoch in human history which is not at all similar to its predecessor, and its characteristics are totally different from what we have hitherto known. That is why we need an understanding of the central processes which typify this historical epoch on the one hand, and on the other hand we need a world outlook and an operational strategy in accordance with the new conditions. The existence, prosperity and steadfastness of the Jewish state will depend upon its ability to adopt a new framework for its domestic and foreign affairs.

2

This epoch is characterized by several traits which we can already diagnose, and which symbolize a genuine revolution in our present lifestyle. The dominant process is the breakdown of the rationalist, humanist outlook as the major cornerstone supporting the life and achievements of Western civilization since the Renaissance. The political, social and economic views which have emanated from this foundation have been based on several “truths” which are presently disappearing–for example, the view that man as an individual is the center of the universe and everything exists in order to fulfill his basic material needs. This position is being invalidated in the present when it has become clear that the amount of resources in the cosmos does not meet Man’s requirements, his economic needs or his demographic constraints. In a world in which there are four billion human beings and economic and energy resources which do not grow proportionally to meet the needs of mankind, it is unrealistic to expect to fulfill the main requirement of Western Society, 1 i.e., the wish and aspiration for boundless consumption. The view that ethics plays no part in determining the direction Man takes, but rather his material needs do–that view is becoming prevalent today as we see a world in which nearly all values are disappearing. We are losing the ability to assess the simplest things, especially when they concern the simple question of what is Good and what is Evil.

3

The vision of man’s limitless aspirations and abilities shrinks in the face of the sad facts of life, when we witness the break-up of world order around us. The view which promises liberty and freedom to mankind seems absurd in light of the sad fact that three fourths of the human race lives under totalitarian regimes. The views concerning equality and social justice have been transformed by socialism and especially by Communism into a laughing stock. There is no argument as to the truth of these two ideas, but it is clear that they have not been put into practice properly and the majority of mankind has lost the liberty, the freedom and the opportunity for equality and justice. In this nuclear world in which we are (still) living in relative peace for thirty years, the concept of peace and coexistence among nations has no meaning when a superpower like the USSR holds a military and political doctrine of the sort it has: that not only is a nuclear war possible and necessary in order to achieve the ends of Marxism, but that it is possible to survive after it, not to speak of the fact that one can be victorious in it.2

4

The essential concepts of human society, especially those of the West, are undergoing a change due to political, military and economic transformations. Thus, the nuclear and conventional might of the USSR has transformed the epoch that has just ended into the last respite before the great saga that will demolish a large part of our world in a multi-dimensional global war, in comparison with which the past world wars will have been mere child’s play. The power of nuclear as well as of conventional weapons, their quantity, their precision and quality will turn most of our world upside down within a few years, and we must align ourselves so as to face that in Israel. That is, then, the main threat to our existence and that of the Western world. 3 The war over resources in the world, the Arab monopoly on oil, and the need of the West to import most of its raw materials from the Third World, are transforming the world we know, given that one of the major aims of the USSR is to defeat the West by gaining control over the gigantic resources in the Persian Gulf and in the southern part of Africa, in which the majority of world minerals are located. We can imagine the dimensions of the global confrontation which will face us in the future.

5

The Gorshkov doctrine calls for Soviet control of the oceans and mineral rich areas of the Third World. That together with the present Soviet nuclear doctrine which holds that it is possible to manage, win and survive a nuclear war, in the course of which the West’s military might well be destroyed and its inhabitants made slaves in the service of Marxism-Leninism, is the main danger to world peace and to our own existence. Since 1967, the Soviets have transformed Clausewitz’ dictum into “War is the continuation of policy in nuclear means,” and made it the motto which guides all their policies. Already today they are busy carrying out their aims in our region and throughout the world, and the need to face them becomes the major element in our country’s security policy and of course that of the rest of the Free World. That is our major foreign challenge.4

6

The Arab Moslem world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly self-destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes. The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorites and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging. 5 Most of the Arabs, 118 million out of 170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt (45 million today).

7

Apart from Egypt, all the Maghreb states are made up of a mixture of Arabs and non-Arab Berbers. In Algeria there is already a civil war raging in the Kabile mountains between the two nations in the country. Morocco and Algeria are at war with each other over Spanish Sahara, in addition to the internal struggle in each of them. Militant Islam endangers the integrity of Tunisia and Qaddafi organizes wars which are destructive from the Arab point of view, from a country which is sparsely populated and which cannot become a powerful nation. That is why he has been attempting unifications in the past with states that are more genuine, like Egypt and Syria. Sudan, the most torn apart state in the Arab Moslem world today is built upon four groups hostile to each other, an Arab Moslem Sunni minority which rules over a majority of non-Arab Africans, Pagans, and Christians. In Egypt there is a Sunni Moslem majority facing a large minority of Christians which is dominant in upper Egypt: some 7 million of them, so that even Sadat, in his speech on May 8, expressed the fear that they will want a state of their own, something like a “second” Christian Lebanon in Egypt.

8

All the Arab States east of Israel are torn apart, broken up and riddled with inner conflict even more than those of the Maghreb. Syria is fundamentally no different from Lebanon except in the strong military regime which rules it. But the real civil war taking place nowadays between the Sunni majority and the Shi’ite Alawi ruling minority (a mere 12% of the population) testifies to the severity of the domestic trouble.

9

Iraq is, once again, no different in essence from its neighbors, although its majority is Shi’ite and the ruling minority Sunni. Sixty-five percent of the population has no say in politics, in which an elite of 20 percent holds the power. In addition there is a large Kurdish minority in the north, and if it weren’t for the strength of the ruling regime, the army and the oil revenues, Iraq’s future state would be no different than that of Lebanon in the past or of Syria today. The seeds of inner conflict and civil war are apparent today already, especially after the rise of Khomeini to power in Iran, a leader whom the Shi’ites in Iraq view as their natural leader.

10

All the Gulf principalities and Saudi Arabia are built upon a delicate house of sand in which there is only oil. In Kuwait, the Kuwaitis constitute only a quarter of the population. In Bahrain, the Shi’ites are the majority but are deprived of power. In the UAE, Shi’ites are once again the majority but the Sunnis are in power. The same is true of Oman and North Yemen. Even in the Marxist South Yemen there is a sizable Shi’ite minority. In Saudi Arabia half the population is foreign, Egyptian and Yemenite, but a Saudi minority holds power.

11

Jordan is in reality Palestinian, ruled by a Trans-Jordanian Bedouin minority, but most of the army and certainly the bureaucracy is now Palestinian. As a matter of fact Amman is as Palestinian as Nablus. All of these countries have powerful armies, relatively speaking. But there is a problem there too. The Syrian army today is mostly Sunni with an Alawi officer corps, the Iraqi army Shi’ite with Sunni commanders. This has great significance in the long run, and that is why it will not be possible to retain the loyalty of the army for a long time except where it comes to the only common denominator: The hostility towards Israel, and today even that is insufficient.

12

Alongside the Arabs, split as they are, the other Moslem states share a similar predicament. Half of Iran’s population is comprised of a Persian speaking group and the other half of an ethnically Turkish group. Turkey’s population comprises a Turkish Sunni Moslem majority, some 50%, and two large minorities, 12 million Shi’ite Alawis and 6 million Sunni Kurds. In Afghanistan there are 5 million

Shi’ites who constitute one third of the population. In Sunni Pakistan there are 15 million Shi’ites who endanger the existence of that state.

13

This national ethnic minority picture extending from Morocco to India and from Somalia to Turkey points to the absence of stability and a rapid degeneration in the entire region. When this picture is added to the economic one, we see how the entire region is built like a house of cards, unable to withstand its severe problems.

14

In this giant and fractured world there are a few wealthy groups and a huge mass of poor people. Most of the Arabs have an average yearly income of 300 dollars. That is the situation in Egypt, in most of the Maghreb countries except for Libya, and in Iraq. Lebanon is torn apart and its economy is falling to pieces. It is a state in which there is no centralized power, but only 5 de facto sovereign authorities (Christian in the north, supported by the Syrians and under the rule of the Franjieh clan, in the East an area of direct Syrian conquest, in the center a Phalangist controlled Christian enclave, in the south and up to the Litani river a mostly Palestinian region controlled by the PLO and Major Haddad’s state of Christians and half a million Shi’ites). Syria is in an even graver situation and even the assistance she will obtain in the future after the unification with Libya will not be sufficient for dealing with the basic problems of existence and the maintenance of a large army. Egypt is in the worst situation: Millions are on the verge of hunger, half the labor force is unemployed, and housing is scarce in this most densely populated area of the world. Except for the army, there is not a single department operating efficiently and the state is in a permanent state of bankruptcy and depends entirely on American foreign assistance granted since the peace.6

15

In the Gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Libya and Egypt there is the largest accumulation of money and oil in the world, but those enjoying it are tiny elites who lack a wide base of support and self-confidence, something that no army can guarantee. 7 The Saudi army with all its equipment cannot defend the regime from real dangers at home or abroad, and what took place in Mecca in 1980 is only an example. A sad and very stormy situation surrounds Israel and creates challenges for it, problems, risks but also far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967. Chances are that opportunities missed at that time will become achievable in the Eighties to an extent and along dimensions which we cannot even imagine today.

16

The “peace” policy and the return of territories, through a dependence upon the US, precludes the realization of the new option created for us. Since 1967, all the governments of Israel have tied our national aims down to narrow political needs, on the one hand, and on the other to destructive opinions at home which neutralized our capacities both at home and abroad. Failing to take steps towards the Arab population in the new territories, acquired in the course of a war forced upon us, is the major strategic error committed by Israel on the morning after the Six Day War. We could have saved ourselves all the bitter and dangerous conflict since then if we had given Jordan to the Palestinians who live west of the Jordan river. By doing that we would have neutralized the Palestinian problem which we nowadays face, and to which we have found solutions that are really no solutions at all, such as territorial compromise or autonomy which amount, in fact, to the same thing. 8 Today, we suddenly face immense opportunities for transforming the situation thoroughly and this we must do in the coming decade, otherwise we shall not survive as a state.

17

In the course of the Nineteen Eighties, the State of Israel will have to go through far-reaching changes in its political and economic regime domestically, along with radical changes in its foreign policy, in order to stand up to the global and regional challenges of this new epoch. The loss of the Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically identical to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one quarter of our present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil. 9 The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not, in the near future, serve to alter that state of affairs.

18

(Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967. The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return of the Sinai, and they will do all they can to return to the fold of the Arab world and to the USSR in order to gain support and military assistance. American aid is guaranteed only for a short while, for the terms of the peace and the weakening of the U.S. both at home and abroad will bring about a reduction in aid. Without oil and the income from it, with the present enormous expenditure, we will not be able to get through 1982 under the present conditions and we will have to act in order to return the situation to the status quo which existed in Sinai prior to Sadat’s visit and the mistaken peace agreement signed with him in March 1979. 10

19

Israel has two major routes through which to realize this purpose, one direct and the other indirect. The direct option is the less realistic one because of the nature of the regime and government in Israel as well as the wisdom of Sadat who obtained our withdrawal from Sinai, which was, next to the war of 1973, his major achievement since he took power. Israel will not unilaterally break the treaty, neither today, nor in 1982, unless it is very hard pressed economically and politically and Egypt provides Israel with the excuse to take the Sinai back into our hands for the fourth time in our short history. What is left therefore, is the indirect option. The economic situation in Egypt, the nature of the regime and its pan-

Arab policy, will bring about a situation after April 1982 in which Israel will be forced to act directly or indirectly in order to regain control over Sinai as a strategic, economic and energy reserve for the long run. Egypt does not constitute a military strategic problem due to its internal conflicts and it could be driven back to the post 1967 war situation in no more than one day. 11

20

The myth of Egypt as the strong leader of the Arab World was demolished back in 1956 and definitely did not survive 1967, but our policy, as in the return of the Sinai, served to turn the myth into “fact.” In reality, however, Egypt’s power in proportion both to Israel alone and to the rest of the Arab World has gone down about 50 percent since 1967. Egypt is no longer the leading political power in the Arab World and is economically on the verge of a crisis. Without foreign assistance the crisis will come tomorrow. 12 In the short run, due to the return of the Sinai, Egypt will gain several advantages at our expense, but only in the short run until 1982, and that will not change the balance of power to its benefit, and will possibly bring about its downfall. Egypt, in its present domestic political picture, is already a corpse, all the more so if we take into account the growing Moslem-Christian rift. Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the Nineteen Eighties on its Western front.

21

Egypt is divided and torn apart into many foci of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic State in Upper Egypt alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key to a historical development which was only set back by the peace agreement but which seems inevitable in the long run. 13

22

The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precendent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unqiue areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today. 14

23

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization. 15

24

The entire Arabian peninsula is a natural candidate for dissolution due to internal and external pressures, and the matter is inevitable especially in Saudi Arabia. Regardless of whether its economic might based on oil remains intact or whether it is diminished in the long run, the internal rifts and breakdowns are a clear and natural development in light of the present political structure. 16

25

Jordan constitutes an immediate strategic target in the short run but not in the long run, for it does not constitute a real threat in the long run after its dissolution, the termination of the lengthy rule of King Hussein and the transfer of power to the Palestinians in the short run.

26

There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel’s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa’amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan. 17

27

Within Israel the distinction between the areas of ’67 and the territories beyond them, those of ’48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of ’67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it, as our existential need in this difficult epoch, the nuclear epoch which we shall soon enter. It is no longer possible to live with three fourths of the Jewish population on the dense shoreline which is so dangerous in a nuclear epoch.

28

Dispersal of the population is therefore a domestic strategic aim of the highest order; otherwise, we shall cease to exist within any borders. Judea, Samaria and the Galilee are our sole guarantee for national existence, and if we do not become the majority in the mountain areas, we shall not rule in the country and we shall be like the Crusaders, who lost this country which was not theirs anyhow, and in which they were foreigners to begin with. Rebalancing the country demographically, strategically and economically is the highest and most central aim today. Taking hold of the mountain watershed from Beersheba to the Upper Galilee is the national aim generated by the major strategic consideration which is settling the mountainous part of the country that is empty of Jews today. l8

29

Realizing our aims on the Eastern front depends first on the realization of this internal strategic objective. The transformation of the political and economic structure, so as to enable the realization of these strategic aims, is the key to achieving the entire change. We need to change from a centralized economy in which the government is extensively involved, to an open and free market as well as to switch from depending upon the U.S. taxpayer to developing, with our own hands, of a genuine productive economic infrastructure. If we are not able to make this change freely and voluntarily, we shall be forced into it by world developments, especially in the areas of economics, energy, and politics, and by our own growing isolation. l9

30

From a military and strategic point of view, the West led by the U.S. is unable to withstand the global pressures of the USSR throughout the world, and Israel must therefore stand alone in the Eighties, without any foreign assistance, military or economic, and this is within our capacities today, with no compromises. 20 Rapid changes in the world will also bring about a change in the condition of world Jewry to which Israel will become not only a last resort but the only existential option. We cannot assume that U.S. Jews, and the communities of Europe and Latin America will continue to exist in the present form in the future. 21

31

Our existence in this country itself is certain, and there is no force that could remove us from here either forcefully or by treachery (Sadat’s method). Despite the difficulties of the mistaken “peace” policy and the problem of the Israeli Arabs and those of the territories, we can effectively deal with these problems in the foreseeable future.

Conclusion

1

Three important points have to be clarified in order to be able to understand the significant possibilities of realization of this Zionist plan for the Middle East, and also why it had to be published.

2

The Military Background of The Plan

The military conditions of this plan have not been mentioned above, but on the many occasions where something very like it is being “explained” in closed meetings to members of the Israeli Establishment, this point is clarified. It is assumed that the Israeli military forces, in all their branches, are insufficient for the actual work of occupation of such wide territories as discussed above. In fact, even in times of intense Palestinian “unrest” on the West Bank, the forces of the Israeli Army are stretched out too much. The answer to that is the method of ruling by means of “Haddad forces” or of “Village Associations” (also known as “Village Leagues”): local forces under “leaders” completely dissociated from the population, not having even any feudal or party structure (such as the Phalangists have, for example). The “states” proposed by Yinon are “Haddadland” and “Village Associations,” and their armed forces will be, no doubt, quite similar. In addition, Israeli military superiority in such a situation will be much greater than it is even now, so that any movement of revolt will be “punished” either by mass humiliation as in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, or by bombardment and obliteration of cities, as in Lebanon now (June 1982), or by both. In order to ensure this, the plan, as explained orally, calls for the establishment of Israeli garrisons in focal places between the mini states, equipped with the necessary mobile destructive forces. In fact, we have seen something like this in Haddadland and we will almost certainly soon see the first example of this system functioning either in South Lebanon or in all Lebanon.

3

It is obvious that the above military assumptions, and the whole plan too, depend also on the Arabs continuing to be even more divided than they are now, and on the lack of any truly progressive mass movement among them. It may be that those two conditions will be removed only when the plan will be well advanced, with consequences which can not be foreseen.

4

Why it is necessary to publish this in Israel?

The reason for publication is the dual nature of the Israeli-Jewish society: A very great measure of freedom and democracy, specially for Jews, combined with expansionism and racist discrimination. In such a situation the Israeli-Jewish elite (for the masses follow the TV and Begin’s speeches) has to be persuaded. The first steps in the process of persuasion are oral, as indicated above, but a time comes in which it becomes inconvenient. Written material must be produced for the benefit of the more stupid “persuaders” and “explainers” (for example medium-rank officers, who are, usually, remarkably stupid). They then “learn it,” more or less, and preach to others. It should be remarked that Israel, and even the Yishuv from the Twenties, has always functioned in this way. I myself well remember how (before I was “in opposition”) the necessity of war with was explained to me and others a year before the 1956 war, and the necessity of conquering “the rest of Western Palestine when we will have the opportunity” was explained in the years 1965-67.

5

Why is it assumed that there is no special risk from the outside in the publication of such plans?

Such risks can come from two sources, so long as the principled opposition inside Israel is very weak (a situation which may change as a consequence of the war on Lebanon) : The Arab World, including the Palestinians, and the United States. The Arab World has shown itself so far quite incapable of a detailed and rational analysis of Israeli-Jewish society, and the Palestinians have been, on the average, no better than the rest. In such a situation, even those who are shouting about the dangers of Israeli expansionism (which are real enough) are doing this not because of factual and detailed knowledge, but because of belief in myth. A good example is the very persistent belief in the non-existent writing on the wall of the Knesset of the Biblical verse about the Nile and the Euphrates. Another example is the persistent, and completely false declarations, which were made by some of the most important Arab leaders, that the two blue stripes of the Israeli flag symbolize the Nile and the Euphrates, while in fact they are taken from the stripes of the Jewish praying shawl (Talit). The Israeli specialists assume that, on the whole, the Arabs will pay no attention to their serious discussions of the future, and the Lebanon war has proved them right. So why should they not continue with their old methods of persuading other Israelis?

6

In the United States a very similar situation exists, at least until now. The more or less serious commentators take their information about Israel, and much of their opinions about it, from two sources. The first is from articles in the “liberal” American press, written almost totally by Jewish admirers of Israel who, even if they are critical of some aspects of the Israeli state, practice loyally what Stalin used to call “the constructive criticism.” (In fact those among them who claim also to be “Anti-Stalinist” are in reality more Stalinist than Stalin, with Israel being their god which has not yet failed). In the framework of such critical worship it must be assumed that Israel has always “good intentions” and only “makes mistakes,” and therefore such a plan would not be a matter for discussion–exactly as the Biblical genocides committed by Jews are not mentioned. The other source of information, The Jerusalem Post, has similar policies. So long, therefore, as the situation exists in which Israel is really a “closed society” to the rest of the world, because the world wants to close its eyes, the publication and even the beginning of the realization of such a plan is realistic and feasible.

Israel Shahak

June 17, 1982 Jerusalem

About the Translator

Israel Shahak is a professor of organic chemistly at Hebrew University in Jerusalem and the chairman of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights. He published The Shahak Papers, collections of key articles from the Hebrew press, and is the author of numerous articles and books, among them Non-Jew in the Jewish State. His latest book is Israel’s Global Role: Weapons for Repression, published by the AAUG in 1982. Israel Shahak: (1933-2001)

Notes

 1. American Universities Field Staff. Report No.33, 1979. According to this research, the population of the world will be 6 billion in the year 2000. Today’s world population can be broken down as follows: China, 958 million; India, 635 million; USSR, 261 million; U.S., 218 million Indonesia, 140 million; Brazil and Japan, 110 million each. According to the figures of the U.N. Population Fund for 1980, there will be, in 2000, 50 cities with a population of over 5 million each. The population ofthp;Third World will then be 80% of the world population. According to Justin Blackwelder, U.S. Census Office chief, the world population will not reach 6 billion because of hunger.

 2. Soviet nuclear policy has been well summarized by two American Sovietologists: Joseph D. Douglas and Amoretta M. Hoeber, Soviet Strategy for Nuclear War, (Stanford, Ca., Hoover Inst. Press, 1979). In the Soviet Union tens and hundreds of articles and books are published each year which detail the Soviet doctrine for nuclear war and there is a great deal of documentation translated into English and published by the U.S. Air Force,including USAF: Marxism-Leninism on War and the Army: The Soviet View, Moscow, 1972; USAF: The Armed Forces of the Soviet State. Moscow, 1975, by Marshal A. Grechko. The basic Soviet approach to the matter is presented in the book by Marshal Sokolovski published in 1962 in Moscow: Marshal V. D. Sokolovski, Military Strategy, Soviet Doctrine and Concepts(New York, Praeger, 1963).

 3. A picture of Soviet intentions in various areas of the world can be drawn from the book by Douglas and Hoeber, ibid. For additional material see: Michael Morgan, “USSR’s Minerals as Strategic Weapon in the Future,” Defense and Foreign Affairs, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1979.

 4. Admiral of the Fleet Sergei Gorshkov, Sea Power and the State, London, 1979. Morgan, loc. cit. General George S. Brown (USAF) C-JCS, Statement to the Congress on the Defense Posture of the United States For Fiscal Year 1979, p. 103; National Security Council, Review of Non-Fuel Mineral Policy, (Washington, D.C. 1979,); Drew Middleton, The New York Times, (9/15/79); Time, 9/21/80.

 5. Elie Kedourie, “The End of the Ottoman Empire,” Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 3, No.4, 1968.

 6. Al-Thawra, Syria 12/20/79, Al-Ahram,12/30/79, Al Ba’ath, Syria, 5/6/79. 55% of the Arabs are 20 years old and younger, 70% of the Arabs live in Africa, 55% of the Arabs under 15 are unemployed, 33% live in urban areas, Oded Yinon, “Egypt’s Population Problem,” The Jerusalem Quarterly, No. 15, Spring 1980.

 7. E. Kanovsky, “Arab Haves and Have Nots,” The Jerusalem Quarterly, No.1, Fall 1976, Al Ba’ath, Syria, 5/6/79.

 8. In his book, former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said that the Israeli government is in fact responsible for the design of American policy in the Middle East, after June ’67, because of its own indecisiveness as to the future of the territories and the inconsistency in its positions since it established the background for Resolution 242 and certainly twelve years later for the Camp David agreements and the peace treaty with Egypt. According to Rabin, on June 19, 1967, President Johnson sent a letter to Prime Minister Eshkol in which he did not mention anything about withdrawal from the new territories but exactly on the same day the government resolved to return territories in exchange for peace. After the Arab resolutions in Khartoum (9/1/67) the government altered its position but contrary to its decision of June 19, did not notify the U.S. of the alteration and the U.S. continued to support 242 in the Security Council on the basis of its earlier understanding that Israel is prepared to return territories. At that point it was already too late to change the U.S. position and Israel’s policy. From here the way was opened to peace agreements on the basis of 242 as was later agreed upon in Camp David. See Yitzhak Rabin. Pinkas Sherut, (Ma’ariv 1979) pp. 226-227.

 9. Foreign and Defense Committee Chairman Prof. Moshe Arens argued in an interview (Ma ‘ariv,10/3/80) that the Israeli government failed to prepare an economic plan before the Camp David agreements and was itself surprised by the cost of the agreements, although already during the negotiations it was possible to calculate the heavy price and the serious error involved in not having prepared the economic grounds for peace.

The former Minister of Treasury, Mr. Yigal Holwitz, stated that if it were not for the withdrawal from the oil fields, Israel would have a positive balance of payments (9/17/80). That same person said two years earlier that the government of Israel (from which he withdrew) had placed a noose around his neck. He was referring to the Camp David agreements (Ha’aretz, 11/3/78). In the course of the whole peace negotiations neither an expert nor an economics advisor was consulted, and the Prime Minister himself, who lacks knowledge and expertise in economics, in a mistaken initiative, asked the U.S. to give us a loan rather than a grant, due to his wish to maintain our respect and the respect of the U.S. towards us. See Ha’aretz1/5/79. Jerusalem Post, 9/7/79. Prof Asaf Razin, formerly a senior consultant in the Treasury, strongly criticized the conduct of the negotiations; Ha’aretz, 5/5/79. Ma’ariv, 9/7/79. As to matters concerning the oil fields and Israel’s energy crisis, see the interview with Mr. Eitan Eisenberg, a government advisor on these matters, Ma’arive Weekly, 12/12/78. The Energy Minister, who personally signed the Camp David agreements and the evacuation of Sdeh Alma, has since emphasized the seriousness of our condition from the point of view of oil supplies more than once…see Yediot Ahronot, 7/20/79. Energy Minister Modai even admitted that the government did not consult him at all on the subject of oil during the Camp David and Blair House negotiations. Ha’aretz, 8/22/79.

 10. Many sources report on the growth of the armaments budget in Egypt and on intentions to give the army preference in a peace epoch budget over domestic needs for which a peace was allegedly obtained. See former Prime Minister Mamduh Salam in an interview 12/18/77, Treasury Minister Abd El Sayeh in an interview 7/25/78, and the paper Al Akhbar, 12/2/78 which clearly stressed that the military budget will receive first priority, despite the peace. This is what former Prime Minister Mustafa Khalil has stated in his cabinet’s programmatic document which was presented to Parliament, 11/25/78. See English translation, ICA, FBIS, Nov. 27. 1978, pp. D 1-10.

According to these sources, Egypt’s military budget increased by 10% between fiscal 1977 and 1978, and the process still goes on. A Saudi source divulged that the Egyptians plan to increase their militmy budget by 100% in the next two years; Ha’aretz, 2/12/79 and Jerusalem Post, 1/14/79.

 11. Most of the economic estimates threw doubt on Egypt’s ability to reconstruct its economy by 1982. See Economic Intelligence Unit, 1978 Supplement, “The Arab Republic of Egypt”; E. Kanovsky, “Recent Economic Developments in the Middle East,” Occasional Papers, The Shiloah Institution, June 1977; Kanovsky, “The Egyptian Economy Since the Mid-Sixties, The Micro Sectors,” Occasional Papers, June 1978; Robert McNamara, President of World Bank, as reported in Times, London, 1/24/78.

 12. See the comparison made by the researeh of the Institute for Strategic Studies in London, and research camed out in the Center for Strategic Studies of Tel Aviv University, as well as the research by the British scientist, Denis Champlin, Military Review, Nov. 1979, ISS: The Military Balance 1979-1980, CSS; Security Arrangements in Sinai…by Brig. Gen. (Res.) A Shalev, No. 3.0 CSS; The Military Balance and the Military Options after the Peace Treaty with Egypt, by Brig. Gen. (Res.) Y. Raviv, No.4, Dec. 1978, as well as many press reports including El Hawadeth, London, 3/7/80; El Watan El Arabi, Paris, 12/14/79.

 13. As for religious ferment in Egypt and the relations between Copts and Moslems see the series of articles published in the Kuwaiti paper, El Qabas, 9/15/80. The English author Irene Beeson reports on the rift between Moslems and Copts, see: Irene Beeson, Guardian, London, 6/24/80, and Desmond Stewart, Middle East Internmational, London 6/6/80. For other reports see Pamela Ann Smith, Guardian, London, 12/24/79; The Christian Science Monitor 12/27/79 as well as Al Dustour, London, 10/15/79; El Kefah El Arabi, 10/15/79.

 14. Arab Press Service, Beirut, 8/6-13/80. The New Republic, 8/16/80, Der Spiegel as cited by Ha’aretz, 3/21/80, and 4/30-5/5/80; The Economist, 3/22/80; Robert Fisk, Times, London, 3/26/80; Ellsworth Jones, Sunday Times, 3/30/80.

 15.  J.P.  Peroncell  Hugoz,  Le  Monde,  Paris  4/28/80;  Dr.  Abbas  Kelidar,  Middle  East  Review,  Summer  1979;

Conflict Studies, ISS, July 1975; Andreas Kolschitter, Der Zeit, (Ha’aretz, 9/21/79) Economist Foreign Report, 10/10/79, Afro-Asian Affairs, London, July 1979.

 16. Arnold Hottinger, “The Rich Arab States in Trouble,” The New York Review of Books, 5/15/80; Arab Press Service, Beirut, 6/25-7/2/80; U.S. News and World Report, 11/5/79 as well as El Ahram, 11/9/79; El Nahar El Arabi Wal Duwali, Paris 9/7/79; El Hawadeth, 11/9/79; David Hakham, Monthly Review, IDF, Jan.-Feb. 79.

 17. As for Jordan’s policies and problems see El Nahar El Arabi Wal Duwali, 4/30/79, 7/2/79; Prof. Elie Kedouri, Ma’ariv 6/8/79; Prof. Tanter, Davar 7/12/79; A. Safdi, Jerusalem Post, 5/31/79; El Watan El Arabi 11/28/79; El Qabas, 11/19/79. As for PLO positions see: The resolutions of the Fatah Fourth Congress, Damascus, August 1980. The Shefa’amr program of the Israeli Arabs was published in Ha’aretz, 9/24/80, and by Arab Press Report 6/18/80. For facts and figures on immigration of Arabs to Jordan, see Amos Ben Vered, Ha’aretz, 2/16/77; Yossef Zuriel, Ma’ariv 1/12/80. As to the PLO’s position towards Israel see Shlomo Gazit, Monthly Review; July 1980; Hani El Hasan in an interview, Al Rai Al’Am, Kuwait 4/15/80; Avi Plaskov, “The Palestinian Problem,” Survival, ISS, London Jan. Feb. 78; David Gutrnann, “The Palestinian Myth,” Commentary, Oct. 75; Bernard Lewis, “The Palestinians and the PLO,” Commentary Jan. 75; Monday Morning, Beirut, 8/18-21/80; Journal of Palestine Studies, Winter 1980.

 18. Prof. Yuval Neeman, “Samaria–The Basis for Israel’s Security,” Ma’arakhot 272-273, May/June 1980; Ya’akov Hasdai, “Peace, the Way and the Right to Know,” Dvar Hashavua, 2/23/80. Aharon Yariv, “Strategic Depth–An Israeli Perspective,” Ma’arakhot 270-271, October 1979; Yitzhak Rabin, “Israel’s Defense Problems in the Eighties,” Ma’arakhot October 1979.

 19. Ezra Zohar, In the Regime’s Pliers (Shikmona, 1974); Motti Heinrich, Do We have a Chance Israel, TruthVersus Legend (Reshafim, 1981).

 20. Henry Kissinger, “The Lessons of the Past,” The Washington Review Vol 1, Jan. 1978; Arthur Ross, “OPEC’s Challenge to the West,” The Washington Quarterly, Winter, 1980; Walter Levy, “Oil and the Decline of the West,” Foreign Affairs, Summer 1980; Special Report–“Our Armed Forees-Ready or Not?” U.S. News and World Report 10/10/77; Stanley Hoffman, “Reflections on the Present Danger,” The New York Review of Books 3/6/80; Time 4/3/80; Leopold Lavedez “The illusions of SALT” Commentary Sept. 79; Norman Podhoretz, “The Present Danger,” Commentary March 1980; Robert Tucker, “Oil and American Power Six Years Later,” Commentary Sept. 1979; Norman Podhoretz, “The Abandonment of Israel,” Commentary July 1976; Elie Kedourie, “Misreading the Middle East,” Commentary July 1979.

 21. According to figures published by Ya’akov Karoz, Yediot Ahronot, 10/17/80, the sum total of anti-Semitic incidents recorded in the world in 1979 was double the amount recorded in 1978. In Germany, France, and Britain the number of anti-Semitic incidents was many times greater in that year. In the U.S. as well there has been a sharp increase in anti-Semitic incidents which were reported in that article. For the new anti-Semitism, see L. Talmon, “The New Anti-Semitism,” The New Republic, 9/18/1976; Barbara Tuchman, “They poisoned the Wells,” Newsweek 2/3/75.

 

RELATED: http://www.cfr.org/saudi-arabia/us-saudi-relations/p36524

http://www.cfr.org/middle-east-and-north-africa/islamic-extremism-rise-isis/p33377

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/target/etc/modern.html

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2:
https://www.youtube.com/c/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

 

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

 

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

SYRIA: THE NEXT JEWEL IN THE CROWN OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

By Howard Nema
 

HN NOTE 4/5/17:  THE SHADOW GOV’T ARE USING THE SAME PLAY FROM THEIR PLAYBOOK.  LET’S HOPE TRUMP DOESN’T TAKE THE BAIT!

 
Author’s note:   I am re-posting this article that was originally published on September 17, 2013 because I believe it is even more timely today.   After all, past is prologue.  Given the recent Ebola hoax, the ever rising tensions in the middle east, I thought it would be appropriate to make a few minor revisions to include some current events.    Please share widely!
                                                                                                                HN 10-19-14
    
 

While Iraq flounders under insurgency from ISIS, millions starve in West Africa and hundreds of thousands of Christians in Nigeria, Somalia, Kenya, Sudan, the Ivory Coast—are being killed, slaughtered, beheaded and even crucified by Muslims, mainstream media attention is focused on the rising conflict in Syria.

Media aversion to reporting on the ongoing genocidal carnage against Christians while welcoming air raids on Syria to punish Assad for allegedly using chemical weapons reveals a larger agenda 
 
The four hundred plus children killed by the August, 2013 chemical attack have taken center stage over the millions starving in Africa and the genocidal ethnic cleansing of Christians.  Why?
 
Clearly, our State Department is not interested in the safety, security, liberty and freedom of these Christians, or the Syrian people, but are very interested in the continued prosperity of Anglo-American corporate and banking interests in the region.
 
After all, the U.S. has played a pivotal role in bringing “democracy” to Libya and Egypt by installing compliant leaders from Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, collectivizing resources via insider corporations and setting up Rothschild Central Banks. 
 
Interestingly enough, the only jewels missing from the crown of the Rothchild’s Central Bank are Syria and Iran. 
 
Under the guise of bringing freedom and liberty to the oppressed people in the Middle East and maintaining Our national security, the World Order establishment have toppled the tyrant Gaddafi in Libya and Mubarack in Egypt.
 
This did little to free the Libyans and Egyptians from oppression, but did much to increase poverty and chaos in the already unstable region while advancing the collectivist goals of the international central bankers and lining the pockets of the mega corporations of the New World Order Anglo-American establishment.  
 
Now, Syria is the next jewel sought by the crown.    Despite military experts warning of further destabilization after a strike on Syria, Obama has downplayed the downside, outrageously stating since we have done nothing about the starving in Africa, this is a move in the right direction.  Really?
 
Obama blames others for his failings and downplays everything negative, like the loss of America’s AAA rating, for one of many examples.
 
If you recall, to solidify this fairy tale propaganda and “restore confidence”, Ben Bernanke, the former Capo of the Federal Reserve crime syndicate promised not to raise interest rates for two years, as if near zero rates helped the stagnant economy up to now, but the Fed plans to keep printing to the tune of up to $85 billion per month.
 
There was talk of an end in early 2014, but as of October 19, 2014, the printing press is still running.
The Fed’s ploy is just another smokescreen to continue looting the American People by printing more money, which creates an equal amount of additional debt, which devalues the dollar.
 
By continuing to raise the debt ceiling to fund the Federal Government’s obligations and payments on over $17 trillion dollars debt and more than $1.5 quadrillion of fraudulent derivative debt have only made matters much worse.
 
In fact, on October 16, the IMF bank concluded that the bankster bailout and stimulus did absolutely nothing to help the U.S. economy.     These very same banking “experts” swore it was the only way to stop the sky from falling and avoid Martial Law.
 
Face it, the banksters are notorious liars and Americans have once again been duped.  Today, we are no closer to economic recovery, but we are indeed closer to Martial Law, especially now with the current Ebola soap opera psyop.
How did we get here?
Let’s take a look back at the banksters plan to rape, pillage and crush the U.S economy. The roots of the scheme dates back almost two decades.  Genius criminal masterminds like Larry Summers cooked up the derivatives Ponzi scheme after his buddy, Bill Clinton repealed Glass-Steagal in 1998.
Pandora’s box was opened allowing allowing banks to trade in securities, the sale of toxic derivatives and risky credit default swaps.  Creating easy credit and derivative securities and credit default swaps in the sub prime mortgage market resulted in a powerful boost to the economy and enormous profits to banks on the way up. It also resulted in tremendous losses and economic decline on the way down.    The banksters knew this.  Clinton knew this. Greenspan knew this.    That was the plan.
Eleven years later, the Ponzi pyramid scheme collapsed like a house of cards, resulting in the “too big to fail” bankster bailouts popularized by Yale Drama School graduate and Skull and Bones alumni Paul Giamatti’s likeable portrayal of Ben Bernanke in the recent HBO film, “To Big To Fail”.    Talk about playing against type.

Bernanke is no good guy. He is a globalist minion, working for the Rothschild and Rockefeller banking interestsLet’s not forget William Hurt as Hank Paulson. (Paulson personally profited over $200 million from the bankster bailout.)

Hurt’s depiction of Paulson as worried and concerned was clearly theatre. Nothing better than having top notch, likeable actors portray despicable characters in a pro-Federal Reserve propaganda piece that casts Bernanke and Paulson as heroes, who helped save a complete financial meltdown.

In fact, in true New World Order fashion, the exact opposite is true. Paulson, Bernanke, Greenspan and Geitner are all responsible and culpable for the continuing economic collapse. And they are still on course.

In 2000, President Clinton made it easier for lower income and minority Americans to qualify for mortgages, expanding homeownership by signing H.R. 1776: The American Homeownership and Economic Opportunity Act into law.On the surface this Act looks pretty good; an opportunity for minorities and the lower class Americans to step up a few rungs on the social ladder and obtain a piece of the American Dream.

As touching as this tug at your liberal heartstrings propaganda appears, looks can be deceiving.  These lax requirements and irresponsible conduct instituted by the banking and mortgage including industry wide corruption and title fraud.  Due to the confusing issue of title with the many changes of ownership and credit default swaps, banks found themselves foreclosing on properties other banks claimed title to.

This was common, two, three even up to a dozen banks foreclosing on the same property. Bank of America even foreclosed on properties where the homeowners had full clear title and NO mortgage. The corrupt courts even sided with Bank of America in many cases. There are currently hundreds, if not thousands of appeals cases pending.

These derivatives created great profits putting millions of Americans into homes they could not afford. This was partly achieved by human nature, but certainly the media’s glossy, high tech messaging of Mc Mansions, big screen TV’s and the overall “spin” on upscale living.

TV sells the good life.Big Houses, granite counters, BMW’s. Go into debt for the good life. Work hard for the good life. Be a slave for the good life.

Unfortunately, most Americans can not afford to life this way, but they want to. So much in fact, that TV shows like the “Kardashians” and “Million Dollar Homes” are tops in the ratings.

Well, we can all dream, right? After all, this is the land of opportunity, isn’t it? Yes, but for the majority of Americans it is not only an out of sight pipe dream, it is a myth here in the land of the fee and home of the slave.

In the heat of the real estate boom of the mid 2000’s, an American earning $50,000 a year could buy a $500,000 house – with as little as NO MONEY DOWN on a 3% adjustable rate mortgage. Wow! Sounds terrific!

Well, what happens if rates go up? What happens when the loan modifies after three years?   What happens if your $1000 mortgage payment rises to $2,500 a month? Fah-get-about- it! No worries. You can refinance….

Sure. Unless the overpriced home you mortgaged loses value, leaving you with an underwater loan, a house you can not sell and a mortgage payment you cannot afford. I do not have to tell you that this has happened to millions of Americans.

Many others were sold bad loans with cut and paste mortgages. Bank Of America was guilty of most of the bad mortgages. As was Wells Fargo. Both are Federal Reserve banks. Both were bailed out in the 2008 swindle. Hmm? Kind of makes you wonder, doesn’t it?
 
Below is the original 1913 title of ownership of the Private Federal Reserve:

1. Rothschild’s of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman, Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

All the primary owners are international bankers of European establishments such as the Bank of England.   
As our Republic slowly evolves into a social controlled cookie cutter democracy, where there dependency on the government trumps God given rights the people willfully embrace their servitude to the elite and their New Age, cultural Marxist, trans-humanist New World Order agenda.
The founding fathers must be turning over in their graves as Our Republic is slowly, incrementally slipping into the tyranny of Big Brother’s endless war and corporate domination of society where the individual is replaced by the collective.  Where people become dependent on the government for survival, and willingly give up their God given rights for that “privilege”.   
This is what is happening in America.  Be it terrorist fear mongering to justify billions spent “to keep us safe”, or “keeping the world safe for democracy”, “or bring ‘freedom and liberty’ the people of Libya from the tyrant Gadaffi — and now Syria and the tyrant Assad.
Like the tyrant Saddam Hussein and the greatest boogie man of all, Osama Bin Laden, who died in late 2001 and was reported dead at least nine separate occasions since 9/11/01.  Bin Laden  was famously “captured” under Obama’s watch and much Goebbels-esque propagandized fanfare and quietly buried at sea.
No pictures of the dead Bin Laden were released as to not enflame radical Muslims to spark a new “Jihad” against the Great Satan.  I guess predator drone strikes that kill hundreds of innocent Muslims  don’t enflame radical Muslims to new acts of terror.
That didn’t work out so good, did it?   There is even more tensions in the middle east sparked by CIA activities,  the rise of ISIS, the murder of Christians, and the increasing publicized beheadings to stir fear and justify increasing military action in the region.
And remember how Osama Bin Laden’s remains were never shown to the public and his body buried at sea “in accordance with Islamic law?”  Really?   Muslim clerics in Cairo stated that Osama Bin Laden’s burial at sea was a violation of Islamic law and tradition with complete disregard for the Muslim practice of placing the body in a grave with the head pointed toward the holy city of Mecca.     Sea burials can be allowed, but only when the death occurred aboard a ship.
 
Bin Laden’s burial at sea “runs against the fundamental principles of Islamic laws, religious values and humanitarian customs,” said Sheik Ahmed al-Tayeb, the grand Imam of Cairo’s al-Azhar mosque, Sunni Islam’s highest seat of learning.
 
Not to mention how nice and neat it all was.  After all, this was the ninth time media reported Bin Laden’s death since the days after 9/11.    Osama Bin Laden suffered from Marfan Syndrome, a serious kidney disease requiring two dialysis machines. 
 
“Despite the fact that we have all been hearing about his kidney problems and the need for dialysis, according to the intelligence people I’ve talked to in Washington, there was no evidence of a dialysis machine in the compound where he was found,” said Mary Anne Weaver, author of “Pakistan: Deep Inside the World’s Most Frightening State.”
 
A video of the compound obtained by ABC News does not show evidence of any dialysis equipment.  In a 2002 interview with CNN, Pakistan President Gen. Pervez Musharraf in said bin Laden had most likely died of kidney failure, and that he’d taken two dialysis machines with him when he went into hiding in Afghanistan. 

Someone who knew and actually trained Osama Bin Laden in the 1980’s to fight the Soviets in the Afghan war is former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under President Reagan, Steve R. Pieczenik.    Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in November of  2001, “not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had Marfan syndrome”.  
 
Marfan syndrome is an inherited disorder that affects connective tissue, which supports and anchors your organs.   Because connective tissue is such an integral part of your body, Marfan syndrome affects the heart, eyes, blood vessels and skeleton.  Pieczenik added, that “the USgovernment knew Bin Laden  was dead long before they invaded Afghanistan.
 
The excuse was first, that the pictures were too graphic and the Government did not want to incite further “Islamic” violence.  Interesting, since the CIA and MI6 were caught doing just that in Afghanistan in, dressed up as Taliban shooting up villages to help destabilize regions and extend the ten year $1.3 trillion criminal war.   But this is a war on terror.  A war for freedom, democracy — to fight the evil doers.  If only that was true.
 
And then there’s the NSA and Homeland Security, who have concluded that many Americans who want freedom and to Restore Our Constitutional Republic are a threat to National Security!  Are you kidding?
We the People are not a threat to National Security, but we are a threat to the Anglo-American establishment.   The shadow government, who for decades have been patiently working to implement the New World Order, a one world, totalitarian socialist state. 
Incredibly, foreigners control the United States money supply, owning exclusive rights to the dollar, entering dollars into their banks books to make money which is then lent back to Our government at a profit. 
The private ownership of the U.S. Dollar and the subsequent shearing of the American people’s weath is by far the Greatest Crime of the 20thCentury.
In addition, the owners of this bank have been responsible for instigating all the major wars and depressions in the last 100 years.  They own the bank, the dollar and all the major media outlets, the military industrial complex, many influential businessmen, celebrity figures, politicians, judges and cops.
Today, the banking cartels have reversed the trend and making it more difficult to qualify for home loans although mortgage rates are at their lowest point in American history.
 
Stricter credit criteria, more income and money down requirements are further weakening the declining housing market, a buyer’s market where few can afford to buy.  The same is true for auto, business and home improvement loans.  
Meanwhile, the banksters horde their $2 trillion of U.S. taxpayer bailout money and buy gold, leaving the American People with $2 trillion bailout debt. 
 
United States multinational corporations are currently sitting on $1.5 trillion of cash reserve but are afraid to invest, expand or hire.   Using the ploy of uncertainty in the market, these global elitists continue to victimize and prey upon the People of the United States.    After the designed implosion and the housing crash, which began in the sub-prime mortgage market, these criminals intimidated the Congress and the American People in 2008, stating that if we didn’t give trillions of tax dollars to bail out the banks and their bad loans, derivatives and credit default swaps, the sky would fall, there would be martial law and a devastating worldwide depression.  
 
In 2011, they did it again.  America was suckered into raising the debt ceiling and again in 2012.       Now America once again will need to raise the debt ceiling in October, 2013.   America stands at the edge of that very same precarious precipice, whose end game may very well be martial law and a devastating depression caused by the bailout black hole.   It is impossible to bail out $1.5 quadrillion.     That is $1,500 trillion, or $1,500,000,000,000,000.
The elite are replaying the same “Bail Out” game show that the IMF admitted did nothing to help the U.S. economy.  It did help secure huge bonuses for the banksters, however.   And our puppet in chief is served his owners on Wall Street well, convincing congress and the American People to bail out Wall Street and the “too big to fail” companies like AIG, while ignoring Main Street and continuous raising of the debt ceiling, further enslaving Americans now and for future generations.   
 
To the Obama-Nation Administration, Wall Street is Main Street. 
 
As enraging at that fact should be to every American, it should not be surprising.  After all, most of Obama’s appointments are former Goldman Sachs executives.  In fact, the Obama’s is the most extreme Wall Street administration in American history.
 
Obama serves the elite agenda for a New World Order.  Make no mistake about it.  Since 9/11 the slow and steady dissolution has increased pace. 
 
Today, the tyranny is quickening every day.  Most Americans are unaware of the terrible danger Our Country is in.   The NSA is spying on Americans and the I.R.S  is targeting Constitutionalists.
 
Homeland Security is gearing up for something big, having purchased 2700 tanks and a two billion rounds of ammunition.  
 
Meanwhile, forces at the highest levels of Our government are obsessed with disarming the American People in every sense of the word.  “Things are going to be okay.”
 
No.  Things are not going to be okay.  Not when Our government is continuously finding ways to take away Our God given Liberties in the name of security.    In his farewell address to the nation, President Eisenhower rightly warned Americans of the dangers of technological and scientific advances and the growth of the  military industrial complex.
We are headed down a very dangerous road as the oligarchs close in on the end game, which is total control of all aspects of human life: finance, agriculture, commerce, transportation, communications, media, education, science, technology and the environment.   If that tall order sounds ridiculous, or absurd, consider the facts.   Collectivist genocidal GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) giant, Monsanto’s former top lobbyist, vice-president and attorney, Michael R. Taylor was appointed Food Czar of the USFDA in October 2010 by President Obama.    Monsanto is intent on controlling the world’s food supply, and they are doing a damned good job of it.
An estimated 125,000 farmers in Indiahave committed suicide after being promised incredibly abundant harvests and income they switched from farming with traditional seeds to planting GM seeds instead.  The result was the exact opposite.  Many Indian farmers are massively in debt to local money-lenders, having over-borrowed to purchase the GM seed.   Pro-GM experts claim that poverty, alcoholism, drought and ‘agrarian distress’ are the real reasons for the deaths.   Bullshit.
 
Many of these farmers lost everything they had.  Lured by promises of future riches, many borrowed money in order to buy the GM seeds. But when multiple harvests failed, these farmers were left with spiraling debts and no income.
 
In my research I have discovered a deeply disturbing fact.  Official figures from the Indian Ministry of Agriculture confirm that more than 1,000 farmers kill themselves in India each month. 
 
The rural populations are dying slow, agonizing deaths.   Most swallow an expensive insecticide Monsanto promised they would need when they were duped into growing expensive GM crops.
 
Powerful GM lobbyists and bought and paid for politicians pump out the dis-information that genetically modified crops have transformed Indian agriculture and provided greater yields than ever before.   These mad scientists, backed by the elite power grabbers have their talking head media minions spew endless globalist rhetoric that the rest of the world should embrace “the future” and follow suit.
 
All corn and most of the soybeans in the United Statesare genetically modified.   Studies find that after feeding GM crops to mice for three generations, the third generation is born sterile. 
 
Speaking of sterility, forced abortions, one child policies, President Barack Hussein Obama also appointed John P. Holdren as U.S. Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy in December 2008, and he was confirmed on March 19, 2009, by a unanimous vote in the Senate.
 
Holdren served as one of President Bill Clinton’s science advisors from 1994 to 2001.  He urged a ‘World of Zero Net Physical Growth’ in 1995 World Bank Publication and oversaw the implementation of the 1983 geo-engineering patents when the government first began spraying aluminum and barium into the stratosphere to help with “climate change”.  
 
Studies on geo-engineering find NO positive aspects to combat bogus climate change and global warming fraud cooked up by the Rothschild’s bank, who will be receiving the global carbon taxes proposed to “fight global warming”.
 
Geo-engineering will do little to affect climate change, but it does have many negative consequences.   Since aluminum has been discussed in relationship to the possible components of geo-engineering (chemtrails), it is important to discuss the side effects.
 
In animal studies, aluminum blocks the electrical discharge of nerve cells and reduces nervous system activity.  Aluminum also inhibits important enzymes in the brain (Na-K-ATPase and hexokinase). Aluminum may also inhibit uptake of important chemicals by nerve cells (dopamine, norepinephrine, and 5-hydroxytryptamine).
 
Dementia resulting from kidney dialysis related to aluminum toxicity causes memory loss, loss of coordination, confusion and disorientation.
 
Aluminum also reduces intestinal activity, which can result in colic.
 
Early symptoms of aluminum toxicity include: flatulence, headaches, colic, dryness of skin and mucous membranes, tendency for colds, burning pain in head relieved by food, heartburn and an aversion to meat.
Later symptoms include paralytic muscular conditions, loss of memory and mental confusion.
 
“Alzheimer’s disease, hypoparathyroidism, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, anemia, kidney dysfunction, liver dysfunction, hemolysis, Ceukocytosis, porphyria, colitis, neuromuscular disorders, osteomalacia, dental cavities, Parkinson’s disease, dementia dialactica, and ulcers are all related to aluminum toxicity.”
 
If you are experiencing these disorders, contact a doctor familiar with tests for metals and DMPS IV chelation.    This information was compiled Dr. Marijah McCain at herbalhealer.com.  Dr. McCain has a homeopathic aluminum detoxifying product.
 
Soil samples across North America and Western Europe show rising levels of aluminum and barium.  Monsanto has devised seeds that are resistant to aluminum and barium — What a shock—
 
Is the picture getting clearer? 
 
Monsanto seeds will be the only seeds that will grow in the poisoned soil.  
 
Getting back to J.P Holdren, at his nomination committee hearing, in March 2009, Holdren testified that he does not believe that government should have a role in determining optimal population size and that he never endorsed forced sterilization.   Really?  
 
Here are excerpts from “Ecoscience”, 1977.  On page 837, Holdren wrote, “Compulsory abortions would be legal.  Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
 
In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that “the population crisis” has already become “sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
 
On Page 786: “Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions.  Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet.  One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone.   If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it.   Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”  
 
Page 787-8: “Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock.  Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development.  To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.” 
 
Page 786-7: “The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control Involuntary fertility control.  A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.   The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
 
The clause, “With official permission”  removes Our God given right to procreate and demonstrates that John Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant.   Holdren envisions a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children.   You can’t make this stuff up.
 
On Page 838, Holdren continues, “The kind of people who cause “social deterioration” can be compelled to not have children.  If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by Overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.”
 
“Social deterioration”?   Holdren is seriously suggesting that “certain” people contribute to social deterioration more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind.
 
Sounds like eugenics to me.  The kind the Rockefeller Foundation adores.  The kind of agenda the Rockefeller Foundation funds, like the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics founded in 1925.
 
The Rockefeller Foundation supported both the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Psychiatry and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics.   The Rockefeller Foundation partially funded the actual building of the Institute and helped keep the Institute afloat during the Depression.
 
In its early years, and during the Nazi era, it was strongly associated with theories of Nazi eugenicsand racial hygieneadvocated by its leading theorists Fritz Lenzand Eugen Fischer, and by its director Otmar von Verschuer.
 
Under Fischer, the sterilization of  German bastard children was undertaken.  Hitler also had those considered “a burden to society” like the sick and mentally ill put to death.  During World War II, the Institute regularly received human body parts, including eyes and skulls, from Dr. Joseph Mengele at Auschwitz to use in studies intended to prove Nazi racial theories.
 
After the war, most of the thousands of files at the Institute were moved to an unknown location or destroyed.  They were never obtained by the Allies to use as evidence in war crimes trials and to prove or dis-prove the Nazi racial ideology which had motivated mass genocide in Europe. Some of the staff of the Institute escaped trial.  So did the Rockefellers.
 
In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of the U.S., the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the criteria that she was “feeble-minded” and promiscuous.   Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated that, “three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
Today, we look back in horror at that ruling.   Recently, in North Carolina, victims from the 1920’s-1980 were given compensation for being forcible sterilized.  The irony is that the genocidal United Nations now deems forced sterilization as a crime against humanity.
 
Aldous Huxley said that “a really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers.  The greatest triumphs of propaganda have been accomplished, not by doing something, but by refraining from doing. Great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth.”
 
This is what has happened to mind controlled America.   We are a population of debt slaves, who embrace the products pushed on us by the corporations with a buy now pay later philosophy with an average of credit card debt per household with credit card debt: $15,799.
  
Now, let’s now figure in the 2 car payments, home mortgage, equity loans, summer home mortgage, time share mortgage, boat mortgage, etc.  Yep… America is embracing our servitude.
 
What about the enormous student loan debt, which averages $25,000, for every student.   Each year approximately 3,000,000 students graduate college.    In 2013,  the economy generated an average of 114,000 jobs per month, leaving a shortfall of over 1,600,000 jobs, not to mention the 28,000,000 Americans who are still  unemployed.    Of course the student loans will default and that will be he next “bailout” crisis.
 
Let’s also not forget the unemployment figures do not count the millions who’s benefits have run out, or those who have been out of work so long they have simply stopped looking for work.   47,000,000 Americans are currently on food stamps but the mainstream media  tells us that things are getting better.  
 
Really?  93 million Americans do not work.  The true unemployment rate is over 15%.
 
The repetitious lie that the recession ended in 2009 continues while mind controlled America goes on with the drudgery of life, escaping to the narrow confines of their living rooms and reality shows about rich people.   Housewives of New Jersey, Dancing with the Stars and “The Voice”  are the distractions of this depression, like going to the movies was during the last one.
 
If the elite’s squeezing of the population isn’t enough, they want many of us dead.   In fact, they have literally written it in stone.  The Georgia Guidestones in Elbert County, Georgia is a large granitemonument comprised of ten guides inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages, English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese and Russian.
 
A shorter message inscribed at the top of the structure is in four ancient languages: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs.
 
West of the Guidestones lies a granite tablet set level with the ground.   This tablet lists facts about the size, weight, and astronomical features of the stones.  It also speaks of a time capsule buried under the tablet, but there are no dates inscribed,  so it is unknown if a time capsule exists.  Inscribed at the top center of the stone are the words:
 
 
                                                  The Georgia Guidestones
                                      Center cluster erected March 22, 1980
                                 Let these be guidestones to an Age of Reason
 
Writing on the left side of the tablet bears the following text: 
 
                                                Astronomic Features:         
1. channel through stone indicates celestial pole.
2. horizontal slot indicates annual travel of sun.
3. sunbeam through capstone marks noontime all year
 
Author:  R.C. Christian 
Sponsors: A small group of Americans who seek the Age of Reason
                           
Time Capsule Placed six feet below this spot
                            To Be Opened on  . . . . . .
 
There is no date for opening.  On the actual Guidestones are ten guidelines set in stone, one language on each face of the four large upright stones.   Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian
 
The 10 commandments of the Georgia Guidestones read as follows:
 
 
        Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
 
 
        Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
 
 
        Unite humanity with a living new language.
 
 
        Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
 
        Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
 
 
        Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
 
 
        Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
 
 
        Balance personal rights with social duties.
 
 
        Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
 
 
        Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature.
 
This is the New World Order’s world government view of humanity.    This is a frightening statement, considering the elite’s love for eugenics, genetic mutation research and their many hidden agendas.   They loved creating “Dolly” the cloned sheep and creating spider goats and cats that glow.  Not to mention endless war in the name of “democracy, freedom and humanitarian assistance.  These sick puppies really love their work. 
 
Know your enemy.  They are a sophisticated, compartmentalized group of bankers and industrialists who work in concert using stealth to obtain their goals for global domination. 
 
They brainstorm ideas like how much to raise oil prices, which countries should be bombed, how long wars should last — Things like that.  All done in secret.  With a private Army guarding their meetings.
 
Hillary Clinton got a slap on the wrist and was fined $240,000 for violating the Logan Act for attending Bilderberg in 2004. 
 
Naughty, naughty, Hillary.    This is the same “What difference does it make?” Benghazi co-conspirator, Shillary Clinton, Our former secretary of state, who admits she is positioning herself to head up the IMF World Bank.    How nice.    Forget the power of the U.S. presidency.  The Real power lies with the Nation Killers of the IMF/World Bank and Shillary knows it.
 
The plans devised at the Bilderberg Group annual meetings are to continue moving forward on the path to world government.  They pass along the agenda to the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, who execute the orders through the United Nations and NATO.   The Federal Reserve prints debt euphemistically called money.  Today, 98 years after the Founding of the Federal Reserve by JP Morgan, J.D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg  and the Rothschilds, we are once again a bankrupt nation.   The first time America was bankrupt only took the Federal Reserve 20 years.   Things were “so bad”, that in 1934, Roosevelt ordered that all Americans must turn in their gold, “to help with the depression”.   People who refused faced 10 years in Federal prison.
 
That same year, Social Security was established.  The people were told it was a retirement fund.  They weren’t told that their very lives were collateral for the bankruptcy debt.  That’s right.   We are collateral.    Property of the Federal Reserve owners.  Chattle, sold on exchanges. 
 
Each of us have a social security card issued through the U.S. Department of Commerce.  Our Social Security numbers are indeed indexed as collateral.    Yes.  The American People are a truly a traded commodity.     Each of us literally have a straw man via our birth certificates which are issued via the U.S. Department of Commerce.  We are literally chattle, each of us worth a share of stock, with a true monetary value based on projection and actual earnings.    I am not kidding.  This is the truth.  You cannot make this stuff up.  
 
In 2010, the United States emerged from bankruptcy, seventy six years after enslaving the future generations with Social Security.   The first few generation lived to see the benefits of the system.
 
But as the decades progressed the Social Security trust fund was leveraged to the hilt.    On its current path, Government studies estimate that Social Security will be unable to pay retirees full benefits by 2037.
 
So where has all the money from everyone’s check been going all these years?   What about our income taxes?   In 1984, President Ronald Reagan formulated an investigative committee to find out how much of the money collected by the I.R.S.   The report, submitted to Reagan by the Grace Commission sited that, “100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt … all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government.” – Grace Commission report submitted to President Ronald Reagan – January 15, 1984
 
How sickening to realize that NOT ONE DIME of I.R.S money goes to the U.S. Government, but pays interest on the Federal Debt to the Private Federal Reserve.  That is why our paper money is circulated as “Federal Reserve Notes”, not actual dollars.
 
In fact, they actually have NO value other then the value of the paper they are printed on.  The notes are printed out of thin air, yet the world trusts the dollar as the world’s currency.  But that confidence is dwindling, like the value of the dollar.  And the globalist answer to the growing currency crisis will be yet another FIAT currency, the Banco.
 
The Federal Reserve is a private Corporation owned by the Rockefeller, JP Morgan and Rothschild interests through intermediary agents, and member banks such as the Bank of England and Bank of America.  
 
The designed purpose of the Fed is not to stabilize the markets and control inflation, it is to slowly  suck the capital dry from the U.S., as the Rothschild’s do in Europe.
 
At the Citizens’ Truth-In-Taxation Hearing in Washington D.C.on February 28, 2002, the Grace Commission found that funds collected by the I.R.S trust were being used to pay for interest on the federal debt, and income transfer payments to beneficiaries of entitlement programs like federal pension plans.  
 
Since Standard & Poors and Moody’s downgraded the United States credit rating from AAA to AA+.  Again, President Obama has stated to the American People that America is still AAA rated, has always been AAA rated and will always be AAA rated. 
 
Believing this would be likened to believing that President Obama would run the most transparent administration in history.  This is the same type of political “feel good” rhetoric to downplay, distract and deceive the American People from the true dire straits Our Nation is experiencing.
 
This economic meltdown was of course, an inevitable result of nearly one hundred years of careful planning by the global elite to consolidate power and control through central banking, mainly the Federal Reserve System.  A system that prints money out of thin air with interest on every dollar printed.   That’s right, every time the Federal Reserve rolls out the printing press printing trillions of dollars, they are also creating an equal amount of debt.  Wait a minute, this can’t be legal.  But it is… sort of.
 
The Federal Reserve was never properly ratified.  Only three states signed on, yet the Federal Reserve was signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson over the congressional Christmas break in 1913.     It is therefore, unconstitutional and illegal.  But since when has that stopped corrupt politicians?
 
The Federal Reserve exemplifies what America’s founding father’s feared most, a central bank controlling the nation’s currency.   That is why the U.S. Constitution clearly states that gold and silver as the only legal currency.  Here is the clause:
 
“ The Congress shall have Power to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures”.
 
The 16th Amendment gave the power to tax the American People on their labor.  The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 gave the power to print money from Congress to International bankers. Bankers who met in secret to draft the Federal Reserve Act in 1910 on Jekyll Island, South Carolina away from the prying eyes of the media, still, at that time, uncontrolled by their influences.
 
It took the Rothschild’s seventy six years to put the third and current central bank, the Federal Reserve into place.  The current owners consist of 6 private banks.   The largest share holders of the private corporation are the Rothschild’s of London and Berlin, who hold fifty seven percent of the stock that is not available to the public for trading. 
 
The other owners are the Lazard Brothers of Paris, Israel Moses Seaf of Italy, Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany, Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germanyand New York, Lehman Brothers of New York Goldman, Sachs of New York, Rockefeller Brothers of New York.
 
All the primary owners of the Federal Reserve are International bankers with ties to European establishments.   Foreigners control Our money supply.  These criminals literally own exclusive rights
to the dollar, remember, our dollars are Federal Reserve,“notes”.    Debt.  Our money is debt.  Nobody owns anything for “cash”.  
 
Every dollar earned since 1913 in this corrupt, enslaving system has produced an equal a dollar of debt.   That is why there is “inflation”.  First of all, it is NOT inflation.  It is dollar devaluation. 
 
As of October, 2014 gold is trading at over $1,300 per ounce.  $20 of gold in 1913 would now be worth over $8500 today in U.S. currency.
 
By far, the private ownership of the currency of the United Statesand the fascist Internal Revenue Service fraud, is the greatest crime in history. The owners of the Federal Reserve have been responsible for instigating and facilitating all the major wars, recessions and depressions in the last 100 years.
 
They own the Fed, they own the dollar and they own all the major media channels, the military industrial complex , many judges and most politicians.   And not surprisingly, sometimes the Fed pays an arbitrary ‘franchise fee’ to the U.S. government to keep the politicians paid off. This is why there is never any real “change”.
 
One hundred years later, the raping and enslavement of the American people continue.  Today, with the debt ceiling increase, and a little mentioned attachment to the bill, called the Council of 13, or the Super Congress.  
 
This “elite” council, comprised of six democrats and six republicans, three each from the House and Senate now has the authority to draft and “fast tracks” critical financial decisions and unpopular legislation without consulting congress or going through the normal Constitutional process of introducing legislation through the lower houses.
 
The Council of 12 gives the 13th member, the Dictator of the United States veto power over the Council’s decision.   This is treason en-route to complete despotism.
 
To make matters even worse, now that the economy and housing market has collapsed, the banksters have once again contracted the money supply, hoarding their bailout money, buying tons of gold and paying out billions in bonuses to their top executives for a job well done.   That’s right.  A job well done.
 
As angry as the American People were at the banks for rewarding such gross negligence, they have played into the globalist’s hands, who could care less about your anger or your misery.  The banksters are laughing all the way to the bank. (pardon the pun) 
 
The masses missed the entire underlying truth.  That the Wall Street bonuses were paid for executing the global elite’s plan to destabilize and collectivize markets while devaluing the currencies of the world.   They did their job.
 
This was a very carefully conceived and executed plan, by the ruling elite.  Another example of how they work together when needed, using their vast influences to move the common agenda along.  In this case, a carefully designed implosion of the economy to bring the world economies to their knees, where they will beg for a new world order, willingly relinquish whatever little they had for food and quarter. 
 
These suffering masses will welcome the New World Order.  They will welcome the new world currency to“wipe out their debt.  Sheople will welcome the New World Order.  With lies of a new world government, based on freedom and opportunity, where there will be peace and famine will no longer be a plague on humanity, and man can reach his full potential.  What horseshit.
 
Replacing Our Nation’s sovereignty with an totalitarian one child policy world government, funded by bogus global warming climate taxes administered through the Rothschild’s bank is what we will get, but the sheople will also welcome any lie they will be told.   And the globalists know it.  That is the plan.  And it is nearing fruition.
 
This is neo-feudalism.   No matter what income level or status you have if you are not a in with the ruling class, you are a serf.   That’s new world order freedom.  Freedom is Slavery. War is Peace.  Ignorance is Strength. 
 
The New World Order operates a two sided double entendre agenda.  One story designed to deceive, confuse, or control the people while their true sinister agenda is hidden, obscured from view. An example of this is the false flag events of  9/11.
 
The terrorists, mostly from Saudi Arabia, several known to be former CIA operatives, become the catalyst for  the “war on terror” that lead America to an undeclared war – er, military kinetic action.    War is peace.  Ignorance is strength. Freedom is slavery.  There is no war.   We have never been at war with East Asia – We have always been at war with East Asia – Orwellian Double think. 
 
Military Industrial Complex puppet Secretary of State  John Kerry demonstrated double think brilliantly by stating that “America was not going to be involved in military action in Libya, we would just be bombing strategic targets”.    And we buy that irrational, Orwellian thinking.  Because most Americans are basically brainwashed by television and the influenced by mainstream media.   And John  Kerry is still passionately pushing for an attack on Syria because it is the “moral thing to do.”
 
 
So why did we go to war – er, military kinetic action in Iraq and Afghanistan?   Why did Obama pull out the troops allowing the rise of ISIS?  Why were we there in the first place?   After all, neither country had was involved in the 9/11 attacks.    Of course they weren’t involved.   9/11 was a staged false flag event, with the help of Saudi Arabia and the Israeli Mossad.   This is not uncommon.  Similar false flags were exposed in recent times,  like the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964, and the USS Liberty in 1967.  I know, conspiracy theorist, right.  Uh-uh.  False flags are nothing new. 
 
On March 13, 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff devised Operation Northwoods. The plan was to have the CIA or Pro-Castro patsies execute false-flag terror attacks against various U.S. military and civilian targets in America.  (Having remote controlled “hijacked” planes crash into skyscrapers were among some of the ideas the Joint Chiefs cooked up.)   This they hoped would justify an invasion of Cuba.  This is the New World Order military industrial complex in action.  Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense.   Although part of the U.S.government’s Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was rejected by President Kennedy and the plan was shelved.
 
The war mongering Joint Chiefs of Staff and those in high places of the military industrial complex were fuming over President Kennedy’s spring, 1963 plans that called for a complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from Vietnamafter the 1964 elections.  He rightly believed that Vietnam would be a quagmire.
 
An initial 1000 man pullout of the 17,000 troops stationed in Vietnam at that time was initiated in October 1963.  
 
After the assassination, one of the first acts under the new Johnson Administration was to reverse President Kennedy’s decision to pull the out the troops and laid the ground work for what would be the Vietnam Conflict.
 
The divide over foreign policy which smoldered during Kennedy’s Presidency was not limited to Vietnam.   During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Joint Chiefs urged Kennedy to take out the Soviet missiles and invade Cuba.   So did former Secretary of State Dean Acheson and future Warren Commissioner Richard Russell . 
 
One of the first things the new Johnson Administration did after Kennedy’s the assassination was to reverse Kennedy’s orders.   David Kaiser’s 2002 book, American Tragedy, depicts a military industrial complex determined to wage war in Asia before, during and after the Kennedy Administration.  
 
The Vietnam Conflict, instead of ending before it began, mushroomed the mid-1960s into a nightmare that consumed Americaand cost the lives of 58,272 soldiers who died, being told they were fighting for democracy against the spread of communism.  Another 1,687 American soldiers went MIA in Vietnam, 866 soldiers suffered harsh treatment in prisoner of war camps, 65 of whom, died in captivity.  Only 36 escaped.  
 
It was not learned until only a few years ago that Cubahad tactical nuclear missiles, and Soviet commanders had standing orders allowing their use in defense of an invasion.    The war mongering militarist arm of the New World Order vehemently opposed Kennedy choice to blockade Cuba, a move that most likely averted World War III.
 
Kennedy also wanted to “splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.”  He ruffled quite a few feathers in the intelligence establishment and literally shook up the Establishment by usurping the Federal Reserve and signing his death warrant, Executive Order #11110 on June 4, 1963.  
 
Up to the 22ndof November, 1963, Kennedy had circulated $32 billion of debt-free currency backed by silver without going through the Federal Reserve.   Lyndon Johnson immediately stopped the issuance of silver certificates soon after assuming the Presidency.   How nice.   How good for the people.   Folks, I could puke.
 
To show the true conspiracy, Kennedy’s executive order still stands to this day.   But it has never been used under any circumstance or during any crisis by any President.  
 
Of course it hasn’t.    They are afraid, and have reason to be.  Ronald Reagan was promptly shot after he dared to criticize the Fed.    Six U.S. Presidents have been assassinated for not cooperating with the Transatlantic Banking Dynasties, William Henry Harrison, poisoned, in 1841, Zachary Taylor, Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and John F. Kennedy 1963. 
 
President Zachary Taylor 12th President of the United States, 1849-1850 died after eating a bowl of cherries and milk.  Arsenic killed Taylor, not spoiled milk.   Before he was President, Zachary wrote,  “No country could prosper without an able independent judiciary, and a sound currency, neither of which has this state (Kentucky) been blessed with for some time past”.   He disagreed with the Democrats over the concept of a strong national bank and opposed the extension of slavery into areas where cotton or sugar could not be grown.
 
President Zachary Taylor opposed a privately owned central bank. He said that the Bank of the United States was dead and favored internal improvements, he would use the veto to protect the Constitution. His political friends, appalled at such statements, preferred that his views remain unknown.

“The idea of a national bank “is dead, and will not be revived in my time. In the discharge of duties my guide will be the Constitution, which I this day swear to preserve, protect, and defend.” – Zachary Taylor

 
The Rothschild interests also attempted to assassinate President James Buchanan, the 15th President of the United States 1857-1861.   Buchanan survived arsenic poisoning after a banquet where thirty eight other people died.   He was a trusted friend of Andrew Jackson who exposed the unconstitutional schemes of the Second Bank of the United States leading to it‘s downfall.  Buchanan, like Jackson loathed the criminal banksters and both opposed a privately owned Central Bank. 
“To avoid entangling alliances has been a maxim of our policy ever since the days of Washington, and its wisdom no one will attempt to dispute.   There is nothing stable but Heaven and the Constitution.  The distribution of patronage of the Government is by far the most disagreeable duty of the President.  Abstract propositions should never be discussed by a legislative body.” – James Buchanan
 
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the U.S. in his First Annual Message to Congress, December 3, 1861, stated: 
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed, if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights.”
President Lincoln needed money to finance the Civil War, and the Rothschild controlled banks in New York offered him loans at 24-36% interest. Lincoln refused the loans because he didn’t want to put the nation into such a monstrous debt.   Ah, the days of fiscal responsibility.
 
Lincoln went to Congress and passed a law authorizing the printing of U.S. Treasury Notes.     He said,  “we gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they ever had – their own paper money to pay their debts”
 
Lincoln printed over 400 million “Greenbacks” (debt and interest-free)  purchase war supplies, pay the soldiers and U.S.government employees.
 
The international banking crime syndicate didn’t like this.   They wanted Lincoln to borrow the money from them, so they could charge usury interest to the American people on a loan.  Lincoln’s solution made this futile.
 
Shortly after Lincoln’s death, the government revoked the Greenback law which ended Lincoln’s debt-free, interest-free money.   A new national banking act was enacted and all currency became interest-bearing, and notes of debt, again.  
 
 
“The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, and more selfish than bureaucracy.  It denounces as public enemies all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my rear is my greatest foe.” – Abraham Lincoln
 
Abraham Lincoln also opposed a private national bank.  In 1861 he stated,  “It is an old maxim and a very sound one, that he that dances should always pay the fiddler.
 
Now, sir, in the present case, if any gentlemen, whose money is a burden to them, choose to lead off a dance, I am decidedly opposed to the people’s money being used to pay the fiddler…all this to settle a question in which the people have no interest, and about which they care nothing.
 
These capitalists generally act harmoniously, and in concert, to fleece the people, and now, that they have got into a quarrel with themselves, we are called upon to appropriate the people’s money to settle the quarrel. The government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers.
 
The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government’s greatest creative opportunity. The financing of all public enterprise, and the conduct of the treasury will become matters of practical administration. Money will cease to be master and will then become servant of humanity. I have been told I was on the road to hell, but I had no idea it was just a mile down the road with a dome on it.”
 
James A. Garfield, the 20th President of the United States also opposed a private central bank.  He said,  “Whoever controls the money in any country is absolute master of industry and commerce.”   
 
The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. Grave doubts have been entertained whether Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make any form of paper money legal tender.
 
The present issue of United States notes has been sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper should depend for its value and currency upon its convenience in use and its prompt redemption in coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its compulsory circulation.
 
These notes are not money, but promises to pay money. If the holders demand it, the promise should be kept.  By the experience of commercial nations in all ages it has been found that gold and silver afford the only safe foundation for a monetary system.
 
Confusion has recently been created by variations in the relative value of the two metals, but I confidently believe that arrangements can be made between the leading commercial nations which will secure the general use of both metals.
 
Congress should provide that the compulsory coinage of silver now required by law may not disturb our monetary system by driving either metal out of circulation. If possible, such an adjustment should be made that the purchasing power of every coined dollar will be exactly equal to its debt-paying power in all the markets of the world. 

A brave man is a man who dares to look the Devil in the face and tell him he is a Devil.  He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation.   The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable.” – James Garfield
 
President William McKinley advocated a gold standard monetary system. Unlike his opponent, William Jennings Bryan, McKinley was against “easy money” with no backing.
 
The McKinley administration passed the Gold Standard Act of 1900 making gold the standard for all the nations currency. 
 
In 1901, William McKinley opposed a private central bank.  He said, “Our financial system needs some revision; our money is all good now, but its value must not further be threatened.
 
It should all be put upon an enduring basis, not subject to easy attack, nor its stability to doubt or dispute. Our currency should continue under the supervision of the Government.
 
The several forms of our paper money offer, in my judgment, a constant embarrassment to the Government and a safe balance in the Treasury.  The free man cannot be long an ignorant man.  In the time of darkest defeat, victory may be nearest.”
 
On June 4, 1963, President Kennedy opposed a private central bank.  He issued Executive Order 11110.  This Executive Order called for the issuance of new currency – the United States Note.  This new currency was to be distributed through the U.S. Treasury and not the Federal Reserve System. And was to be issued debt and interest free.
 
Upon Kennedy’s assassination, this currency was withdrawn from circulation, never to be issued again.  A short time before he was murdered, Kennedy said, “The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans freedom and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight.”
 
President Gerald Ford’s Presidency was scarred by a controversial pardon to Richard Nixon and unwillingness to bail out New York City in 1975 when it was on the verge of economic collapse.  Ford promising to veto any “bailout for the city.   The New York Daily News reported the president’s position with the headline, “FORD TO CITY: DROP DEAD.”
 
The like’s of Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, Treasury Secretary Simon and others within the White House began to suggest that government may have to save the city from collapse. Ford held his ground.  No bailout.
 
Is it a coincidence after two assassination attempts Ford changed his mind and approved federal loans and a bailout to the city?   That Nelson Rockefeller then Vice-President, a family member of the international bankers would have become President if the assassination attempt was successful?  
 
Gerald Ford opposed a private national bank.  
 
“If Lincoln were alive today, he’d be turning over in his grave. Government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.  Our constitution works. Our great republic is a government of laws, not of men.  The political lesson of Watergate is this: Never again must America allow an arrogant, elite guard of political adolescents to by-pass the regular party organization and dictate the terms of a national election.” – Gerald R. Ford
 
In 1981 Ronald Reagan opposed the private Federal Reserve.  He said, “I just wanted to speak to you about something from the Internal Revenue Code.   It is the last sentence of section 509A of the code and it reads: ‘For purposes of paragraph 3, an organization described in paragraph 2 shall be deemed to include an organization described in section 501C-4, 5, or 6, which would be described in paragraph 2 if it were an organization described in section 501C-3.’ And that’s just one sentence out of those fifty-seven feet of books.”
 
Reagan also stated, “are you entitled to the fruits of your labor or does government have some presumptive right to spend and spend and spend?  Have we the courage and the will to face up to the immorality and discrimination of the progressive tax, and demand a return to traditional proportionate taxation?   Today in our country the tax collector’s share is 37 cents of every dollar earned.   Freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp. Government does not tax to get the money it needs; government always finds a need for the money it gets.”
 
Early in his administration, President Reagan was reviewing candidates to replace Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker.  MK-ULTRA mind control victim named, Mark David Chapman seems to have changed Reagan’s mind.  After the botched assassination attempt, Reagan inexplicably changed his position and allowed Volcker to remain as Chairman of the Fed.
 
That same year, 1981, Reagan requested a report to find out just where the Federal income tax dollars go, it was called the Grace Commission Report.  These are the exact text from the actual report summary:
 
The Grace Commission Report found that, “One hundred percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by the Federal Government contributions to transfer payments.  In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on services which taxpayers expect from their Government”.
 
In other words every penny of our income taxes goes to pay the interest these private national foreign banks say we owe them.
 
Every President since Kennedy has served the global elite oligarchs of the criminal Federal Reserve, and their agenda to de-industrialize America, de-value the dollar and collectivize our markets to form a one world dictatorial government in league with the major corporations of the world to control all aspects of human life.  
 
In 1973, thanks to communist sympathizer and profiteer David Rockefeller and his newly formed Trilateral Commission, President Nixon opened ties to China.   
 
In “A China Traveler”, published that year in the New York Times, Rockefeller called China’s leader, Mao-Tse-Tung “one of the greatest leaders in history.”     He added that “China’s one child policy should be the model for the world”.
 
Rockefeller, notorious for his “concern” about over population actually had the audacity to praise Chairman Mao, a man who slaughtered 60 million of his own people. 
 
China’s totalitarian model is the prototype of the one world government Rockefeller wishes to establish, an authoritarian hybrid of communism and corporatism (fascism).  What Hitler was unable to achieve by force, the New World Order controllers are achieving by using stealth.
 
It is a corporate takeover of the world, guided and backed by a scientific dictatorial one world government, complete with a world bank, a global currency, global carbon taxes, a global court and even a global army.   Much of this infrastructure has slowly being fostered into place including a growing worldwide Police State control grid.   A great example of this would be the under reported protests against the G20. 
 
Each year, the protesters are met by S.W.A.T teams clad in riot gear using an L.R.A.D (Long Range Acoustical Device) to blast eardrums and scatter peaceful protestors.  This first happened in Pittsburgh in 2008.  
 
Americans have the right to peacefully assembly and protest,  but there is no First Amendment when it comes to the G20.   Not here.  Or anywhere.
 
The 2009 G20 protests in London, was met with fierce and violent opposition by Police “stormtroopers” instigating riots.  
 
The same was true at the 2010 G20 meeting in Toronto, where even a paraplegic was thrown out of his wheelchair by Police goons.   Footage of this atrocious act and many others can be found in a great Canadian  film titled, “INTO THE FIRE”, a documentary on the 2010 G20 in Toronto.
 
Current Imperial America and the New World Order controllers.  Whenever America polices the world or goes to war it is in the name of democracy.  Democracy is two wolves and a sheep wondering what to have for dinner.  We live in a Constitution Republic, where the individual counts, not mob rule. 
 
America doesn’t go to war for liberty, freedom or human rights either.  America goes to war for the corporate elite and their mega giant companies like Exxon-Mobil, Halliburton and KBR.   Please try to remember that.    When it comes to 9/11, Iraq and Afghanistan, Syria and now Africa, the People are told one story as the true agenda unfolds, usually resulting in completely the opposite happening.
 
The war on terror is a war on the American People.  Their liberty, their freedom and privacy.  It is a war of control over the masses, who willfully allow increasing invasions of privacy, protecting insider corporate profits and seizure of natural resources. 
 
It is also a war of government sponsored drug dealing.    The freedom America has brought to the Iraq and Afghanistan is the genocide of over a million people .    But as discussed previously, depopulation is the plan and the Club of Rome was founded to deal with the population problem.
 
These are the plans as set forth by the Rockefeller controlled Council on Foreign Relations, whose headquarters were founded in New York Cityin 1921.  Together with Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973 and the Bilderberg Group, founded by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and Dennis Healey in 1954.
 
These organizations set policy to move the one world government agenda along.  The United Nations executes many of the genocidal eugenics programs of population reduction under the guise of “humanitarian aid, or assistance”. 
 
These globalists are collectivists, knocking out their competition in their goal for world domination.    They dominate banking, the military industrial complex, big oil, big agriculture (google Monsanto evil), energy, environmentalism, pharmaceuticals, government regulatory bodies –the world’s food and water supply. 
 
These are the players of the New World Order.   The banking and industrial elite.   They are the  war mongering owners of the military industrial complex, the Federal Reserve and the IMF.
 
The owners of the major multinational conglomerates and corporations whose common goal is to dominate their perspective places in the markets and ultimately control all the resources on the planet.   This is to be orchestrated through a well oiled technocracy, ruled by an iron fist.    An authoritarian one world dictatorial government.  
 
To accomplish this immense task has thus far taken literally centuries.  The generations of the same ruling bloodline families have continued the agenda — and will continue the agenda until it is seen through.  The elite are consumed by their heritage, lineage and are literally sickened by lower class humanity.  
 
They do their work over the course of fifty to seventy five year cycles.  And over the last cycle, the globalists have made slow and steady progress.   After the United Nations was founded in San Franciscoin 1945, John D. Rockfeller, Jr. donated land on the East Side of Manhattan in New York City, where the United Nations has stood since 1947.    The same year, the National Security Act was passed, creating the Central Intelligence Agency (formerly the Office of Strategic Services) under Prescott Bush.  1947 was also the year the CIA created operation Paperclip, bringing top Nazi scientists and doctors like Josef Mengele into Our government. 
 
That same year the Rockefeller Brothers Fund funded the construction of the Allen Memorial Institute at Mc Gill University in Montreal, Canada where Dr. Ewen Cameron began his torturous MK ULTRA mind control experiments for the CIA.  Also in 1947, Project Paper Clip was instituted, bringing the most brilliant Nazi physicists and scientists secretly into America to work on nuclear and bio-weapons development. 
 
The CIA and Dr. Ewen Cameron benefited as well from Project Paperclip.  Dr. Cameron wanted to learn the mind control techniques concentration camp victims were subjected to.  
 
Through project paperclip, Cameron got his wish.  He recruited some of the most savage Nazi medical torturers to teach him their sadistic trade.  Project MK-ULTRA was born.
 
Brainwashed Americans have been programmed by the multi mass media mind control propaganda to accept a slow and steady progress toward a New World Order.  Most Americans oblivious to the controllers agenda because they are divided by the false left/right, Republican/Democrat paradigm. 
 
America wonders why republican and democratic presidents come and go, but the agenda of war, collectivism, de-industrialization, exporting of jobs and corporate profits continues at the expense of the People.
The globalists count on the fact that most Americans actually believe the propaganda that America is good and anyone we are against are evil.  Make no mistake, no matter what your faith or beliefs, this is a spiritual battle of good vs. evil, freedom vs. enslavement.  The globalists are well on their way to achieving their stealth goal of depopulation and total control.  Only an active, aware, knowledgeable and informed public can stop them.
 
.
.
.                                        Revised edition.  Edited 10/19/14
.
.
.
 
new-world-order-CAUTION
 
 
 

http://www.HowardNema.com

 

.
 
TRUTH TALK NEWS websites & blog
                                                                       

WAKE UP OTHERS AND SHARE THE TRUTH!

Watch TRUTH TALK NEWS

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

Subscribe, follow and share the truth!

 

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’

Delamer Duverus

 
 

If you seek truth and want to restore Constitutional Gov’t please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this blog. Thank you for your continued support. Together we can restore Our republic. Together we can be the change we wish to see in the world by exposing the forces that wish to enslave us.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and affiliated sites are for the purpose of FAIR USE and can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law. Please share this information widely.
.
.
.
 
FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.