June 29, 2022

HowardNema.com

BUILD BACK BETTER MEANS SLAVERY & GENOCIDE! NON-COMPLIANCE IS OUR ONLY HOPE! THE UN/DAVOS ELITE HAVE LAUNCHED A QUIET WAR AGAINST HUMANITY FOUGHT WITH SILENT WEAPONS OF MASS DECEPTION AND MASS DESTRUCTION! SAVE HUMANITY! DOWNLOAD AND SHARE ALL THE LINKS, BOOKS, VIDEOS, INTERVIEWS, STUDIES, WHITE PAPERS, ARTICLES AND DOCUMENTARIES AVAILABLE ON THIS SITE THAT EXPOSES THIS EVIL AGENDA! TELL OTHERS TO DO THE SAME! WE MUST GET THIS HEAVILY CENSORED INFORMATION OUT TO THE PUBLIC!

AN ANALYSIS OF THE VRBPAC MEETING ON TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2022

A lot of facts were hidden among all the propaganda. Everyone is invited to comment and share this article in order to help crowdsource the analysis.

James Rogusski

PLEASE SHARE THIS PAGE TO HELP CROWDSOURCE THE ANALYSIS

Share

CROWDSOURCING THE ANALYSIS:

REFRESH THIS PAGE OFTEN TO ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE THE LATEST UPDATED VERSION.

This article is a work in progress. I published this article just 15 minutes after the meeting ended and I will be updating it as time permits. Please help out by watching the recording and commenting in the comment section below. Please include the slide number or time stamp within the video to which your comment is directed. I will be happy to include readers’ comments in the body of this article as they are submitted.

QUESTION #1 (Approved unanimously 22-0)

Based on the totality of scientific evidence available, do the benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine when administered as a 2-dose series (100 μg each dose) outweigh its risks for use in adolescents 12 through 17 years of age?

QUESTION #2 (Approved unanimously 22-0)

Based on the totality of scientific evidence available, do the benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine when administered as a 2-dose series (50 μg each dose) outweigh its risks for use in children 6 through 11 years of age?

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/GbNpaZeDPiA?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

SUMMARY:

  1. The Committee over-ruled the fact that the data provided by the ModeRNA studies were done during the time group in which Alpha, Beta and Delta were prevalent, but not Omicron. The entire study is not relevant to the current state of the world. There was absolutely no proof of benefit against Omicron.
  2. 75+% of children are already seropositive, which means they have already developed natural immunity due to exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and therefore would not benefit from , but could actually be harmed by injections.
  3. Adverse reactions to the biological product are increased in those who already had developed natural immunity.
  4. The uptake among 6-17 year olds has only been around 30%. Another version of a similar product will not add any benefit.
  5. They are clearly counting on and planning for half-dose boosters (third dose).
  6. There is already an EUA for Pfizer, so what good would another injection provide?
  7. Efficacy was not proven. Instead, “immunobridging” was used as a proxy.
  8. Very small number of participants (340-387) were involved in the study of immunobridging.
  9. The benefit risk analysis completely ignored the data and was based upon “simulations” and “modeling, not the actual data from the studies.”
  10. The durability of “immunity” is likely to wain between three and five months which will necessitate additional useless boosters that target extinct variants.
  11. Dr. Marks misrepresented the reality by incorrectly stating that there was no variance in efficacy among different races.
  12. Dr. Offitt (and others) clearly stated that 2 doses won’t work and he believed that 3 doses will be needed and he voted yes with the understanding that three doses would be needed.
  13. Choice is a false reason to approve an experimental injection for an age group that already has.
  14. The briefing documents were an absolute mess, but yet everyone praised them.

The benefit-risk analysis provided by Moderna is absolutely pathetic.

Moderna Benefits And Risks Conclusions

19.5MB ∙ PDF File

Read now

PUBLIC COMMENTS:


BRUCHA 1:


BRUCHA 2:


BRUCHA 3:


BRUCHA 4:


BRUCHA 5:


BRUCHA 6:


BRUCHA 7:


BRUCHA 8:


BRUCHA 9:


BRUCHA 10:


BRUCHA 11:


BRUCHA 12:


BRUCHA 14:


BRUCHA 15:


BRUCHA 16:


BRUCHA 17:


BRUCHA 18:


BRUCHA 19:







The slides below are from the VRBPAC meeting on Tuesday June 14, 2022

SLIDE 1:

77% of children already have immunity.


SLIDE 2:

Pfizer vaccine efficacy is negative in regards to Omicron.


SLIDE 3:

Pfizer efficacy is negative against Omicron.


SLIDE 4:

Pfizer vaccine efficacy is negative in regards to Omicron.


SLIDE 5:

Non-Hispanic Whites aged 12-17 have the lowest level of vaccine uptake.


SLIDE 6:

Myocarditis clearly occurs soon after the 2nd injection.


SLIDE 7:

Myocarditis clearly occurs soon after the 2nd injection.


SLIDE 8:

Myocarditis clearly occurs soon after the 2nd injection.


SLIDE 9:

Myocarditis clearly occurs soon after the 2nd injection.


SLIDE 10:

Moderna causes more myocarditis.


SLIDE 11:

Moderna causes more myocarditis.


SLIDE 12:

Moderna causes more myocarditis.


SLIDE 13:

Myocarditis is more prevalent after the second dose.


SLIDE 14:


SLIDE 15:


SLIDE 16:


SLIDE 17:

77% of children have already had and survived COVID-19


SLIDE 18:

Moderna causes more myocarditis.


SLIDE 19:

Moderna causes more myocarditis.


SLIDE 20:

A peak of 6/1000,000


SLIDE 21:

COVID-19 was never as bad as influenza, which magically disappeared.


SLIDE 22:

COVID-19 was never as bad as influenza, which magically disappeared.


SLIDE 23:


SLIDE 24:


SLIDE 25:


SLIDE 26:


SLIDE 27:


SLIDE 28:


SLIDE 29:


SLIDE 30:


SLIDE 31:

The slide above and below constitute a fantastic lie.

SEE NUMERATOR VERSUS DENOMINATOR BELOW

After disease is different than after injection

SLIDE 32:


SLIDE 33:


SLIDE 34:


SLIDE 35:


SLIDE 36:


SLIDE 37:


SLIDE 38:


SLIDE 39:


SLIDE 40:


SLIDE 41:


SLIDE 42:


SLIDE 43:


SLIDE 44:


SLIDE 45:


SLIDE 46:


SLIDE 47:


SLIDE 48:


SLIDE 49:


SLIDE 50:


SLIDE 51:


SLIDE 52:


SLIDE 53:


SLIDE 54:


SLIDE 55:


SLIDE 56:


SLIDE 57:


SLIDE 58:


SLIDE 59:


SLIDE 60:


SLIDE 61:


SLIDE 62:


SLIDE 63:


SLIDE 64:


SLIDE 65:


SLIDE 66:


SLIDE 67:


SLIDE 68:


SLIDE 69:


SLIDE 70:


SLIDE 71:


SLIDE 72:


SLIDE 73:


SLIDE 74:


SLIDE 75:


SLIDE 76:


SLIDE 77:


SLIDE 78:

ARTICLES:

Steve Kirsch’s newsletter

Concise summary of the FDA meeting (Day 1): Went as expected; unanimous approval

I used to watch the VRBPAC and ACIP meetings, but it was so depressing and I have more important things to do (you are going to really love the next poll coming up later today). The best link to watch the action is the annotated livestream where you can see Meryl Nass’s live commentary. It will be live again tomorrow morning at 8:30am ET…Read morean hour ago · 34 likes · 23 comments · Steve Kirsch


by James Roguski

The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.

JamesRoguski.substack.com/about

JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive

310-619-3055

James Roguski’s newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Subscribe now

error

Share the truth!

Follow by Email
RSS