Tag Archives: propaganda

THE TRUE HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND THE CIVIL WAR

BOOKS/RELATED LINKS/SOURCES:

SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE by Eustace Mullins PDF

howardnema.com/exposing-the-federal-reserve-crime-syndicate

 

Edited, complied from listed sources with commentary by HN

THE INTENTIONAL SLANTS AND SKEWERS OF HISTORY

History is very slanted, or skewered. and it is not by accident.  There is a very intentional slant, or skewer of history. It is not by accident and it has not been done to “protect the innocent,” as in the Law And Order true crime detective TV show, but rather to protect the guilty and/or project them in a better light. 

THE TRUE HISTORY OF SLAVERY

The history of man enslaving other men is sadly as old as mankind itself.  This collection of facts from various sources about slavery should be quite illuminating, as many have been omitted from our popular culture and we were certainly not taught about in school, novels, Hollywood or even PBS.

BLACK SLAVE OWNERS IN THE US

Anthony Johnson was a black tobacco farmer. While he was not the first slave owner in American history, he was the first legal slave owner in American history, having been among the first to have his lifetime ownership of a servant legally sanctioned by a court.
A former indentured servant, Anthony Johnson was a “free negro” who owned a 250-acre farm in Virginia during the 1650s, with five indentured servants under contract to him.

Philip Burnham, in the article “Selling Poor Steven” published in the February/March 1993 issue of American Heritage, found that in the US Census of 1830 there were 3,775 free blacks who owned 12,740 black slaves.

Burnham wrote about the black slave John Casor, who was denied his freedom by his master Anthony Johnson:

“In the 1640s John Casor was brought from Africa to America, where he toiled as a servant for a Virginia landowner. In 1654 Casor filed a complaint in Northampton County Court, claiming that his master, Anthony Johnson, had unjustly extended the terms of his indenture with the intention of keeping Casor his slave for life. Johnson, insisting he knew nothing of any indenture, fought hard to retain what he regarded as his personal property.

After much wrangling, on March 8, 1655, the court ruled that “the said John Casor Negro shall forthwith be returned unto the service of his master Anthony Johnson,” consigning him to a bitter lifetime of bondage. Given the vulnerable legal status of servants – black and white – in colonial America, the decision was not surprising But the documents reveal one additional fact of interest: Anthony Johnson, like his chattel Casor, was black….”

One of these slaves was a black man named John Casor, who claimed that his term of service had expired years earlier and Johnson was holding him illegally.

In 1654, In one of the first known legal sanctions of slavery, other than as a punishment for crime, a civil court found that Anthony Johnson in fact owned Casor’s services for life.

William Ellison was one of North Carolina’s largest slave holder in 1860. He was also a very wealthy free black plantation owner and cotton gin manufacturer who lived in South Carolina (not North Carolina).

According to the 1860 census (in which his surname was listed as “Ellerson”), he owned 63 black slaves, making him the largest of the 171 black slaveholders in South Carolina, but far from the largest overall slave holder in the state.

American Indians also owned thousands of black slaves. Historian Tiya Miles provided this snapshot of the Native American ownership of black slaves at the turn of the 19th century for Slate magazine in January 2016:

Miles places the number of enslaved people held by Cherokees at around 600 at the start of the 19th century and around 1,500 at the time of westward removal in 1838-9. Creeks, Choctaws, and Chickasaws, she said, held around 3,500 slaves, across the three nations, as the 19th century began.

“Slavery inched its way slowly into Cherokee life. When a white man moved into a Native location, usually to work as a trader or as an Indian agent, he would own African slaves.” If such a person also had a child with a Native woman, as was not uncommon, the half-European, half-Native child would inherit the enslaved people (and their children) under white law, as well as the right to use tribal lands under tribal law. This combination put such people in a position to expand their wealth, eventually operating large farms and plantations.

In 1830 there were 3,775 free black people who owned 12,740 black slaves.  There were approximately 319,599 free blacks in the United States in 1830. Approximately 13.7 per cent of the total black population was free. A significant number of these free blacks were the owners of slaves. The census of 1830 lists 3,775 free Negroes who owned a total of 12,760 slaves.

Many black slaves were allowed to hold jobs, own businesses, and own real estate.
There were exceptions, but generally speaking — especially after 1750, by which time slave codes had been entered into the law books in most of the American colonies — black slaves were not legally permitted to own property or businesses. From the Oxford Companion to American Law (2002):

Under these early codes, slaves had virtually no legal rights IN most areas they could be executed for crimes that were not capital offenses for whites. Their testimony was restricted in legal cases and could not be used either for or against whites. Trials of slaves were usually by special courts. Slaves could not own property, move about without consent of their owners, or legally marry.

Brutal black-on-black slavery was common in Africa for thousands of years.
The phenomenon of human beings enslaving other human beings goes back millenia, but not just among blacks, and not just in Africa.

Most slaves brought to America from Africa were purchased from black slave owners.
Slavery was eliminated in America via the efforts of people of various ethnicities, including Caucasians, who took up the banner of the abolitionist movement.

The names of the white leaders of that movement tend to be better known than those of the black leaders, among whom were David Walker, Frederick Douglass, Dred Scott, Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, Nat Turner, and many others.

When Congress passed (and the states ratified) the 13th Amendment in 1865, it was the culmination of many years of work by that multi-racial movement.

Little has been published regarding those Blacks who owned Black slaves in the USA, however, more research is bringing this little-known subject to light.  Carter G. Woodson, whose grandparents and father had been slaves, was one of the first to write about the Black slave owners.

In Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830 (published in 1924) Woodson gives the names and number of slaves owned by free blacks counted in the U. S. Census of 1830, listing them by name and the number of slaves owned.

Michael P. Tremoglie, in The Black Roots of Slavery also noted the issue of Black slave owners.

“There were many free blacks in the American colonies. They were enfranchised and as early as 1641, Mathias De Sousa, were elected to legislatures. These free blacks owned slaves – some for philanthropic reasons, as Carter G. Woodson suggests. However as John Hope Franklin wrote, “…free Negroes had a real economic interest in the institution of slavery and held slaves in order to improve their economic status.”

The census of 1830 lists 965 free black slave owners in Louisiana, owning 4,206 slaves. The state of South Carolina, lists 464 free blacks owning 2,715 slaves. How ironic it is that so many blacks owned so many slaves in South Carolina. Yet, no one seemed to mention this during the flag controversy.

Some blacks served in the Confederate army, which is another omission in our popular culture. The movie Glory did not happen to mention that blacks served in the Confederate army. It did give the impression that the black soldiers in the 54th Massachusetts were former slaves – which was not true.”

Harry Koger, in Black Slave Owners. Free Black Slave Masters in South Carolina, reported on the success of Black women in Charleston.

“By 1860, so many Black women in Charleston had inherited or been given slaves and other property by white men, and used their property to start successful businesses, that they owned 70% of the Black owned slaves in the city.”

From Kroger’s work, it is noted that free Black slave owners resided in states as north as New York and as far south as Florida, extending westward into Kentucky, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Missouri. According to the federal census of 1830, free blacks owned more than 10,000 slaves in Louisiana, Maryland, South Carolina, and Virginia. The majority of black slave owners lived in Louisiana and planted sugar cane.

John Hope Franklin and Loren Schweninger, in their book Runaway Slaves: Rebels on the Plantation, revealed that conditions under Black masters could be such that slaves would run away:

“The largest black slaveholder in the South, John Carruthers Stanly of North Carolina, faced a number of problems in the 1820s in dealing with a slave labor force on his three turpentine plantations in Craven County. With a total of 163 slaves, Stanly was a harsh, profit-minded taskmaster, and his field hands would run away.

Stanley dealt with this through his two white overseers and with a spy network that included a few trusted slaves. Brister, his slave barber in New Bern, was responsible for relaying to his owner rumors of planned escapes …Nor did Stanly have any pangs of conscience about selling children away from their parents or holding free blacks in bondage.

Free black slave owners who lived in urban areas – Charleston, Savannah, Mobile, Natchez, and New Orleans – also faced difficulties with their slave property. Free mulatto barber William Johnson of Natchez was not certain what had happened to his recently purchased slave, Walker, when he disappeared in 1835.

He had either been stolen or had run away to Kentucky to rejoin his wife. When on 4 July 1833, authorities in Ascension Parish, Louisiana, jailed the twelve- or fourteen-year-old black boy named Isaac taken off the steamer Watchman, he admitted he was owned by a ‘free woman of color in New Orleans named Jane’.”

In Dixie’s Censored Subject: Black Slaveowners, published in The Barnes Review, Robert M. Grooms furnished several examples of Black slave owners in the USA:

“In the rare instances when the ownership of slaves by free Negroes is acknowledged in the history books, justification centers on the claim that black slave masters were simply individuals who purchased the freedom of a spouse or child from a white slaveholder and had been unable to legally manumit them. Although this did indeed happen at times, it is a misrepresentation of the majority of instances, one which is debunked by records of the period on blacks who owned slaves. These include individuals such as Justus Angel and Mistress L. Horry, of Colleton District, South Carolina, who each owned 84 slaves in 1830.

In fact, in 1830 a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more.

The majority of slaveholders, white and black, owned only one to five slaves. More often than not, and contrary to a century and a half of bullwhips-on-tortured-backs propaganda, black and white masters worked and ate alongside their charges; be it in house, field or workshop.

The few individuals who owned 50 or more slaves were confined to the top one percent, and have been defined as slave magnates.  In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000. That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978.

Interestingly, considering today’s accounts of life under slavery, authors Johnson and Roak report instances where free Negroes petitioned to be allowed to become slaves; this because they were unable to support themselves. As with the slaves of his white counterparts, occasionally Black slave owner WIlliam Ellison’s slaves ran away.
The historians of Sumter District reported that from time to time Ellison advertised for the return of his runaways. On at least one occasion Ellison hired the services of a slave catcher.

Ellison hired a white man who had purchased a small hotel in Stateburg in the 1820s to run down “a valuable slave. Andrews caught the slave in Belleville, Virginia and stated: “I was paid on returning home $77.50 and $74 for expenses.

Following in their father’s footsteps, the Ellison family actively supported the Confederacy throughout the war. They converted nearly their entire plantation to the production of corn, fodder, bacon, corn shucks and cotton for the Confederate armies. They paid $5,000 in taxes during the war. They also invested more than $9,000 in Confederate bonds, treasury notes and certificates in addition to the Confederate currency they held.”

As an interesting sideline to Black slave owners in the South of the USA, is that there were also an estimated 65,000 Southern blacks in the Confederate military, including over 13,000 who fought against the North in battle.

A well-known novel, The Known World, by Black author Edward P. Jones, has tackled the issue of Black-owned slaves, much to the surprise of those readers who had never heard of Black slave owners. However, the interesting story of Blacks who owned slaves is largely ignored by the media and educators.

BLACK SLAVERY USED AS PROPAGANDA

The multiculturalists, dominant in media and education, continuously use the issue of Black Slavery as a psychological baton to beat over the heads of White people, children in particular, to damage any concept of ethnic pride that they have (while at the same time, encouraging ethnic pride amongst Blacks, Asians, etc.). Black slavery, amongst other issues, is used by multiculturalists as propaganda to discourage Whites from becoming so-called “racists”, and to encourage them (brainwash them) into becoming multiculturalists.

Kevin Alfred Strom, on the American Dissident Voices radio program, gave his views on multiculturalist propaganda in his broadcast “The Truth About Slavery”.

“By recounting and emphasizing again and again the real and imagined sufferings of Black people under slavery, the White student is made to feel that his ancestors were cruel, morally retarded, and evil. They are made to feel that they owe Black people a nearly infinite compensation, since, they are taught, Black people’s problems today are the legacy of hundreds of years of slavery for which White people are responsible. They are taught that the relative prosperity which we enjoy today was achieved largely by exploitation of Black slaves.

Is it any wonder that thousands of our young people join Jesse Jackson in chanting “Hey Hey Ho Ho, Western Culture’s Gotta Go”? Is it any wonder that they all too often reject our European cultural heritage and embrace all forms of alien styles of music, dancing, dress, grooming and slang, from Jamaican “rasta” to “gangsta rap”?

Is it any wonder that White teenagers are committing suicide in higher numbers every year? They have received, in our public schools and colleges, not a “liberal education,” but an education by liberals.

They have been taught, er- indoctrinated very well indeed, that they and their ancestors and their traditions and their natural feelings are worthless and an obstacle to be overcome.”

The blame for slavery should not be placed solely upon the consciences of Europeans, and that it was a practice carried out by all races. In fact, slavery is still practiced in Africa, by Africans.

It would be wrong, however to place the focus only on Europe, as the African slave trade with Arabia was of similar if not greater proportions. Even after the West abolished slavery, Arab countries continued with this atrocity.

Little was known of the methods by which the slaves were obtained, or of the raids and burning of villages and wholesale depopulation of large regions to supply slaves to the Mohammedan markets in the East, not to mention the demand for Africa itself.
The export of slaves from East Africa to Arabia, Iran, and India had been a lucrative trade for centuries until it was finally stopped by Britain in 1845.

Even as recently as 1953, several Saudi’s went to West Africa posing as Moslem missionaries and invited thousands of Africans on a pilgrimage to Mekka. On arrival the pilgrims were arrested for entering the country without visas and were sold as slaves.

In the late 1950’s there were between 500,000 and 700,000 slaves in Arabia. There are 30 millions slaves in the world today, mostly in Islamic countries where slavery is legal.

Slavery, as practiced in Africa, was even more horrendous and still continues on a large scale, even to this day. On 6 March 2002, the French TV channel TF1, reported in its main news bulletin how an estimated 15 000 children, abducted from Mali with promises of a better life, were sold as slaves to cotton plantations in the Ivory Coast.”

Child-slavery is a flourishing business in West Africa, in countries like Nigeria, Togo, Benin, and Gabon. However, despite the enormity of this modern slavery, the media still focus their tales of slavery on the issue of Black slavery in the old USA, not the current widespread immediate problem it still is today.

White Western societies are subjected to the constant multiculturalist media propaganda of Black slavery as main stories or as many passing references in movies, and TV shows – whether in fictional stories, “magazine” news items, or referred to in current news. This must change.

Dr. William Pierce, late leader of the American racial-nationalist organisation National Alliance, recognised that the modern mass media deliberately ignores the current modern slave trade in Africa:

“Businessmen in the coastal cities send buyers into the interior with buses, where they collect surplus children, in the seven- to 15-year-old age range, and bring them back in groups of 50 to 100 – in other words, a bus load – to the slave markets on the coast. Typically the buyers pay parents anywhere from 10 to 30 dollars per child.  In some areas, they simply bribe local officials to look the other way and kidnap the children.

Once in the coastal cities, the children are housed in large, supermarket-style buildings where shoppers can stroll through, select the children they want to buy, and pay for their merchandise at the door as they leave. Some of the purchasers send the children out on the streets to work as prostitutes. Others use them as house servants or as factory workers.

This is not a small-time thing or an occasional thing. This is a thriving business involving thousands of children bought and sold every year in dozens of slave markets in West African cities, in the region which used to be known as the “slave coast,” because that’s where the slave dealers, during the 18th and early 19th centuries, would buy ship loads of slaves to take to the West Indies and the Americas for plantation work.

After slavery was outlawed in Europe and America, it continued as an ongoing institution in Africa, just as it had for countless centuries before White men began buying African slaves.

The only reason Europeans and White Americans ever hear anything about this ongoing African slave trade is that there are a few tender-hearted White groups, such as Amnesty International and Anti-Slavery International. Otherwise, the issue has been until only recently completely ignored.

These groups try to arouse public opinion in America and Europe against slavery. They also work through politicians, trying to persuade them to put anti-slavery amendments into aid agreements with African countries.

As a result of such aid-agreement amendments most African countries recently have gone through the motions of enacting legislation outlawing slavery. All this means in practice is that the slave dealers must pay bribes to the politicians or the police in order to avoid interference with their business.

President Trump has stepped up actions against human trafficking, prosecuting thousands of cases that would otherwise not have seen the light of day here in America. For eight straight years Obama ignored the plight of human trafficking in America to focus on his Saul Alinsky inspired political agenda of dividing Our nation on racial and economic issues and targeting enemies, like Trump, the Republicans and the US Constitution.

Do you wonder why you don’t see more news about the slave trade? Do you wonder why the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the major television news networks have virtually nothing to say about it?
Can you imagine the outrage you would see in these controlled media, day after day and week after week, if White people were behind this trade in Black children?

Of course, you can! But news about Blacks in Africa, behaving the way Blacks always have behaved, whether it is buying and selling child slaves in Nigeria or engaging in ritual cannibalism in Liberia or communist mass murderer Nelson Mandela’s “necklacing” of political enemies and accused “witches” in South Africa, is news which doesn’t fit the political leftist narrative and is therefore deemed not newsworthy by the masters of the liberal controlled mainstream media.

In fact, the media masters consider such news positively harmful, because it conflicts with the image they have built in the minds of the White public: an image of virtuous, peaceable, freedom-loving, industrious, sensitive, and creative Blacks, essentially noble Blacks, who have failed to rise to the cultural level of Europe and America only because they have been enslaved and exploited by cruel, greedy White supremacists.

It’s important to maintain this deceptive image, because it reinforces the sense of White racial guilt.   Convincing Whites that they somehow owe something to non-Whites, that they must never think of their own racial interests or feel any sense of White racial solidarity, because that can only lead to terrible things like slavery and the oppression of noble Blacks.

Even though slavery ended in the USA well over a hundred years ago, in 1865, even though only 8% of American families owned slaves, even though many Blacks owned slaves, and even though no-one who was involved in that slavery is alive today, the whole of America’s White population is collectively blamed, and is never forgiven for slavery that occurred in the 1700s and 1800s, and that blame is extended to Whites in general across the world.

However, Arab and Black slave traders and slave owners, who have continued to practice slavery for hundreds of years, and who have enslaved millions of blacks, and continue the practice of slavery even to this day, are virtually ignored by the Western media.

The Arab and African countries who do very little about this practice, or turn a blind eye to it, are not subject to ongoing condemnation by the media or Western governments. Whereas pre-1994 South Africa was continually attacked and maligned for having a White-dominated society and an official policy of separate racial development, or apartheid; the countries that allow modern-day Black slavery are not subjected to continual media campaigns against them, nor international economic boycotts against them (as happened to White South Africa).

In fact, the human rights abuses are generally left untouched and ignored by the controlled mainstream media, who love the death cult of communism because they profit on fomenting propaganda and hate.    After all, if it bleeds it leads.

Why? Because the issue has never been about slavery as such – the issue has always been about how to find an excuse to condemn and denigrate White people, with the resulting White Guilt Complex and steady demolishing of White ethnic pride, all of which is ideologically conducive to the furthering of “multiculturalism”.

To lay the blame for slavery upon Whites in general (“Whites used Blacks as slaves”) rather than upon that small percentage who actually owned slaves (“plantation owners used Blacks as slaves”), or upon those few Africans who enslaved Blacks, or upon those few White ship owners who actually engaged in the slave trade, is an instinctive tactic by multiculturalists who wish to denigrate the White race as a whole.

The Marxist multiculturalists’ obsession with Black slavery has nothing to do with slavery, but everything to do with a hatred of the position of the White race in the world (including a self-hatred by those Whites, instilled by a White Guilt Complex and by the anti-White hatred of multiracialists in general).    Same goes for the labels of xenophobe, homophobe, transgender-phobe, misogynist, racist, yada, yada, yada.

And what of modern slavery?

Where are the movies, the mini-series productions, the constant side references in TV shows? Why doesn’t the Western media produce continuous television outpourings of rage against this horrendous practice? The reason is because modern slavery is a product of the Third World, overwhelmingly carried out by Blacks, and does not fit into the ideological parameters of their Marxist anti-White propaganda.

The United Nations Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery estimated in 1999 that some 20 million people are held in bonded labor around the world. Another report, put together by Anti-Slavery International in 2002 claims that as many as 27 million people worldwide are held in one form of slavery or another, most of them children. Today 30 million people are enslaved world wide and that number is still rising.
The report highlighted the plight of bonded agricultural workers in Pakistan, forced labor in the Sudan, and the worldwide problem of child domestic servants and the sexual exploitation of children.

Other countries cited by the report as tolerating slavery included Brazil, Mauritania, and the United Arab Emirates. It has also been estimated that in India alone, forty million people, including fifteen million children, are working in slave-like conditions as bonded laborers.

Salim Muwakkil, writing in The Chicago Tribune, has noted the silence from America on the issue of modern-day slavery in Africa.

“The discussion about slavery in Africa has been raging just beneath the surface of public discourse for at least a decade. That conversation has focused primarily on the African nations of Mauritania and Sudan, where slavery is less a function of poverty than of tradition and war. What’s more, since both countries are “Islamic republics,” dominated by Arab rulers, the issue has been aggravated by religious antagonisms, race and cultural rivalries.

Further controversy has centered on the lack of protest from the African-American community, especially since condemnation of the transatlantic slave trade is so pivotal to black leadership’s critique of the West.”

Muwakkil has also noted the racial and ethnic aspects to this slavery.
“In Mauritania, the country’s leadership is dominated by ethnic Berbers who are racially distinct from the indigenous black population. In Sudan, however, the difference is mostly cultural or vaguely “ethnic”.

Serge Trifkovic, in The Sword of the Prophet: A Politically-Incorrect Guide to Islam, has revealed the racial nature of the Black slavery carried out by Arabs in Mauritania and Sudan.

“Contrary to the myth that Islam is a religion free from racial prejudice, slavery in the Muslim world has been, and remains, brutally racist in character. To find truly endemic, open, raw anti-Black racism and slavery today one needs to go to the two Islamic Republics in Africa: Mauritania and Sudan. Black people have been enslaved on such a scale that the term black has become synonymous with slave.

For the pure-black populations of Sudan and Mauritania, independence from colonial rule marked the end of a slavery-free respite. Slavery was “abolished” several times in Mauritania since independence, most recently on July 5, 1980.

Yet the Anti-Slavery Society’s findings (1982) and those of Africa Watch (1990) point to the existence of at least 100,000 “full-time” slaves and additional 300,000 half-slaves, all of them black, still being held by Arab-Mauritanians.

The Muslim world has yet to produce a serious indigenous movement to abolish slavery that was not the consequence of Western prompting.

The Arabian Peninsula in 1962 became the world’s penultimate region to officially abolish slavery, yet years later Saudi Arabia alone was estimated to contain a quarter of a million slaves. Thousands of miles away from Africa, in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province, girls as young as five are auctioned off to highest bidders.

Afghan girls between the ages of 5 and 17 sell for $80 to $100. The price depends on the colors of their eyes and skin; if they are virgins, the price is higher. The girls are generally sold into prostitution or, if they are lucky, they may join harems in the Middle East. If they are lucky.”

Slaves in modern Africa miss out on the massive media propaganda that is devoted to Black slavery in pre-Civil War America, simply because their masters are the wrong colour – that is, their masters are Arab or African themselves.

If the slaves masters of modern Africa were Whites from South Africa or Rhodesia then the media outrage and propaganda would know no bounds, and – like the media propaganda hurled against the old South Africa – would be of such continuous high publicity that every citizen would be extremely aware of it, it would be an issue of “debate” in every school, it would be the subject of campaigns by multiculturalist and “progressive” organisations, boycotts would be organised, and governments would be forced into action.

If the multiculturalists were really so concerned about the cruelty of slavery, they would be protesting day and night against the modern-day countries that allow this practice to continue. Yet, on this current issue of slavery, they are virtually silent.

Multiculturalists are far more concerned with promoting their world-view than they are with condemning slavery. The fact is that the media outpourings on Black slavery are due more to their value as multiculturalist propaganda against “white racism” than for any particular concern about human suffering.

While the Arabs have been acknowledged as a prime force in the early usage of slaves from Africa, very little has been written about their usage of White slaves, whether they were part of the Russian slave trade or those kidnapped by Arab pirates. However, in recent years, the research of some authors has been bringing this issue to light.

David Brion Davis, in The New York Review of Books, explains that. “The origins of African slavery in the New World cannot be understood without some knowledge of the millennium of warfare between Christians and Muslims that took place in the Mediterranean and Atlantic and the piracy and kidnapping that went along with it. In 1627 pirates from the Barbary Coast of North Africa raided distant Iceland and enslaved nearly four hundred astonished residents.

In 1617 Muslim pirates, having long enslaved Christians along the coasts of Spain, France, Italy, and even Ireland, captured 1,200 men and women in Portuguese Madeira. Down to the 1640s, there were many more English slaves in Muslim North Africa than African slaves under English control in the Caribbean. Indeed, a 1624 parliamentary proclamation estimated that the Barbary states held at least 1,500 English slaves, mostly sailors captured in the Mediterranean or Atlantic.”

Professor Robert Davis, in his book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, estimated that 1 million to 1.25 million White people were enslaved by North African pirates between 1530 and 1780. North African pirates abducted and enslaved more Europeans from coastal villages and towns.

Italy, Spain, Portugal and France were hardest hit but the raiders also seized people in Britain, Ireland and Iceland. They even captured 130 American seamen from ships that they boarded in the Atlantic and Mediterranean between 1785 and 1793.
Arab pirates and White Slaves

Interest in the Arab slaving of Europeans was rekindled in the 1990s by the discovery of the site of a Barbary Coast shipwreck at Moor Sands on the South Devon coast in England.  Icon Films produced a documentary on the subject here are their findings:

“For England after 1625 there were great periods, particularly in Devon and Cornwall, Dorset, even around Bristol, where ships couldn’t leave port. The first of the Muslims showed up in 1625 it caused enormous panic. It was the suddenness. It was a surprise, the fact that there was so many of them and the fact that the English had a coastline which was virtually unprotected.”

“After looking at some dozens of population estimates from a number of different kinds of sources we have an average, year in year out, especially between the years 1580 and 1680 of about 35,000, 34,000 slaves at any given time. Well, knowing this it then becomes a question of estimating simply how many slaves it would be necessary to be taken every year to keep that number. I’ve have estimated overall that between 1530 and 1780, that is about two and a half centuries, something of the order of a million to a million and quarter white Europeans were enslaved and taken to Barbary.”

“Arab pirates plagued the south west coast of England and Ireland throughout the seventeenth century, but the height of this activity was around the 1630s, when England’s navy was at its weakest. While anything of value was fair game, their main quarry was slaves.

In the beginning they targeted the crews of West Country fishing boats, but as the pirates grew bolder they came ashore to find victims, such as the entire congregation of a village church in Cornwall and most of the inhabitants of Baltimore in Southern Ireland. A successfully ransomed sailor reported “If the hands be smooth, they was ransomed, but if the hands be rough, they was sold as slaves”. He told that a slave would fetch £40, a ransomnable captive £80 and a fair maiden up to £300.

By 1629 west country merchants were losing so many ships that James 1st was forced to send a fleet to North Africa to demand the return of the captives. It failed completely, but Admiral Mansell stated on his return that he believed there were between 25 and 30,000 Christian slaves in captivity.”

WHITE SLAVES, AFRICAN MASTERS

Reviews have praised White Slaves, African Masters: An Anthology of American Barbary Captivity Narratives, a book that has revealed the slavery of North American colonists by Barbary privateers.

“Some of the most popular stories in nineteenth-century America were sensational tales of whites captured and enslaved in North Africa. White Slaves, African Masters for the first time gathers together a selection of these Barbary captivity narratives, which significantly influenced early American attitudes toward race, slavery, and nationalism.

Though Barbary privateers began to seize North American colonists as early as 1625, Barbary captivity narratives did not begin to flourish until after the American Revolution. During these years, stories of Barbary captivity forced the U.S. government to pay humiliating tributes to African rulers, stimulated the drive to create the U.S. Navy, and brought on America’s first post-revolutionary war. These tales also were used both to justify and to vilify slavery.”

SLAVERY UNDER ISLAM CONTINUES TO THIS DAY

Books such as Islam’s Black Slaves: The Other Black Diaspora by Ronald Segal and Race and Slavery in the Middle East: A Historical Enquiry by Bernard Lewis have made available a wider knowledge on Arab slavery.

Bernard Lewis, who is an authority on the Near and Middle East, connection of slavery and status, both in theory and practice in the Islamic world from the 7th century to the present day.

White slaves were imported until the late 19th Century, when the Russians closed the Caucasus route.    False idealized views have promulgated idealized guilt generated by Western perception of Islamic slavery as being more benign than its Western counterpart, which is simply not true.  Ask a slave in Libya waiting to be killed for his organs to be sold if Islamic slavery is more benign.

Arab rulers even had white eunuchs (slaves with their testicles cut off).   Nice, right.

In Islam’s Black Slaves, Ronald Segal reveals that the Caliph in Baghdad at the beginning of the tenth century had seven thousand black eunuchs and four thousand white ones in his palace. Ibn Hawqal, writing in the 970s, remarked that “among the most famous exports [from al-Andalus to other Muslim lands] are comely slaves, both male and female from Frankish and Galician regions” and that “all Slavic eunuchs on earth come from al-Andalus, because they are castrated in that region”.

These are just a few examples of information available on the Arab trade in White slaves; however, this information rarely comes to light in biased Multiculturalist education systems, as they prefer to concentrate on the issue of Black slavery to the exclusion of all other types of slavery. In pushing a guilt complex upon white children, as part of their ideological fight to promote Multiculturalism and attack “White racism”, activist teachers would be aware that telling the truth about widespread White slavery would not be helpful in their promotion of Multiculturalist propaganda.

WHITE SLAVERY IN WHITE COUNTRIES

The usage of White slaves in Europe has received little attention by the media or in academia, even though it was a widespread practice.  Juliet Gardiner and Neil Wenborn have given a broad background to the institution of slavery in Britain.

“Slavery has had an important position in the society and economy of the British Isles and of Britain’s imperial possessions from time imme衫orial until the relatively recent past. It was an integral institution in Roman society. It played a large part in Celtic societies, and was important in Irish society until the 12th century.

The Irish were particularly assiduous slave traders, while prisoners taken in battle were frequently enslaved; there was also a flourishing trade in slaves between Bristol and Dublin against which Wulfstan of Worcester preached. Slavery had been an important institution for the Anglo-Saxons in England; slaves could be bought and sold, and slavery was an inherited condition or could be imposed as a legal punishment. Ten per cent of the population recorded in Domesday Book [1086] were slaves. The disappearance of slavery in England in the early 12th century remains a mysterious process.”

In Britain, as in many other countries, prisoners of war and criminals could be sold into slavery; however, the trade in slaves also included the kidnapping of unsuspecting poor people. Snippets in history resources sometimes mention in passing this slave trade in White people. For example, in a history of the City of Bristol and its links with the Transatlantic Slave Trade, we find the following snippet of information:

“By the 12th century some Bristol traders were routinely selling English children to Ireland (especially young girls)”.

It was said of Malcolm III, King of Scotland, that when he invaded England in 1070 and ravaged Durham, that his forces carried off so many prisoners that for years after English slaves were found in every hamlet of Scotland.

When James II took the British throne in 1685, the Duke of Monmouth, bastard son of Charles II, raised a rebellion to claim the throne for himself. When his forces were crushed at Sedgemoor, the Duke was executed with 320 of his followers. However, hundreds more of the rebels were sentenced to slavery instead.

“Over 800 rebels, as well as young girls who had embroidered Monmouth’s standards at Taunton, were given over to persons who enjoyed favour of court to be sold into slavery in the plantations of the West Indies, there to be treated, in Samuel Pepys’s words, ‘according to their deserts’.”

Extracts from “The Truth About Slavery” are revealing of the nature of White slavery.
“According to Thomas Burton’s Parliamentary Diary 1656-1659, in 1659 the English parliament debated the practice of selling British Whites into slavery in the New World. In the debate, these Whites were referred to not as “indentured servants” but as “slaves.”
In the Calendar of State Papers, Colonial Series, America and West Indies of 1701, we read of a protest over the “encouragement to the spiriting away of Englishmen without their consent and selling them for slaves, which hath been a practice very frequent and known by the name of kidnapping.” In the British West Indies, plantation slavery was instituted as early as 1627. In Barbados by the 1640s there were an estimated 25,000 slaves, of whom 21,700 were White.

Historian Col. A. B. Ellis, writing in the British Newspaper Argosy for May 6, 1893, said: “Few, but readers of old colonial state papers and records, are aware that between the years 1649 to 1690 a lively trade was carried on between England and the plantations, as the colonies were then called, [a trade] in political prisoners… they were sold at auction… for various terms of years, sometimes for life, as slaves.”

Sir George Sandys’ 1618 plan for Virginia referred to bound Whites assigned to the treasurer’s office to “belong to said office forever.” The service of Whites bound to Berkeley’s Hundred was deemed “perpetual.”
https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/american-pageant/author/bailey-thomas-a-kennedy-david-m-cohen-lizabeth/

David M. Kennedy, Lizabeth Cohen, and Thomas A. Bailey, in The American Pageant, have noted the high numbers of “indentured servants” in Virginia and Maryland.

“Because of the massive amounts of tobacco crops planted by families, “indentured servants” were brought in from England to work on the farms. In exchange for working, they received transatlantic passage and eventual “freedom dues”, including a few barrels of corn, a suit of clothes, and possibly a small piece of land.

Virginia and Maryland employed the “headright” system to encourage the importation of servant workers. Under its terms, whoever paid the passage of a laborer received the right to acquire 50 acres of land.

Chesapeake planters brought some 100,000 indentured servants to the region by 1700. These “white slaves” represented more than 3/4 of all European immigrants to Virginia and Maryland in the 17th Century.”

Paul Heinegg, in his book, Free African Americans of North Carolina and Virginia, adds to the story.

“Most of the free African Americans of Virginia and North Carolina originated in Virginia where they became free in the 17th and 18th century before chattel slavery and racism fully developed in the United States.

When they arrived in Virginia, Africans joined a society which was divided between master and white servant…. They joined the same households with white servants – working, eating, sleeping, getting drunk, and running away together.

The replacement of white servants with African slaves, begun in earnest in 1660, continued for more than a century. African slaves had still not completely replaced white servants by 17 October 1773 when the jailer in Prince William County advertised in the Virginia Gazette that he had caught a runaway white servant man:

“Committed to Prince William was William Rawlings, who says he is the property of Francis Smith of Chesterfield. The owner is desired to pay charges, and take him away.”
And he advertised in the same edition that he had jailed a runaway white servant woman: “Committed to the goal of Prince William a servant woman about 26 years of age, named Mary Richardson; has on a short printed cotton gown, and striped Virginia cloth petticoat.”

Michael Hoffman, in his book They Were White and They Were Slaves, confirms the large numbers of White slaves in early America.

“From 1609 until the early 1800’s, between one half and two thirds of all the White colonists who came to the New World came as slaves. Of the passengers on the Mayflower, twelve were White slaves. White slaves cleared the forests, drained the swamps, built the roads. They worked and died in greater numbers than anyone else.”

British people were sentenced to transportation to the American colonies for petty crimes; and, as was the case with those transported to Australia, they were used as slaves by landowners. As well as which, orphaned children and other children of poor white families, from the slums of England, were kidnapped and transported to the colonies. A review of They Were White and They Were Slaves details some of the horrors of White slavery.

“To be ‘sentenced to transportation’ to the colonies was tantamount to being sentenced to slavery.

The notion that transportation was a merciful alternative to imprisonment or death in Britain is an erroneous one. In fact, a merciful judge was regarded as one who did not transport British people into slavery in America.

Transportation of the white individuals from England had higher losses of life than that of the Black slaves of Africa. It cost more to obtain Blacks from Africa and the Whites were cheaply obtained and were viewed as expendable. In the 17th and 18th century it was customary to keep the White slaves below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey.  A white slave would be confined to a hole not more that sixteen feet long, chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks.

The death rate of white slaves to America was about 25% compared to 10% of black slaves. If a white slave was sold in advance to a Virginia planter, his well being and care was the responsibility of the Captain of the ship until they reached the halfway point of the voyage. After that the responsibility of costs of provisions went to the planter whether or not the slave survived the trip.  Captains became infamous for providing sufficient food for only the first half of the trip and virtually starving their captives until they arrived in America.

Upon arrival in America, the white kidnapped and convicts were displayed on an auction block, examined, then sold by the ship’s Captain. Once sold, the nightmare began. As many as 80% of a shipment of white slaves died their first year. Long hours and sun exposure were considered part of a first year ‘seasoning”. They would work from sunrise to sunset in the fields or lead mines and then would be put to work in a shed grinding corn until midnight.

Some expected to serve their time and obtain land, others to apprentice to learn a trade, but in most cases they were severely treated by beatings, etc. and did not survive. As their terms of indenture came to a close, many were beaten and tortured, in hopes they would try to flee. If they did flee and were caught, their indenture was extended another seven, ten or more years.

Also additional time would be added for the cost of their capture. They were branded on the cheek with the letter “R” and/or one or both ears were removed so they would not repeat their fleeing. One half of White “indentured servants” did not live to attain their freedom.

Young white females in bondage were denied the right to marry. A woman having a baby, out of wedlock, was an extension of two and a half years to her term. The baby was taken from her and sold. These children’s bondage was a “mere” 21 years for boys and 18 years for girls. By 1769, all children born to even free white women who were unmarried were also candidates for enslavement. Children were sold for a few pounds of tobacco to another master.”

Michael Hoffman noted that White slaves in Barbados were badly treated by the plantation owners.

“In Barbados by the 1640’s there were an estimated 25,000 slaves, of whom 21,700 were White. Cromwell’s conquest of Ireland in the middle of the seventeenth century made slaves as well as subjects of the Irish people. Over a hundred thousand men, women and children were seized by the English troops and shipped to the West Indies, where they were sold into slavery. In the British West Indies the torture visited upon White slaves by their masters was routine. Masters hung White slaves by their hands and set their hands afire as a means of punishment.

To end this barbarity, Colonel William Brayne wrote to English authorities in 1656 urging the importation of negro slaves on the grounds that, “as the planters would have to pay much for them, they would have an interest in preserving their lives, which was wanting in the case of whites”, many of whom, he charged, were killed by overwork and cruel treatment. Ten thousand Whites were kidnapped from England in the year 1670 alone.”
Noel Scott has also researched the little-known practice of the White slavery suffered by the White working class, using sources such as W.J. Cash, Jim Goad, Michael Hoffman, Gary B. Nash, Robert J. Steinfeld, and Howard Zinn.

Hoffman recounts the atrocities Oliver Cromwell and his Roundheads performed against the Irish peasantry and anyone that so much as disagreed with Cromwell’s despotic, puritanical reign of terror. Cromwell “Barbadosed” 100,000 of his foes. Being “Barbadosed” involved being enslaved and imported to Barbados, where the unlucky British, Scots and Irish were “seasoned” in hellish weather and malaria-conducive conditions. In the 1640s, over eighty five percent of the slaves in Barbados were white, and by 1653, fifty percent of white Barbadians were sent courtesy of Cromwell.

What is often omitted from history lectures and texts is that the majority of whites did not come to the New World seeking religious freedom. The majority of whites were “kid-nabbed,” drugged, knocked out or otherwise conned into coming to the Americas. “Drums” were the hired hands of wealthy businessmen that hit poor Londoners over the head and shipped them to the Americas; “crimps” and “spirits” either drugged victims or snatched them off the streets.

Indentured servitude contracts were often forged documents, and the majority of indentured servants stolen away to the Americas were children who lacked the capacity to enter into a legal contract, notes W.J. Cash, in “The Mind of the South.” Francis Trollope estimates that 200,000 British children were kidnapped and shipped to the Americas or forced into factory labor.

In the “Early Stuart Diaries,” a 1618 parliamentary bill is mentioned which allowed constables to kidnap orphans over eight years old, imprison them and then ship the orphans as slaves to colonial plantations. A 1652 commonwealth law permitted vagrants and beggars to be “schlepped in shackles to the colonies,” writes Goad. And following the English’s lead, the Scottish Privy Council also sought to export its poor white trash to the Americas, in 1669, notes Gary B. Nash in his book “Red, White, and Black: The Peoples of Early America.” The order issued by the Scottish Privy Council made it legal to capture “strong and idle beggars, vagabonds, Egyptians, common and notorious whores, thieves, and other dissolute and lousy persons.”

Another myth is the bold-faced lie that “only blacks suffered through a harrowing ‘middle passage’ across the Atlantic.” Goad shares the plight of a German Palatine, Gottlieb Mittelberger, who was duped by “newlanders” (the German equivalent of British “drums” or “spirits”). Mittelberger came willingly, in 1750, but soon realized he had been conned.

Water and food were scarce, dead women and babies were tossed overboard and German slaves had it even worse below deck, writes Howard Zinn, in “A People’s History of the United States.” In 1731, one German ship set sail with one hundred fifty German Palatines and lost one hundred sixteen, writes Goad. In Roger A. Ekirch’s “Bound for America,” he estimates that ten to fifteen percent of all white bondsmen perished before completing the “middle passage.”

Whites, like blacks, suffered the inhumanity of being separated from their families and sold like they were non-human animals on auction blocks. One such white slave woman describes it, in “Bound for America”: “We were driven through the country like cattle to a Smithfield market and exposed to sale in public fairs like so many brute beasts.” In Robert J. Steinfeld’s “The Invention of Free Labor,” he notes that West Florida’s 1766 law stated that an indentured servant was “the property of his [or her] Master.”

That sounds like slavery to me.

One might wonder why black slavery ever took root if white slaves were so abundant. Goad explains that it was business as usual: whites could easily blend into the general white population if they escaped slave owners’ clutches, but a black slave stood out more and was easily recaptured.

One might also argue that after black slavery took root, former white slaves and their progeny had it made in the shade, but Goad counters this by making an astute point: Why would plantation owners pay white workers when they had a new crop of slave laborers from Africa?”

A review of Jim Goad’s The Redneck Manifesto shows that an inkling of this research is starting to reach a wider audience.

“The thesis starts out in medieval Europe, with its ruling class and serfs. It gets more trenchant and further from liberal mythology in its analysis of indentured servitude. Try this on for size: “A study of Virginia from 1623 to 1637 showed that white servants outnumbered white freemen by three to one. In Maryland at one point in the 1600s, the ration was six to one.” Henry Cromwell, the Lord Protector’s son, issued an edict that forcibly seizing young Irish women and shipping them to the colonies was “so much to their own good.”

Sounds just like liberals, doesn’t it?

“So even though the popular belief is that NO whites were shipped to America against their will, it’s highly possible that MORE whites were bought here unwillingly than blacks.” And sold to the highest bidder. And, like a rental car, abused far more than the capital goods, like the black slaves. Since, Goad argues, his ancestors were among those white slaves, why should he pay reparations to anyone?”

It is odd to note that those who call for reparations for slavery from Whites, or demand an apology for slavery from Whites, are themselves guilty of a perverse kind of racism. Robert W. Tracinski recognised this weird hypocrisy.

“An apology for slavery on behalf of the American nation presumes that whites today, who predominantly oppose racism, and never owned slaves, and who bear no personal responsibility for slavery, still bear a collective responsibility – a guilt they bear simply by belonging to the same race as the slave-holders of the Old South. Such an apology promotes the very idea at the root of slavery: racial collectivism.

Those who owned slaves were certainly guilty of a grave injustice. But by what standards can other whites (many of whom are not even descendants of the slave-holders) be held responsible for their ideas and actions? The only justification for such an approach is the idea that each member of the race can be blamed for the actions of every other member, that we are all just interchangeable cells of the racial collective.

The ultimate result of this approach is not racial harmony or a color-blind society, but racial warfare. Under the premise of racial collectivism, an injustice committed against any member of your racial group entitles you to retaliate against any member of the perpetrator’s racial group.”

The issue of White slavery is receiving more attention nowadays, albeit only from minor researchers who are virtually ignored by the media and educational institutions.
However, they have made a start in countering the decades-long Multiculturalist propaganda over Black slavery and its associated push to induce a collective feeling of guilt in the general White population.

Propaganda regarding Black slavery, especially whilst ignoring White slavery, is nothing less than anti-White racism and therefore should be exposed and opposed. To counter the wrongs of Multiculturalist propaganda, it is high time that the issue of White slavery is prominently discussed in the media and in schools.

WHITE SLAVES BLACK SLAVE OWNERS IN AMERICA

Robert M. Grooms, in “The Johnson Family: African-American Owners of White and Black Slaves”, has revealed the fact that Blacks owned White slaves in America. He also notes that a legal precedent for life-long slavery in America was established by a Black slave owner with regard to one of his Black slaves.

“On April 10, 1606 the Virginia Company of London was granted a royal charter by King James I, awarding it a large tract of land in present day Virginia, Delaware and Maryland.

On May 13, 1607 three small ships, Susan Constant, Godspeed and Discovery, arrived at Cape Henry, sailed up the James River, and landed at present-day Jamestown (“James Towne”). Following a 131-day voyage crowded in damp, cold, foul smelling holds in the darkness beneath the decks, 104 settlers, including twelve servants, disembarked and established a rough log fortress.

In August 1619, more than a year before the landing of the ship Mayflower, a captured Dutch man-of-war, with a Spanish captain name Jope and an English pilot named Marmaduke, anchored in the James River near Jamestown. On board were “20 and odd” men and women of African descent.

The Virginia colony was in need of laborers, while the captain and his crew were in need of supplies. A bargain was struck and twenty Negroes, the first of their race in the colonies, were sold to the colonists, fresh food and water was brought aboard, and the ship sailed away.

According to the African-American Chairman of President William Clinton’s Commission on Race, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin:

These newcomers, who happened to be black, were simply more indentured servants. They were listed in the census counts of 1623 and 1624; and as late as 1651, Negroes whose period of service had expired were also being assigned land much the same way that it was being assigned to whites who had completed their indenture. During the first-half century of existence Virginia had many Negroes as servants; and the record reveals an increasing numbers of free Negroes.

Franklin wrongly designated the first twenty Negroes in the colonies as indentured servants, instead of redemptioners. Indentured servants, in return for paying the cost of their passage to the New World, entered into a written contract while still in Europe to work for a specified owner, for a specified number of years, under determined conditions.

The length of the bound servitude, be it an extendable set number of years or durante vite (servitude for life) has no bearing on whether an individual is deemed a slave. The vast majority of whites and all blacks arrived in the colonies as redemptioners. They were generally of the underclass, including orphans, who were rounded up (often involuntarily) while still in their native country and transported to the New World.

Whites were frequently transported in the same ships that were used for Africans.
One redemptioner who came to American in 1750 recalled his trip with horror: “To keep from starving, we had to eat rats and mice. We paid from eight pence to two shilling for a mouse, four pence for a quart of water.”

Gittlieb Mittelburger in, Journey to Pennsylvania, recorded in 1750 that: The sale of human beings at the market on board the ship is carried on thus: …Every day Englishmen, Dutchmen, and High German people come from the city of Philadelphia and other places in part from a great distance, say twenty, thirty, or forty hours away, and go on board the newly-arrived ship that has brought and offers for sale passengers from Europe, and select among the healthy persons such as they deem suitable for their business

White and black servants joined the same households – working, eating, sleeping and running away together. Their terms of service could be extended for a large number of minor offenses, including marrying or having children without permission. As a result of extensions, many whites served their whole life as a “servant.”

A child born to a female redemptioner could become the property of her owner and the mother’s term extended. For example, George Cummins had the indenture of his white servant woman named Christian Finney extended by a year and her child bound for thirty-one years by order of the Carteret County Count on December 7, 1736.

When she applied to the court for her freedom on June 9, 1744, the court ruled that she serve another five months to pay for the cost incurred by her owner to bring the earlier action. When she applied again 6 months later, she was ordered to serve an additional year for having a “Mulatto Child in the time of her servitude.”

Before 1643 servants without indentures generally became freemen after a term of service varying from two to eight years. After 1643, the terms of servants “brought into the colony without indentures or covenants to testify to their agreement” were fixed at four to seven years, the period varying somewhat with the age of the servant. It was the custom and later the law that a redemptioner, white or black, received from his master at the time of his discharge a certain amount of property called “freedom dues.” In 1660 Virginia custom was to give each new freeman “3 barrels of corn and suit of clothes.”

In 1651 Anthony Johnson [a negro] was given 250 acres as “head rights” for purchasing five incoming white redemptioners.

In 1652 John Johnson, Anthony Johnson’s eldest son, purchased eleven incoming white males and females, and received 550 acres adjacent to his father.

There were a number of additional Virginia land patents representing grants to free blacks of from fifty to 550 acres for purchasing white redemptioners. For example, on

April 18, 1667 Emanuel Cabew received fifty acres in James City County, and in 1668 fifty acres were deed to John Harris of Queen’s Creek. Francis Payne paid for his freedom in 1650 by purchasing three incoming whites for his master’s use.
White slavery in the Industrial Revolution

Michael A. Hoffman II has explained that even whilst not encumbered by the institution of slavery, White people were subjected to slave-like conditions.

“In the 18th century in Britain and America, the Industrial Revolution spawned the factory system whose first laborers were miserably oppressed White children as young as six years of age.

They were locked in the factories for sixteen hours a day and mangled by the primitive machinery. Hands and arms were regularly ripped to pieces. Little girls often had their hair caught in the machinery and were scalped from their foreheads to the back of their necks.

White Children wounded and crippled in the factories were turned out without compensation of any kind and left to die of their injuries. Children late to work or who fell asleep were beaten with iron bars. Lest we imagine these horrors were limited to only the early years of the Industrial Revolution, eight and ten year old White children throughout America were hard at work in miserable factories and mines as late as 1920.”
The awful conditions suffered by the child chimney sweeps are alluded to in the poem

“The Sweep Boys Lament” (London, 1824):

I’m weak and young and frightened oft,
when the dark flue I see;
by blows and threats forced up aloft,
where nobody loves me.

My master beats me with a rope,
a cruel master he:
But I have neither friends nor hope;
For nobody loves me.

They loved the negro ‘oer the wave,
they strove to set him free;
But though I am a little slave,
there’s nobody loves me.

Another example of child slavery in Britain can be found in A Memoir of Robert Blincoe, An Orphan Boy, Sent from the Workhouse at St. Pancras, London at 7 Years of Age to Endure the Horrors of a Cotton Mill.

“Being too short of stature to reach his work standing on the floor, he was placed on a block; but this expedient only remedied a part of the evil, for he was not able by any possible exertion to keep pace with the machinery. In vain the …child declared it was not in his power to move quicker. He was beaten by the overlooker with great severity and cursed and reviled from morning ’till night, ’till his life became a burthen to him and his body discoloured with bruises.”

Men would be typically hired for heavy duty or labouring jobs, whilst women would carry out more intricate work. Women were paid less than men, and children were paid even less, and therefore employers liked to hire children as a source of cheap labour.
Chapman Cohen, in Christianity, Slavery and Labour, made note of these practices.Sir Samuel Romily [1757 – 1818] says:

It is a very common practice with the great populous parishes in London to bind children in large numbers to the proprietors of cotton-mills in Lancashire and Yorkshire, at a distance of 200 miles. The children who are sent off by wagon loads at a time, are as much lost for ever to their parents as if they were shipped off for the West Indies. The parishes that bind them, by procuring a settlement for the children at the end of forty days, get rid of them for ever; and the poor children have not a human being in the world to whom they can look up for redress against the wrongs they may be exposed to from these wholesale dealers in them, whose object it is to get everything they can possibly wring from their excessive labour and fatigue.

CHILDREN WORKING IN THE MINES

In the mines the conditions were, if possible, still worse. In 1842, there was presented to both Houses of Parliament a Report from the Children’s Employment Commissioners. From a summary of this report, published in the Westminster Review for October, 1842, and extending over fifty pages, I take the following: Of the extent of child labor in mines, we are told:

“Children are taken at the earliest ages, if only to be used as living and waving candlesticks, or to keep rats from a dinner; and it is in pits of this worst character, too, in which most female children are employed. It would appear from the practical returns obtained by the Commissioner, that about one-third of the persons employed in coal mines are under eighteen years of age, and that much more than one-third of this proportion are under thirteen years of age.”

In Shropshire we learn “there are very few under six or seven who are employed to draw weights with a girdle round the body; and those only when the roof of the pit is so low for short distances as to prevent horses of the smallest size from being employed.” Of a Yorkshire pit, in describing the way the children draw the trucks of coal–from two to five cwt. [hundred weight (has varied: 100-120 pounds)], “they buckle round their naked person a broad leather strap, to which is attached in front a broad ring and about four feet of chain, terminating in a hook.” No wonder the Commissioners speak of these human beasts of burden, chained, fettered, and harnessed, as “presenting an appearance indescribably disgusting and unnatural.”

In the West Riding there was no distinction of sex so far as underground labor was concerned. “The men work in a state of perfect nakedness, and are in this state assisted in their labors by females of all ages, from girls of six years old up to women of twenty-one, these females being quite naked down to the waist.” Pages might be filled with similar descriptions of pits in England, Scotland and Wales. The whole forms a striking comment on Canon Brownlow’s statement that “One of the most remarkable effects of Christianity was.the rehabilitation of manual labor in public estimation.

One ought to say a word or two on the employment of boys in sweeping chimneys – a practice unknown outside the British Isles – before leaving this aspect of the subject. Children of six or seven were employed at this task, although an Act was passed in 1817 ordering that no boy should be employed under eight years of age.

Most of these boys were either sold outright to the employers by callous parents, or apprenticed from the parish. They were set to climbing chimneys, and often straw was lit behind them to encourage quickness of movement. Some masters washed their boys once a week, others just left them alone. The boys were stunted in growth, blear-eyed from the soot, and “flapper-kneed” from climbing. Deaths from suffocation were common. Yet, when in 1803, a very mild Bill was brought before the House of Lords, regulating the trade, it was rejected by a House consisting of one Archbishop, five Bishops, three Dukes, five Earls, one Viscount, and ten Barons.”

The chronic overworking of Whites was rampant in Western societies. The fact that England had campaigned for an end to Black slavey while ignoring conditions at home that were equivalent to White slavery was a source of anger to many working class people and trade unionists.

In 1837, George Loveless, the leading figure of the Tolpuddle Martyrs (the six Dorset labourers who had been sent to the penal colony of New South Wales for their Trades Union activity), made a speech to his fellow labourers:

“England has for many years been lifting her voice against the abominable practice of negro slavery. Numbers of great men have talked, have laboured and have struggled until at length emancipation has been granted to the black slaves in the West Indies. When will they dream of advocating the cause of England’s white slaves?”
At the height of the anti-slavery campaign, William Cobbett wrote to Wilberforce:

“You seem to have great affection for the negroes… I feel for the hard-pinched, the ill-treated, the beaten down labouring classes of England, Scotland and Ireland, to whom you do all the mischief that it is in your power to do; because you describe their situation as good, and because you do, in some degree, at any rate, draw the public attention away from their sufferings.”

In an impassioned letter to the Leeds Mercury in 1830, a social reformer, Richard Oastler, wrote:

“Thousands of our fellow creatures are existing in a state of slavery more horrid than are the victims of that hellish system, colonial slavery… The very streets which receive the droppings of the Anti-Slavery Society are every morning wet by the tears of innocent victims at the accursed shrine of avarice, who are compelled, not by the cart whip of the negro slave driver, but by the equally appalling thong or strap of the overlooker, to hasten, half-dressed, but NOT half-fed, to those magazines of British infantile slavery – the worsted mills in the town of Bradford.”

Advocates of social justice, such as Loveless, Cobbett, and Oastler, campaigned hard to alleviate the conditions of the working people of those times. In the 1890s, Rev. Louis Albert Banks of Boston wrote the book White Slaves Or The Oppressions Of The Worthy Poor to expose the awful conditions of the poor people that he had witnessed in his work.

SLAVE GIRLS

Chapman Cohen, in Christianity, Slavery and Labor, has revealed instances of White slavery in Britain in the seventeenth century and beyond.

“In the seventeenth century thousands of Irish-men, women, and children were seized by the order, or under the licence of the English Government, and sold as slaves for use in the West Indies. In the Calendar of State Papers, under various dates, between 1653-6, the following entries occur: “For a licence to Sir John Clotworthy to transport to America 500 natural Irishmen.” A slave dealer, named Sellick, is granted a licence to take 400 children from Ireland for New England and Virginia. Later “1,000 Irish girls and the like number of youths” are sold to the planters in Jamaica.

In Scotland the Parliament passed, in 1606, an Act binding all workmen engaged in coal mines and at salt works to perpetual service. For over a century and a half later whenever coal mines or salt works changed owners those employed were sold with the estates. They were emancipated in 1775 by an Act of the British Parliament, but with certain special conditions that made the Act almost a dead letter. It was not until 1799 that the colliers [coal miners] and salt-workers of Scotland became free men.”

The Heritage League has also revealed some of the horrendous working conditions suffered by White people in Britain during the nineteenth century.

“Campaigning by a few radicals, and several of the more humane factory owners, led to a Factory Inquiry Commission being set up by Parliament in 1833. Reports to the Commission showed that children as young as 5, but more often 7, were employed in a working day of 14-16 hours, exclusive of intervals and meals. It was also reported that factory owners permitted overseers to flog and maltreat children and often took an active part themselves. In many factories children were employed on 12-hour night shifts. Medical reports to the Commission showed that thousands of children were maimed and deformed by factory work, lack of sleep often leading to accidents involving several children and adults.

“The Secret Of England’s Greatness, 5 pence Per Hour”
[The Bulletin, August 1889]

Shop assistants were notoriously overworked, and campaigners eventually secured the passage of the Shop Hours Act in 1886. The Act imposed a limit of hours worked per week of 74 hours, however, this remained ineffectual until the enforcement of the regulations was handed over to the local authorities in 1912. One has to wonder how many hours a week shop assistants were forced to work, if a reduction to 74 hours a week was thought to be “reasonable”. It is little wonder that such conditions have been referred to as “White slavery” or “wage slavery”.

In such times, Black slaves in America were often treated better than White employees, as the slaves could be quite expensive to buy, and therefore were looked after as an economic asset. The Economist has estimated that in 1753 an African slave from the Gold Coast would cost £16 (about UK£1,000 or US$1,650 in today’s money), and in the West Indies would fetch up to £35.”[104] On the other hand, White labourers were simply hired by the hour or by the day, and – in a era without Workers’ Compensation laws – could be used in reckless and dangerous ways without economic liability to their bosses.

An example of this can be seen in the observations of Frederic Olmsted.
“In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York’s Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship’s hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes, the men in the hold were Irish. Olmsted inquired about this to a shipworker. “Oh,” said the worker, “the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything.”

In light of the “White slavery” conditions suffered by the British working class, the Heritage League has attacked those “bleeding hearts” who have for so long tried to place the yoke of a “White guilt complex” upon the shoulders of White people worldwide.

“The cause of African slavery was championed, whilst that of the child slaves of Britain was virtually ignored, because of an early form of political correctness. The “bleeding hearts” of the day preferred to campaign for abolition of slavery because it was more socially acceptable: because it was taking place somewhere else. Considering the attitudes of their ilk today, it is unsurprising that they would campaign for one but ignore the other.

When one reflects and considers the suffering of our ancestors, our kith and kin, and the way their plight was ignored, then you have to say that we are the ones who should be angry. Conquerors have enslaved their enemies since before the dawn of time, the native Britons were enslaved by the Romans, then by the Saxons who, in turn, were enslaved by the Normans. We move on. And it is the mark of a civilized and mature folk that they accept that what was done in the past was done in the context of the age in which it took place.”

For those who did not know about these things, and sadly there are a great number, I hope that you will now be better equipped to resist attempts to make you feel guilty about your past. And perhaps you will educate others who are ignorant of the truth.

WHITE SLAVERY AND THE MODERN MEDIA

Michael Hoffman has revealed the double standards of the media when it comes to slavery and mistreatment of those in servitude. This double standard is also applied in the schools and universities of Multiculturalist education.

“The wealthy, educated White elite in America are the sick heirs of what Charles Dickens in Bleak House termed “telescopic philanthropy” – the concern for the condition of distant peoples while the plight of kindred in one’s own backyard are ignored.
Today much of what we see on “Turner Television” and Pat Robertson’s misnamed “Family Channel,” are TV films depicting Blacks in chains, Blacks being whipped, Blacks oppressed. Nowhere can we find a cinematic chronicle of the Whites who were beaten and killed in White slavery. Four-fifths of the White slaves sent to Britain’s sugar colonies in the West Indies did not survive their first year.

Soldiers in the American Revolution and sailors impressed into the American navy received upwards of two hundred whiplashes for minor infractions. But no TV show lifts the shirt of these White yeoman to reveal the scars on their backs.

The Establishment would rather weep over the poor persecuted Negroes, but leave the White working class “rednecks” and “crackers” (both of these terms of derision were first applied to White slaves), to live next door to the Blacks.

Little has changed since the early 1800s when the men of property and station of the English Parliament outlawed Black slavery throughout the Empire. While this Parliament was in session to enact this law, ragged five year old White orphan boys, beaten, starved and whipped, were being forced up the chimneys of the English parliament, to clean them. Sometimes the chimney masonry collapsed on these boys. Other times they suffocated to death inside their narrow smoke channels.

Long after Blacks were free throughout the British Empire, the British House of Lords refused to abolish chimney-sweeping by White children under the age of ten. The Lords contended that to do so would interfere with “property rights.” The lives of the White children were not worth a farthing and were considered no subject for humanitarian concern.

The chronicle of White slavery in America comprises the dustiest shelf in the darkest corner of suppressed American history. Should the truth about that epoch ever emerge into the public consciousness of Americans, the whole basis for the swindle of “Affirmative action,” “minority set-asides” and proposed “Reparations to African-Americans” will be swept away. The fact is, the White working people of this country owe no one. They are themselves the descendants, as Congressman Wilmot so aptly said, of “the sons of toil.”

There will only be racial peace when knowledge of radical historical truths are widespread and both sides negotiate from positions of strength and not from fantasies of White working class guilt and the uniqueness of Black suffering.

Let it be said, in many cases Blacks in slavery had it better than poor Whites in the antebellum South. This is why there was such strong resistance to the Confederacy in the poverty-stricken areas of the mountain south, such as Winston County in Alabama and the Beech mountains of North Carolina. Those poor Whites could not imagine why any White laborer would want to die for the slave-owning plutocracy that more often than not, gave better care and attention to their Black servants than they did to the free white labor they scorned as “trash.”

To this day, the White ruling class denigrates the White poor and patronizes Blacks.  This is simply to have the means to control both groups and keep them divided and at each others throats by fomenting racial hatred.

We must also not forget that the Bolsheviks and Nazis both used slave labor to further their “cause”.    Communism itself is a form or indentured servitude, as one cannot live life on their own terms, but rather under the “collective.”

I argue that communism IS slavery. – HN

 

PLEASE SHARE THIS INFORMATION WIDELY!

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended, please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site.

Thank you for your continued support.

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable and for the purposes of FAIR USE.  All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

KID ROCK CONFIRMS MICHIGAN SENATE RUN

By Howard Nema

“Cowboy, baby!”

Musician Kid Rock has announced his bid for the U.S. Senate in Michigan on the GOP ticket in 2018 to challenge Democrat Debbie Stabenow for her seat.

Singer Kid Rock, in a tweet Wednesday, announced his bid for U.S. Senate.

Rock, a  conservative told The Guardian in 2015, “I am definitely a Republican on fiscal issues and the military, but I lean to the middle on social issues. I am no fan of abortion, but it’s not up to a man to tell a woman what to do.  As an ordained minister I don’t look forward to marrying gay people, but I’m not opposed to it.”

Kid’s an ordained minister?  For real? 

Kid Rock would be the first GOP candidate to win a Senate seat since 1998.  Debbie Stabenow has held her seat since 2000.

Image result for reagan

While Reagan was a celebrity he wasn’t a political novice.  While we need more Americanism in Washington and State and local houses and Kid Rock and Ted Nugent exude Americanism, I hope this doesn’t start to become a trend.  

In my view, despite true red, white and blue Patriotism and devotion to Americanism and the Constitution, generally celebrities competing for political office is a terrible thing for America.   Let’s face it.  For the most part, celebrities are way out of touch with the average American, but they do indeed have curb appeal.  And that curb appeal can be a double edged sword. 

It can also be dangerous.  Manipulative.   After all, six companies own the 90% of record, publishing and movie companies that write these celebrities’ pay checks. 

I see this as the ominous dawning of new era of  social engineering and control via celebrity influence.   Thanks to Edward Bernays introducing fashion and product placement to Hollywood in the 1920’s to sell products to the masses, globalist propaganda is now being directly sold to the masses via their favorite celebrities.

Image result for LEO AT UN

Socially aware, politically active” celebrities,  giving the elite an ultimate propaganda platform to spew their Marxist totalitarian socialist  one world New World Order agenda. 

Yes.  The cult of personality is a dangerous thing.  

Just look what happened with Obama.    I suppose things could get worse.  Imagine Kanye West for President.  Or Meryl Streep….  God help us —  Are these “celebrities popular, alluring?  Yes.  Are they competent to run for office, no.  

Just look at Al Franken.Image result for Al Franken 1970's

These people are actors, performers and entertainers. 

Image result for al franken saturday night live

Don’t we have enough of these people in Washington and State Houses across the country already?

 

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended, please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site.

Thank you for your continued support.

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable and for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

 

 

 

 

 

Source:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/12/kid-rock-confirms-michigan-senate-run.html

 

THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBALIST PROPAGANDIST MIKA BRZEZINSKI

By Howard Nema

We are living in the technetronic era.   For those who are not in the know, Mika Brzezinski is the daughter of the late political scientist and globalist insider, Zbignew Brzezinski.

In 1970, while she was still a Red diaper baby, Mika’s dad wrote the book, BETWEEN TWO AGES: AMERICA’S ROLE IN THE TECHNOTRONIC ERA.

Zbignew Brzezinski was a member of the Rockefeller apparatus and was one  of the founding members of the Trilateral Commission.  He spent a career in political science working to erase the sovereignty of the United States by forwarding the efforts of the Milner, or Round Table Group; in their neo-feudal quest for domination over the political and economic systems of the world.

Intentionally, I might add — at the “direct expense” of all other economic groups.

Brzezinski referred to these people as “the elite”.   He ran in their circles. He knew them.  And he worked for them.   He was a pro-United Nations, anti-American anti-Constitutional, Council on Foreign Relations globalist elitist, disguised as an American Patriot, just like his daughter Mika.

ZB NWOAnd like her infamous late father, Mika Brzezinski is also a globalist hack, working as a propagandist for the New World Order at MSNBC.

It is unlikely that Mika or her new fiance, phony conservative Joe Scarborough, would read the following quotes from her daddy’s 1970 book on Morning Joe.

For the record, they wouldn’t be read on CNN—or FOX either, for that matter. 

“In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards THE AGGREGATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT OF MILLIONS OF UNCOORDINATED CITIZEN, EASILY WITHIN THE REACH OF MAGNETIC AND ATTRACTIVE PERSONALITIES (HN: example: OBAMA) EFFECTIVELY EXPLOITING THE LATEST COMMUNICATIONS TECHNIQUES TO MANIPULATE EMOTIONS AND CONTROL REASON“.

“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society.   Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.  (HN:  Individual liberty, family, God, etc.)  Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.

“Society dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how.   Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control.”

Like her late father, Mika is working to destroy the sovereignty of America and forward the goals of the United Nations.

How do you think she got her MSNBC  gig in the first place?  Bloodline connections, that’s how.  Today we are living in a society socially engineered by the elite exactly as described 47 years ago in Brzezinski’s 1970 book!  Coincidence?  No.  Social control?   Yes.

ARE YOU WAKING UP YET!

I wonder if Mika will take her future husband Joe Scarborough’s surname?   Who knows?  Maybe she’ll use a hyphen?

Ms. Mika Brzezinski-Scarborough.   I like it.  Sort of has a politically correct ring to it, doesn’t it?

The late Zbignew Brzezinski

Link to FULL PDF of Brzezinski’s 1970 book

RELATED BOOKS:


Carroll Quigley’s TRAGEDY AND HOPE: A HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN OUR TIME

SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS – PDF

THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT by Carroll Quigley

America’s Secret Establishment:  An Introduction To The Order of Skull and Bones by Antony Sutton

100 BOOKS YOU MUST READ TO UNDERSTAND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended, please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site.

Thank you for your continued support.

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable and for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

 

TRUMP AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS…

 

Despite the globalist’s mass media distractions and manipulations, fake news and lies of collusion with Russia and the Pavlovian paranoia and COINTELPRO disinformation currently swirling around a jaded and divided Truth Community, President Trump DOES NOT serve the New World Order or the shadow government.

Trump is not a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), nor is he a Freemason, nor has he ever attended Bilderberg, nor is he an internationalist/globalist/communist, making him a true outsider despite concerns and controlled opposition manipulations in the truth community.

Trump is against Common Core, the cookie cutter communist indoctrination program known as education while favoring school choice and diverse curriculum, something the cherry picking diversity seeking communist left oppose since their views on indoctrination rebuke diversity in education and stipulates that individual needs must submit to the collective.     

Senate_Investigating_Committee_On_Education-California-Textbooks-1948-120pgs-GOV-EDU.sml

Below is an excerpt from the California Senate Investigative Committee on Education’s Eleventh Report 1953:

 

 

Trump’s Long Road to the White House:

Funny how back in 1998 Jesse Jackson praised and thanked “racist/xenophobic/bigot” Donald Trump for a lifetime of service to African-Americans.
On July 8, 2015 MSNBC reviewed a July 7, 2015 Simpson’s video used in a widespread disinformation COINTELPRO operation to divide the ever-growing truth community, claiming the video was from 2000 and it proved Illuminati control over Trump.  Pure Bullshit!  LMFAO!
Excerpt from the 2015 Simpson’s episode:
On June 28, 2001, former Navy Intelligence Officer and radio host, William Cooper accurately predicted 9/11:
Before Cooper, Donald Trump also predicted 9/11:
Donald Trump interview on the day of 9/11/01:
On 9/11/01 World Trade Center Bldg 7 was razed by a controlled demolition but was reported to have collapsed due to fire more than 20 minutes before it happened:

 

Henry Kissinger discusses his meeting with President-elect Trump:

 

SUBSCRIBE TO TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2:
https://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site.  Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE.    All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

FEAR AND LOATHING, TRUTH AND THE RULE OF LAW

“Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism.” –  PROTOCOL 1:6  Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion (1903)

The Protocols of the Elders of Sion has been lambasted as an anti-Semitic work, but in reality it is a grand deception by the elders of the illumined ones to blame the Jews for their plan of global domination and despotism.    First off, the title itself is as deceptive as the history of the name it truly represents, which is the ancient cult of illumined ones known as the Priory of Sion, not Zion.

The secret societies commonly use communism and other totalitarian ideologies as fodder to achieve their goal of a “New World Order.”  Yes,  some Jews are part of this conspiracy, but it is not a Jewish conspiracy by any means.

The Hidden Masters behind the Shadow Government believe they are the only true mature minds.   It is they alone who are destined to rule, imbued with secret knowledge and deistic power due to their intellect and wisdom to rule over the rest of us.

This is not an opinion.  This is what they believe.  In any case, what was published in Russia in 1903 by  Sergei Nilus has come to pass despite Wikipedia’s assessment.

Below is PROTOCOL 1 of the Illumined ones plans for world domination first published in Russia in 1903 to gain momentum for the 1905 Russian Revolution and to foment anti-Semitism.   It worked.  So far.  The book has been demonized as a hoax for 114 years and counting as all of its protocols come into existence in the real world.  These facts are indisputable.

When reading THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF SION, replace “Jews” with “Hidden Masters” and goyim with the word, “cattle” (humanity).

PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS
OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF SION

PROTOCOL No. 1

1. ….Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light upon surrounding facts.
2. What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from the two points of view, that of ourselves and that of the GOYIM (CATTLE/HUMANITY).
3. It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.
4. What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men? What has served for their guidance hitherto?
5. In the beginnings of the structure of society, they were subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards – to Law, which is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature, right lies in force.
6. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one’s party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, SO-CALLED LIBERALISM, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears; the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism.
GOLD
7. In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self-government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.
8. Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes – in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: IT IS IN OUR POWER. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not – it goes to the bottom.
9. Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as the above are immoral, I would put the following questions: If every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defense, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible?
10. Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more favor with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, traditions and sentimental theorems, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance of political secrets, puts forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.
11. The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have recourse both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the GOYIM, but we must in no wise be guided by them.
RIGHT IS MIGHT
12. Our right lies in force. The word “right” is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you.
13. Where does right begin? Where does it end?
14. In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right – to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism.
15. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invincible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.
16. Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.
17. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labor of many centuries brought to naught.
18. In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless and un-reasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.
19. Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet.
20. A people left to itself, i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power and honors and the disorders arising therefrom. Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgment, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interest? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable; for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.
WE ARE DESPOTS
21. It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery.
22. Behold the alcoholic animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the GOYIM are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has been inducted by our special agents – by tutors, lackeys, governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others, by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the GOYIM. In the number of these last I count also the so-called “society ladies,” voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury.
23. Our countersign is – Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty.
24. Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know that we are too merciless for all disobedience to cease.
WE SHALL END LIBERTY
25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political – to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.
26. In all corners of the earth the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOY States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card – the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the GOYIM, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the GOYIM we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.
27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyze initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities.
28. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove.
29. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.

 

SOURCES/RELATED INFORMATION:

147 COMPANIES CONTROL THE WORLD

A link to the full version of PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF SION and many other books can be found below:

http://www.howardnema.com/2016/09/01/100-books-you-must-read-understand-the-new-world-order

SUBSCRIBE TO TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL
https://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

 

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

 

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

 

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

AMERICANISM, SOCIALISM AND THE RISE OF THE RADICAL LEFT

 

SOURCES, VIDEOS, BOOKS,  ARTICLES  AND RELATED INFORMATION:

Norman Dodd’s Report To The Reece Committee On Foundations-1954

Arthur Schlesinger Predicts the Future of Socialism

The-Secret-Destiny-of-America-(1944) by Manly P. Hall

The Manly P. Hall Archives

Rules-for-Radicals by Saul Alinksy

Freud_Complete_Works

PROOFS_OF_A_CONSPIRACY_John_Robison

MEMOIRS ILLUSTRATING THE HISTORY OF JACOBINISM by A. BARRUEL

Senate_Investigating_Committee_On_Education-California-Textbooks-1948-120pgs-GOV-EDU.sml

Secret-Societies-and-European-Revolution

Foundations of the American Century The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the Rise of American Power by Inderjeet Parmar

Federal Failure: The Miseducation of America’s Children

The Communist Manifesto

The Deliberate Dumbing Down Of America by Charlotte Iserbyt

American Psychiatric Association Report On The Sexualization of Girls-full

UN AGENDA 21

The Soviet Union and the United Nations

SILENT WEAPONS for QUIET WARS

Tragedy And Hope by Carroll Quigley

Socialism An Economic and Sociological Analysis by Ludwig Von Mises

Mindwar by Col. Michael Aquino

Limits-to-Growth

The Singularity And Human Destiny

Humanist-Manifesto-II

Philip_Dru_Administrator by Col. Edward M. House

Public-Opinion-by Walter-Lippmann

Propaganda by Edward Burnays

100 Books You Must Read to Understand the New World Order

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2:
https://www.youtube.com/c/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com
Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

ONE NATION DIVIDED BY DESIGN

By Howard Nema

TRUTH TALK NEWS examines the wedge driven by the global elite to divide Our Nation using deception to achieve their goal of a border-less totalitarian socialist world system ruled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world.

carroll-quigley-quote

Of course, most Americans do not know, or believe that this vast socio-economic political network even exists.    But it most certainly does exist. 

Although It has no official name it is often referred to as the Milner Group.  Or Milner’s Kindergarten.

In his 1949 book, THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT published posthumously in 1981 after his death, Quigley wrote about the origins of this group:

“The Rhodes Scholarships, established by the terms of Cecil Rhodes’s seventh will, are known to everyone.   What is not so widely known is that Rhodes in five previous wills left his fortune to form a secret society, which was to devote itself to the preservation and expansion of the British Empire. And what does not seem to be known to anyone is that this secret society was created by Rhodes and his principal trustee, Lord Milner, and continues to exist to this day.  (HN: And it still exists)

To be sure, this secret society is not a childish thing like the Ku Klux Klan, and it does not have any secret robes, secret handclasps, or secret passwords. It does not need any of these, since its members know each other intimately. It probably has no oaths of secrecy nor any formal procedure of initiation. It does, however, exist and holds secret meetings, over which the senior member present presides.” 

(HN: Notice how Quigley tries to distance the Brotherhood of Freemasonry from the Group by eluding to it being “childish” and they “probably” have no oaths of initiation.   Even with the immense information revealed in TRAGEDY AND HOPE and THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT, Quigley protects the secrets of the Hidden Masters.  The same can be said for the connections of the Group to the Jesuits and the Vatican, who are all aligned and working for this same “cause”. )

The Group aligned with these and others for this common purpose, including the Black Nobility Families of Europe in 1954 and formed the Bilderberg Group.    

Are you starting to see the picture?   

They ARE the shadow government.   Their minions have weaved their way into the fabric of all Our institutions, gaining power and influence along the way. 

As a result of the contentious 2016 Presidential Election, these elitist members of the shadow government have been revealed in all their wickedness, via Wikileaks.

Despite a massive mass media psyop and the elite mustering together all their power and influence to sway public opinion and destroy Donald Trump, he still won the election.    Now, it is time to destroy them,

burnays

Lies and deceptions will no longer be tolerated.  The People have been awakened.

These are historic days.  It is an amazing time to be alive, but these are very dangerous times.  These elitists are use to getting their way for centuries and they do not like to lose.   This is not over for them, so expect more propaganda and rising chaos.

Their evil knows no limits.   Anything is possible.   They play to win at all costs.   The end justifies the means.

OBAMA LIARSSSOBAMA LIAR

 

PROPAGANDA   IS   THE   EXECUTIVE   ARM   OF   THE INVISIBLE  GOVERNMENT  –  Edward  Burnays  (1928)

 

edward-bernays-quote

burnays1FAKE NEWS OBSOLETE

fake-journalists
PAID SHADOW GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDISTS

bertrand-russel-dietbertrand-russell

One of the most deceptive, contentious and divisive issues facing America today is illegal immigration.

The fact is illegal immigration serves both business and politics.   Since the Electoral College is based upon population, not citizenship, Democrats welcome open borders for two main reasons:

1.  Democrats assume illegals would be enticed to vote Democrat on the dead voter rolls since they receive such cushy welfare benefits and “sanctuary” from the Democrat Party’s kindness, compassion and  “benevolence”.

2. The Saul Alinksy inspired radical communists have taken over the Democrat Party and employed the Cloward-Piven Strategy, devised in 1966 by married Columbia sociology professors Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven to create social change through poverty, by overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to create a crisis that would lead to replacement of the welfare system and establishing a guaranteed annual income by the redistribution of wealth.

You can’t make this stuff up.    This is what the elite are working for.  

Jesuit Georgetown Professor and Council On Foreign Relations insider Carroll Quigley gives great insight into this on page 950 of his 1966 book, TRAGEDY AND HOPE:  A HISTORY OF THE WORLD IN OUR TIME where he wrote:

“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the … Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Using communism, economic warfare, the Democrat Party, open borders, terrorism, refugees and illegal immigration, the elite seek to create a global socialist “utopia” ruled by a benevolent despotism.  

The annual cost of illegal immigration to taxpayers is roughly $113 billion a year at the federal, state and local level.  The majority of the costs, $84 billion are absorbed by state and local governments. 

http://www.fairus.org/publications/the-fiscal-burden-of-illegal-immigration-on-united-states-taxpayers

To help do the math on who is committing what crimes and who are incarcerated I have provided some more facts:

Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015

Danielle Kaeble, Lauren E. Glaze, Bureau of Justice Statistics

December 29, 2016    NCJ 250374

Presents statistics on persons supervised by adult correctional systems in the United States at year end 2015, including persons supervised in the community on probation or parole and those incarcerated in state or federal prison or local jail.

The report describes the size and change in the total correctional population during 2015.

Appendix tables provide statistics on other correctional populations and jurisdiction-level estimates of the total correctional population by correctional status and sex for selected years.

Highlights:

  • At year end 2015, an estimated 6,741,400 persons were supervised by U.S. adult correctional systems, a decrease of about 115,600 persons from year end 2014.

  • About 1 in 37 adults (or 2.7% of adults in the United States) was under some form of correctional supervision at year end 2015, the lowest rate since 1994.

  • The U.S. correctional population declined 1.7% during 2015 due to decreases in both the community supervision (down 1.3%) and incarcerated (down 2.3%) populations.

  • By year end 2015, the community supervision population (4,650,900) fell to the lowest level since 2000 (4,564,900), and the incarcerated population (2,173,800) fell to the lowest level since 2004 (2,136,600).

  • All of the decrease in the community supervision population during 2015 resulted from a drop in the probation population (down 2.0%), as the parole population (up 1.5%) increased.

  • In 2015, the majority (69%) of the decline in the incarcerated population resulted from the drop in the prison population (down 35,500).

Part of the Correctional Populations in the United States Series

Press Release
PDF (787K)
ASCII file (43K)
Comma-delimited format (CSV) (Zip format 23K)

About the Source Data:

Annual Probation Survey and Annual Parole Survey
Annual Survey of Jails
Census of Jails
Deaths in Custody Reporting Program (DCRP)
National Prisoner Statistics (NPS) Program
Survey of Jails in Indian Country

Illegal Immigrants Accounted for Nearly 37 Percent of Federal Sentences in FY 2014

AP/Rogelio V. Solis

Illegal immigrants account for about 3.5 percent of the U.S population, but represent 36.7 percent of federal sentences in 2014 according to U.S. Sentencing Commission data.

Citing a U.S. Government Accountability Office, “one of every four inmates in federal prisons is an illegal immigrant.”

To learn more:  Explore unauthorized immigrant population trends for states, birth countries and regions, and see an interactive map and detailed table showing the latest estimates of the unauthorized immigrant population by state.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/03/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/

http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/316959.pdf

 

While well-meaning, honest, caring, compassionate people put their trust in government to solve many of America’s problems they don’t realize that politicians on both sides of the aisle have not been working for the benefit of the people, but rather have been exploiting and profiting crony corporations while enriching themselves.   Given what we saw with the 2016 Presidential Election, this should be a surprise to no one.

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

MedianNetWorth2012v2.jpg

Sadly, this has become not the exception, but the norm.  

Many of these greedy, lying, manipulative politicians have enriched themselves and multinational corporations at the expense of We the People. 

There is a laundry list of political hacks who have fleeced and sold America down the river continuously for decades on both sides of the political aisle.

The average yearly percentage change in net worth of the top 10 congressional incumbents whose calculated net worth divided by the number of years studied was the highest.

Of the “Top 10”, 7 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans. 

The study looks at 320 Republicans, 296 Democrats and two Independents.

Negative to positive increases

Because this study focuses on percentage increases, a gap in the study it is difficult to determine a meaningful percentage for a member who had a starting net worth in the negatives but increased to a positive net worth by 2012.

However, there were substantial increases in wealth of the members who fell into this category.

For the 49 members who went from a negative net worth to a positive net worth, the average increase was $3.4 million per member.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD’S WAR ON CHILDREN

We all know about the evil, sick and revolting revelations about Planned Parenthood selling baby parts for scientific and medical research that the media has completely downplayed and ignored.  But the fact is, Planned Parenthood is nothing more than an global abortion factory and fetal body parts distributor.

Despite all the cries that cutting government funding of Planned Parenthood would deny women access to healthcare it is a wicked and deplorable lie.    These people are lying sociopaths.

Planned Parenthood is hailed and protected by the media and liberals for providing necessary women’s services, but they do NOT even offer prenatal services. 

Nor did the Soros funded Women’s March on Washington Psyop that excluded female supporters opposed to abortion.  Considering the insanity unleashed at the event, I am certain right to life women opposed to abortion were glad to be banned from the lunacy where “Nasty Woman” feminist Ashley Judd ranted about her pussy, bloody tampons and erections for almost eight minutes. 

Remember folks, she is an actress.  She and probably many more celebrities and professional protestors paid to stir up division and hatred by one of the more than 50 women’s groups funded by villainous New World Order mastermind George Soros, the face of the Hidden Masters behind the curtain.

THE WOMEN’S MARCH ON WASHINGTON WAS DESIGNED TO FORWARD THE ACCEPTANCE AND TOLERANCE OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD’S EVIL EUGENICS DEPOPULATION AGENDA DISGUISED AS GIVING WOMEN HEALTHCARE.

 

Planned Parenthood is a global depopulation force founded by a racist Nazi and KKK sympathizer and eugenicist named Margaret Sanger, who wrote many books that are never discussed by Planned Parenthood, their supporters or the media since they deal with eugenics and the extermination of blacks, Jews and “other weeds”.

WOMEN AND THE NEW RACE by Margaret Sanger (1920)

The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.

Woman and the New Race, ch. 6: “The Wickedness of Creating Large Families.” Here, Sanger argues that, because the conditions of large families tend to involve poverty and illness, it is better for everyone involved if a child’s life is snuffed out before he or she has a chance to pose difficulties to its family.

[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

Plan for Peace” from Birth Control Review (April 1932, pp. 107-108)

Article 1. The purpose of the American Baby Code shall be to provide for a better distribution of babies… and to protect society against the propagation and increase of the unfit.

Article 4. No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child, and no man shall have the right to become a father, without a permit…

Article 6. No permit for parenthood shall be valid for more than one birth.

“America Needs a Code for Babies,” 27 Mar 1934

Give dysgenic groups [people with “bad genes”] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.

April 1932 Birth Control Review, pg. 108

Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.

Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities.  The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

“A woman’s duty: To look the whole world in the face with a go-to-hell look in the eyes… to speak and act in defiance of convention.”

The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1

“[The most penetrating thinkers] are coming to see that a qualitative factor as opposed to a quantitative one is of primary importance in dealing with the great masses of humanity.

 

In  Pivot of Civilization, 1922, Margaret Sanger preaches speaks her eugenic philosophy – that only “quality” people worthy of life should be allowed to live.

“Such parents swell the pathetic ranks of the unemployed. Feeble-mindedness perpetuates itself from the ranks of those who are blandly indifferent to their racial responsibilities.   And it is largely this type of humanity we are now drawing upon to populate our world for the generations to come. In this orgy of multiplying and replenishing the earth, this type is pari passu multiplying and perpetuating those direst evils in which we must, if civilization is to survive, extirpate by the very roots.”

 

The Rockefeller Foundation funded the founding of Margaret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood in 1916 and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute Of Anthropology Human Heredity And Eugenics in 1927 in Berlin, Germany. 

Andrew Carnegie and other elitist robber barons also championed the cause of eugenics to assist in the Great Work of perfecting man by the ethnic cleansing of those they deemed undesirable.   The word “eugenics” means well born.

Carnegie funded the founding of the Eugenics Record Office in Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island in 1910.  Adolf Hitler modeled his Master Race theory on the work of Sir Francis Galton, cousin of evolutionist Charles Darwin and other American eugenicists.

Carnegie Institution of Washington

http://library.cshl.edu/special-collections/carnegie-institution-of-washington

Below is an amazing documentary exposing the elite’s eugenics/depopulation agenda:

NUMBER-ONE-KILLER-2013-FB

Under a Trump administration, the US government funding of the Planned Parenthood abortion factory will soon end.

 

It is an abysmal horror that a “non-profit” with  annual profits of $127,000,000 needs a government handout.

This is simply more government cheese for the rats in the Washington swamp to feast on while forwarding the global elite’s on going depopulation agenda.

The Truth About MARGARET SANGER (This article first appeared in the January 20, 1992 edition of Citizen magazine)How Planned Parenthood Duped America

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker TTwarned of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger’s other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as “scientific” and “humanitarian.” And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America’s human “breeding stock” and purging America’s “bad strains.” These “strains” included the “shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South.

“Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as “unfit,” a plan she said would be the “salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were “irresponsible and reckless,” among whom she included those ” whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers.”

She further contended that “there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered “unfit” cannot be easily refuted.While Planned Parenthood’s current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917.

She published such articles as “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925), “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), and many others.

These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive.

Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government.

Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as “gospel”; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America’s family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justices all accept as “social orthodoxy.”

Blaming Families

Sanger’s obsession with eugenics can be traced back to her own family. One of 11 children, she wrote in the autobiographical book, My Fight for Birth Control, that “I associated poverty, toil, unemployment, drunkenness, cruelty, quarreling, fighting, debts, jails with large families.”

Just as important was the impression in her childhood of an inferior family status, exacerbated by the iconoclastic, “free-thinking” views of her father, whose “anti-Catholic attitudes did not make for his popularity” in a predominantly Irish community.

The fact that the wealthy families in her hometown of Corning, N.Y., had relatively few children, Sanger took as prima facie evidence of the impoverishing effect of larger families. The personal impact of this belief was heightened 1899, at the age of 48. Sanger was convinced that the “ordeals of motherhood” had caused the death of her mother.

The lingering consumption (tuberculosis) that took her mother’s life visited Sanger at the birth of her own first child on Nov. 18, 1905.   The diagnosis forced her to seek refuge in the Adirondacks to strengthen her for the impending birth. Despite the precautions, the birth of baby Grant was “agonizing,” the mere memory of which Sanger described as “mental torture” more than 25 years later.

She once described the experience as a factor “to be reckoned with” in her zealous campaign for birth control.From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the “unfit.” Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:  It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance.

There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.

To Sanger, the ebbing away of moral and religious codes over sexual conduct was a natural consequence of the worthlessness of such codes in the individual’s search for self-fulfillment. “Instead of laying down hard and fast rules of sexual conduct,”

Sanger wrote in her 1922 book Pivot of Civilization, “sex can be rendered effective and valuable only as it meets and satisfies the interests and demands of the pupil himself.”  Her attitude is appropriately described as libertinism, but sex knowledge was not the same as individual liberty, as her writings on procreation emphasized.

The second edition of Sanger’s life story, An Autobiography, appeared in 1938. There Sanger described her first cross-country lecture tour in 1916. Her standard speech asserted seven conditions of life that “mandated” the use of birth control: the third was “when parents, though normal, had subnormal children”; the fourth, “when husband and wife were adolescent”; the fifth, “when the earning capacity of the father was inadequate.”

No right existed to exercise sex knowledge to advance procreation. Sanger described the fact that “anyone, no matter how ignorant, how diseased mentally or physically, how lacking in all knowledge of children, seemed to consider he or she had the right to become a parent.”Religious Bigotry

In the 1910’s and 1920’s, the entire social order–religion, law, politics, medicine, and the media–was arrayed against the idea and practice of birth control. This opposition began in 1873 when an overwhelmingly Protestant Congress passed, and a Protestant president signed into law, a bill that became known as the Comstock Law, named after its main proponent, Anthony Comstock.

The U.S. Congress classified obscene writing, along with drugs, and devices and articles that prevented conception or caused abortion, under the same net of criminality and forbade their importation or mailing.Sanger set out to have such legislation abolished or amended.

Her initial efforts were directed at the Congress with the opening of a Washington, D.C., office of her American Birth Control League in 1926. Sanger wanted to amend section 211 of the U.S. criminal code to allow the interstate shipment and mailing of contraceptives among physicians, druggists and drug manufacturers.  

Continue to page 2   

Go to page: 1 – 2345

abortion-stats-

There is a silent war being waged against American traditions, morality and family values by the Hidden Masters of the Shadow Government.  It is literally a war against life itself.
A silent war fought with quiet weapons of deception.  Neatly wrapped and packaged for sale by the global elite.

Fatherless Children Molyneux 6_30_14

A slickly marketed anti-God, anti-family Marxist cult-ure of death has been cunningly sold by Madison Avenue mass media manipulation and Hollywood pop culture for decades, and slyly indoctrinated generations to embrace the cookie cutter ideals of “Common Core” socialist driven education curriculums and ever increasing globalism as the only way to achieve peace,  prosperity and put and end to poverty.  
Certainly this all sounds just and quite alluring, but it is all a bitter illusion conceived by the elite.    A   magical spell of  mass hypnotic delusion.   Or is should say, magickal.

 

These are but a few of the many hidden truths ignored by history books and the mainstream media.

 

SUBSCRIBE TO TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2:
https://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNewsChannel2

TRUTH TALK NEWS
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

ACCESS THE SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS, BOOKS, DOCUMENTARIES, BROADCASTS, ARTICLES, VIDEOS, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site.   Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

BERNIE, TRUMP AND THE TRAGEDY OF HOPE AND CHANGE

By Howard Nema

Could democracy be merely an illusion?

Have you have ever suspected that very powerful people have  guided events throughout history for generations; and that these royal and noble families have created a system appearing to be democratic, but actually excludes ordinary citizens from decision-making and through ever increasing taxation, regulations and legislation, incrementally enslaves them in a system of benevolent despotism with generous helpings of circus and bread?

We see this with the 2016 Presidential Elections which is clearly a circus and is chock full of bread $$$.

We also see the influence of the Hidden Masters behind both the democratic and republican political machines that have each attacked and sought to destroy their own party members, namely Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.

In Quigley’s work we discover that national constitutions are routinely undermined by the leaders who are elected to defend them.

We learn that “all social instruments tend to become institutions,” regardless of their benevolent origin, and, from that point forward, the institution is run for the benefit of those who control it (at the expense of its original purpose).

(We see this in the generational rise of socialism and government dependence.)

Quigley reveals that real power operates behind the scenes, in secrecy, and with little to fear from democratic elections.

He proves that conspiracies, secret societies, and small, powerful networks of individuals are not only real; they’re extremely effective at creating or destroying entire nations and shaping the world as a whole.

We learn that “representative government” is nothing less than a carefully managed con, like the Federal Reserve, the IRS and a litany of other collectivist tyrannies we must endure to feed the parasite elites and their insatiable quest for global domination.

Since these disturbing truths contradict nearly everything we have been taught to believe about our government, our education system, and the media, many dismiss these truths as nonsensical nut job conspiracy theories that only gullible fools would believe.

But Carroll Quigley was no conspiracy theorist or gullible fool. He was a prominent historian who specialized in studying the evolution of civilizations as well as secret societies.

Quigley taught at Princeton University, Harvard University, and the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He worked as an advisor to the US Defense Department, the US Navy, and the Smithsonian Institution.

In short, Carroll Quigley was a well-connected member of Ivy League society. Based on his own words, and his training as a historian, it appears that he was chosen by members of a secret network to write the real history of their rise to power. However, as Quigley later realized, these individuals did not expect or intend for him to publish their secrets for the rest of the world to see.

In 1966 after 2 years of having unfettered access to the records and minutes of the Council on Foreign Relations and more than 20 years of being in the presence of their leaders and spheres of influence, Bill Clinton’s mentor, Jesuit professor at Georgetown University Carroll Quigley wrote Tragedy and Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time.

In this superb expose of the ruling elite and their plans for a one world system of financial and political control in private hands, Quigley intricately details the “Anglo-American Establishment and their collectivist corporate goal of unifying the United States and Great Britain in a socio-economic political system dominated by the Central Banks of the world.

Shortly after publishing Tragedy and Hope, “the Network” took action against and the book he’d spent twenty years researching and two years writing was pulled from the market.

As Quigley recounts:

“The original edition published by Macmillan in 1966 sold about 8800 copies and sales were picking up in 1968 when they “ran out of stock,” as they told me (but in 1974, when I went after them with a lawyer, they told me that they had destroyed the plates in 1968). They lied to me for six years, telling me that they would re-print when they got 2000 orders, which could never happen because they told anyone who asked that it was out of print and would not be reprinted. They denied this until I sent them Xerox copies of such replies to libraries, at which they told me it was a clerk’s error. In other words they lied to me but prevented me from regaining the publication rights by doing so. . .

[Rights revert back to the copyright holder if the book is out of print, but not if the book is simply out of stock.]

…Powerful influences in this country want me, or at least my work, suppressed.”

When reading the 1377 page Tragedy and Hope, you immediately realize that it wasn’t written for the casual reader.  It is a long, tedious read of which 95 percent consists of basic economic, political, and diplomatic history. However, the other 5 percent contains some truly astonishing admissions about the existence, nature, and effectiveness of covert power.

As one would expect from an Ivy League historian, both Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment reveals the existence of a secret network that formed to bring “all the habitable portions of the world” under its control.

A college of corporations. In Tragedy and Hope, Quigley wrote:

“I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies…but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.”

Quigley exposes this wealthy “Anglophile network” that cooperates with any group that can help it achieve its goal.

(This includes Communists, which, on the surface, would seem to be the sworn enemy of super-wealthy capitalist conspirators.)

Quigley chronicles how the Network formed in the late 1800s in England and immediately began creating front groups.  By 1919, it had formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House), and it went on to create other extremely powerful institutes within “the chief British dominions and in the United States.” Hiding behind these front groups, the Network began secretly exercising its power.

In the United States the main institute was named the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which Quigley described as “a front for J. P. Morgan and company.”

In short time, the Network expanded its operations; spreading like cancer into our universities, media, and especially government “foreign policy.”

On this basis, which was originally financial and goes back to George Peabody, there grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. In England, the center was the Round Table Group, while in the United States it was J. P. Morgan and Company or its local branches in Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland.

The American branch of this “English Establishment” exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (The New York Times, New York Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, the Washington Post, and the lamented Boston Evening Transcript). In fact, the editor of the Christian Science Monitor was the chief American correspondent (anonymously)…It might be mentioned that the existence of this Wall Street, Anglo-American axis is quite obvious once it is pointed out.

If the idea of powerful Wall Street insiders joining a secret foreign network to establish dominion over all “habitable portions of the world” and successfully penetrating “into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy” sounds like something you should have heard about, you’re right. But the secret to why you haven’t is contained in the story itself. (The successful “penetration” of universities, the press, and the government has proven quite useful to those who wish “to remain unknown.”)

The group behind this Great Work which Carroll Quigley calls, “The Network”, which has no official name is also known as the Milner Group, or Milner’s kindergarten.

They have worked for generations, centuries– to achieve this goal and to reach the stage of socio-political control we see today.

Their nameless, faceless dominant presence is obvious to all of us in inflation and dollar devaluation. We see it in rising food prices, commodities stagnant wages, rising unemployment, poverty and shrinking middle class.

Although most are aware of these effects of their influence, they are ignorant to the group, or their agenda.

Quigley agrees on most of the goals of this clandestine operation, but disagrees on the group’s omerta of absolute secrecy, believing the “cause” of the Milner’s is significant in world history and should be known.

Here are a few key quotes from Quigley’s

Tragedy And Hope:

“In 1891, Cecil Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a “Circle of Initiates” and an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” later organized as the Round Table organization. In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States.

In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations. After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries. They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom.

There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.

The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations.   Each central bank sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”

The Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR)

Quigley provides many examples of Network infiltration and manipulation. For instance, on pages 132 and 953 of Tragedy and Hope, he exposes yet another “front group” called the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). Because the IPR provides priceless insight into the deceptive nature and true power of the Network, we’ll briefly cover it here. Let’s begin with the final report of a US Senate investigation of the IPR. It stated, in part:

The IPR has been considered by the American Communist Party and by Soviet officials as an instrument of Communist policy, propaganda and military intelligence. The IPR disseminated and sought to popularize false information including information originating from Soviet and Communist sources…The IPR was a vehicle used by the Communists to orient American far eastern policies toward Communist objectives.

To the average person, it sounds crazy to suggest that a network of super-wealthy capitalists is secretly conspiring to gain control of the world.

But it sounds even crazier to accuse these same super-wealthy capitalists of using their tremendous wealth and power to “popularize” a system of government (Communism) that would, in theory anyway, lead to the destruction of all their wealth and power.

Surely, if such an unbelievable story were true, the free press would have shouted it from the rooftops…right? Wrong. Let’s jump ahead for just a second and look at how Quigley described the Network-directed media cover up of the Senate investigation:

“It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any [revelations] to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions.

As this demonstrates, the Network fully understands the importance of controlling public opinion. This also provides a glimpse into how it can do so.”

(If a disturbing truth isn’t reported on by a “respected” news outlet, it might as well not exist. The vast majority of citizens will remain forever oblivious.)

Additionally, in this particular case, any senator that insisted on taking the investigation “too far” would surely face a smear campaign by the same press that was ignoring the IPR story.

Needless to say, this type of influence can drastically affect how much attention an issue receives in the media. The merit and importance of a story will often take a backseat to the wishes of those who have the power to keep it quiet. More importantly, similar tactics of control can be applied in other areas as well. Keep that in mind as you read the following short summary of the IPR’s activities, because the blueprint for directing perception and policies hasn’t changed.

In 1951 the Subcommittee on Internal Security of the Senate Judiciary Committee…sought to show that China had been lost to the Communists by the deliberate actions of a group of academic experts on the Far East and Communist fellow travelers whose work in that direction was controlled and coordinated by the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR). The influence of the Communists in IPR is well established, but the patronage of Wall Street is less well known.

The headquarters of the IPR and of the American Council of IPR were both in New York and were closely associated on an interlocking basis. Each spent about $2.5 million dollars [nearly $30 million when adjusted for inflation] over the quarter-century from 1925 to 1950, of which about half, in each case, came from the Carnegie Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation (which were themselves interlocking groups controlled by an alliance of Morgan and Rockefeller interests in Wall Street). Much of the rest…came from firms closely allied to these two Wall Street interests, such as Standard Oil, International Telephone and Telegraph, International General Electric, the National City Bank, and the Chase National Bank.”

On the Network’s influence over Far East Policy:

“There is considerable truth in the…contention that the American experts on China were organized into a single interlocking group which had a general consensus of a Leftish character.

It is also true that this group, from its control of funds, academic recommendations, and research or publication opportunities, could favor persons who accepted the established consensus and could injure, financially or in professional advancement, persons who did not accept it.

It is also true that the established group, by its influence on book reviewing in The New York Times, the Herald Tribune, the Saturday Review, a few magazines, including the “liberal weeklies,” and in the professional journals, could advance or hamper any specialist’s career.

It is also true that these things were done in the United States in regard to the Far East by the Institute of Pacific Relations, that this organization had been infiltrated by Communists, and by Communist sympathizers, and that much of this group’s influence arose from its access to and control over the flow of funds from financial foundations to scholarly activities.

Awards for work in the Far Eastern area required approval or recommendation from members of IPR. Moreover, access to publication and recommendations to academic positions in the handful of great American universities concerned with the Far East required similar sponsorship.

And, finally, there can be little doubt that consultant jobs on Far Eastern matters in the State Department or other government agencies were largely restricted to IPR-approved people. The individuals who published, who had money, found jobs, were consulted, and who were appointed intermittently to government missions were those who were tolerant of the IPR line.”

Amazingly, after admitting all of this, Quigley somehow concludes:

“The charges…accepted and proliferated by the neo-isolationists in the 1950’s and by the radical Right in the 1960’s, that China was “lost” because of this group, or that the members of this group were disloyal to the United States, or engaged in espionage, or were participants in a conscious plot, or that the whole group was controlled by Soviet agents or even by Communists, is not true.

In Quigley’s defense, the last part of his statement is obviously accurate: the group wasn’t controlled by “Soviet agents or even Communists.” Rather, according to Quigley himself, the group was controlled by a secret network of individuals who “have no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so.”

This is one of many cases where Quigley expresses a clear bias toward the Network and its “instruments.” Clearly, this bias clouds his judgment. For instance, he repeatedly describes the Network’s methodical deception of others, but apparently he never questions whether he too might have been deceived.

He describes the carnage of their “mistaken” policies, but their “good intentions” are always accepted without a second thought.

Combine this favorable bias with his open contempt for “the radical Right” and “neo-isolationists,” and poorly reasoned conclusions are nearly unavoidable.

His casual dismissal of the IPR’s role in the fate of China provides but one shining example. That Quigley can admit the IPR had tremendous financial and political power, a specific agenda, and actually achieved its goals, but then attribute the rise of Mao Zedong solely to the “incompetence and corruption” of Chiang Kai-shek’s regime is difficult to explain.

After the creation of the IPR in 1925, wouldn’t you know the civil war in China conveniently began? It seems the Network preferred a Communist regime in China. This is apparent in the following statement by Quigley:

“From the broadest point of view the situation was this: The rivalry between the two super-Powers [the United States and Soviet Union] could be balanced and its tensions reduced only by the coming into existence of another Great Power on the land mass of Eurasia. There were three possibilities of this: a federated and prosperous Western Europe, India, or China. The first was essential; one of the others was highly desirable; and possibly all three might be achievable, but in no case was it essential, or even desirable, for the new Great Power to be allied with the United States.

If the Soviet Union were boxed in by the allies of the United States, it would feel threatened by the United States, and would seek security by more intensive exploitation of its resources in a military direction, with a natural increase in world tension. If, on the other hand, the Soviet Union were boxed in by at least two great neutral Powers, it could be kept from extensive expansion by the initial strength of such great Powers and the possibility that these Powers would ally with the United States if the Soviet Union put pressure on them.”

The “Great Game” of playing one side off another, engaging in balance-of-power politics, is discussed many times throughout Quigley’s book. I’ve included the reference above only because it provides a potentially logical motive (at least logical in the Realpolitik sense of the word) for the Network’s policy toward China.

Now, returning to Quigley’s characterization of the IPR conspiracy and the subsequent lack of media coverage referenced earlier: As a result of continuing pressure, spurred on by the “radical Right,” the Network soon found itself the target of two Congressional investigations. Quigley describes the second of these investigations, the Reece Committee, this way:

“A congressional committee, following backward to their source the threads which led from admitted Communists like Whittaker Chambers, through Alger Hiss, and the Carnegie Endowment to Thomas Lamont and the Morgan Bank, fell into the whole complicated network of the interlocking tax-exempt foundations. The Eighty-third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman.

It soon became clear that people of immense wealth would be unhappy if the investigation went too far and that the “most respected” newspapers in the country, closely allied with these men of wealth, would not get excited enough about any [revelations] to make the publicity worth while, in terms of votes or campaign contributions.

An interesting report showing the Left-wing associations of the interlocking nexus of tax-exempt foundations was issued in 1954 rather quietly. Four years later, the Reece committee’s general counsel, Rene A. Wormser, wrote a shocked, but not shocking, book on the subject called Foundations: Their Power and Influence.”

Quigley then closes this chapter on the Network with the following:

“The financial circles of London and those of the eastern United States…reflects one of the most powerful influences in the twentieth-century American and world history.

The two ends of this English-speaking axis have sometimes been called, perhaps facetiously, the English and American Establishments. There is, however, a considerable degree of truth behind the joke, a truth which reflects a very real power structure. It is this power structure which the Radical Right in the United States has been attacking for years in the belief that they are attacking the Communists.”

Again, as Quigley points out, the “power structure” that he exposed isn’t loyal to Communism, or Socialism, or Fascism, or capitalism. The Network is happy to exploit the rhetoric of any movement or ideology, prop up any dictator or tyrant, and support any economic or political model, provided it serves their one overarching aim.

That aim, to bring “all the habitable portions of the world under their control,” is as old as the lust for power itself. The death and suffering that their policies have already caused in pursuit of this aim are incalculable. Allowing them to continue as they have will only bring more of the same.

W. Cleon Skousen shines light on this in his book, The Naked Capitalist:

“As I see it, the great contribution which Dr. Carroll Quigley unintentionally made by writing Tragedy and Hope was to help the ordinary American realize the utter contempt which the network leaders have for ordinary people. Human beings are treated en masse as helpless puppets on an international chess board where giants of economic and political power subject them to wars, revolution, civil strife, confiscation, subversion, indoctrination, manipulation and deception.”

Skousen hit the nail on the head. Tragedy and Hope revealed something even more important than “one of the most powerful influences in the twentieth-century American and world history.” It inadvertently revealed the mind-set of those who wield such power. It exposed the astonishing arrogance and hypocrisy of those who feel they have the right to rule billions of other human beings.

If there is one goal for this book, it is to expose the attitude and inherent nature of those who seek to dominate others. Don’t worry about remembering all of the dates and names that have been listed. Don’t worry about trying to recall all of the specific events.

(All of that information will always be here if you need to find it again.)

Instead, make it a point to simply verify the following: there is no lie that these men and women will not tell.

There is no crime that they will not commit. The only measure of “right” and “wrong,” in their view, is whether their tactics succeed or fail.

The Network’s game is won by those who calculate properly, and moral considerations only impede accurate calculation.

Henry Kissinger personifies the essence of the Network accurate calculation mindset. In his book Diplomacy, he introduces his readers to the amoral concepts of raison d’état (translated as “reasons of state,” or state interests) and Realpolitik.

The basis of both concepts, Kissinger explains, that individual men can be judged negatively on moral grounds, but governments cannot. When it comes to government action, the only suitable judgment is based on whether or not the government achieves its ends.

Throughout his book, Kissinger praises those who are “wise enough” to govern by these concepts and practically mocks those who object on so-called “moral” grounds.

In praise of seventeenth-century French statesman, Cardinal de Richelieu, Kissinger writes:

“Though privately religious, [Richelieu] viewed his duties as minister in entirely secular terms. Salvation might be his personal objective, but to Richelieu, the statesman, it was irrelevant. “Man is immortal, his salvation is hereafter,” he once said. “The state has no immortality, its salvation is now or never.” In other words, states do not receive credit in any world for doing what is right; they are only rewarded for being strong enough to do what is necessary.

As the King’s First Minister, [Richelieu] subsumed both religion and morality to raison d’état, his guiding light.

Richelieu was indeed the manipulator described, and did use religion [as a tool of manipulation]. He would no doubt have replied that he had merely analyzed the world as it was, much as Machiavelli had. Like Machiavelli, he might well have preferred a world of more refined moral sensibilities, but he was convinced that history would judge his statesmanship by how well he had used the conditions and the factors he was given to work with.”

To clarify, according to statesman like Kissinger, the moral and legislative laws that limit the actions of ordinary men do not apply to a select few. To escape accountability, the ruling class needs only to invoke the name of the state.

This, of course, is the same position held by past rulers who justified theft, deceit, torture, slavery, and slaughter in the name of God.

The tactic has simply been modernized. Our new rulers have substituted “the state” for God. And conveniently for them, they are the state…and not just any state; they are the emerging, omnipotent, global state.

Though citizens have been conditioned to believe that their statesmen and government instruments are in place to serve them, nothing could be further from the truth. Both the instruments and statesmen are part of an institutional apparatus that exists for the benefit of those who control it.

Put another way: the state is nothing more than a collection of men and women who direct the resources and policies of government. Contrary to popular belief, it is an institution that exists for its own sake, to ensure its own “salvation,” and to prevent the rise of anything that might challenge its power.

This is a harsh reality, and some will surely object on the grounds that the modern state is different. After all, it is built on the consent of the people. Democratic elections enable citizens to vote for who their leaders will be. They can choose from Republicans or Democrats. They can throw either out of office if they break their campaign promises.

But what if our so-called representative government is all a carefully crafted illusion? What if the Network chooses the candidates that we get to vote for? What if the Network’s “experts,” not the figureheads placed in official positions of power, are the ones who ultimately determine government policy? What if both political parties, right and left, are controlled by the exact same people? Quigley shines some light on this topic as well:

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.

Quigley goes even further when describing the system that’s now emerging:

“It is increasingly clear that, in the twentieth century, the expert will replace…the democratic voter in control of the political system…Hopefully, the elements of choice and freedom may survive for the ordinary individual in that he may be free to make a choice between two opposing political groups (even if these groups have little policy choice within the parameters of policy established by the experts)…in general, his freedom and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives.”

Does that statement alarm you? Let’s hope so.

Quigley’s work highlights how a small group of dominant men were able to secure control of local, national, continental, and even global policy to the point of control we see today. We blame politicians for all of societies ills, when these hidden masters are behind most of the mayhem in the world.

Quigley continued:

“Though the power of this network is not complete, they are moving inexorably in that direction. Without increased awareness (and resistance), their unelected and unaccountable global state will become a reality. And though the illusion of national sovereignty might be maintained, the freedom of the world’s citizens will be controlled within very narrow alternatives.

Real power is unelected. Politicians change, but the power structure does not. The Network operates behind the scenes, for its own benefit, without ever consulting those who are affected by its decisions.

The Network is composed of individuals who prefer anonymity. They are satisfied to possess the reality rather than the appearance of power.

This approach of secretly exercising power is common throughout history because it protects the conspirators from the consequences of their actions.

A primary tactic for directing public opinion and government policy is to place willing servants in leadership positions of trusted institutions (media, universities, government, foundations, etc.).

If there is ever a major backlash against a given policy, the servant can be replaced. This leaves both the institution and the individuals who actually direct its power unharmed.

Historically, those who establish sophisticated systems of domination are not only highly intelligent; they are supremely deceptive and ruthless. They completely ignore the ethical barriers that govern a normal human being’s behavior. They do not believe that the moral and legislative laws, which others are expected to abide by, apply to them. This gives them an enormous advantage over the masses that cannot easily imagine their mind-set.

Advances in technology have enabled modern rulers to dominate larger and larger areas of the globe. As a result, the substance of national sovereignty has already been destroyed, and whatever remains of its shell is being dismantled as quickly as possible. The new system they’re building (which they themselves refer to as a New World Order), will trade the existing illusion of democratically directed government for their long-sought, expert-directed, authoritarian technocracy.”

To be sure, it’s difficult to accept these statements upon first hearing them. They challenge our world view and force us to reconsider everything that we’ve been taught to believe. It’s much easier to dismiss these facts without further investigation; it’s easier to accept comforting lies that alleviate our anxieties.

But this, of course, is exactly the opposite of what must be done. If we allow ourselves to be manipulated, we empower the Network at our own expense.

Edward Bernays, perhaps more than anyone, helped establish the modern system of public manipulation. Drawing on the psychoanalytical techniques of his uncle, Sigmund Freud, Bernays became known as the father of propaganda. His low opinion of the masses is best expressed in his own words. The following quotes are taken from his book Propaganda:

“No serious sociologist any longer believes that the voice of the people expresses any divine or specially wise and lofty idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders…and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion.

If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?”

The fact is, we are dominated by a small cabal that understand the mental processes of the masses and psychological manipulation more almost any of us.

It is they who pull the strings of the puppets we elect. Puppets who are guided to control the public mind and contrive new ways to forward the Great Work and guide the world into the New World Order.

Political campaigns today are circus and bread. Lots of bread $$$$

A presidential candidate may be drafted due to popular demand,” but his or her future is really decided by the so called society of experts, a half dozen men, hidden in the shadows of luxurious secrecy.

The conscious manipulation of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.

Bertrand Russell describes the global “society of experts:

“The society of experts will control propaganda and education. It will teach loyalty to the world government, and make nationalism high treason. The government, being an oligarchy, will instill submissiveness into the great bulk of the population…It is possible that it may invent ingenious ways of concealing its own power, leaving the forms of democracy intact, and allowing the plutocrats or politicians to imagine that they are cleverly controlling these forms…whatever the outward forms may be, all real power will come to be concentrated in the hands of those who understand the art of scientific manipulation.”

In 1974 after his legal battle against his publisher failed, Carroll Quigley said:

“I am now quite sure that ‘Tragedy and Hope’ was suppressed although I do not know why or by whom.”

I do.   And now so do you. They are the elusive hidden masters of the Network who, by concealing its own power seek to dominate our world. They are the puppet masters holding the strings of Our political leaders and using mass media to influence public opinion by any and all means necessary to attain their goal.

Purveyors of the democratic illusion assure us that sophisticated conspiracies and powerful secret societies are figments of Our imaginations, given to right wing extremism and religious fanaticism.

But as you have learned, there does indeed exist a hidden hand guiding the course of history. We must awaken others to this reality. Until a critical mass of understanding is reached, humanity will remain enslaved and the elite sociopaths operating behind the scenes will never be held accountable for their treasonous crimes.

Sources and related material:

Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiY36HJgJzOAhXJbR4KHZofCtQQFggsMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FTragedy_and_Hope.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH6wvYbRPSBH_5GDlMlYygpcIfiAw&sig2=buNtyz3ikB8-1dJloG1TGA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

The Anglo-American Establishment by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi9zq_WgJzOAhXDHh4KHZmDD5IQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2Fthe_anglo-american_establishment.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF5uQ0g3JT-l9gvLUcAqe-c3anizQ&sig2=qHSbWXkeRrFxHntySofoHA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Weapons Systems And Political Stability by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiQxbjlgJzOAhWJpx4KHRkKC8MQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FWeapons%2520Systems%2520and%2520Political%2520Stability.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHvQqG-3Ai1p4_rR0Y0esN1xlDFRg&sig2=f1sQfkPAabBPmFBuQ9LukQ&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

The Evolution Of Civilizations by Carroll Quigley:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj-6bn1gJzOAhVFqR4KHUlfBUIQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.carrollquigley.net%2Fpdf%2FCarroll-Quigley-TheEvolutionOfCivilizations-AnIntroductionToHistoricalAnalysis-1st%262nd-Editions.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGnRarxBobdsojSAC3NFG_RC7bbnA&sig2=JX7xqoE8dJ3WGJwgdog1CA&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Propaganda by Edward Burnays:

http://edward-bernays.soup.io/post/19658768/Edward-Bernays-Propaganda-1928-pdf-PDF-357

Public Opinion by Walter Lippmann:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjpjbCegZzOAhVHdh4KHVAcBWEQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwwnorton.com%2Fcollege%2Fhistory%2Famerica-essential-learning%2Fdocs%2FWLippmann-Public_Opinion-1922.pdf&usg=AFQjCNH-x94uyZy4HtkgffUceti-szn3TQ&sig2=hy-KMBB3bZLh1XsQ3tWo_A&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

Diplomacy by Henry Kissinger:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwiIw_itgJzOAhVJFh4KHQ9aC84QFggqMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.virginia.edu%2Fusdiphis%2Freadings%2FKissinger%2C%2520Diplomacy.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGjlzo9XfhG1lcNCXlZmgNyOoatLA&sig2=TNYuiQLotEycTMJPAt5vFQ

The Final Days by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward:

https://www.google.com/#q=the+final+days+bernstein+pdf

The Foundations: Their Power and Influence by Rene A. Wormser:

https://archive.org/details/FoundationsTheirPowerAndInfluenceReneAWormser1958

The Naked Capitalist by W. Cleon Skousen:

https://archive.org/details/104813153CleonSkousenTheNakedCapitalist1970

Norman Dodd interview by G. Edward Griffin regarding the 1953 Reese Committee (1982):

http://truthtalknews.blogspot.com/2014/08/common-core-and-the-hidden-agenda-a-1982-interview-with-Norman-Dodd.html

Network (1976) FULL MOVIE:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynnLCMppOls

Morals And Dogma by Albert Pike:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiShJ3xgpzOAhXTNx4KHV5mB98QFghJMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.resist.com%2FOnlinebooks%2FPike-MoralsAndDogma.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFDJXS8z_L50GcyHRmeq98MWdMImQ&sig2=PaoPFMWptQ7CFKWcdj4yWg&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

A.C. De La Rive, La Femme et l’Enfants Dans La Franc – maconnerie universelle

(English Translation) :

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.histoireebook.com/index.php%3Fpost/2012/05/20/De-La-Rive-A-C-La-femme-et-l-enfant-dans-la-franc-maconnerie-universelle&prev=search

Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Sion) :

http://www.howardnema.com/tag/protocols-of-the-elders-of-sion/

Proofs of A Conspiracy by John Robison (1797):

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjK2eTKg5zOAhWH8x4KHVgiDE8QFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.conspiracyarchive.com%2FPROOFS_OF_A_CONSPIRACY_John_Robison.pdf&usg=AFQjCNFJ_LT44aFH2J6QYLdJFWnOgNzO7g&sig2=vjN3pLJp-SHARrLfZdIheg&bvm=bv.128617741,d.dmo

 Feel free to share and download this FAIR USE content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

 

In the end all we have is memories.

What will our memories of today be tomorrow?

Some things to think on until next time.

TRUTH TALK NEWS

“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

USE THE GREEN SEARCH ENGINE AT THE TOP RIGHT TO PERUSE TOPICS FROM THE ABUNDANCE OF LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, ARTICLES, CONGRESSIONAL RECORDS AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE NEW TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2

ADDITIONAL TRUTH TALK NEWS SITES:

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com

http://www.HowardNema.com

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic as intended please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

 

 

OPERATION EXTRACTION: An American PSYOP

Please use the SEARCH ENGINE at the TOP RIGHT to peruse topics and take advantage of the abundance of information available on this site. 

TRUTH TALK NEWS YouTube Channel
SUBSCRIBE TO TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2 on YouTube
http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

http://truthtalknewschannel2.blogspot.com/

 

Before you lies a path of breadcrumbs to the many interconnections of a vast spider web that spans far and wide, but is joined by a single thread, intricately woven to the core of a bottom less pit of evil, where lies a den of enlightened vipers working to change the world for the good of humanity by claiming dominion over us all.

Do not be deceived by their apparent kindness, compassion and generosity, after all, a snake . . . is a snake.

 

June 6, 2016

By Howard Nema

Americans often wonder why America, the so called, Land of Opportunity has been in a seemingly relentless decades long socio-economic decline.

We wonder why more and more, the so called, Land of the Free and home of the brave is fast becoming the land of the fee and home of the slave.

We wonder why in the 1950’s one Average American’s income could raise a family of four.

We wonder why costs continue to rise, but wages remain stagnant.

We wonder why the rich get richer while the middle class continues to sink into poverty.

We wonder why there is such effort to make people comfortably in their poverty, giving them free cell phones and birth control, rather than offering ways to move up the economic ladder.

We wonder why there is so much division, poverty and famine in the world.

We wonder why after seventy years since the founding of the United Nations there is even more turmoil in the world.

We see the horrors of war and terrorism because these acts are visible, but we do not recognize the silent acts of economic warfare and terrorism waged against American wealth for generations, since this conflict is invisible, veiled by a curtain of deception.

We wonder about all of these things without understanding why these conditions seem to fester and worsen.

There is a reason as you will soon learn.

Much of the information contained in this TRUTH TALK NEWS documentary has been long suppressed by the media and educational institutions, but is nonetheless true and verifiable.

Using a long list of carefully sourced and documented third party sources, including sourced congressional records this presentation details how and why America is being systematically deindustrialized by design and the culprits behind the scenes of this devious agenda.

One only has to look at history to see how far Our Nation has strayed from the Founding principles of Our Republic and the Constitution.

This presentation will rest any doubts that Americans have been manipulated and deceived into willingly relinquishing the wealth of Our nation by first selling the idea of consumerism, then socialism and now globalism as the only path to peace and prosperity.

This devious and clever, long planned ruse is continuous. After viewing this presentation anyone with the powers of logic and critical thinking will realize that there is indeed a plan in progress aimed at the deindustrialization of America by slowly siphoning off America’s wealth and reducing the standard of living cloaked by the use of mass media manipulation, catchy slogans and outright lies.

rothschild-carbon tax panama-papers

This presentation seeks to explain why we have willfully accepted this path to neo-feudal serfdom and how we are motivated by feelings and desire, not logic or intellect; and how this flaw in human nature exposed by Sigmund Freud and Edward Burnays is being used as a weapon to gain control over the masses.

After more than one hundred years of deception, as the boldness of those behind the New World Order expose their power, even the most politically unaware citizens are finally starting to realize that both political parties are owned by the same forces and that each individual party fight amongst themselves for power in a political game of King of the Hill.

Rothschild renohilary-close-with-rothschilds-rockefelersGEORGE AND DAVID ROCK rockefeller.jpgNWO QUOTE TRANSFORMATION

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” – George Santayana

Today, the hidden hand is using the useful idiots, as Lenin called them, to stir up the pot of racial hatred and dissent and foment division, using textbook communist tactics to rally support for globalist agendas and political candidates; and to protest against any candidate that threatens their established power.

BALTIMORE RIOT ALLal-sharpton

The hidden hand controls the psyche of the mob mentality and as you will soon see, uses psychology and human behavior to control and manipulate the masses.

Trump-Supporter-Bloodied-Pearce-Twitter-575x431BLACK LIVES ARE THE KILLERS

Today we see hate groups disguised as activist groups like MoveOn.org, Democracy Spring, La Raza, BLACK LIVES MATTER and other globalist funded oppositions groups, who they pay their “activist” operators to stir up the mob causing looting, property damage, violence, death and mayhem.

booker-t-washington

And as you will soon discover, all of this is by design.

 

CONSUMERISM, GLOBALISM & MASS MEDIA MIND CONTROL

America’s decline is the result of a carefully crafted plan to transform Our country into a neo-feudal totalitarian socialist state ruled by a world government.

One only has to look at history to see how much America has been transformed already and how far we have strayed as a nation from its founding principles and Our Constitution.

obama burning constitution

America has been transformed. . . from a government designed to protect the rights and property of individuals to a government that targets and exploits its population and takes away the rights and property of the individual.

Whether it was Woodrow Wilson piping Edward Burnay’s slogan, “keeping the world safe for democracy” or the Bush era “Nation Building” or the endless mantra of “saving the planet” and litany of propaganda slogans, We the People are continuously duped into accepting agendas that have proven to be a disaster for America as we continue down a slow and steady socio-economic spiral descent into what the elite call, a “benevolent despotism”.

NWO OBAMA

In this presentation I have gathered and constructed third party sources revealing indisputable facts that create a trail of breadcrumbs to understanding how this elaborate deception manifested itself and who the culprits are behind this massive fraud.

This entire scam has been achieved thus far in most part by generational control of the mass media and US education system.

COMMON CORE Pic

COMMON COREEEEES

 

Common Core and other indoctrination methods being employed for more than forty years are now transforming elementary school children to accept what they learn as fact, without question from grade school through High School.

No wonder so many young people identify as socialists. It is up to us parents to teach our children true history, not history distorted to promote a political agenda.

Do you wonder why so many out of work and underemployed millennials with massive college debt support socialist Bernie Sanders for President in 2016?

As you will learn, there is good reason for this.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 28: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) addresses a rally in support of Social Security in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill March 28, 2011 in Washington, DC. Sanders and four other Democratic senators, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), said the Republicans' entitlement reform plan will "dismantle Social Security, delay distribution of benefits to seniors." (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Bernie Sanders

While the issues Sanders raises are on target, his socialist solutions are definitely not the answer.   I believe Bernie’s intentions are good, but his religious devotion to leftist agendas cloud his logic and reasoning and serve the very elite he wishes to punish and make pay for the severe economic challenges we continue to face today.

america destroyed

Big government and more socialism are the engine facilitating the extraction of American wealth, by design.

In fact, socialism is one of the reasons America is in such decline. Another is the fanaticism of political correctness, cultural Marxism and secular humanism.

But the most dangerous and destructive forces are the democrat and republican parties, both of whom are in a constant internal struggle for power.

But the real power lies behind the political parties, hidden and unseen and their doctrine calls for the abolition of property, a progressive income tax, a central bank, control over production by the state and other collectivist totalitarian measures we already live under today that continues to put a stranglehold on the American worker and the poor and extract the wealth of the productive sector overseas.

This too is by design.

                                                                                                                                     HN

 

un involved in peace

UNITED NATIONSThe United Nations lowered its forecast for the world economy on Thursday, painting a bleak picture of stagnating growth with little prospect for a turnaround this year.

The U.N. report on the World Economic Situation and Prospects as of mid-2016 forecasts overall global growth of just 2.4 percent this year, the same as last year. It represents a significant drop from the 2.9 percent growth the U.N. forecast for this year in its report last December.

“The bleak state of the world economy clearly poses significant challenges for member states around the world,” Assistant Secretary-General Lenni Montiel told a news conference launching the report.

He said forecasts for many countries in Africa and Latin America as well as for Russia and many of the former Soviet republics have been revised downward over the past few months.

The report blames a host of factors for this year’s lackluster economic prospects including persistent weak demand in the major economies which remains a drag on global growth, the low price of oil and other commodities which are hurting exporting countries, severe weather-related shocks especially severe drought related to El Nino, political challenges, and large capital outflows in many developing regions.

Dawn Holland, a senior economist in the U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, said the 2.4 percent growth predicted for this year is 1 percent lower than the average annual rate of growth of 3.4 percent in the decade leading up to the global financial crisis in 2008 and 2009. It reflects the weak global economy for most of the last decade, she said.

For 2017, Monteil said, “the global economy is projected to expand by 2.8 percent, marking a very modest improvement — and possibly reflecting the downturn bottoming out in some emerging economies.”

But he stressed that for the world economy to grow it needs increased investment and greater fiscal stimulus coordinated by the major economies who have relied for too long only on monetary stimulus like interest rates.

Holland said so far there are no proposals for coordinated fiscal stimulus measures, but the issue will be discussed at the upcoming summit of the Group of Seven major industrial powers in Japan on May 26-27.

The report highlights the prolonged economic downturns in Brazil and Russia, both with significant regional spillovers.

In Russia, GDP is forecast to contract by 1.9 percent in 2016 due to fiscal tightening, further declines in private consumption and investment, and continuing international sanctions, it said.

In Brazil, where President Dilma Rousseff in facing impeachment, the U.N. is projecting that the economy will contract by 3.4 percent this year, reflecting the deepening political crisis, rising inflation, a surging fiscal deficit and high interest rates.

The world’s poorest countries are expected to grow by 4.8 percent in 2016 and 5.5 percent in 2017 but the report stressed that these figures are far below the U.N. target of at least 7.7 percent growth needed to increase spending on health care, education and measures to combat climate change.

The rich developed countries are not expected to see an improvement in GDP over last year, and in the United States the U.N. is predicting a drop in growth from 2.4 percent in 2015 to 2.2 percent this year due to weak business investment and low exports. Next year, the U.S. economy is forecast to rise slightly to 2.5 percent.

The report said “economic growth in Africa continues to lose momentum, as it is buffeted by global, regional and internal headwinds.” GDP growth for the continent slowed to 3 percent last year and is expected to weaken more this year to 2.8 percent though east Africa is expected to see 6.1 percent growth.

Latin America and the Caribbean are expected to see the region’s economies contract by 0.6 percent for the second straight year, according to the report.

Holland said this would be the first two-year contraction since the debt crisis of 1982-83. She cited high inflation, high interest rates, rising unemployment, rising fiscal deficits “and a loss in confidence which is holding back investment” in some South American countries.

On a positive note, east Asia is projected to see 5.5 percent economic growth this year, with China’s economy forecast to grow by 6.4 percent in 2016 and 6.5 percent in 2017, in line with government targets, the report said.    (SOURCE)

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it. . .

 

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’

Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are for the sole purposes of FAIR USE.    All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.   You are encouraged to share and download all of the FAIR USE content available on this site.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes

SOURCES & RELATED INFORMATION:

Below are links to all sources including FULL BOOKS, PDF’s, ARTICLES, FILMS and VIDEOS of all material discussed and contained in this presentation.

BOOKS & PDF’s:

Andrew Carnegie: Triumphant Democracy (1886)

http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/born_in_blood_by_john_robinson.htm

An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones by Antony Sutton

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony Sutton

Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler by Antony Sutton

Wall Street and FDR by Antony Sutton

Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley

The Anglo American Establishment by Carrol Quigley

The World Order by Eustace Mullins

Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins

Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional by Dr. Leonard Horowitz

Limits to Growth by William W. Behrens III, Jorgen Randers, Dennis Meadows & Donella Meadows

Limits to Growth 30 Year Update

Edward Bernays – Public Relations

Edward Bernays – “Propaganda” (1928) – PDF

Sigmund Freud – COMPLETE Works – PDF

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD – SENATE. 64th CONGRESS, 1st …

Lippmann & Merz, A Test of the News, fm TIF. TNR 08.04

Public Opinon by Walter Lippman

The Public Philosophy by Walter Lippman (1955)

The Cold War by Walter Lippman

THE PHANTOM PUBLIC by Walter Lippman

The Year Book of Railway Literature: 1897 – Forgotten Books

Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking – Strategic …

Social Engineering – Securing The Human

Social Engineering : The Human Factor

David Rockefeller Memoirs (2002) NO FREE PDF AVAILABLE (What a shock, eh?)

Sociological Theory and Social Control – Sociology

Perspectives on the Concept of Social Control – Annual …

Deviance and Social Control

Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control – Library of …

CIA OPERATION MK-ULTRA GOVERNMENT DOCUMENT

Behold A Pale Horse by William Cooper :: Hour of the Time

Britain’ Need for Benevolent Despotism – Imperial Policy in Malta 1934-1939 by Simone Azzopardi

SUBLIMINAL SEDUCTION by Wilson Brian Key

Subliminal Sexuality – Tufts University

Werner Erhard – The Transformation of Man – PDF

The EST Standard Training : Werner Erhard, Vic Gioscia – PDF

https://archive.org/details/TheESTStandardTraining

Mind Dynamics – Alexander Everett

Leadership Dynamics – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

William Penn Patrick – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming – PDF

Neuro Linguistic Programming – PDF

https://archive.org/details/yearbookrailway00robigoog

How Science discovered the Silva Method – PDF

The Silva Mind Control Method – PDF

H.P. Blavatsky’s COMPLETE Works – PDF

Mysteries of Magic by Eliphas Levi

The Founding Fathers, Deism, and Christianity – Britannica.com

The Life Of George Washington by John Marshall

Secular Humanism and Atheism beyond Progressive – PDF

Secular Humanism: The Devil’s Original Lie – PDF

The religious face of humanism – PDF

The New Freedom by Woodrow Wilson (1913)

WAR IS A RACKET by General Smedley Butler

Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin

The Rockefeller File: Chap. 4, The Power of Foundations

Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundation in the Rise of American Power by Inderjeet Parmar

 

NEWS ARTICLES & IMPORTANT LINKS:

http://www.howardnema.com/?s=NATION+KILLING

http://www.alux.com/universities-super-rich-kids/2/

12 Major Foundations Commit $500 Million to Education Innovation

Education or Domination? The Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Ford

Got Dough? How Billionaires Rule Our Schools – Dissent

Rothschilds Famliy, part owner of Largest Voting machine Co.

http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Horton: Not a Conspiracy Theory: The Gates Foundation Bought

http://truthtalknews.blogspot.com/2014/10/Nation-Killing-How-the-New-World-Order-Rolls.html

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/24790572/cape-woman-living-of-the-grid-challenged-by-city#.VyveY-TmqB8

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/433222/black-americans-barack-obama-going-backwards-under-president-obama

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416735/blacks-lose-ground-under-obama-deroy-murdock

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tavis-smiley-obama-black-wealth_us_569820dbe4b0ce496423f053

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/28/naacp-president-black-people-worse-under-obama/

http://townhall.com/columnists/larryelder/2015/07/23/under-obama-blacks-are-worse-off–far-worse-n2028985

Why Are Electricity Prices Increasing? – The Edison Foundation

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-power-prices-20140426-story.html

http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/nov/16/energy-prices-rise

http://thetechnocratictyranny.com/smart-meters/smch-04-rise-of-a-dooms-day-cult/

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601760426,00.html

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG716.html

http://theweek.com/articles/624768/how-authoritarian-socialism-caused-venezuelas-collapse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._presidential_campaign_slogans

http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/apr/30/new-obama-slogan-has-long-ties-marxism-socialism/

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/accounting-fraud-is-business-as-usual-at-the-pentagon/

http://americanpolicy.org/agenda21/\

Enron Environmentalism: The Carbon Credits Scam Pumps

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/un-paints-bleak-picture-of-stagnating-world-economy/ar-BBsYJRz?ocid=spartandhp

Globalism Destroys America:

NAFTA’s Economic Impact – Council on Foreign Relations

How Has NAFTA Affected the Mexican Economy? – IMF

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/11/24/what-weve-learned-from-nafta/under-nafta-mexico-suffered-and-the-united-states-felt-its-pain

The Trans-Pacific Partnership — USTR.gov

Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Defeat Famine: Kill the WTO – Schiller Institute

http://www.sundaytimes.lk/061008/International/int1.html

https://caycelibrary.com/cayceinfo.php

Rev Moon and the United Nations:

https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/176/31366.html

Are the Moonies attempting to gain control of the UN?:

https://jtf.org/forum/index.php?topic=805.0

George Soros funds Ferguson protests, hopes to spur civil action

Organizations Funded by George Soros and His Open Society

George Soros: Top 10 Reasons He Is Dangerous | Human Events

george-soros-funded-hate-group-democracy-spring-set-to-attack

‘Hawaii’s George Soros’: The Hidden Donor Funding The Illegal

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2001/feb/12/comment.aids

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-04/edmond-de-rothschild-in-geneva-targeted-by-french-criminal-probe

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-03/rothschild-pays-11-5-million-for-helping-americans-evade-taxes

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-27/the-world-s-favorite-new-tax-haven-is-the-united-states

http://antinewworldorder.blogspot.com/2007/06/david-rockefeller-memoirs-2002.html

http://anonhq.com/rothschild-bank-switzerland-now-criminal-investigation-david-de-rothschild-indictment/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/04/health/who-world-cancer-report/

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/0,9263,7601380530,00.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/12/politics/transgender-bathrooms-obama-administration/

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/obama-calls-international-tax-reform-fails-mention-u-s-worlds-favorite-billionaire-tax-haven/

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2007/sci_techs/3423init_warming_hoax.html

https://johnosullivan.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/national-academies-and-the-non-greenhouse-gas-effect-part-6/

FILMS & VIDEOS:

BROTHERHOOD OF THE SNAKE1

Malthusian author of LIMITS TO GROWTH in his own words:

 

 

 

 

 

CENTURY OF THE SELF

The Century of the Self is a 2002 British television documentary series by filmmaker Adam Curtis focusing on the work of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud, Anna Freud, and PR consultant Edward Bernays.

In episode one, Curtis says, “This series is about how those in power have used Freud’s theories to try and control the dangerous crowd in an age of mass democracy.”

Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, changed our perception of the mind and its workings.

The documentary explores the various ways that governments and corporations have utilized Freud’s theories.   Freud and his nephew Edward Bernays, who was the first to use psychological techniques in public relations, are discussed in part one.   His daughter Anna Freud, a pioneer of child psychology, is mentioned in part two. Wilhelm Reich, an opponent of Freud’s theories, is discussed in part three.

To many in politics and business, the triumph of the self is the ultimate expression of democracy, where power has finally moved to the people. Certainly, the people may feel they are in charge, but are they really?

The Century of the Self tells the untold and sometimes controversial story of the growth of the mass-consumer society. How was the all-consuming self created, by whom, and in whose interests?

The Century of the Self asks deeper questions about the roots and methods of consumerism and commodification and their implications. It also questions the modern way people see themselves, the attitudes to fashion, and superficiality.

The business and political worlds use psychological techniques to read, create and fulfil the desires of the public, and to make their products and speeches as pleasing as possible to consumers and voters. Curtis questions the intentions and origins of this relatively new approach to engaging the public.

Where once the political process was about engaging people’s rational, conscious minds, as well as facilitating their needs as a group, Stuart Ewen, a historian of public relations, argues that politicians now appeal to primitive impulses that have little bearing on issues outside the narrow self-interests of a consumer society.

The words of Paul Mazur, a leading Wall Street banker working for Lehman Brothers in 1927, are cited: “We must shift America from a needs- to a desires-culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things, even before the old have been entirely consumed. Man’s desires must overshadow his needs.”

Subscribe to TRUTH TALK NEWS and Howard Nema on YouTube.
“Where truth the mainstream media ignores is the top story!”

All information reported on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com is sourced and verifiable.

It is critical that you take the initiative to confirm the information contained on this FAIR USE site. Feel free to share and download all content.

Do the research.

Find your own truth.

There is only one truth.

Seek and you will find it.

http://www.HowardNema.com

http://www.youtube.com/TruthTalkNews

http://www.TruthTalkNews.blogspot.com

TRUTH TALK NEWS CHANNEL 2: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWjDoBfIGGnxKqI_HjhqtWg

http://www.TruthTalkNewsChannel2.blogspot.com

‘One basic truth can be used as a foundation for a mountain of lies, and if we dig down deep enough in the mountain of lies, and bring out that truth, to set it on top of the mountain of lies; the entire mountain of lies will crumble under the weight of that one truth, and there is nothing more devastating to a structure of lies than the revelation of the truth upon which the structure of lies was built, because the shock waves of the revelation of the truth reverberate, and continue to reverberate throughout the Earth for generations to follow, awakening even those people who had no desire to be awakened to the truth.’ – Delamer Duverus

If you seek truth and want to help restore Our Constitutional Republic please subscribe and share the valuable information contained on this site. Thank you for your continued support.

All content on TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are soley for the purposes of FAIR USE. All content herein can be used by anyone in accordance with U.S. Copyright law.

Please take advantage of the abundance of information contained on this website.

TRUTH TALK NEWS and HowardNema.com are free and independent of any network, group or association.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Some content displayed on this video/site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material has been made available in our efforts to advance understanding political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. constituting a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, all the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes